Before we begin today, I thought I’d share this depressing fact: Last night I downloaded the new Pluto TV app, which promises to offer 100 channels of live streaming television. Among those channels is an entire (nonfiction) channel devoted to “Conspiracies and Myths.” At least they had the good sense to put it in the entertainment tier rather than the education tier, but it’s still disturbing that the newest competitor to traditional television is running The Moon Landing Was a Hoax and other paranoid programming on an entire channel devoted to conspiracy theories. Anyway, there isn’t much news in a recent story in the Amador Ledger-Dispatch of Amador County, California about the America Unearthed episode chronicling the discovery of a Mexican spear head in Hawaii and the seizure of said artifact by the National Park Service. However, the article shows that the discoverer of the artifact, Trevor Carter, is still interested in publicizing the show and the surrounding events months after the show aired, and the media seem uninterested in critically evaluating claims for the allegedly “historic” nature of the discovery. The tone was set right from the headline, which describes the obsidian spear point as a “possible historic link between Mayans and Polynesians.” The article goes on to liken Carter to Indiana Jones: “Only a man like Indiana Jones would hike up the side of a volcano, then hike miles deep into its belly, stumble upon precious, ancient treasure and, while trying to return it to its rightful owner, be relentlessly pursued by factions wanting the treasure for their own glory.” Presumably the “factions” are meant to be the National Park Service, but they might better refer to America Unearthed. Carter is living in California now, so the Ledger-Dispatch found it newsworthy to discuss Carter’s discovery of the spear point with his friend Brian Axtell, his contact with Dr. Janet Six, and the bizarre events surrounding the National Park Service’s seizure of the artifact after Carter contacted America Unearthed and the production company began asking questions. At that point the Park Service realized that a national TV show was going to expose the fact that two men had illegally removed a possible archaeological artifact from a national park. While Axtel (sic) met with officials from the Parks Service, a plain-clothes U. S. Forest Service agent flashed an official badge, confiscated the spearhead she had asked to examine, and threatened legal action against Axtel and Carter. The agent also banned the men from Haleakala National Park. Park access and permits were denied to the film crew, causing the program to be filmed on Haleakala Ranch, which is private property. The article uses the passive voice to avoid stating whether the paper tried to contact the Park Service for comment, saying only that “Calls to the National Forest Service and the National Park Service have been non-comital (sic) and dismissive.” What does that mean? And what did the Forest Service have to do with what all involved had previously called a Park Service issue? The article makes one brief mention of the fact that a modern origin for the spear point cannot be ruled out. I take it that the author of the article, Carolyn Schmitz, is making an oblique reference to my critical comments about the spear point when discussing reasons why it may not be evidence of contact between the Mayans and the pre-Contact Hawaiians: …online blogs have speculated about the mystery, suggesting that the item could have been brought to the island by Mayans crossing the sea; or it could be a trinket brought to the island by a harmonic convergence held at the park. There are those who blog about what they know about, using the greenish-gold obsidian spearhead as their springboard. Their topics include Polynesians, volcanos (sic), hippies, Mayans, rocks and minerals, hiking trails and young outdoor enthusiasts. So far as I know, I was the first to research the Harmonic Convergence connection (based on a brief notice in the Maui Times from Dr. Janet Six) and publish discussions of the events and the New Age believers’ use of Mexican obsidian while in Hawaii as a “sacred” substance in connection with Mayan calendar beliefs.
30 Comments
Walt
6/12/2014 08:02:35 am
I hope you'll review Pluto TV someday. I don't keep up with streaming options like I should, so I'd be very interested in hearing your analysis of things.
Reply
666
6/12/2014 08:56:58 am
Indiana Jones was known to have looted an artefact in the very first moments of "Raiders of the Lost Ark" - modelling on Indiana Jones serves no purpose, since every single relic in existence was looted and should return to respective countries of origin without further delay
Reply
Varika
6/12/2014 04:02:24 pm
To be at least vaguely fair, Indiana Jones was supposed to be happening during the 1940s, when, well, "it belongs in a museum" WAS a pretty common archeological cry. Still, the 40s were 70 years ago, so being "like Indiana Jones" ain't exactly staying up with the times. Also I'm pretty sure that the character was modeled after Belzoni, though don't quote me on that.
666
6/12/2014 11:40:46 pm
The mistakes of the past should be corrected.
.
6/15/2014 06:45:51 am
Triple Six, your best quip yet.
