First, a brief update: Yesterday I received the first proof copy of the hardcopy edition of Cthulhu in World Mythology. It’s undergoing a final set of corrections, and then it should be available for sale at Atomic Overmind and on sites like Amazon and Barnes & Noble shortly. So, if you’ve been waiting for the print edition to order your copy, the wait is almost over! Linda Moulton-Howe and the Alaska Pyramid Here’s a bizarre claim I didn’t know about. I have no idea how I missed it. In March the Humans Are Free fringe website reported a claim that Ancient Aliens pundit and fringe author Linda Moulton-Howe made in 2012 that a major pyramid had been discovered in Alaska. The Humans Are Free article appears to be derived, sometimes verbatim, from pieces that ran on Moulton-Howe’s Earth Files in 2012, but which are now locked behind a membership paywall. Similar articles appeared on numerous other sites such as Before It’s News in 2013, all derived from the same source. So, here’s the story as given on fringe websites: On May 22, 1992, the Chinese detonated a nuclear bomb as part of its largest-ever nuclear test. (This is true.) American scientists allegedly used the occasion to study the earth’s crust by setting up monitoring equipment in Alaska. (This is not true since the explosion took seismologists by surprise.) As a result of this, the scientists discovered a large cavity fifty miles from Mt. McKinley within which was a pyramid larger than the Great Pyramid of Giza. (This is complete fiction.) Allow me to let Moulton-Howe share the extensive evidence she compiled for this pyramid in 2012: A retired U. S. Army Counterintelligence agent, Doug Mutschler, says that when China exploded its largest underground nuclear test on May 22, 1992, geologists and seismologists used the event to study the Earth’s crust and discovered a large pyramid-shaped structure underground in western Alaska between Mount McKinley […] and Nome on Norton Sound. Allegedly, Anchorage Channel 13 broadcast one news story in the fall of 1992 about the China nuclear test and subsequent pyramid discovery. The Army agent says he learned the news report was ordered erased. “Anchorage Channel 13” is ABC affiliate KYUR-TV, but Moulton-Howe, a former television journalist, apparently did not bother to take even the rudimentary step of contacting the TV station or examining transcripts from independent transcription agencies to confirm anything about the story. But she doesn’t have to because the Mutschler asserts that the story was “erased” and therefore its absence becomes proof of its former presence! Mutschler claims to have joined the military in 1981, served as a chief warrant officer in military intelligence, and left the service in 1995 due to physical disability. Moulton-Howe requested his discharge papers and posted them online, confirming that he did serve in counterintelligence in southwest Asia. However, Mutschler waited twenty years to “reveal” the pyramid. Actually, she doesn’t say this at all. She shared the original email Muschler sent to her: From: Douglas A. Mutschler It’s interesting that the initial email made no mention of the Chinese detonation or a TV news story, and in fact Mutschler implies (though with an ambiguous passive construction) that the Army tried to suppress information from the soldiers, not from the media. But this isn’t what he said when asking Ask.com for help finding the news footage, where he attributes the story entirely to his memory of a news story about the Chinese detonation from November 1992. I am not able to determine which version came first. Here he is again talking to Moulton-Howe by phone later in 2012, where he repeats the same: Doug Mutschler and I talked on the phone in-depth about how he had come to learn about the China underground detonation and an alleged crustal study that revealed a pyramid structure larger than Cheops that was reported six months later on Channel 13 (NBC) in Anchorage with graphics and scientific analysis of the large discovered structure. Doug Mutschler was in the Fort Richardson Orderly Room with 39 other men in the last week of November or first week of December 