|
The journal PLOS One has retracted two recent papers providing alleged evidence for the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis, citing deceptive citations, failure to follow standard research methodology, misidentification of materials, and faulty age models and sampling strategies, among other concerns. The two papers attempted to prove that a comet airburst caused megafauna extinctions and that comet dust had been found in Baffin Bay dating back to this time, around 10,800 BCE. Taken together, the errors suggest either intentional deception or a research team so enamored of its hypothesis that they disregarded the safeguards of scientific inquiry. Only one of the co-authors agreed with one of the retractions. Many of the others, including those from the Comet Research Group, disagreed with both retractions, while PLOS One editors could not reach a plurality of the authors. The retractions are another blow to Graham Hancock’s favorite catastrophe and the broader claim that a comet impact sank Atlantis caused the Great Flood of mythology.
12 Comments
Kent
2/15/2026 12:02:47 pm
These pusillanimous pipsqueaks, nervous Nellies of nitpickery are the enemies of Truth. They want you to ignore what the Church and the Smithsonian are hiding from you. Oh the pain!
Reply
E.P.Grondine
2/16/2026 11:58:18 am
Hello jason -
Reply
Paul
2/16/2026 06:57:56 pm
Eddy,
Reply
Kent
2/17/2026 12:20:29 pm
At least one of the YDIH proponents has form as the BBC detectives are fond of saying.
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
2/16/2026 01:19:22 pm
Huh. I'd considered the microspherule one plausible but not supported by evidence elsewhere in the geologic record, but i guess we can move that one over to the Busted column.
Reply
E.P. Grondine
2/18/2026 03:42:17 pm
What's needed are craters. That is the only thing that will end most of this
Reply
Jim
2/20/2026 12:48:38 am
I have various sized craters available at $4.85 per cubic foot.
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
2/20/2026 10:53:01 am
Yeah, because craters, and not a uniform depositional layer around the globe, are what marked the K-T Boundary. All a crater would prove is a local impact event, not global fallout from it. Chicxulub was found well after the K-T horizon had been established, and even then it's not the only possible explanation for what happened.
Reply
kent
2/20/2026 10:17:42 pm
A good point you raise. We have craters, for instance Crater Lake. What's wanted is *meteoric* craters, which we also have, for instance Barringer Crater. At least the Wounded Knee contingent is no longer asking for a $40,000 stipend to go to the library.
Rock Knocker
2/22/2026 10:11:54 am
“What’s needed are craters.”
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
March 2026
|
RSS Feed