This week, PBS presented Odysseus Returns, a documentary following the three-decade quest of “amateur historian” Makis Metaxas as he attempts to convince the world that Odysseus was real, that Homer’s island of Ithaca was in fact the neighboring island of Kefalonia in northwest Greece, and that he had seen both the tomb of Odysseus and the Greek hero’s bones. It’s a tall order for a ninety-minute film, and I was disappointed that the somewhat meandering documentary presents only one side of the argument, leaving the audience with the impression that not only is Metaxas right but that the Greek government and archaeologists are conspiring to prevent Odysseus’ tomb from being identified. So much does the film endorse Metaxas’s perspective that PBS affixed a disclaimer to the beginning of the documentary noting that the film’s claims are not the views of the Greek government. Typically, such as disclaimer says something like “not necessarily,” implying some wiggle room, but this one is simply “not.” Metaxas has been on the trail of Odysseus for thirty years, and part of his argument is logical enough and a defensible literary proposition: He argues that the “Ithaca” described in the Odyssey is not the island of Ithaki in today’s Greece but rather the neighboring island of Kefalonia, whose geography better matches the features described by Homer. It is quite possible that in Homer’s time, or before, Kefalonia and Ithaki were part of a single polity whose ruler referred to it as Ithaca. It would be unusual, of course, for a Greek location to have its name transferred, but it is not unprecedented. Robert Bittlestone proposed the same idea in his 2005 book Odysseus Unbound. However, because Homer is big tourist business in Greece, the claim could threaten the island of Ithaki’s business model, so it has been controversial. Metaxas, who was once a government official on Kefalonia, claims that the Greek ministry overseeing archaeology has tried to suppress his claims to maintain the status quo. The Greek government did not participate in the film. To this extent, the documentary offers little more than a local dispute over literary analysis, but Metaxas doesn’t stop with this claim. Sometime in the early 1990s, Metaxas says he stumbled across the entrance to a Mycenaean tholos tomb at Tzanata on Kefalonia, and he believes that it must be the tomb of Odysseus. The tomb was formally discovered in 1992 by archaeologist Lazaros Kolonas, who excavated the tomb and its 72 bodies. It appears to be the tomb of kings or elites due to its large size and (formerly) rich burials, long since looted, so Metaxas concludes that Odysseus would have been buried there. He goes further and feels that a body with remains of a cloak might be Odysseus himself. The argument rests, at heart, on the claim that a crystal seal found in the tomb is the broach Odysseus wears in Odyssey 19.225–232. There, Odysseus wears a golden pin on his cloak which depicts an unusual scene of a dog killing a fawn. The rock seal from the tholos tomb is made of crystal and depicts a lion killing a deer. We hear in the documentary that the words “lion” and “dog” have the same metrical length in ancient Greek, so Homer may have swapped out the lion for the dog, since lions were no longer common in the Mediterranean by his time. (They had become extinct in Greece after the Bronze Age collapse, by around 1000 BCE, some three centuries before Homer.) No comment is made about the seal being of rock and the pin of gold, nor of one being an identification seal and the other being a cloak brooch. (In the image below, Metaxas has colored an impression of the clear crystal seal yellow to appear more like gold.) This is quite a bit of weight to rest on a rock, particularly when the similarities can also be ascribed to coincidence, since hunting scenes, including those with deer and lions, are relatively common on Mycenaean seals. Indeed, a very similar seal with a lion killing a deer was found at Mycenae, showing that the Tzanata tomb seal is not unique. Further, Homer is known to have included some genuine bits of Mycenaean culture and lore in his poems. The famous boar tusk helmet in Iliad 10.260–5 describes a genuine accessory that went out of fashion three hundred years earlier, and he describes the Achaean leader with the old kingly term anax (Mycenaean wanax) that had fallen out of favor centuries before, replaced by basileus. Martin Nilsson carefully documented in The Mycenaean Origin of Greek Mythology (1932) how Greek myths, including Homer’s epics, correspond to cities that were important in the Bronze Age, even if they declined or vanished after, and character names use older word-forms that go back to Mycenaean usage. So, in short, while the rock crystal seal is not really all that similar to the Homeric brooch, it would not exactly be out of character for Homer (or whoever or however many passed under that name) to have remembered in a general way the royal seal of the kings of Ithaca from the Bronze Age, or at least the general type of animal seals used by Mycenaean high officials.
