Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Indian Nationalism, and the Interglacial Polar Origins of the Aryan Race12/6/2015 The other day I mentioned the tendency of nationalists to glorify their own homeland as the centerpiece of civilization, and today I have another example of this drawn from the historical archives. This was a story I didn’t know, and it was interesting to learn about a close connection between fringe history and nationalism in India long before the current prime minister, Narendra Modi, promoted a nationalist revision of Indian history that involved Vedic airplanes, Ganesh’s plastic surgery, and other evidence-free assertions. Our story for today concerns Bal Gangadhar Tilak, the first Indian independence leader, and an opponent of Gandhi’s non-violent approach. Tilak began agitating for Indian independence in the early 1890s, at which time he also produced a book called Orion (1893), in which he attempted to argue that Vedic scriptures were much more ancient than previously recognized, using astronomy to date the oldest layers to 4500 BCE. This would make Vedic literature thousands of years older than the Bible, the Pyramid Texts, or even the Epic of Gilgamesh, and by happy coincidence places India at the origin of literary history.
However, Tilak did not content himself with merely asserting the antiquity of the Vedas. Instead, in articles published in the newspaper he ran, he used Bhagavad Gita as justification for violent uprisings against the British colonial government, citing a passage that rendered blameless those who commit violence against tyranny. When in 1897 two of Tilak’s readers acted on his words and killed two colonial officials, Tilak was tried and convicted of inciting murder. He served twelve months of an eighteen month sentence, which transformed him into a nationalist hero. But it was during his time in prison (his first stint, that is; he would be imprisoned again later in life) that Tilak began work on a massive work of fringe history that sought the origins of the Aryan race in the Arctic. In this endeavor, he received the assistance of the famous philologist and proponent of Solar Hero mythology F. Max Müller. On the strength of Tilak’s work on the Orion, Müller sent to the imprisoned Tilak his translation of the Rig-Veda (later revealed to be someone else’s translation for which he took credit), and he pushed the British government to release Tilak early. As a result of pressure from Müller, the colonial government gave Tilak a series of concessions: first, the use of the Rig-Veda, then a lamp by which to read it at night. During his imprisonment, Tilak used the time to copy out passages from the Rig-Veda that he felt pointed toward a startling new theory of world history. Müller, on his end, and unaware of Tilak’s activities in prison, helped secure his release six months early, in conjunction with a campaign from the Indian press. “In the very first letter I wrote to Prof. Max Müller after my release,” Tilak recalled, “I thanked him sincerely for his disinterested kindness, and also gave him a brief summary of my new theory regarding the primitive Aryan home as disclosed by Vedic evidence.” Müller was apparently quite surprised at the use to which Tilak had put his Rig-Veda, and replied gently that Tilak’s ideas might have had merit if they did not contradict the facts of geology. Tilak responded that he would soon have a rebuttal to the geological objection, despite being “a mere layman” in the sciences, but Müller died on October 28, 1900, before Tilak could present it to him. Tilak had drafted his ideas as The Arctic Home in the Vedas in 1898, but he did not publish it until 1903. Tilak’s view should be familiar to fans of fringe history, for it is shared by Ignatius Donnelly, Charles Hapgood, Andrew Collins, Graham Hancock, and countless others, namely, that the Aryan race once ran roughshod over the world in the period around the end of the last Ice Age when the flooding caused by the melting ice somehow undid their civilization. Tilak believed that the early Aryans had a material and technical culture equivalent to that of Dynastic Egypt before the flood that ended their world. But unlike our other authors, he makes the Aryan race into an originally polar race, inhabitants of a temperate Arctic, sort of like Rand Flem-Ath’s placement of Atlantis in Antarctica. He is perhaps closest, though, to Paradise Found (1885) and The True Key to Ancient Cosmology and Mythical Geography (1882) by the Rev. William F. Warren, which argued that both Atlantis and “the cradle of the human race, the Eden of primitive tradition, [were] situated at the North Pole, in a country submerged at the time of the Deluge.” According to the incomplete geology of the time, many thought that the Arctic had been warm and temperate around 10,000 BCE before glaciating sometime thereafter. (You’ll recognize this as analogous to the period between the Older and Younger Dryas, now called the Allerød oscillation, which Graham Hancock assigns to his lost civilization, though Tilak had no way of knowing he accidentally guessed a geological period that turned out to be close to correct.) Their evidence is also quite similar, comprising an examination of what we would today call the Indo-European heritage of both Vedic India and various European cultures, but resting on the idea of Hyperborea and Ultima Thule as Aryan homelands. Tilak traces more connections to the Rig-Veda than does Warren, but both wrongly dismiss Central Asia as the origin of the Indo-European languages in favor of some distant land to the north. Tilak does so on the strength of the Avesta, which in the first fargard of the Vendidad (1.1-2) places the Aryan homeland (the Airyana Vaeja, also called the Iran-Vej) seemingly north of all other lands. There’s a good reason for the similarity: Tilak used Paradise Found as one of his own sources. However, just in case you care, the English translator of Müller’s edition of the Avesta, James Darmester, notes that “the Bundahish distinctly states that Iran-Vej is ‘bordering upon Adarbajan’ (XXIX, 12),” placing it in eastern Iran in the later Zoroastrian writings. The difference is that Warren used his claims to forward the idea that the Greeks, Western exemplars par excellence, had special insight into prehistory and that the Bible could be shown to be literally true, whereas Tilak used his claims to prove that “the subject matter of the Vedic hymns is ancient and inter-glacial” such that “the Vedas are the oldest records of the Aryan race,” preserved in glorious continuity from before the Younger Dryas down to the present. Warren’s view was supported by the British prime minister, William Gladstone (himself a believer in Atlantis), as a true insight into Classical and Biblical literature that just happened to glorify the West, while Tilak’s version earned him the enmity of the British government for promoting Indian nationalism. If that doesn’t lay bare the political aspects of fringe history, I don’t know what does.