1992 when they all listened with amazement to the in-depth TV news report about the extraordinary large pyramid discovery underground in Alaska. Afterward, Doug went to his room to program his VCR to tape the next news cast because he wanted to study the news report. But nothing was broadcast. He called his father in Fairborn, Ohio, who always watches morning, noon and night news, but the father said there had been nothing about a large pyramid structure discovered in Alaska after Earth crustal studies during the May 22, 1992, one megaton underground nuclear test in Lon Por, China. The differences are rather striking. In the initial email, Mutschler says that the information “was reported to us in 1992” and was “brought to my attention,” apparently through Army channels. But then he changed his wording and instead claimed to have seen the story on TV six months later. He went on to assert that TV station employees at first denied broadcasting the story before a technician told him that the story had been suppressed and destroyed. So why did only one Alaskan TV station find out about the pyramid? Moulton-Howe is silent. Given this, I at first wondered if Mutschler wasn’t misremembering the November 10, 1993 NBC-TV special Mystery of the Sphinx, which suggested that there had been a pyramid-building super-culture around 10,500 BCE. As we shall see below, there is a still better explanation. At any rate, given that none of the other alleged 39 witnesses or the thousands of Alaskan TV viewers have any memory of this story, and the entirety of the evidence is one man’s twenty-year-old memory of what he thinks he saw on TV, it seems there is cause for doubt. Ghost Theory’s Harry Paterson tried to get to the bottom of the story in August 2012, though he was operating on the assumption that Moulton-Howe (who provided him with research materials and recommended the story) and Mutschler were accurate in their claims. He contacted the U.S. Geologic Survey in Anchorage and asked about the 1992 crustal survey Moulton-Howe mentions, and he learned that there was no earth crust survey going on that year, directly contradicting Moulton-Howe’s version of events. Nevertheless, he decided to side with Moulton-Howe because he believed Mutschler to be incapable of telling a lie, or even being wrong, since he was military intelligence. Leaving aside the fact that memory is notoriously inaccurate and inexact, why would believers trust a member of the same organization they had just accused of a global conspiracy to suppress archaeological evidence? Did they not just admit that they believe them to be proficient and capable liars capable of creating believable cover stories? Moulton-Howe discovered that the phone number Multscher gave her did not work when she tried to follow up with him, and when he finally called her back, he asserted that the government was manipulating the phones to prevent him from calling her. Satisfied with this conspiracy, the two then recorded an interview. In this interview, the story gets more convoluted. Here are Multscher’s most developed claims: …it was in late November to early December [1992] – and I’m sitting there in the Orderly Room with about 40 other people and we were waiting for the last formation of the day. We’re watching the TV, a news program was on and they started talking about this Chinese detonation of an underground nuclear bomb that was set off earlier that year. […] And the story was about geologists around the world had been informed through the U.N. because China had told the U.N. they were going to do this. And so these geologists got together and said let’s get the best recordings of the Earth’s crust and mantle using the vibrations from this explosion. What the geologists said they found in this byline news story was under Alaska, they found a pyramid bigger than the one in Egypt. They said they did not know if it were solid or hollow. They could not tell that, but they had the distinct outline of a pyramid. Note that Moulton-Howe has paraphrased these claims with greater exactitude than the original: “About 40 other people” becomes exactly “39 other men,” for example.