After Metaxas spends some time explaining how he has been wronged, persecuted, and ridiculed for threatening the monopoly of Big Greek Myth, he takes us to the site of the Tzanata tholos tomb, which had been open for tourists but is currently off limits due to what is said to be conservation and restoration work. Metaxas notes that almost no work has been done for many years and the site has never been formally published in academic literature (though I found that it has been discussed in academic books since 1999 and Kolonas published at least three articles about it since 1992), but instead of attributing this to the general malaise of the Greek government over the past challenging decade of austerity and crisis, he claims that the Greek government and elite archaeologists are conspiring to lock away the tomb to prevent the public from learning that Odysseus was real and buried on Kefalonia so Ithaki can keep collecting Odyssey-themed tourism money. It’s a bit much, particularly since in 2021 Metaxas praised the government for its conservation efforts and plans to build a protective roof over the site. If they were really trying to suppress the “truth,” why would Ministry of Culture give filmmakers access to the identification seals and let an outside expert make impressions of them and study them? As far back as 1999, Christina Souyoudzoglou-Haywood published an academic book, The Ionian Islands in the Bronze Age and Early Iron Age, discussing the tholos tomb, how it transforms our understanding of the Mycenaean political structure of Kefalonia, and acknowledging the possibility that it might reflect a “Homeric” arrangement where Kefalonia controlled Ithaki. But she cautioned that not enough evidence exists to draw such a conclusion. And that hasn’t changed. It’s not a secret; it’s just not proven. Metaxas’s conspiracy theory is rather silly on its surface, since Metaxas’s ideas appear in contemporary tourist guides to Kefalonia, including the Berlitz Guide, and the tholos, far from being suppressed, is actively promoted in the tourist industry as a major attraction in that part of Greece, appearing in literally dozens of tourist guides since 2000. Metaxas’s ideas are not pseudohistory in the mold of Ancient Aliens, but his ideas go much farther than the evidence allows and are rooted in the same belief that ancient myths, if properly interpreted through modern eyes, become an eyewitness guide to ancient history. The filmmakers, working for Morgan Freeman’s production company (Freeman provides narration for passages from The Odyssey), pull back at the end from Metaxas’s extreme ideas and instead hold only to a more modest and defensible conclusion that the Mycenaean-era tholos tomb supports the idea that Kefalonia was the original Homeric Ithaca. But by then the damage has been done, and the audience is left thinking that an eccentric old Greek found the actual body of Odysseus, still wearing the same clothes Homer put him in.
17 Comments
Jesse Kalin
9/1/2024 01:19:59 pm
Actually, I didn't think that--that it was proven this was Odysseus,etc. Dog vs. lion was a problem. But basically, no hard evidence. However, the geographical features there, vs. their lack or unconvincingness on Ithaki, is important, and shifts weight to Kefalonia as central and the idea Homeric Ithaca is a kingdom of islands (how many suitors does Penelope have and where do they come form?). Kolonas's last, hedging, "if", remarks give some wight to this idea. Your remarks that no one is hiding this cite, or even the Odysseian claim, are nice. Thanks for the analysis.
Reply
Paul
9/1/2024 03:38:20 pm
Kolonas is not silly: If Ithaka existed, and if Odysseus existed, he would be buried in this tomb.
Reply
Kent
9/1/2024 02:47:49 pm
Is it possible that "Ithaca" and whatever words that go with it, metonyms and such just *sound* better in the verse version of the made-up story?
Reply
Paul
9/1/2024 03:36:04 pm
Clearly, to assert what you have in this article you are not Greek (which your names gives away also) and you know nothing about how Greek politics work.
Reply
Kent
9/3/2024 01:41:49 pm
I'm not a very parfait solicitor whatever that is, but I think you come close to slandering the reviewer. "You are calling the man and his wife liars. Shame on you."
Reply
Mark L
9/3/2024 02:00:58 pm
You're not a solicitor. Might want to look up the difference between "slander" and "libel", for one.
Reply
Kent
9/3/2024 05:47:05 pm
Aren't you just a delight!
An Over-Educated Grunt
9/2/2024 02:21:04 pm
Yeah, the idea that the Greek government is suppressing something that could bring in tourist dollars is silly on its face. They're so cash strapped that anything that brings money into the country, up to and including AA nonsense, is a candidate for endorsement.
Reply
Ignatius
9/3/2024 09:56:42 pm
The Greek government and the local Ephorates (archeology) are totally different things. Ephorates are massively territorial and they have immense power. Archeology is the most powerful thing in Greece. Even the Prime Minister cannot remove an Ephor in a region.
Reply
Ignatius
9/3/2024 09:21:54 pm
Interesting review. I actually know the people involved, the situation, and the archaeologists in question—archaeology is a small world. I can assure you that the filmmakers did their very best to distinguish between opinion and statements from the archaeologists responsible for the excavations.