18 Comments
Ph
12/6/2015 09:56:42 am
Just follow the maternal DNA and you roughly know where and how humans progressed on this earth.
Reply
Bob Jase
12/6/2015 11:20:09 am
Ah, but have you checked the stasis chambers at the bottom of the ocean at the north pole?
Reply
Cesar
12/6/2015 02:10:21 pm
The idea of an Arctic origin of civilization was introduced to the West in 1775 by French astronomer Jean-Sylvain Bailly (1736-1793) from Indian and Iranian sources. Studying newly available Vedic and Avestic astronomical tables, he concluded that there millennia before his time (1781) "this very capable people, very bright, that was the ancestor of all the peoples of Asia, or at least the source of their light; their home was North Asia, in parallels 50° or 60°."
Reply
Cesar
12/6/2015 02:15:18 pm
three millennia before his time (1781)
Reply
David Bradbury
12/6/2015 04:37:36 pm
Bailly's evidence for a polar hypothesis (p103) is about as fringe as it gets- quoting the legends of Proserpine, and of Hercules & the Amazons ("in which one sees that night has an empire in the celestial zones, which is snatched from him by Hercules, symbol of the spring sun") and disregarding their applicability to all regions where foliage fails in winter, not just the Pole where night lasts 6 months.
Reply
Cesar
12/6/2015 05:22:24 pm
Bailly wrote Lettres sur l'Atlantide de Platon (1779) where he locates Atlantis in the Arctic.
David Bradbury
12/7/2015 08:26:13 am
I see I'm nearly 250 years behind the times with my observations on Bailly's use of seasonal sun myths. From the review of "Letters Concerning the Atlantides of Plato" in The Monthly Review (London) 1779, concerning Bailly's claim that such myths: "could never have been invented but in those countries, which are for a long time deprived of the light and heat of that great luminary." -
Shane Sullivan
12/6/2015 02:33:13 pm
I seem to recall that Goodrick-Clarke talks about this in Black Sun. Apparently Tilak was a big influence on Savitri Devi, and thus an indirectly important figure in the history of neo-Nazi esotericism.
Reply
Platy
12/7/2015 12:41:08 pm
I was actually thinking about that towards the end of the post. Funny since I just read Black Sun.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
12/7/2015 03:00:33 pm
Boy, that book really got me steamed. Now every time I watch one of those old sci-fi movies where the aliens looked exactly like humans, I'm reminded of fascism.
Alaric
12/6/2015 05:46:23 pm
This "Aryans from the North Pole" bit sounded familiar to me, and I correctly remembered where from. I think it's worth quoting.
Reply
John
12/7/2015 08:39:42 am
The most widely accepted fringish Indian theory these days, backed up by numerous semi-scholarly works, is that the Indo-European languages originated in India.The standard theory, supported by much evidence, is that the Indo-Europeans originated somewhere on the central Asian steppe or the Ukraine or Anatolia and its representatives in India migrated there about 2000 BC. While the exact homeland cannot be pinned down, the trace of the ancestors of the speakers of Indic languages (Hindi, Bengali and Sanskrit, etc) and their close cousins the Iranians (Persian, Dari, Kurdish) can be traced (imperfectly as they were illiterate) through archaeology and historical linguistics analysis. The Dravidian languages (Tamil, etc) are unrelated languages now spoken in southern India and seem to have been originally spoken much farther to the north (discerned through placenames and cultural archaeology). The name India itself comes from the Indus River, the first major geographical feature migrants from the north would have encountered (originally called the Sind but in some languages (notably Greek) s changed to h then disappeared, giving us Hindi as well). The Indo-European languages of India (called Indic languages, earlier Aryan languages after the Sanskrit word for themselves which literally meant noble) have adopted some phonological features of the Dravidian languages while no other Indo-European languages have. Sanskrit sagas seem to talk about a migration from the north starting in the Swat Valley which is in the extreme nw corner of Pakistan (and a Taliban stronghold these days). The Indo-Europeans may have been the first ones to domesticate the horse and brought chariot warfare to the Bronze Age Middle East. In southern Pakistan was located the Harrapan Culture along the Indus which thrived from about 3300 to 1500 BC. The Harrapans wrote in a script that has not been deciphered indicating it was probably not Indo-European but could possibly be Dravidian or an unknown language (Sumerian and Elamite were two nearby languages not related to any others or each other).
Reply
Colin Hunt
12/7/2015 10:38:44 am
Check out where our civilization really comes from, as the Apollo 20 mission proved!!! See http://cosmiclifesite.com/id11.html
Reply
Shane Sullivan
12/7/2015 02:24:27 pm
Strangely, out of all the things on that page, what made me laugh the hardest was "Notice that the Moon was captured by Earth's gravity some five hundred thousand years ago."
Reply
DaveR
12/7/2015 02:47:04 pm
What made me laugh was the Apollo 20 mission.
Shane Sullivan
12/7/2015 03:01:25 pm
Yeah, that was a good one.
DaveR
12/7/2015 03:31:45 pm
In truth, all fringers, or are they fringies?, know the moon landings were a hoax. 11/4/2019 01:33:36 pm
Good article thanks for share.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
September 2024
|