Nationally syndicated columnist Tina Dupuy, who in her childhood was a member of a cult, wrote against charlatanism and anti-science in America culture in a recent column. Dupuy singled out the History Channel and its corporate owners, Disney and the Hearst Corporation, for making money from what she called the television equivalent of homeopathic scam remedies: The History Channel, a joint venture between Hearst and Disney, has fed into this fevered fetish with their programming: “Ancient Aliens,” “UFO Hunters,” “Decoded,” “The Bible Code,” “Cities of the Underworld,” “Mystery Quest,” “Nostradamus Effect,” “Armageddon.” We effectively have an ahistorical History Channel. Although not everything she wrote seemed to make complete sense from a writing perspective, the sentiment is spot-on. Dupuy concluded that from fake history documentaries to fake medicine “charlatans are indicative of simple economics: supply and demand. As long as we demand manure, someone will step up to shovel it. And business appears to be good.”
And it’s only going to get better if Post Star blogger Martha Petteys is to be believed. Petteys was selected to report her television viewing to A. C. Nielsen to calculate TV ratings. Petteys announced on her blog that she plans to watch Ancient Aliens. Every viewer is extra money in Disney’s and Hearst’s pockets! Further evidence can be found in the recent distribution of Giorgio Tsoukalos’s In Search of Aliens on cable and satellite channels around the world. You may have seen some of the Spanish and/or Portuguese promos for the show that have popped up online in which the Ancient Aliens star promotes the series to Latin American viewers. I found interesting this Spanish-language article from Costa Rica that discusses Tsoukalos and the role of the History Channel in making the ancient astronaut theory mainstream not just in America but around the world. (All translations are mine.) “History Channel is one of the major contributors to the debate [over alien visitation] thanks to its many programs, documentaries, and specials that look up at the sky and wonder what else is up there,” writes Danny Brenes of La Nación. “The new series, In Search of Aliens, is the latest piece of History’s interstellar puzzle.” It’s probably hard to deny that you’re a purveyor of pseudoscience when even the puff pieces promoting your programming describe you as the loudest voice promoting ancient astronauts. Brenes goes on to describe Tsoukalos as one of the driving forces behind the ancient astronaut theory before wrongly describing him as a writer. Tsoukalos has never produced a book, and so far as I can tell his literary output is limited to a handful of forewords to ancient astronaut books and occasional pieces in his irregular ancient astronaut newsletter, Legendary Times. Brenes, though, does make one very astute comparison that rarely shows up in English-language media coverage of Ancient Aliens and its ilk: “This hypothesis says that the development of human cultures, technologies, and religions is due to visits from aliens to our planet throughout history. Something like an alien creationism.” Here in America, where creationism is a political football, it’s rare to see the media equate the belief system of high ranking politicians and their constituents to the obviously fantastical belief in aliens, as though to imply an equivalency. Creationism and ancient astronaut theories are mirror images of one another, rely on very similar “evidence,” and serve similar purposes as part of their respective cultural revitalization movements. One just happens to command more cultural respect in America due to its close association with powerful political and religious interests.
32 Comments
666
2/7/2015 02:59:08 am
If you get a kick out of it, it isn't real history.
Reply
Cathleen Anderson
2/7/2015 03:04:52 am
Real history can be made just as interesting as all of this nonsense. It would be even better, because real answers to questions can be shown to exist.
Reply
666
2/7/2015 03:15:42 am
Nobody's really interested in how the stone monuments in Baalbeck were constructed.
Only Me
2/7/2015 04:51:33 am
@ Cathleen
Duke of URL
2/8/2015 04:44:45 am
Cathleen, I whole-heartedly agree with you. Learning about REAL things is ever so much more interesting (and useful) than faked things.
Bob Jase
2/8/2015 05:25:04 am
Absolutely - fairy tales entertain but reality amazes.
Dora
2/10/2015 05:24:16 am
Agree Cathleen! Real history is better, to have real answers. And in real history is so much diversity, and the logic of thinking and methodology is richer and much more fascinating.
