|
On Sunday, Corsetti released his promised video attacking Zahi Hawass. During his appearance on Piers Morgan Uncensored on Friday, Hawass had stated that nothing had been found in the Osiris Shaft sarcophagus, which was empty when it was opened in 1999. Corsetti correctly notes that when Hawass published his site report in 2007, he stated that a skeleton (more properly, the remains of human bones) had been found in the sarcophagus along with some amulets. Corsetti calls this an “enormous lie” (though, more likely, a lapse in memory from a discovery nearly 30 years ago) but omits the description Hawass gave ascribing the skeleton, the amulets, and the sarcophagus to the Late Period, specifically to the Twenty-Sixth Dynasty (c. 600 BCE), added long after the oldest artifacts found in the shaft, from the Sixth Dynasty (c. 2200 BCE). (As Paul notes in the comments below, these may be intrusive and cannot be used to date the shaft.) Instead, Corsetti relies on Herodotus, who described the tomb of Khufu in his Histories, a description Hawass believes to be a secondhand account of the Osiris Shaft cenotaph of Osiris. Herodotus had briefly described “the underground chambers on the hill upon which the pyramids stand, which he [i.e. Khufu] caused to be made as sepulchral chambers for himself in an island, having conducted thither a channel from the Nile” (2.124, trans. Macaulay). Corsetti takes this account, made in the fifth century BCE, to be proof that the tomb dates from the reign of Khufu, which is of course as absurd as taking at face value the claim Herodotus made that the pyramids were financed through the prostitution of Khufu’s daughter (2.126).
Corsetti's social media accusation that Hawass was complicit in black market antiquities sales turned out to be a reference to a long-dismissed charge from the 2011 Arab Spring revolutions that Hawass “exposed” antiquities to potential theft by sending them for international exhibitions without proper authority under Egypt’s Antiquities Protection Law. The charges were retribution for his close relationship with the country's deposed president, Hosni Mubarak. The charges, widely seen as groundless, were later dropped. Corsetti interpreted this to mean that artifacts from the tomb had been looted for sale on the black market and Hawass covered up both the looting and the discovery of what he speculates might have been “body parts of an extraterrestrial,” or else he found the body of Khufu and sold it for cash. “It’s extremely suspicious to say the least,” Corsetti said, again ignoring the stylistic and other evidence that the materials in the shaft date from around 600 BCE, some two millennia after Khufu.
4 Comments
5/17/2026 06:39:08 pm
The "sixth dynasty pot" (like all the other pottery and most of the objects - shabtis and amulets) is not illustrated or properly described in the "report". Neither is its context of discovery given. It cannot be used therefore to date any part of the complex to the sixth dynasty. It could be a vessel somebody had picked up somewhere on the surface and brought down into the open shaft at any date, for example to put water in.
Reply
Librarian at the hall of records
5/17/2026 09:41:52 pm
A chapter in a festschrift edited by heavy hitters and with chapters contributed by a who’s who list of prominent Egyptologists isn’t chopped liver. Corsetti is about to reach the point where even flat earthers think that he is a cretin
Reply
Paulus
5/18/2026 12:53:27 am
So, Corsetti, et. al., project their own predilections onto folks that actually use science.
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
5/19/2026 04:18:40 pm
If he keeps this up, it might rise to the level of... Hawassment.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
July 2026
|
RSS Feed