Reply
Doc rock
9/5/2024 10:47:46 am
I worked archeological sites in three states and never robbed a grave. Only excavated one grave and that was to determine if it was a Civil War grave to try to prevent the whole area from being destroyed by construction. But maybe things work differently in Greece.
Reply
Kent
9/5/2024 11:28:11 pm
I lean toward thinking it's a different animal but el diccionario says red deer is "馬鹿 mǎ lù red deer / fool / idiot (from Japanese "baka")" literally "horse deer" and I believe the Japanese term figures in their term for The Three Stooges. I'm inclined to think this is a different animal because geography.
Reply
Ignatius
9/3/2024 09:49:36 pm
Clarify: I didn’t mean to imply that *you* were an ignorant person, obviously not, but as far as this situation is concerned, your assumptions about the ministry of culture and skepticism about motives of Makis and his claims - these are, from no fault of your own, based in ignorance about a deeply complicated 30 year web of intrigue. Americans (and Brits) always base their perceptions on their own reality, but the Greek reality is simply not the same. After all, we didn’t invent drama (or perfect it as one could say the Russians did for the Novel) because drama and tragedy was foreign to us. Odysseus is important to us, and the discovery of this tomb and this possibility brings us great pride and hope. We are all grateful for it and even though it was hard-fought, we are grateful the ministry allowed the film to premiere. They fact that they did without the archeologists publication should tell you more about the power of this discovery than its implied dubious nature.
Reply
Michael
9/4/2024 12:55:19 am
PBS did not require to affix any such disclaimer. That was a directive from the Ministry of Culture in order to gain permission to show the films archeological sites. the reason for this is that Kolonas, though he has publicly stated his opinion that this is Homeric Ithaki and the tomb of Odysseus “if they existed” ( he is going by the same burden of proof to call Pylos “Nestor’s” place or Mycenae “Agamemnon’s Kingdom” -so one shouldn’t diminish what he is saying by simply being a careful archeologist) Kolonas has still not published his findings on the dig- a valid point the filmmakers chose to include provided by the archeological service on the island. I heard yesterday (there is no hidden rumor “mythos” on Kefalonia or Ithaki), he was supposed to have published his book before this film premiered. This of course is headache for all, and therefore the MoC in Greece had no choice but to require this and the filmmakers respected this request. However, there are those who do not agree with this theory, or any theory about anything probably, but as all things in this life, some seem to be driven just as much by the will to prove a thing wrong as those who are driven to prove it true. This is the way… unfortunately or perhaps fortunately. Hard to say. But I tell what is totally ridiculous. Every time I drive by that area and do not see an active dig or excavation is a crime to this Island and to archeology. I don’t know who is responsible for this but it is a terrible terrible tragedy. Every day is another day for some idiot to loot that area. And nothing is really being done to protect it!
Reply
Aw
9/4/2024 10:52:54 pm
Can someone explain how there could be a tomb for a character from a fictional story about one eyed giants, a six headed monster, and a witch goddess turning people into pigs?
Reply
Ignatius
9/5/2024 03:45:26 pm
The Homeric poem is an amalgamation of previous stories and myths wrapped around real events and real characters. And then it’s spread out through history. Additionally, many of the tales are about “hospitality” and how the wretched suitors were abusing Odysseus’s hospitality. The bards used these tales as a dramatic build to Odysseus’s return. In each story, there is a crime against hospitality which for the Greeks of this time, this was the highest form of insult. So the Cyclops is worst kind of host. He slaughters and eats his prisoners. Odysseus and his men eat the sacred cows of the sun god and were all cursed. It was common for the Mycenaeans to place themselves into the stories of previous poems and myths- and also symbols. So this seal stone is Minoan and preceded Odysseus by 300 years but it’s cleverly written in and described to reflect Odysseus, his very seal stone symbol representing the situation between lion and helpless fawn. So these tall tales became devices for the character to transmute their “Kleos” or their renown. Through the ages certain things were modified for more modern audiences (800-600 BC) but a tremendous amount was left as it was told 1200 BC. The Mycenaean Kings from Homer most likely existed. (Why would the make up fake kings and fake places- rather they would adapt older stories to their real kings and real places) we kno for ure that thwie palaces and homelands existed. Even the person Odysseus might have been a preexisting character that was hijacked by the ruling king who participated in the siege of Troy. Fascinating book: Why Homer Matters.
Reply
Kent
9/7/2024 02:19:39 am
"The Homeric poem is an amalgamation of previous stories and myths wrapped around real events and real characters."
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
September 2024
|