I have been unable to find any indication that the UN provided information to seismologists about the nuclear tests. In fact, the June 1992 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (published several weeks earlier than its cover date) betrayed no awareness of any planned tests, noting that China had conducted no tests since 1990. However, there was in fact a series of Chinese nuclear tests between May 1992 and October 1993, so it is unclear why a news broadcast would be covering a six-month-old event so breathlessly. A Lexis-Nexis search finds no news coverage of Chinese nuclear testing or seismology in Alaska in the fall of 1992—but there was coverage of the Egyptian pyramids around that time! A major 5.3-magnitude earthquake hit Cairo on October 12, 1992. It shook the pyramids and the Sphinx and damaged hundreds of medieval Islamic structures. It was the largest earthquake ever to have struck the area. It was immensely damaging, and the epicenter was only a few kilometers from Giza, near Dahshur. Inspectors were sent to the pyramids to make sure they were OK after a large block fell from the Great Pyramid. More than 500 people died. There is also a UN connection: The UN monitored the 1992 quake and helped coordinate disaster response. It seems likely that Multscher misunderstood or misinterpreted coverage of the 1992 Cairo earthquake, most likely regional Alaskan coverage of local seismography and preparedness work, since Anchorage suffered massively in the 9.2-magnitude 1964 Alaska earthquake and has always been understandably worried about a future quake of that magnitude. If that’s the case, a local expert might have mentioned how seismographs in Anchorage picked up the Chinese explosion and its seismic signature as well as the Cairo quake. In a crowded room with forty soldiers, many of whom were presumably talking and making noise, it’s easy to see how Multscher could have half-seen, half-heard and partially misunderstood a news report, looking only at the images on the screen and misinterpreting a seismic spike for a geophysical outline of a pyramid, especially if he was already a believer in fringe ideas. Even the exact wording about something being “bigger” that Egypt might have come from a comparison between the seismic signature of the Cairo quake and the much bigger seismic signature of the 1964 Anchorage quake. (The 1964 quake was the second most powerful ever measured by seismograph.) To confirm this version, we of course would need someone to go through the tapes of 1992 Alaskan local news reports—but that’s the genius of fringe thinking: even if you found exactly what I just described, they’d still say the government suppressed the originals. Multscher’s story quickly took on a life of its own, bouncing from one credulous website to the next. By December 2012, the pyramid story was now subject to elaboration. Believers now claimed that the Russians reported that a subcritical American nuclear test conducted on December 5 of 2012 was designed to prevent the Alaskan pyramid from being uncovered before the Maya Apocalypse of 2012! Subcritical experiments do not involve nuclear explosions, so I have no idea how that might have worked. When the Maya Apocalypse fizzled, the Alaskan pyramid of doom gradually faded in popularity, but apparently it keeps resurfacing on various fringe websites, referring back to Moulton-Howe’s uncritical “investigation” of one man’s twenty-year-old memory of a brief TV news report.
57 Comments
KIF
5/20/2014 07:17:51 am
More of the same to follow
Reply
steve StC
5/20/2014 05:54:19 pm
Still think Jason Colavito doesn't see racists behind every bush? See his Tweet from May 16th. (Naturally, it links to an article from NPR).
Reply
Varika
5/21/2014 07:04:53 am
Well, first of all, his twitter feed is not his blog, so it can explore other subjects. Second of all, one of the things people do is use the supernatural to JUSTIFY RACISM. 5/21/2014 07:25:09 am
I wasn't referring to anything. I shared a link to an NPR story about the reason ice cream trucks adopted the watermelon version of "Turkey in the Straw," which they claimed was due to the use of minstrel music in early ice cream parlors. All I did was share a link to an interesting story; sharing links does not, obviously, imply endorsement of the writer's view. Steve omitted the link to make it look like I was independently ranting about racist ice cream trucks.
stve StC
5/21/2014 10:45:14 am
His Twitter account IS very much related to his blog. Go look at his Twitter feed - https://twitter.com/JasonColavito Quite correctly, Jason uses it to promote his blog posts to his social followers. It's good content marketing practice. Look under his name on the left, Varika - "I am an author, editor, and skeptical xenoarchaeologist investigating the connections between science, history, and speculative fiction." Same description as on his blog. 5/21/2014 10:53:11 am
You'll notice Steve didn't mention my Tweet about the recent Macleans piece about the dumbing down of America.
steve stC
5/21/2014 11:26:11 am
Actually, as you posted your latest remark, I was reading through that article after scrolling down your Tweets. I have my opinions about why you linked to that as well.
Only Me
5/21/2014 11:51:36 am
Holy trees with dicks, Steve. The link to the Macleans article IS IN THE TWEET. How the hell is Jason "hiding" it from his readers? 5/21/2014 12:16:43 pm
I have trouble understanding Steve, frankly. He's mad at me because Macleans placed an article about the political consequences of unreason in the politics section? And that I have read articles in sections of magazines (Canadian magazines, no less) that he disapproves of? I imagine he fails to see the irony that he is looking to restrict me and delegitimize any views that disagree with him in exactly the way the Macleans article outlined for the bullying forces of unreason.