666
6/12/2014 08:08:35 am
It's like weeding the garden, engaging in all this debunking of unwanted growth, the iconoclasm of fringe beliefs
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
6/12/2014 08:38:58 am
Insofar as they have two arms, two legs, and heads, I suppose they do resemble Indiana Jones, but at least those movies hinted that offscreen he could be a respectable academic (see the "neolithic" scene in "Raiders"), and Jones was generally not grabbing artifacts for personal aggrandizement (both the Hovidos idol and Coronado's cross were specifically mentioned as museum fodder). Appearing in full-on bro mode on an H2 program to promote an item you looted from a national park does not in fact make you Indiana Jones.
Reply
Only Me
6/12/2014 09:14:47 am
What's troubling is the buy-in the reporter has for the story. A conspiracy because the Park Service reclaimed an artifact that was *illegally* removed, in accordance with federal law? All other alternative explanations for how it came to be in the park dismissively waved away? Good grief.
Reply
666
6/12/2014 09:19:44 am
Even analytical archaeology can be subjective in nature.
Reply
666
6/12/2014 09:24:21 am
Postscript: All those fakes in museums that could have been perpetrated by the likes of Raphael and Michelangelo - the excavations of Vesuvius and Herculaneum would have served as wonderful inspiration That Pluto TV is actually ingenious. All they do is assemble YouTube videos from different categories and embed them in the service, on a schedule, for consumption. They can then insert their own ads in between each "broadcast." All the (immense cost of) bandwidth comes from YouTube servers while they just sit back and reap the rewards. The only real work comes from curating the content and programming the interface.
Reply
BP
6/13/2014 06:38:06 am
I'll agree with the Amador Ledger-Dispatch, that this guy is like Indiana Jones. He thinks he's an archaeologist, but really just loots any old site with the hopes of striking it rich, getting attention, or both.
Reply
Rev. Phil Gotsch
6/13/2014 11:43:33 am
Unlike everybody else commenting on this question, apparently I alone have not personally examined the obsidian point in question, or compared it side-by-side to similar modern productions …
Reply
Mark E.
6/13/2014 03:12:06 pm
"Indiana Jones" removed the artifact and then cleaned it, the contextual evidence is gone that would have helped in determining when the artifact was deposited.
Reply
Only Me
6/13/2014 06:02:03 pm
Ever the spin doctor, I see. No comment in this thread has definitively stated the spear point is an artifact OR a modern replica. That debate occurred nearly four months ago. Do join the rest of us in the here and now.
Reply
Rev. Phil Gotsch
6/14/2014 03:46:39 am
Well, duh …
Reply
Only Me
6/14/2014 09:42:28 am
Actually, I do see your point. You want to leave a sarcastic remark about everyone else, except you, having the opportunity to study the spear point because most are of the opinion it's modern. You disagree, and trot out Dr. Six every time to vainly give your opinion weight.
Reply
Rev. Phil Gotsch
6/14/2014 10:36:13 am
No …
Only Me
6/14/2014 02:25:38 pm
I don't see anyone else having an "obsidian point" problem, either.
.
6/15/2014 06:44:10 am
hippies with harmonicas is a
Rev. Phil Gotsch
6/14/2014 04:33:13 pm
LOL …
Reply
Only Me
6/14/2014 06:02:44 pm
Are you purposefully being a dumbass? No, seriously. I shouldn't have to explain it to you, but I will.
Reply
Rev. Phil Gotsch
6/15/2014 05:53:02 am
LOL …
Reply
.
6/15/2014 06:40:24 am
its yesterdayz newz twice over but worthy of note
Reply
Only Me
6/15/2014 02:45:16 pm
Well, since you're defaulting to repeating yourself ONCE AGAIN, it's obvious you have nothing left to say.
Reply
Rev. Phil Gotsch
6/15/2014 03:37:42 pm
Well, … duh … until and unless a qualified person performs and reports the necessary tests and examinations and studies on the obsidian point, there isn't much more to say about it … for now ...
Only Me
6/15/2014 05:22:12 pm
Duh, LOL, whatever...Duh, LOL, whatever...Duh, LOL, whatever
Rev. Phil Gotsch
6/16/2014 01:06:22 am
Is there any new Information about the "obsidian point" … ??? or not … ???
.
6/15/2014 06:52:11 am
Harrison Ford agreed despite his seventysomething age
Reply
Seeker
6/17/2014 04:46:36 pm
Thanks for tracking this comical news story down, Jason. Seriously, they didn't want to "piss off Pele" so they removed the item from the park and started packing it around? Made a tattoo from it?
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
November 2024
|