EP
2/7/2015 03:37:00 am
Anyone remember when 666 was pretending that he's been banned? Those were good times. (Because 666 wasn't posting.)
Reply
666
2/7/2015 04:58:01 am
Nobody gets a kick out of how Roman Monuments were really constructed. Educational textbooks do not become bestsellers. Only university students ask for such material in libraries.
Only Me
2/7/2015 05:33:18 am
"Educational textbooks do not become bestsellers."
Jerky (Cellphone)
2/7/2015 05:40:19 am
I do 666, And I'm an illiterate high school drop out who's never set foot on a university in my whole life. So I guess I'm living proof that you are wrong.
666
2/7/2015 06:01:31 am
It's heartening to know there are people with intuitive understanding
EP
2/7/2015 06:12:32 am
"Educational textbooks do not become bestsellers."
V
2/7/2015 11:20:11 am
666: http://www.history.com/shows/ancient-discoveries
EP
2/7/2015 11:36:31 am
666 blames everything on evil psychiatrists and their evil crazy pills.
666
2/7/2015 11:51:50 am
Check out the 1990s television series "Secrets of Lost Empires"
MartyR
2/7/2015 04:22:54 am
It's all about money, of course. Much of this programming takes place on Friday and Saturday nights, the worst nights of the week for TV. So, you have relatively inexpensive programming, filling a niche for what has to be a good profit margin. That's all Disney is and was. Remember Sunday's Wonderful World of Disney? it was the first infomercial for the amusement park.
Reply
Paul S.
2/7/2015 07:43:32 am
I used to watch the History Channel back in the days when it mostly showed documentaries on World War II. It was kind of one-dimensional but at least it was real history.
Reply
Rick
2/7/2015 12:20:28 pm
Same here with older shows. I mainly watch the new stuff because it's interesting but also to pick it apart.
Reply
Joe Scales
2/7/2015 01:19:42 pm
"Or he requires the poster to cite sources for points they are making but then doesn't require that of himself."
EP
2/7/2015 01:31:06 pm
I hope that all the illiterate women trying to get that forensic petrographer dick at least aren't sockpuppets. The alternative is too sad to contemplate.
666
2/7/2015 08:08:00 pm
Believing in Scott Wolter stuff is a type of fix.
666
2/7/2015 09:20:09 pm
The likes of Scott Wolter and Graham Hancock, do they privately know that what they believe in and are peddling is bullshit, but they get a kick out of believing it, that's the question.
Rick
2/8/2015 12:34:38 am
@joe
Joe Scales
2/8/2015 04:06:12 am
"I'm still waiting on his papers on dating carvings. Where are they? I saw one paper on the KRS that really didn't tell me much of anything. Surely he has papers underway that use thousands of examples showing the weathering in different climates accounting for precipitation levels, temperature extremes, etc. Because the lack of papers makes it appear as though he is just looking at the carvings and guessing."
Bob Jase
2/8/2015 05:28:42 am
"
Reply
EP
2/8/2015 06:25:40 am
History's current programming: Literally worse than Hitler :)
HITLER WAS OFTEN LITERALLY WORSE THAN HITLER
2/8/2015 07:52:08 am
at best, A+E'z "hilter" channel izz inferior copy
666
2/8/2015 12:55:34 am
> going against the machine of academia
Reply
Clete
2/8/2015 01:18:20 pm
I used to watch the History Channel quite a bit. It was really the go to channel when there wasn't a good movie on, or baseball, the only other things I watched. Then it changed and that change can be traced to one person...Nancy Dubrac. A & E put her in charge of the channel with only one goal...increase rating.
Reply
Joe Scales
2/8/2015 02:29:42 pm
"Even now, when they put on "historical" programming, it is terrible. example is their latest offering "Sons of Liberty". Not even close to being accurate. I mean, John Adams playing Rambo, really."
Reply
JL Adamson
2/9/2015 12:59:35 am
I admit I have only seen a couple of episodes of Cities of the Underworld but I'm confused why it would be in the same category of Ancient Aliens and UFO Hunters.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
October 2024
|