Before we begin today, some ratings news: America Unearthed ticked up in the live plus same day ratings to 514,000 viewers and a 0.09 in the advertiser-preferred adults 18-49 demographic. The show reached a series high for its Travel Channel run for an atypical episode with almost no fringe history content. The rise in viewership might be due to viewers finding the series after a few weeks on the air, or realizing new episodes are airing. It might also be due to continued weak ratings for the History Channel, whose Curse of Civil War Gold draws two-thirds fewer viewers than Curse of Oak Island, which normally fills the Tuesday night timeslots, or to the lack of major sports events on Tuesday leading to lower ratings for ESPN, whose largely male audience overlaps with that America Unearthed. The show’s performance over the next few weeks will let us know if the audience will continue to grow. It isn’t much of a secret that the current team of UFO researchers at To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science is made up of a large number of people who formerly worked for Robert Bigelow at his National Institute for Discovery Science, the organization that hunted for paranormal anomalies at Skinwalker Ranch and claimed that poltergeist-like creatures from another dimension caused anomalies and left no trace of their existence for researchers to find. In the runup to the launch of To the Stars’ History Channel series Unidentified, several sets of alleged documents from NIDS were posted anonymously online in April and came to the attention of UFO researchers a week ago thanks to Richard Dolan of Ancient Aliens excitedly calling them the UFO “leak of the century.”
Other ufologists are split on whether the documents are real or fake. The documents claim to be leaked notes from Eric Davis, formerly of NIDS and now chief science officer at Hal Puthoff’s EarthTech International, which shares Puthoff with To the Stars and works under contract with To the Stars. One set of documents purportedly written by Davis claims that Davis, Puthoff, and the NIDS team took the infamous Fox Alien Autopsy very seriously and former CIA agent and UFO researcher Christopher “Kit” Green claimed to have been shown photographs of the “real” alien autopsy by Pentagon officials. According to Puthoff’s longtime research associate Jacques Vallée, writing in Forbidden Science, Green did indeed claim to have researched photos of an alien autopsy in the 1980s but told Vallée and Puthoff at the time that he was unable to confirm anything. The photos, he said, were fakes: “‘It goes back to the seventies,’ he answered. ‘When the first alleged autopsy pictures came out, all that stuff by Len Stringfield.’ The pictures turned out to show bodies in coffin-like boxes with wires and pipes running into them, a bad joke.” As Keith Basterfield noted, Vallée’s journals do not confirm the dates or content of the documents but do support the general information about the group of characters who spent more than a decade investigating alien autopsies. But in Vallée’s telling, they found nothing. The second set of documents claims to be a set of minutes Davis recorded during interviews with Adm. Thomas Wilson, the former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, in which the admiral claims that a UFO crashed in Roswell, New Mexico and the U.S. government had been working to reverse engineer the craft. When asked about the documents, Davis declined comment, but To the Stars’ Christopher Mellon suggested (without confirming) that they are fake. Wilson has confirmed that he met with UFO-believing former astronaut Edgar Mitchell and UFO researcher Steven Greer in 1997 as a courtesy to Mitchell, but he has adamantly denied any involvement with UFOs and contradicted Greer’s claims about Wilson’s supposed efforts to ferret out UFO secrets. In reading the documents, they read to me like fakes. There are a large number of stylistically strange tics in them, including some weird attempts at recording dialect that seem out of place. The material is too conveniently in line with modern Roswell mythology, which itself lacks a strong evidentiary foundation, given that it is a confection made up of claims piled on claims dating back at most only a couple of decades. The more interesting question is who would bother creating these fake documents, which tend to serve to make the current To the Stars team and those in their orbit look like they are the secret possessors of UFO secrets that they are holding close to the vest for some glorious day of disclosure yet to come.
36 Comments
Alien autopsy
6/13/2019 10:28:26 am
Reminds me of The Turin Shroud. Groups of scientists seriously believe in that fake as well.
Reply
Joe Scales
6/13/2019 10:46:49 am
"...whose Curse of Civil War Gold..."
Reply
Machala
6/13/2019 12:15:33 pm
I actually viewed this piece of amateur awful offal. I have seen better productions done by junior-high school students. No matter how hard they try, the script is non-existant and production disconcertingly bad.
Reply
Joe Scales
6/13/2019 01:39:56 pm
I was never fooled by Marty Lagina's folksy charm. He's a lawyer. He's an engineer. He's a millionaire. There's no way he got into Oak Island believing the hoax. But now that he's pushing this Curse of Civil War Gold abomination, pretending to be the skeptical financier... and even getting his son more acting credits... he's just a piece of crap in my book. Another charlatan trading on the stupidity of television viewers, happily poisoning the well of knowledge as they cash another check.
Hal
6/13/2019 12:14:48 pm
Jason loves to mention how poor the ratings are for these shows. But his own show on the AHC codes and conspiracies, which he pushed and has bragged about many times, had less than 50,000 viewers. He hasn’t done another one since. Another green monster.
Reply
Kent
6/13/2019 01:28:56 pm
Is "Another green monster" your signature?
Reply
Kal
6/13/2019 02:23:09 pm
Did he mean "Jealousy is the green eyed monster that has taken my master"? That's from Shakespeare, Othello.
Reply
Alien Autopsy Debunked
6/13/2019 02:36:16 pm
In case anyone missed it
Reply
Kent
6/13/2019 02:40:20 pm
I note that questions have been raised about Luis Elizondo's role or lack thereof in AATIP.
