No wonder Graham Hancock has been testy. An article yesterday in The Guardian says that the U.S. filming on the new season of Ancient Apocalypse was scuttled after the production ran into difficulties with obtaining permission to film at some locations. Hancock’s program received permits to film at Chaco Canyon and the Grand Canyon for an episode on the peopling of the Americas. Several days of filming had already been completed at Chaco Canyon, but ITN, the company behind the series, pulled out of the U.S. and will scrap the episode in favor of a non-American location. The Guardian piece implies that the difficulty was with Native tribes, who spoke out against Hancock’s hijacking of their history and opposed efforts to film at ancestral sites. Grand Canyon National Park sought to deny Hancock a permit based on objections from Native groups, but federal officials in Washington overrode their objections to issue the permit—since the government can’t pick and choose permits by viewpoint. Tribal locations, though, can do what they like. Read the full story at the Guardian.
9 Comments
Jim
7/2/2024 01:44:44 pm
He hasn't been this pissed since he was told Ignatius Donnelly was a racist.
Reply
Liam mcpoyle
7/2/2024 07:23:31 pm
The financial shortfall will probably be offset by increased book sales and speaking fees generated by Hancock screaming that this is a realization of his previous claims of being canceled. Within the next month he will probably get two hours of free advertising on that halfwit Russel Brands podcast. Will probably get another extended solo appearance on Rogan.
Reply
E.P. Grondine
7/3/2024 10:14:27 am
I wonder if its the same bunch of assholes I have dealt with for years, who can not handle the existence of recent impact events .
Reply
E.P. Grondine
7/3/2024 07:13:09 pm
"We’ll uncover the latest findings about the earliest inhabitants of the Americas and reveal remarkable scientific knowledge that’s been handed down for generations. Where did humans settle first in the Americas, and what do we know about them?”"
Reply
Kim
7/7/2024 01:56:09 am
Your explanation of the legalities was nicely clear and concise compared to the other accounts I've read, including the Guardian's frankly -- thanks!
Reply
Charles Verrastro
7/8/2024 02:05:23 pm
Having lived all my life on the borders of two major tribes and befriending many, including several Seminole Chiefs, the last Bundle Keeper, a Snake Clan oral Historian, and one who was a professional anthropologist, my sympathies lie with the Native Americans.
Reply
E.P. Grondine
7/10/2024 11:48:15 am
Hi Charles -
Reply
Jim
7/10/2024 07:42:57 pm
" But to my knowledge which is limited) Mr. Hancock is not among them ."
Kent
7/12/2024 12:58:22 pm
Another episode of Old People Sharing Imaginary Stories of Imaginary Indians on Ancient Alley-Oop. Dudes, for convenience's sake I'm calling one of you Oliver Atreides II and the other Cooper Atreides II, puhleeze have a loved one or a caregiver give your word salads an eyeballing and give their evaluation on a no pooper basis. Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
October 2024
|