Steve StC
5/21/2014 02:05:32 pm
I'm not mad at you, Jason. I find it rather sad and juvenile that you see racists behind every bush.
Only Me
5/21/2014 02:59:50 pm
"race baiting blog post"
John
2/22/2016 07:17:50 pm
I think this article was total shite and this Jason Colavito dude sounds like he's frantically attempting to blow smoke up his own ass.
SteveStC
5/20/2014 06:17:39 pm
Where I grew up, the song lyrics went like this:
Reply
Only Me
5/21/2014 09:26:21 am
Hey, Steve, can you explain to me (or anyone) why you assume Jason's Tweeter account must be limited to only those subjects related to the mission statement of his blog?
The Referee
5/21/2014 09:30:36 am
Steve St Clair strikes out again!!!!!
Steve StC
5/21/2014 10:33:28 am
Jason's Twitter account is directly and intentionally tied to his website via the "branding" green, the art, and the "about me" sort of message that all Twitter accounts have - "I am an author, editor, and skeptical xenoarchaeologist investigating the connections between science, history, and speculative fiction."
Only Me
5/21/2014 10:57:11 am
A Twitter (not Tweeter, da hell was I thinking?) account is not the same as a blog forum. There's absolutely no limitation, enforceable by any means, that disallows Jason from linking to articles or re-Tweeting messages that, in his opinion, are interesting.
Steve StC
5/21/2014 02:40:07 pm
Really my last post on this -
Only Me
5/21/2014 03:15:18 pm
And not one shit was given that day about that comment.
Walt
5/21/2014 03:40:33 pm
Those comments on the NPR article reflect my opinion fairly well too. It's a shame intelligent discussion of the issues just cannot be had at this blog. Jason clearly does see race everywhere he looks and aims to protect those who he feels are less informed than he. He's also not very respectful of others during the process. He's right, he's always right, and he knows he's always right and he'll tell you why when you logically explain how he's wrong.
will
5/21/2014 03:53:07 pm
"Finding any and every excuse to nitpick his website is not the only source of joy in my life. That's a cute statement "Only Me," but far from accurate."
SteveStC
5/21/2014 04:08:48 pm
I got a good chuckle out of that one "Will" …
Only Me
5/21/2014 04:16:30 pm
Yes, Walt, I used dick, shit and even ass. Clearly, your sensitivities are not foremost in my mind when I comment.
Steve StC
5/21/2014 05:28:02 pm
Uh Oh…. NASA book suggests that ancient rock art could have been created by extraterrestrials -
Walt
5/21/2014 05:48:55 pm
So, disagreeing with Steve and saying that I think Jason sometimes provides a valuable service when discussing hidden racist ideas is hopping on the "bash Jason" bandwagon? Of course it is, because you're ordained in the cult and see eveything through Jason-colored glasses. Unbiased readers will recognize that as a compliment.
Only Me
5/22/2014 04:36:03 am
Actually, Walt, I was referring to how you so readily agreed that Jason sees racism everywhere. You followed that up by saying he's protecting those less informed than himself, which, of course, explains why he links to his sources so that his readership can peruse them for themselves. Then there was the sarcastic statement that he's always right, even when proven wrong. Tell me, Socrates, how and when have you proven him wrong on anything? Ever?
Walt
5/23/2014 01:21:15 am
Only Me, like I said I see both sides. I have good things and bad things to say about Jason. You have only good things. Steve and a couple others have only bad things. 5/23/2014 01:30:10 am
I did not misread any press release, Walt. As you well know, the H2 promotional packet contained a factually-inaccurate description of the series "The Universe: Ancient Mysteries Solved" in which they stated that the Megalithic Yard would be a focus of the show. It was not, and that error is on the H2 press team, not me.
Walt
5/23/2014 01:45:33 am
I'd agree it was not a well-written release and didn't even seem to be written by someone who had any idea what the show really was. But, I managed to read it critically enough to not be fooled by it. I was familiar with the original show so I knew your comments and the release just didn't make any sense.