Reply
Accumulated Wisdom
6/13/2019 04:03:57 pm
"It was on the History Channel so, you know it's true."
Reply
Machala
6/13/2019 06:46:18 pm
That sounds like something my wife would say regarding the Bible.
Reply
RiverM
6/13/2019 10:44:48 pm
Secret to a happy marriage: Discuss religion well before marriage.
Crash55
6/13/2019 07:01:42 pm
I don’t know about these documents but I am almost certain that the briefing they showed in the last episode of Unidentified is fake. It was supposed to be a briefing for DoD personnel but there were no logos anyplace on it. In 25 years of DoD service I have never seen a briefing without logos since we went to PowerPoint. The higher up the people you are briefing the more important the format is correct. More telling though is that lack of any marking. If the briefing was what they said it was supposed to be it should have been portion marked, there wasn’t even an FOUO statement
Reply
Documents
6/13/2019 08:02:46 pm
Don't UFO documents always have the tendency of verifying the respective author's theories - like religious stories, always written long after the events they describe, fulfil religious wishful thinking
Reply
Marquess of always
6/13/2019 08:30:00 pm
Counterexample: Book of Mormon
Crash55
6/14/2019 07:07:39 pm
Religious books are often written such that they can bee used to justify anything - just ignore the parts you don’t agree with.
Sheer waste of taxpayer's money
6/13/2019 08:16:28 pm
Here they are, jumped-up experts on rubbish
Reply
Quoting Eric Davis
6/13/2019 08:27:31 pm
Reply
Seth Brundle
6/13/2019 08:36:53 pm
Here's the online Eric Davis PDF doc
6/13/2019 08:54:01 pm
https://fas.org/sgp/eprint/teleport.pdf
Brundlefly
6/13/2019 09:12:08 pm
Timothy Green Beckley liked it.
Jockobadger
6/14/2019 12:56:51 pm
Hey SWOTM - Just because the earthtech guys understand quantum physics and you don't doesn't mean they're experts on rubbish. Hah.
Reply
Matt
6/17/2019 08:05:08 am
50% of the team are Puthoffs.
Kent
6/17/2019 11:36:27 am
Just like Tom DeLonge has his sister handling PR. I would interview but not hire the COO, and would probably hire the CFO (bookkeeper) because how much harm could he do? Wouldn't even respond to an email from physicist Puthoff.
tom mellett
6/17/2019 03:58:57 pm
Yo Matt! And the other 50% are Puthons.
Mark
6/16/2019 11:23:19 am
Hey, pseudoskeptic, Richard Dolan has called you out...well, not by name, but Dolan claims that Dolan is willing to debate any pseudoskeptic on the subject of the Wilson document. Are you willing to debate Dolan, or are you too afraid?
Reply
Kent
6/17/2019 12:45:55 pm
I'm curious about Stephen Greer got read into this (imaginary) project. Aside from being an MD and keeping himself in FANTASTIC shape, he's an idiot.
Reply
Kent
6/17/2019 01:07:57 pm
How do you debate someone's notes. That's what "The Wilson Document" is. It's just some guys notes. I could write up some notes about how Davis and I came up with a plan to fake the notes. Would Dolan like to debate my notes?
Reply
Mark
6/19/2019 11:37:29 am
Wilson is also dead, Hoss, just so you know. Anyway, the way that you're posting reminds me of another pseudoskeptic, named ONLY ME, who acted in a similar way on this same blog a month or two before the historic NY Times article hit in 2017. (maybe it was you...) I told him that Luis Elizondo had already come out and said that Elizondo ran one conspiracy to study UFOs and keep it secret from everyone else. That pseudoskeptic tried to say that it was just one man's assertions, and that many before him have made similar assertions, and all were bogus, as if every assertion by every man under any circumstances had the same validity - always "just one man's assertions," regardless of who he was, the circumstances surrounding the assertions, the timing of the assertions, etc. (apparently, Kloor is another pseudoskeptic hasn't gotten the message, yet...) If that is what you believe, then maybe you'll want to debate Dolan, and make the claim that Davis's notes are "just one person's notes."
Kent
6/19/2019 04:46:17 pm
Wilson's not dead "Hoss". When you start talking fucked up shit in your first sentence what shall I make of the rest of it? I ignore it.
Kent
6/19/2019 07:31:56 pm
"So what are we talking about?
Mark
6/20/2019 11:59:04 am
What are we talking about? I'm talking about trying to get you pseudoskeptics to debate Richard Dolan, rather than just posting comments on your blogs. I can't force you, (legally) of course, but I think that you should be willing to debate if you want to post mean things, at least in this case.
Joe Scales
6/20/2019 01:46:31 pm
"I'm talking about trying to get you pseudoskeptics to debate Richard Dolan..."
Kent
6/20/2019 01:56:07 pm
"I'm talking about trying to get you pseudoskeptics to debate Richard Dolan..."
Mark
6/21/2019 01:59:20 pm
LOL!!! How does someone "look like" a child molester? Well, perhaps I am being a "douche," depending on your subjective definition of the idea. However, I also really would like to see a pseudoskeptic debate Dolan on this, publicly. You're right that I have no interest in debating it all, myself. If you would debate Dolan, you could make that argument that the whole thing hasn't been proven, yet, and Dolan could say that it has. It would be fun and interesting to watch.
Kent
6/21/2019 02:05:31 pm
No, it wouldn't. Further, I don't bend to the urgings of anyone who can't keep track of who is dead and who is not. Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
October 2024
|