Speaking to a mostly empty committee room were some of the usual suspects: The first was Tim Gallaudet, the former Navy Admiral and NOAA administrator who believes he is haunted by evil spirits and who put his daughter on cable TV to claim she can speak to the dead. Gallaudet admits to having no direct experience with UFO sightings but claims to have been disturbed by emails about it. At one point in his ridiculous testimony, Gallaudet bitterly complained that AARO had asked him to consider alternative explanation for UFOs beyond interdimensional space monsters. That, of course, was proof of a cover-up since prosaic explanations, in his paranormal mindset, are ipso facto untrue. The second was Lue Elizondo, who claims to have psychic powers and to be able to attack people as an astral projection. Elizondo recently passed off a reflection of a ceiling light fixture as a UFO mothership, and today he claimed that he couldn’t say anything important in open session and had signed a document preventing him from talking about the alleged crash retrievals he wrote about in his book. Elizondo did not repeat the many claims in his book under oath, even when asked about the same material. Elizondo dodged specific questions about aliens, demurring from stating directly that the U.S. possesses alien bodies. Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO): Have we communicated with aliens? In other words, no.
Mike Gold used to work with Robert Bigelow and offered nothing useful other than a pitch for more funding for NASA, where he consults. Mike Shellenberger is a journalist whose paywalled UFO coverage demonstrates precious little critical analysis. He’s made bold claims about aliens that he has consistently failed to back up with evidence. His whistleblower document was singularly unimpressive. His schtick was to demand an end to government secrecy, though he seemed oblivious to questions of whether the public (and our enemies) should be able to know about, for example, secret government technology. Is anything rightly classified? Not for Shellenberger. Even taken at face value, his new whistleblower document, grandly titled the “Immaculate Constellation Document,” is only interesting for bureaucratic reasons. It is a secondhand account of an anonymous source who claimed to have seen still other documents. According to the document, the program was allegedly established in 2018, after the inaccurate New York Times 2017 UFO story, so it proves nothing about any historical effort to study UFOs or communicate with aliens. It supposedly collected records similar to what AARO also gathered and therefore is of little consequence since it did not have physical alien evidence. The whistleblower even misinterprets known paranormal research but claiming that prior programs, like the remote viewing program Project Stargate (which Elizondo and Hal Puthoff were part of and Chris Mellon oversaw in its final phase), and intelligence community records of Soviet and Chinese paranormal research, were related to an ongoing belief in a paranormal reality of which aliens are a part. Those records are public and make very clear their purpose, which wasn’t about proving aliens real but was part of a bonkers midcentury New Age exploration of the paranormal as a weapon in the Cold War, a practice influenced by science fiction on both sides of the Iron Curtain, and one that failed on both sides.
9 Comments
Two EL's
11/13/2024 11:11:37 pm
These people are tools for foreign governments. Tool is an extremely fitting description.
Reply
Paul
11/14/2024 08:05:32 am
The yolk has pretty much been sucked out of that egg.
Reply
cruelsister
11/14/2024 08:35:21 am
The meeting went better than I thought. The meetings Chair, Nancy Mace, made it clear that for any funding for the Wacko Sciences to continue some actual PROOF must be put into evidence, which, of course, it was not.
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
11/14/2024 10:43:09 am
I'll believe it when this year's NDAA lacks UFO language. And, given who's writing this year's NDAA, I consider that... optimistic.
Reply
kent
11/14/2024 07:03:16 pm
It would be superkewl if you'd share with the class "who's" you think is "writing" it and why you think "who's" is a problem. FY 2024, 5 or 6? House version or Senate version? Gitchu soapbox on!
An Over-Educated Grunt
11/18/2024 08:20:57 pm
Same people who write it every year, the professional staffers on the House and Senate Armed Services Committee. The difference is that the party in charge is, to put it mildly, run by a pack of Alex Jones listeners.
kent
11/14/2024 01:16:47 pm
I think Elizondo is lying when he says he was in Stargate. Actually I think that about everything he says.
Reply
Luke
11/14/2024 06:01:48 pm
"Small group of very unserious people get taken seriously by people who have more power than you"
Reply
Jim
11/15/2024 09:15:11 pm
Opening statements from Elizondo.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
November 2024
|