Yesterday I received an interesting letter from a professor in Croatia who wanted me to hear about his pet theory that Homer’s Troy is actually located in Croatia. Vedran Sinožić is a professor specializing in Istrian history, and wouldn’t you know that he determined that the Trojan War took place in Istria. According to the description of the expanded second edition of his book Our Troy, “Istrian historian Vedran Sinožić presents his knowledge of the true location of ancient Troy. After many years of research and exhaustive work on collecting all available information and knowledge, Sinožić provides numerous arguments that prove that the legendary Homeric Troy is not located in Hisarlik in Turkey, but is located in the Republic of Croatia—in today’s town of Motovun in Istria.” The second edition of his book appeared last year, and Sinožić spent much of this year promoting the book at international book fairs and in Eastern European media. Sinožić says that he is in the process of producing a sequel to the book as part of a planned three-volume series. He told me that he contacted me because he hoped to share his ideas with the American people.
Sinožić says that his hypothesis is based on the notion that the center of the Greek world was not the Aegean Sea but the Adriatic, and therefore the events recorded in Greek mythology actually occurred in the area between Dalmatia and Italy rather than between Greece and Asia Minor. The argument revolves around what he sees as a series of geographic and linguistic correspondences between Homeric accounts and the geography and language of Istria at the head of the Adriatic, as well as the fact the Odysseus’ Ithaca has always been connected to the western side of Greece and the Adriatic rather than the east and the Aegean. Since I do not speak Croatian, I have not read the book but only brief accounts available online and through what Sinožić told me. While there is a superficial logic to this general idea, there is the bigger problem that accepting it would require a wholesale revision of our entire understanding of Mycenaean and Greek history, a rejection of the established connections between the Mycenaean world of Greece and the Hittite world of Anatolia, and a rejection of the linguistic and archaeological evidence that the myth of the Trojan War derived from late Mycenaean or sub-Mycenaean wars with the city-states of what is now Turkey. The correspondence, for example, between Hittite references to place names like Wilusa and people like Alexander, and their Homeric counterparts is increasingly difficult to dismiss, especially to replace it with less directly related linguistic elements from Slavic languages. But at heart, the argument is an emotional one rather than a logical one, something that the author admits in describing his book for a Croatian publication: “I was led by some feeling or instinct to find Troy in Istria. With frequent visits to the towns and villages of Istria, filled with a feeling of love, I came to Motovun. After just one day reading Truhel, I realized that Motovun must be Troy, and that Ithaca must be the island of Unije, because it must be near to Troy.” Unije was known to the Romans as Nis, from which the modern name derives, but to my knowledge there is no evidence of a Greek presence in the Bronze Age. Similarly, for the Trojan War to have taken place in Istria would require so much more infrastructure and so many more archaeological remains that currently exist. This seems to be another case of the curious law that those who go looking for famous people and events in unusual places often find them close to their homes.
29 Comments
Mandalore
12/28/2017 10:24:11 am
There is archaeological evidence of Mycenaeans and Minoans in Italy during the Bronze Age. Also, it is worth noting that one of the two legendary Trojan survivors, Antenor, was said to have traveled to the northern Adriatic and founded Patavium (modem Padua). Legends also say he traveled else.
Reply
12/28/2017 10:51:51 am
If I recall, the Mycenaean presence in Italy was mostly on the western side, in the Bay of Naples and Sardinia. I'm not sure about the northern Adriatic.
Reply
Mandalore
12/29/2017 08:52:12 am
I agree about legends being unhelpful. Most of the foundation return or travel stories after the Trojan War are just silly. But fun to read.
B. DULE
12/29/2017 03:20:39 pm
Well, first of all, I'm sure that prof. Sinožić spent a lot of his time and energy for his research about Troja.I found the expression " cherrypicking" really inappropriate for a hard work.He wasn't doing all that from behind the desk at home, but he actually visits all those places, talking with people etc.
Reply
Mandalore
12/29/2017 06:23:53 pm
If he is so hard working and dedicated, why does he ignore so much evidence that contradicts his pet theory?
CAPITANO
1/17/2018 01:45:08 pm
Sinozic found a really Homerie Troy with a detective method and there are not errors. For me his best thing is a comparison with a medieval Venicewhich takes a power in the big part of the east side of Mediterranean sea. Anyway, he has many arguments and he has not competitors. His Troy is acropolis city,like Homer say and in Turkey there's not city on the hill,which is only a "tell". I am historian too and I could his location is now the best in the world. You could just watching the video of Motovun city, especially the spectacle with a fog
Reply
Kenneth Pizzi
11/29/2018 07:16:36 pm
This theory was first brought to light by amateur and non-academically affiliated historian, Robert Salinas Price, in his 1984 published book, Homer’s Blind Audience. Based on 20 years of independent research, Salinas-Price, who was initially from Mexico, but resided in San Antonio, TX, contends that ancient Troy was not located in the northwest corner of modern day Turkey, but off the coast of modern Croatia.
Reply
Robi
1/18/2019 06:53:44 pm
There are numerous (large hills) funerary mounds throughout Istria where the remains of the local were entombed. The remains which were all cremated and placed in distinct urns were of an Etruscan style (possible Histri tribes) that predated the Romans by a fair bit of time.
Reply
Even the superficial logic is not convincing: Because Homer in his Odyssee talked about foreign countries, far far away from the Aegaean Sea and Troy. Thus, if the professor identifies Croatia with some places in Homer (what could be true, why not), then this is clearly an argument against (!) locating Troy there.
