[Editors's note: The following story was based upon a report from a source running a Facebook page who claimed to be familiar with America Unearthed's production and had been relaying reliable information in the past. I spoke with a History official on 4/17 who confirmed that the source was incorrect and the incident described below never happened. Details are here.] Apparently the H2 network and its parent, History, have decided that America Unearthed is focusing too much on alternative Christianity and Jesus Bloodline conspiracies. According to information provided to me by a source familiar with the production, History had a meeting with show star Scott Wolter on March 28 to discuss his statements about the marriage of Jesus to Mary Magdalene and the alleged Holy Bloodline descendants of Christ’s union with her. Some Christians apparently took offense to the claims about Jesus and expressed their displeasure on Facebook and in other forums. According to the source, Wolter apologized for any offensive statements, and no further action was taken. I tried to contact History to confirm the story, but History directs inquiries to its parent company, A+E Networks. In turn, A+E requires reporters to undergo a registration and approval process that lasts 1-2 weeks before granting a reporter access to contact information for their press department. Well, I tried. They’re welcome to send me a statement if they have something to say, or, you know, make it possible for reporters to talk to them. [Update, 7:07 PM: Now my source claims to be "legally" unable to speak about the event in question, and I have my doubts about what really happened, or if anything actually happened at all. This would be a reason why A+E might want to think about making it easier to get hold of them. Thanks to a helpful reader, I've gotten contact information for the History PR person, and I have an inquiry in to find out their side.] History’s most successful broadcast in years was its telecast of a miniseries based on the Bible, and this has drawn an increased number of Christian viewers to History programming. Additionally, both History and H2 target middle to upper class white male viewers (average household income of $75,000 per year), who tend to be demographically more conservative than the general population, as are those who are interested in history-themed programming.
History’s viewers are overwhelmingly male (64% in 2012), while H2’s are even more so (67%). Viewers of information-themed programming of all kinds, including news and historical programming, are more conservative as a whole than the general population. While men are less likely than women to be religious, those who are older than 50 are more heavily religious than the general population (71% of all nonbelievers are younger than 50, according to Pew Research). History tends to attract an older audience, with an average age of 55, a demographic that is again both more conservative and more religious than the general population. At the time that H2 launched its new slate of original programming, its audience skewed even older than History’s, though this has likely changed as part of their rebranding effort. Therefore, it wouldn’t surprise me at all if History put a bit of pressure on Wolter and Committee Films to soften their claims about non-traditional Christianity, if only for financial reasons. I note that no one held a meeting to discuss how offensive the show is to logic and reason. Perhaps this is one reason that the scattered bits of information available about season two indicate that the show will be exploring a more diverse range of diffusionist topics, including Native American mysteries and “lost” civilizations. On the one hand, this at least means more variety, but on the other hand, it also means a lot more work to learn about a wide range of topics to debunk the show’s slipshod findings, rather than focusing just on Henry Sinclair and the Jesus Bloodline. While we’re on the topic of corporate intrigue, I’ll also pass along this little tidbit sent to me by a concerned reader. As you know, production company Committee Films received a large cash award of more than $100,000 for America Unearthed from Minnesota Film and Television’s Snowbate program, which distributes tax dollars to media productions. The chair of the Snowbate Committee, which decides how funds are disbursed, is Heidi Schuster, who works as director of operations for a company called Splice. This company, in turn, is the postproduction partner for Committee Films, providing “design, 3D graphics, online edit, color, sound design and audio mix” for program. Splice has worked with Committee Films since 2009’s Holy Grail in America, another Scott Wolter Jesus-Bloodline conspiracy documentary. According to production documents Committee Films filed with Minnesota Film and Television, America Unearthed paid Splice nearly $10,000 for sound work alone on just the show’s pilot episode. Postproduction work in other categories totaled more than $86,000, though I do not know how much went to Splice. Presumably Splice continues to be paid for its work on the series. I’m not privy to the internal workings of Minnesota Film and Television, and for all I know Schuster could have recused herself from involvement in the decision. But what a small world it is that public tax money goes straight into productions that directly benefit the companies whose representatives distribute the money—and has consistently done so since 2009!
16 Comments
Matt Mc
4/12/2013 08:28:28 am
So, just so I get it right. Wolter gets upset that main stream Scientists do take his theories seriously and claims that they go to great lengths to suppress the truth about the true history of America but it is perfectly acceptable for those who give him money to suppress his theories?
Reply
Jim
4/12/2013 08:38:03 am
Money talks, bullshit walks.
Reply
Gunn
4/12/2013 08:36:30 am
Good analysis, Jason. I think too many people came to learn late that the bloodline nonsense had a wretchedly fictional basis to it...Dan Brown and before.
Reply
Gunn
4/12/2013 01:45:07 pm
I wanted to be certain about the Hooked X information, so I went back to look at the website: www.richardnielsen.org which contains almost unending information about the X and Hooked X symbols/runes, from a Scandinavian perspective.
Reply
CFC
4/12/2013 01:51:23 pm
I recall reading that paper as well but forgot about it until you referred to it. Thanks Gunn!
Christopher Randolph
4/14/2013 03:51:06 pm
"many Americans, Christians, don't like the idea of substituting a bloodline for a faith..."
Reply
Gunn
4/15/2013 03:01:11 am
Did you mean to say "I think you mean to and are you?
Cathleen Anderson
4/12/2013 08:49:08 am
So, was that a waste of taxpayer funds? I don't know.
Reply
Cathleen Anderson
4/14/2013 04:02:59 am
I doubt that anyone will care too much about the fact that Committee Films received the cash. I suspect that the Legislative Auditor's office will want to take a look at that conflict of interest report though.
Reply
Thane
4/13/2013 01:55:19 am
Ut-Oh
Reply
Charlie Primero
4/13/2013 07:44:09 am
Good conspiracy theory. Thanks man.
Reply
Will Ritson
5/4/2013 06:48:59 pm
"But what a small world it is that public tax money goes straight into productions that directly benefit the companies whose representatives distribute the money"
Reply
Will Ritson
5/4/2013 06:51:00 pm
P.S. Might want to hold off on posting more "source" material. You don't want to end up looking like Susan Rice.
Reply
terry the censor
5/23/2013 09:46:53 pm
Jason, I'm way behind on your posts and I just learned you retracted this one. I would like to comment on that.
Reply
5/23/2013 11:32:43 pm
Except that Scott Wolter went on the radio last week and described this very incident, though in self-aggrandizing terms. He claimed to have met with the network executives, discussed the religious content of his show, told them he did not intend to offend anyone, and then got their agreement to go forward with "hitting them hard" (the maintstream) with the truth about Jesus. So, in short, History lied to my face. See my blog post for 5/22.
Reply
terry the censor
5/24/2013 07:05:42 am
Yes, but my point was about integrity. When you thought you were wrong, you acted to correct the record in a transparent manner. Fringers don't do that, they double-down, for fear of giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
October 2024
|