|
UFO-believing Christian congressman Eric Burlinson (R-Mo.) suggested that as a member of the House Oversight Committee, he could open an investigation into claims that the Smithsonian is hiding the bones of Bible giants. Burlinson, who spoke about his belief in Nephilim at a Nephilim conference this summer, credited Christian podcaster and gigantologist Timothy Alberino with radicalizing him to believe in the giant bone conspiracy, a popular but false belief among evangelical Christian extremists who oppose the evolutionary theory. "I do believe [giants] were real," Burlinson said on a Blaze network show earlier this summer.
Regular readers will remember that the conspiracy theory about a Smithsonian cover-up appears to have originated with Ancient Aliens star David Childress, who accused the Smithsonian of covering up the lost white race of giant Mound Builders in a 1993 article. Childress's ideas were popularized by figures on both the far left and the far right, including Native activist Vine Deloria and reactionary creationist Ross Hamilton. Ultimately, the claims rested on a series of old newspaper reports claiming that the bones of giants had been dug up in some part of the country and sent to the Smithsonian, which claims to have no Bible giant bones. As Ales Hrdlička, the former head of the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, told Science News Letter in 1934, such stories reflected locals measuring bones incorrectly or mistaking mammoth and mastodon bones for those of human giants. When they arrived at the Smithsonian, they were correctly cataloged for what they were, not what believers imagined them to be. I have covered this claim so many times (including in my study The Mound Builder Myth [2020]), and it is depressing that an idiotic conspiracy theory made from fabricated evidence and mythology is now yet another bit of fake science and conspiracy theory polluting Congress thanks to grifters who profit from bad research and false claims. And with the Trump Administration vowing to bring the Smithsonian's content in line with the president's vision of history, it's not beyond the realm of possibility that Mound Builder conspiracies could one day return to the Smithsonian, more than 130 years after they were scientifically disproved by the Smithsonian itself.
13 Comments
Kent
8/15/2025 01:24:14 am
I personally will continue to refer to this dweeb as "Hatcher Childress". I treated Prince, a productive citizen the same when he changed his name. Similarly "Ye" will always be "that colored mental patient" to me. Don't get me started on Cactus Jack!
Reply
E.P. Grondine
8/15/2025 10:14:41 am
Hi Jason -
Reply
Gamester
8/16/2025 03:30:00 pm
*That's* not the problem. I bid 40,000 Quatloos for a photograph of the 7 foot tall Thrall!
Reply
E.P. Grondine
8/24/2025 06:19:51 pm
You can find a picture of me and Bernie in my video on the p eopling of the Americas.
Kent
8/25/2025 05:43:57 pm
Not a single tall person in that video. We have a word for that in English. It starts with "lia" and ends in "iar". Imagine my surprise, because it's imaginary.
E.P.Grondine
8/26/2025 06:44:11 pm
There is picture of me and bernie.
kent
8/28/2025 12:43:36 pm
Newsflash: you are not tall. He is not tall. Yet you paraded him. Like a white man running a Tall Indian Sideshow. Iarlay.
Paul
8/17/2025 12:29:10 am
Wrong again, Eddy.
Reply
E.P.Grondone
8/25/2025 11:14:08 am
Hi Paul-
Paul
8/28/2025 06:58:39 pm
Eddy, most people moved on from make believe a couple years after being able to read Jack and the Beanstalk. Apparently, you have not. Your delusions are, well, delusional. Have you talked to Harvey, your six foot rabbit today? He is also a giant.
Doc rock
8/21/2025 03:48:40 am
Hasn't the Smithsonian on both past and present been governed by a board of directors and board of regents that include conservative Christans. Would they be crypto-Templars who are part of a long lived plot to hide evidence of giants collected by the organization?
Reply
E.P.Grondine
8/24/2025 08:41:25 pm
Read Jason Jarrells"s book and then firmulate your thesis.
Reply
Submitted
8/26/2025 03:06:39 pm
The anatomy of a fake giant account: a lively and fascinating tale of deceit and detrusion in 19th century gigantology.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
February 2026
|
RSS Feed