Reply
E.P. Grondine
12/28/2017 11:33:43 am
Hi Jason -
Reply
Bob Jase
12/28/2017 02:12:15 pm
Years ago I accidentally discovered Atlantis in Plainville, CT. Except for location, size, configuration of buildings and possibly two millenia of time its exactly as Plato described it.
Reply
nomuse
1/8/2018 07:53:21 pm
I keep forgetting who said it, but the quote I'm reminded of is if you just change the gender, location, moral character and date then King Arthur was obviously Cleopatra.
Reply
A C
12/28/2017 02:34:00 pm
But Iman Wilkens already proved that the real Troy was in Cambridgeshire.
Reply
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
12/28/2017 09:45:36 pm
Eco's joke is one of my favorite jokes ever. If you're going to steal ideas, you might as well steal the best ideas out there.
Reply
Matija
12/28/2017 03:28:54 pm
This is not the first time Troy has been "found" on the Adriatic coast. There was Roberto Salinas Price who promoted his view that Troy was in Gabela in Bosnia in the 1980s, and was a minor celebrity in former Yugoslavia:
Reply
Jonathan Feinstein
1/1/2018 03:57:20 pm
I actually have a copy of one of his books, 'Homer's Blind Audience." He was handing out free vanity-press copies at an AIA convention in New Orleans around 1980 (I think, it might have been a year or to later). The copies were bound in blank card stock with a self-adhesive label printed with the title on it. Colleagues warned me not to take it too seriously, but that it was not the worst argument for Troy in Dalmatia. I did read through it and will give him credit for mentioning other proposed sites for Troy (including Schlieman's). While Mycenaean archaeology was not my strong point, he was correct that none of the sites exactly match the descriptions, but then neither did his.
Reply
Brian
12/28/2017 09:20:01 pm
Reminds me of a book I sort of read a while back that argued that the whole of Homer's tales took place in England. Because the author was British.
Reply
Clete
12/29/2017 12:17:21 am
Years ago, I remember reading a Clive Cussler Novel which advanced the theory as a plot devise that the Trojan war was actually fought in England over Tin mines. I forget what the name of the novel was, but it was an interesting story.
Reply
Riley V
12/28/2017 11:10:13 pm
Jason,
Reply
Edo Benko
12/29/2017 10:32:08 am
To be able to discuss the position of Troy, at first, it is necessary to believe in Homer when he has given detailed geographic descriptions of the area of events and accurately lists the names of toponyms in the field and the names of the subjects of the event and, secondly, the war did not lead for beautiful Helena (it's just a justification) but because of material motivations and benefits.
Reply
Right in the first line of your text appears the statement, "you have to believe in Homer". Well. That is the problem. To "believe" is the wrong category. Totally wrong.
Reply
Edo Benko
12/29/2017 01:28:17 pm
I agree with you that, for an understanding of what is happening and how it is happening, Homer should be placed in the context of the times when the events are occurring and this is necessary for an understanding of religious, strategic, military, economic, ethnic and other circumstances.
@Edo Benko:
John
12/29/2017 02:31:32 pm
I doubt that any Slavic language was spoken in the Balkans before the 5th century A.D.
Reply
Benko
12/29/2017 03:37:55 pm
We do not know it today, but we might be surprised. Migration of peoples and ethnic groups should not be followed by language. Many different circumstances have influenced individual ethnic groups to adopt and use the language belonging to the other ethnic group.
Reply
Maja
12/29/2017 03:07:26 pm
Everyone can belive or not to believe in what is offered to us in books (about Troy, Homer ...), but from these same books it is nice to read and find the exact places are in and around Motovun, and to see the details described are just now in Western Istria (Motovun - Troy) , Everyone has the right to believe or to doubt,
Reply
Đino
12/31/2017 09:42:33 am
In this big story that is in the very foundation of European civilization, there is still a whole series of open puzzles. Thus from classical era until today, there is no absolute consensus on the content of Iliad, who was Homer, whether the Trojan War took place and where was Troy located, regardless of official and academic worldwide ambitions for the final confirmation of Schliemann’s Troy at Hissarlik. Speaking of Hissarlik, today, nearly a century and a half after the beginning of research in Asia Minor, it can be said objectively that the archaeological findings do not confirm, nor deny Schelimann's theory.
Reply
Đino
12/31/2017 09:44:36 am
Long story short, Istria is a unique peninsula which hides numerous secrets in plain sight, and Troy could be just one of them, why not? Professor Sinožić’s research is work in progress and he is daily finding new evidences which will be published in his next book, among which is the “smoking gun” evidence of the overall mission to find Troy in the world, the unsolvable problem everyone in this field has met so far, the warm spring. But, there will be much more talk about this in the near future.
Reply
Marisa
6/4/2018 11:42:06 am
Đino, as usual with Croatian pseudohistorians this professor's entire argument rests upon grasping at straws by using Slavic toponyms that couldn't have been invented before the 9th century AD, when Slavs are first mentioned in Istria. In fact the first mention of Slavs in the Istrian peninsula is in a complaint by the cities and towns of Istria addressed to the Holy Roman Emperor complaining about the Slavs he'd allowed to settle in their lands raiding villages, stealing crops and allowing their animals to graze far and wide. Constantine agreed to make them move someplace else. The supposed Istrian Troy was actually called Montona until 1947.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
December 2024
|