One of the biggest problems with “alternative” history is that its practitioners come up with an idea and then cherry pick evidence to support it, even if a fair evaluation of the facts suggests other conclusions. We saw this last Friday on America Unearthed where Scott Wolter was dead set on declaring a spring house (a type of root cellar) a Freemasons’ ritual bathhouse to the point that he actively ignored evidence opposing his hypothesis. We see it in every ancient astronaut book and every episode of Ancient Aliens, too.

So today I’d like to share one of my adventures in archaeology and to think about what alternative historians would have made of it.

This is reaching back a ways, to my undergraduate work in archaeology.

As part of the coursework, I had to take a class in archaeological field methods, and part of that methods training involved doing a sample dig. So in the cold of an early spring day, the whole class traveled out to what our professor, in preliminary survey work, had determined was likely the site of a colonial-era Native American lodge outside of Ithaca, New York. The area was muddy and studded with trees, and the twenty of us were already dirty from the knees down before we had sunk a single shovel into the grid we had plotted across the land.

We had our hypothesis, of course, that this was a Native American lodge site, and based on that we thought we knew what to expect. So imagine our surprise when the first shovels of dirt uncovered a layer of asphalt shingles! This was certainly strange, but perhaps it was just some farm debris in the top soil. We removed the shingles and dug down further, and we began turning up bright pink ceramic tiles, clumps of olive green shag carpet, and broken chunks of pipes. It quickly became obvious that this was the remains of a bathroom.

Now, if you were an alternative historian, what would you make of this? Following the alternative history methodology of deciding on a premise before searching for evidence, you’d be forced to conclude that the colonial era Native peoples of Central New York not only had advanced plumbing but also terrible taste in interior design. Perhaps the time-traveling aliens visited plumbing upon them?

But, believe it or not, archaeologists don’t decide on the truth before digging. A hypothesis is a guess, and if the facts don’t bear it out, the explanation needs to change. It was quite obvious that what we all thought was a Native American lodge was in fact the bulldozed remains of a Depression-era farmhouse, redecorated in the 1950s, and demolished sometime in the 1970s, as a property records search would later confirm.

Now contrast that with Scott Wolter striving to make a spring house, a well-known type of early American architecture, into the cult center of a secret society. Consider the ancient astronaut speculators who pick and choose among ancient buildings to try to force them into the shape of the constellations. I think you can see the difference between a real effort to understand the past and its ersatz imitation. 

 


Comments

B L
02/12/2013 11:52am

The one good thing (so far) to come from America Unearthed? I have had the pleasure of discovering your blog. I started watching America Unearthed from the get-go. In recent years I had become interested in the Kensington Rune Stone, and through that, became familiar with the work of Scott Wolter. I had high hopes, but five minutes into the first show I began experiencing intense feelings of disappointment.

I would love to see a show like America Unearthed that interprets similar sites and topics in a non-biased, honest way. If certain findings can be debunked, then great. If other findings cannot be explained, then mystery and possibility remain. There really is no need to dumb this stuff down. It serves no purpose other than to call into question any legitimate work those featured in the show have been involved in. For instance...according to Wolter he was called in by the government to examine debris from the Pentagon after 9/11. If I worked for the military I would certainly push for a review of his findings if I caught wind of his new show.

I still have hopes about the Kensington Runestone, though. While it is true that most experts that have examined the stone believe it to be a hoax, it is my understanding that recent runic discoveries in Scandinavia have not been applied to the carving and language on the Kensington stone. If such findings pan out it would certainly point to the stone's authenticity as such writing would have been unknown to anyone living at the time of the stone's discovery. Please indulge this poorly placed pitch.

Keep up the good work!

Reply
terry the censor
02/13/2013 12:19am

> if you were an alternative historian, what would you make of this?

Time travellers from the 1920s visited with and settled amongst early Native Americans but left after Nibiru's previous pass levelled their house.

Reply
J.
02/14/2013 3:40pm

It isn't alternative history proper unless and until you have a fit about <i>other</i> property records that would support your theory being purposefully withheld, from you specifically. Alternative history seems to require straw man personal vendettas as narrative motivators.

Reply
Eric Van Bibber
02/23/2013 3:36pm

I agree. These shows are a disappointment to those who like a good historical mystery (and expectations of a logical explanation). What's really sad is that there are a large number of fans who think what he does is real science. I saw on the internet that the show has been renewed, so another year of over-dramatized B.S.

Reply



Leave a Reply