I don’t typically watch Josh Gates’s Discovery channel documentary series, and Expedition Files, the latest spinoff of Expedition Unknown, didn’t really appeal to me. Gates expends minimal effort standing in front of a screen and narrating segments comprised of b-roll and the occasional expert interview, and the topics are such hoary rehashes that In Search Of… had already done many of the same segments forty years ago. I decided to check out a couple of segments this week, however, because Gates touched on two topics that are extremely familiar to me. In last week’s third episode, Expedition Files devoted its long middle segment to the “Curse of King Tut,” evaluating two supposedly scientific explanations for the curse. The first was the old suggestion that a fungus growing in Tutankhamun’s tomb killed several of the men who excavated it. Even Gates recognizes that this does not correlate with many of the deaths, which were decidedly non-fungal. The remainder of the segment relates a “new” claim that the tomb’s limestone walls poisoned visitors with high levels of radon.
The claim made headlines earlier this year when Robin Fellowes published it in the quasi-academic Journal of Scientific Exploration, but Jaime Bigu made the same claim in the Journal of Environmental Radioactivity back in 1999. Anyhow, Gates correctly notes that radon does not explain those who died of gunshots, suicide, or, in one case, asphyxiation by pillow. There is also no evidence that radon directly contributed to any deaths. The curse narrative is especially weird since it folds in deaths that occurred over a decades, a period of time when hard-living middle-aged men do typically begin aging and dying off. It’s not much of a curse if it takes longer to enact that Tutankhamun actually reigned. But most disappointingly, Gates neglected to even pay lip service to the well-known fact that the “curse” was made up by Marie Corelli from a half-remembered passage from Murtada ibn al-’Afif’s medieval history of Egypt and the more than one hundred fictional stories of vengeful mummies published in English in the years before the opening of Tut’s tomb. I covered this in detail back in 2016. This week, in episode 4, all of the stories are archaeological. I’m not very interested in Roanoke, so I’ll skip over the familiar narrative. The second segment plunges into the Biblical story of Sodom, rehearsing the passages from Genesis and then falsely claiming as a new revelation that the show can only now reveal evangelical archaeologist Stephen Collins’s long-ago claim that Tell al-Hammam (also transliterated as Tall al-Hammam) was Sodom and had been destroyed by an asteroid. Collins first made the claim in 2006. The claim appeared on The Universe back in 2014, and Collins made headlines promoting it again in 2021 and again about a year ago. As I wrote at the time: “The claim Tall El-Hammam was destroyed by an air burst is disputable. Its identification with Sodom is unproved and dubious, and no one has provided any evidence that an event supposedly transpiring in 1600 BCE was preserved accurately down to the composition of the first written account of Sodom in the surviving Genesis narrative, typically ascribed to the period around 500 BCE or later.” You can read more detail in the links above. Gates, of course, offers no hint that anyone disputes Collins’s claims and leaves the audience believing it had been proven conclusively. The final segment delves into the history of Stonehenge. Gates discusses the legend that Merlin brought Stonehenge to England, but he mangles the story, conflating two parts of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s story given in the Historia Regum Brittaniae (8.10-12). Gates claims Merlin brought the stones from Ireland and hired giants to set them up. Geoffrey’s actual story was that giants had carried the stones from Africa to Ireland and that Merlin, much later, used his wizardry and clever technology, along with thousands of men, to move them. I’m sure no one read Geoffrey before writing this show. The rest of the episode reports, without embellishment, recent research into how far across Britain the stones that make up Stonehenge traveled. A chunk of Expedition Unknown from 2021 is grafted in to fill out the time.
27 Comments
E.P. Grondine
12/12/2024 01:09:13 pm
"The claim Tall El-Hammam was destroyed by an air burst is disputable. Its identification with Sodom is unproved and dubious"
Reply
Paul
12/14/2024 12:39:18 am
Eddie,
Reply
E.P. Grondine
12/15/2024 01:15:16 pm
Hi Paul -
Stony the Giant
12/16/2024 02:15:17 pm
"I do not have the luxury of being wrong"
Why do you, Chief, persist in calling Hibben "Hibbens"? You've been doing it for at least 7 years so spare us the "I had a stroke, I can poop anywhere, I do what I want!" bs. It calls ALL of your claimed "research" into question. Still waiting on ONE photograph of a 7 foot tall Injun. You are obviously and undeniably a liar.