Only Me
5/23/2014 06:52:08 am
Yes, I see a lot of good in what Jason does. It's nice to see someone make the effort to counterbalance the fringe insanity. I read the articles, follow the links provided and do my own research, which is why I am intolerant of those who come here to demean and abuse not only Jason, but his readership.
Walt
5/23/2014 08:32:18 am
I did understand Steve was using that tweet just to raise a ruckus and find fault. I saw the tweet, rolled my eyes, shook my head, and didn't bother reading it. I probably would've found it interesting, but I'm suffering from a bit of race overload from this blog. If Jason had blogged it, hopefully I would've commented in the manner as quoted by Steve from the NPR comments, but they were probably better written than I would've achieved. I might've called him a name.
Only Me
5/23/2014 09:23:15 am
Thank you for the thoughtful response.
Walt
5/23/2014 05:40:30 pm
I appreciate your thoughts and we most likely agree completely in principal. Unfortunately, practice here seems to be another story, and I don't necessarily mean you.
deb
12/29/2022 07:25:58 pm
all bs as i see it. yes it will be really stupid.
Reply
Mandalore
5/20/2014 07:36:30 am
Why would anyone cover this up if it were true? It would be awesome if there were a pyramid in Alaska, and it would generate a huge amount of attention that couldn't be suppressed.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
5/20/2014 12:05:44 pm
Luckily for the government, only one person in the world saw the newscast.
Reply
BD
4/17/2015 05:02:07 pm
All that remains of all of the ancient orders, including persons who appear to be merely elected officials, have an almost sacred obligation to hide the true history of our species and
Reply
Dave Lewis
5/20/2014 09:05:12 am
Linda Moulton Howe was on Coast to Coast Am several times talking about the Alaska Pyramid. I'll see if I can get those episodes.
Reply
Clint Knapp
5/20/2014 05:38:38 pm
Every time Investigative Believer Linda Moulton Howe recites her failed mnemonic device "Just remember I'm a reporter who files news about the earth!" to get us to remember her website (Earthfiles.com), I have to suspend my disbelief in alien experimentation on human subjects.
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
5/20/2014 10:02:48 am
I have some experience with geophysical testing, and I can tell you that you're not going to get a whole lot of information about near-surface structures from seismograph readings of a nuke blast in China. The first frequencies to damp out are the highest ones with the shortest wavelengths, needed to register near-surface objects (since you need a minimum of one wavelength between transmission surface and reflection surface, and between reflection surface and reception surface, to get any quality of reading). Long waves at low frequencies, which are great for deeper objects and longer distances, are not good for near-surface information for that very reason, and the "thump" you get from a nuke blast is going to have all sorts of noise you get in the transmission that the analysis team will have a very difficult time filtering out without some sort of pre-planning. The Chinese were unlikely to share their nuclear device's specifications, test rig, et cetera, so filtering all that out is difficult at best. Besides, a single thump from a single source measured at a cluster of geophones or seismographs not explicitly looking to do sub-surface mapping isn't going to produce the quality of data required to tell you there's a pyramid-sized anomaly in the nearest layers to the surface. For that, you need a deliberate test program designed to sweep that given area, and those are expensive (about the only people who can afford them on that scale on a regular basis, at least five years ago when I was messing around with this, are nuclear plant designers).
Reply
Paul Cargile
5/21/2014 02:59:55 am
I'm in the Non Destruction Inspection/Testing field in ultrasonics testing graphite composite aircraft parts (skins and framework sections) and what caught my was the claim of finding a pyramid inside a cavity. I work in the 1 to 5 MHz range with material usually less than a quarter of an inch thick and trapped pockets of air practically block sound, and you can't "see" what's behind it unless you test from the other side of the material. I image that with lower frequencies if you detect a cavern or some other cavity in the rock, you aren't going to see what's inside of it, unless you can send waves up through the rock floor.
