Canadian Spanish-Language Publication Attacks Me for Debunking Fake Ancient Astronaut Art
I would be remiss if I didn’t pause for a moment to acknowledge the death this week of special effects master Ray Harryhausen at the age of 92. Harryhausen’s masterpiece was the 1963 Jason and the Argonauts, whose brief scene of skeleton warriors battling the Greek heroes ranks among the most impressive few minutes of special effects I’ve ever seen. Its obvious derivative in Army of Darkness is longer and more sustained, but not as exuberant. I mention all of this because the film left such an impression on my father that I ended up named for the Argonaut.
Moving on to today’s outrage:
Last year I wrote a brief piece for my website about a really fake-looking painting allegedly found in an Uzbekistan cave showing android-looking aliens and a flying saucer. This supposedly ancient painting first appeared in Sputnik magazine, a Soviet propaganda publication, and the author of the Sputnik story later admitted that the image was a fake.
Before this, however, the painting was heavily promoted by Erich von Däniken after it appeared in the German film version of Chariots of the Gods and its American adaptation, In Search of Ancient Astronauts (1973) with Rod Serling. Imagine my surprise to find my article ridiculed this week in a Canadian Spanish-language arts publication called Cañasanta in an article about archaeological artifacts that “defy rational explanation.” I’ve taken the liberty of translating it into English, and I trust you’ll forgive me for cleaning up its sloppy writing a bit:
The cave paintings found in FERGHANA (Uzbekistan):
Well that certainly got my attention! I’m flattered, I guess, to be considered a “renowned international skeptic,” but I’m saddened that they caricatured my work as “ridicule.”
Obviously, I did not use an ad hominem attack to discredit the paintings; ad hominem refers to an attack on the speaker rather than the argument, and if the speaker admits to fabrication, that’s a pretty relevant point. Beyond this, I also discussed the image’s artistic problems (including its anachronistic use of perspective and the existence of an unfinished draft version), its provenance problems (the picture was commissioned for a magazine article), the inclusion of the hoax Dropa stones in the picture, and the confession of Zaisev (also transliterated as Saizev) that it was a fake, drawn by an artist whose name appears on the picture. And it wasn’t even me saying that: Erich von Däniken admitted that Zaisev called it a fake, though he tried to spin it to his advantage through an ad hominem attack on Zaisev’s character: Who can trust Soviets?
I quickly lost confidence in Cañasanta magazine’s reading comprehension skills.
I of course wanted to know what the University of Washington was doing investigating fabricated paintings in Uzbekistan and why they were challenging me. Would you like to know what the “University of Washington” study referenced above really is? Here’s the link Cañasanta provides. Yes, it’s a listing for the school library’s copy of In Search of Ancient Astronauts, the 1973 TV documentary hosted by Rod Serling, based on Erich von Däniken’s Chariots of the Gods. That is the whole of their involvement. This confirmed that Cañasanta can’t read. Obviously, a library’s holdings are not a university’s endorsement of their contents.
What’s wrong with ancient astronaut believers? Do they think that libraries purge their holdings of all disproved or incorrect work whenever a new article is published? How would we be able to review the history of ideas if every idea vanished when another succeeded it?
The Cañasanta story is being picked up on Spanish-language blogs, so I thought I had best say something about it before it gets too far out of hand.
5/10/2013 04:29:21 am
The University of Washington link clearly has the subheading "Classroom Support Services". Using the word "support" obviously implies a blanket endorsement of all content. I'm more intrigued by U of W's placing the film under the Archaeology topic heading.
5/10/2013 04:32:21 am
When I was in college, we used that film in an archaeology class (as a negative example) and in a journalism class (for critical thinking), so there are legitimate reasons to have it in the library and under archaeology.
5/10/2013 07:56:17 am
Being mentioned by pseudo-scientists in this way: Is it a bad feeling, or are you happy that your opinion is mentioned and maybe some followers of the "other side" get a chance to start thinking?
5/10/2013 02:15:26 pm
It's a double-edged sword. At least they linked to me so readers can judge for themselves.
5/17/2013 02:06:51 pm
I'm sure you realize that if the artist who produced the cave painting was in contact with the technologically advanced extraterrestrials, they would have taught him about artistic perspective? So it's only anachronistic based on what we've been taught.
5/23/2013 08:47:53 pm
The Story with the Fergana Astronaut is a little bit trickier. If you can read it in german, here is the solution. The Sputnik Magzin maked a mistake with numbering the Pictures. http://www.palaeoseti.de/doku.php/oasien/fergana
5/23/2013 11:30:03 pm
Thank you very mich for this. I will be updating my online article to reflect this additional information.
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply.
I am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab.
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Terms & Conditions
Please read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.