Archaeologist Ed Barnhart appeared on Lex Fridman’s podcast this week to spend more than three hours (!) discussing “lost civilizations” and ancient history. During the conversation, Barnhart called Graham Hancock a “great researcher,” agreed with the idea that the Amazon rainforest had been intentionally planted by a lost civilization, and dissembled when asked directly about the ancient astronaut theory. I suppose there isn’t much one can do to respond to questions about aliens when your entire claim to fame rests on your regular appearances as a cast member on Ancient Aliens, but asserting that Hancock is a great researcher is so silly—Hancock’s sources are often wildly outdated, he misrepresents material at will, and he is highly selective in his cherry-picking—that this can only be either an attempt to jump on the Ancient Apocalypse bandwagon or a preview of an appearance on that show later this month. And if you are wondering: Recent research found that parts of the Amazon were altered by ancient agriculture, resulting in a nutrient rich terra preta soil in and around ancient settlements, but this is a far cry from assuming the entire Amazon basin was artificially planned and planted by Atlantis. The best estimates are that terra preta covers less than 3% of the Amazon, and probably closer to 0.3%, though some put the figure as high as 10%.
5 Comments
Old News
10/3/2024 07:58:37 pm
The modified soil has been discussed for years. It's how the local populations dealt with the acidity of the soil. Twisting it into ancient aliens is just dumb.
Reply
Doc rock
10/4/2024 10:17:27 am
My understanding is that terra preta soil is found in various areas of the world. Hancockian wackjobs say evidence of a lost original civilization. The sane lean toward a more mundane explanation. People eventually figure out new and improved ways to get continued or improved crop yields in relation to local environments.
Reply
Crash55
10/4/2024 11:19:08 am
I watched his course on Ancient Civilizations of North America (free trial on Amazon) and it was decent. There were no crazy ideas.
Reply
Rock Knocker
10/6/2024 01:55:38 pm
It is difficult to actually know how much of Amazonia is covered in terra preta since it is largely unexplored by science. The early 2000s studies varied widely in their predictions - and were not written by silly lost civilization pseudoscientist nutjobs. A more recent study (McMichael et. all 2013) using more advanced modeling predicts as much as 3.2% of Amazonia could be covered in the human-created soil.
Reply
Jill Robinson
10/21/2024 11:40:42 am
"your entire claim to fame"
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
March 2025
|