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
5/21/2014 06:22:37 am
You might get a vague boundary layer indication, but you're looking at a side projection, where the wave's been bouncing around since China anyway, so a lot of your signal has been attenuated out and you're looking at a very noisy result. So you're talking about pretty much the worst possible conditions for detecting a void. Normally if you're going to look for those, your geophone array is either gridded out, if it's on the surface, laid out as downhole sensors so you can pick up different responses at different depths, or ideally a combination of the two. In either case, the load is applied as close to on-axis with the sensors as you can get, to get the best signal/noise ratio. Soil and rock masses have a lot of inertia, so it takes a pretty good thump to transmit a signal through them. When you're doing it intentionally, you can do this with something like a semi truck with a multi-ton drop weight on the back, and you just repeat the pulse at the desired frequency. The shallower the response you're looking for, the smaller the weight and higher the frequency. Basically this is how oil fields are explored by seismic methods; you do that, then map out the surface where the response changes. Takes a lot of experience (which I admit I don't have, oil patch never interested me) to learn to read the returns, and if you're not looking for them in the first place, you're not going to see that material interface. I could go on about this all day, and honestly I didn't mean to ramble as much as I had, I just don't get a lot of chances to talk about it.
Dave Lewis
5/20/2014 11:17:08 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_frTdqu6rds
Reply
Pat McGee
12/6/2022 01:12:31 pm
Alaska (part of USA) certainly the USA has tested investigated & recvd their answers one way other re: black pyramid. NASA will not comment & further discuss hidden pyramid.
Joe
5/20/2014 05:18:55 pm
Funniest part is how his being military intelligence ends up having nothing to do with anything. Local news breaks the story and even the bit about the government erasing the story comes not from his intelligence channels but from some low-level local TV station employee.
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
5/21/2014 06:27:04 am
And there's only one orderly room in all of Ft. Richardson...
Reply
5/21/2014 12:35:53 am
Reminds me of Childress's claims of a pyramid (also detected seismically) 5km beneath Perth Western Australia. It's too deep to dig up but nonetheless is known as "The Lost City of Asteroth". Apparently.
Reply
Graham
5/30/2015 06:34:19 pm
I know people in Perth (Western Australia) and they've never heard of this one, sounds like someone overdosed on Lovecraft.
Reply
Dave Lewis
5/21/2014 09:39:52 am
LMH was on Coast to Coast AM on 2012-07-26, 2012-08-30,
Reply
AE
5/22/2014 07:21:32 am
Then there is always the crystal pyramid underwater in the Bermuda Triangle. I am surprised that Howe does not appear to have picked up on that.
Reply
seen
10/1/2014 01:07:08 pm
Reports of the Alaska Pyramid appeared in new papers in Vancouver BC circa 1992 - 1993.
Reply
BillDee
4/27/2015 12:03:23 am
Your convoluted attempts to "unexplain" this are just as bad or worse than Howe's. lol
Reply
Not a Bot
9/5/2020 02:46:49 am
Jason, thank you for your sane manner of bravely sharing answers to help educate and guide people to the truth of matters. You’ve taken on the difficult task of correcting misconceptions in a world of many gullible people who don’t know what confirmation bias means or why they should not rely on their brain’s perception of reality. The comments are quite some years ago but the Alaskan underground pyramid story still prevails even though it’s been debunked long ago. The new fringe group as of this writing is QAnon and I bet Steve StC is a follower of its religulous conspiracy theory about an orange narcissist false prophet they adore who is playing stupid to outwit evil pedophiles. Q is Dinesh D’Souza of course but the joiners of QAnon most likely don’t know who the heck he is or will like him based on their shallow outlook of POC. Also, Steve StC and others trolled you unnecessarily as certain tunes are indeed racist and are now becoming banned from playing on ice cream vendors’ trucks.
Reply
Bill Owens
9/15/2021 06:44:14 pm
Sanctimonious liberal cant not appropriate here (we're inundated with this crap enough as it is.)
Reply
Steve is a moron
3/11/2023 06:40:14 am
I saw some dumb ass alien show about this pyramid and found this excellent article debunking the entire thing.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
October 2024
|