E.P. Grondine
12/18/2024 10:30:19 am
Sorry about the ' in Hibben's.
Kent
12/16/2024 04:24:19 pm
Saying Hancock is wrong can reliably be considered correct, but saying Hancock is wrong doesn't *ipso facto* make Carlson correct.
Reply
Paul
12/16/2024 06:20:03 pm
Don’t know how many times it will take, Eddy.
Reply
E.P.Grondine
12/18/2024 10:56:32 am
I ask myself hows many times it will take quite often.
"You prattle on about the Holocene Start Impact Events, but are completely unaware of the recent impact megatsunami's[']."
Paul
12/19/2024 09:06:35 am
Eddy,
E.P. Grondine
12/19/2024 07:42:42 pm
Hi Paul - The evidence of those smaller impacts is well known to those working in the field. Used to be you'd take a course from Dallas Abbott or read Ted Bryant.
E.P. Grondine
12/19/2024 07:46:49 pm
I don't like to point out tall Andaste descendants, but since there seems to be a lack of awareness of them:
Paul
12/20/2024 12:25:05 pm
So, Eddy,
Itchy pop
12/20/2024 02:19:37 pm
Most craters are surrounded by poison ivy and poison oak. If geologists are as vulnerable to this threat as archaeologists then no wonder the sites are ignored.
Kent
12/12/2024 03:58:45 pm
The intro of the show mentions "with a degree in archaeology" but it doesn't mention that Mr. Gates double-majored. His other Bachelor's degree is in ... wait for it America, Drama.
Reply
gdave
12/13/2024 03:50:07 pm
The shaddah diacritic is often omitted in written Arabic, so you'll often seen حمام written without it. But حمام as in "hot spring" definitely has the shaddah on the medial consonant, so "hammam" with the doubled medial "m" would be an accurate transliteration. Without the shaddah, حمام "hamam" means "pigeon".
Reply
kent
12/14/2024 12:04:38 pm
Thanks, that's what I expected. An alot of a lot of languages have g.c. and it's hearable. There's an em when the lips close and an em when the lips open, like ummah أُمَّة. This is why baby's first word is often "mama", all the kid has to do is open his mouth.
Larry
12/12/2024 04:37:38 pm
How long until Gates claims Templar ancestry?
Reply
dj
12/13/2024 12:20:51 am
Odd that the actual Biblical reason for God destroying Sodom and Gomorrah was-conspicuously-never mentioned. Townspeople demanded that Lot produce his visitors in order to rape them due to homosexuality being commonplace in that city. I'm sure political correctness is the reason for the omission and equally sure my comment will not be published, but the truth is the truth, even all these years later. If you're not going to tell the real story, keep it to yourself.
Reply
kent
12/13/2024 12:45:30 pm
The baseline assumption for anything in the Bible should be that it's not true and never happened. A reasonable person might assume that it's the homosexuality or non-mention of it that bothers you but you're a bit squiffy on the rape thing and don't seem to have a problem with Lot offering the mob his virgin daughters to "do to them as you please". That's queer, Shirley? Not to worry, the IDF has you covered. As the Giant on Twin Peaks said "It's happening again."
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
12/13/2024 02:12:16 pm
Could just be God frowns on violating the law of hospitality, as once under Lot's roof he had a duty to protect them. Could be God frowns on gang rape regardless of gender. Could be any number of obscure causes in a millennia-old story that guaranteed isn't in its original form. Odds of it being specifically fully consensual male-male relationships are about even with it being because they wore both wool and linen.
Reply
Josh Gates would not have a story
12/13/2024 04:35:17 am
If he stuck to the historical facts!
Reply
Tree Ring a Bell
12/13/2024 07:53:07 am
The 1600 BCE would be in range of the Thera Event. If I remember correctly, the dendrology pointed to 1637 BCE +/-5yrs.
Reply
E.P.Grondine
12/18/2024 11:04:12 am
The initial count that I had was 1628 BCE. Where didyou get that new one?
Reply
Luke l
12/13/2024 01:28:37 pm
Of course it was giants. Not humans using trial and error.
Reply
kent
12/21/2024 03:46:15 pm
Saw a rerun today of one of these *Expedition Unknown* where Mr. Gates marveled that the story of Sodom and Gomorrah was included not just in *The Bible* but also in *The Torah*. SMFH. Whaddaya, whaddaya, whaddaya gonna do?
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
January 2025
|