Ancient Aliens returned from a one-week hiatus on Friday only to see ratings remain firmly lodged at 1.06 million viewers, hovering around its weekly average. Its lead-out, the debut episode of William Shatner’s new In Search Of knock off The UnXplained, handily outdrew the finale of the show it replaced, Unidentified, and also Ancient Aliens itself with 1.11 million viewers. The oddly consistent ratings for almost literally anything that airs after Ancient Aliens suggests that there is ceiling on the audience for this type of program, and it hovers around 1.2 million people. Over at Graham Hancock’s website, Dave Truman of the Lost Science of the Andes website offers a revisionist history of Teotihuacan that attempts to link it to a (fictitious) global system of megalithic measurements and astronomical precision. Here’s a taste of some of his data about the standard units of measurement believed to have been used at Teotihuacan: Just like [engineer Hugh] Harleson [Jr.]’s unit of 41.711 inches, the 32.68 inch unit is very close to other ancient linear units, including the Spanish vara, the Japanese shaku and the Harappan gaz. Perhaps most tellingly of all, it is virtually identical to the megalithic yard, which is thought to have been ‘derived directly from the polar circumference of the Earth using a system of geometry that was based on the number of revolutions of the planet in a year.’ Beats me what that is supposed to mean. When we are talking about numbers as large as the Earth’s polar radius, the math becomes absurd. The polar radius is 3,950 miles, which translates to 250,272,000 inches. If we divide this by 41.711 inches, we get the rather pointless 6,000,143.85. If we tried to divide the polar radius by six million, we should end up with 41.712 rather than 41.711. The other number doesn’t seem to go into the polar circumference close to evenly. I come out with a long train of digits close to 48.2 million. If we try to assume a round figure of 48 million as the ratio, the “correct” unit should be 32.82 inches. But since ratios of these units are arbitrary—there is no significance I can see to either six million of 48 million—this looks a lot like a coincidence. At a certain point, the small scale of any unit that roughly approximates 3 or 4 human feet will allow it to divide evenly into basically any number millions of times larger. But it gets worse. Truman believes that Teotihuacan was situated not to take advantage of a central location in the Valley of Mexico but rather to serve as a portal to another dimension, one activated by 19.4° north latitude, where Teotihuacan is located, because it is close to 19.47°, the position on a sphere where the vertices of an upside-down tetrahedron would touch if the apex were positioned at the south pole. He believes that the nearby volcanoes around 19° are symptomatic of an interdimensional energy rift: Clearly, although it manifests in our physical three-dimensional reality primarily as volcanic heat, this cannot explain why Teotihuacán was constructed as a centre where shamans, priests and others came to perform their ceremonies. Such rituals aimed to establish contact with, knowledge of, or even immersion in, a realm beyond that of humans’ usual three-dimensional perceptions. But rest assured that Truman knows how crazy this sounds: If we follow this line of thinking, then perhaps Teotihuacán’s 19.4° latitude was a location that facilitated contact with such a realm. This may not be as ridiculous as it first seems, if we consider consciousness to be at least as real as the material world that dances before our senses every moment of our lives. Some schools of physics, nowadays largely ignored by the scientific establishment in the West, attest that there are higher spatial dimensions beyond the three that we are normally accustomed to perceiving. Might these hyper-dimensions also have been the spirit realm of Teotihuacán’s shamans? It’s hard, really, even to comment on this gobbledygook since it conflates so many different ideas. But basically this seems to be a reflection of modern “sacred geometry” ideas about the star tetrahedron (two tetrahedrons superimposed in opposite directions) being the “Merkabah,” the Chariot of God from Ezekiel, a merging of New Age geometry and Jewish mysticism. In early days, a strain of mystical thought was known as the Maseh Merkabah, and it is mentioned in the Talmud. As best I understand it, in Kabbalah the Merkabah could manifest in a human as the voice of one of the Sefira, or emanations that create the physical realm from the spiritual. New Agers apparently apply this to the entire planet.
The short form is that Truman’s sacred geometry holds water only if we identify the star tetrahedron as the Merkabah, and as best I can tell, that’s a New Age idea associated with “energy” magic. I haven’t been able to find reference to the Merkabah as tetrahedrons before the mid-1990s, but a lot of New Age material from before then isn’t online. Since material about the Merkabah as tetrahedrons refers to “ascended masters,” I’d guess there is a theosophy influence, too. The specific issue of tetrahedrons being related to “energy” vortexes at 19.47° (or 19.5°) seems to have been popularized in the early 1990s by Richard Hoagland, who claimed that many heavenly bodies had energy vortexes at that point, such as Jupiter’s Great Red Spot and Mars’s Olympus Mons. From there, New Age writers like Richard Dannelley related it to Kabbalistic material about the Merkabah in the Keys of Enoch, a 1977 book by James J. Hurtak claiming to explain how God manifests in the material plain through thought-forms. Sound familiar? That’s exactly what Truman claims Teotihuacan was supposed to be. Underneath his silly math, numerology, and fringe history, he’s just imagining new ways to apply the Keys of Enoch, whose ancient wisdom dates to 1977 and is a bunch of New Age mysticism married to the Watchers from the Book of Enoch.
23 Comments
Dick dingleberry
7/23/2019 08:55:40 am
Of course the ratio of the circumference of the earth to its diameter (twice the radius) would equal pi which itself has a value which cannot be determined with concrete certainty (super computers can find no pattern to it) — so a measurement derived from that constant would itself be a non-integer which might appear to be a random number, wouldn’t it?
Reply
Tudlaw
7/23/2019 05:56:31 pm
Pi can be and has been shown to be transcendental with pencil and paper. No need to bring supercomputers into the equation.
Reply
Brian
7/23/2019 09:14:10 am
By my calculations, based on the number of verses in Chapter 6 of the Gospel According to Luke divided by the number of books of the Bible of the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church multiplied by the age of the Earth as calculated by Ussher, the number of angels that can dance on the head of a (standard Walmart-purchased sewing) pin is 3643.543209877. Which proves conclusively that angels are able to disjunct themselves into decimally determined pieces, as is confirmed by the esoteric truth hidden in J.M. Barrie's fable of the GENESIS of fairies from the fracturing of the first laugh of the first baby.
Reply
Machala
7/23/2019 11:34:12 am
Brian, don't give up your day job!
Reply
Jim Davis
7/23/2019 09:14:23 am
Curiously, the SI unit of length, the meter, was defined as one ten-millionth of the length of an arc between the north pole and the equator that passes through Paris. This makes the circumference of the earth an even 40,000 km.
Reply
BigFred
7/23/2019 12:48:53 pm
Did not know that Sports Illustrated had it's own unit of measurement. Learned something new today. Cool.
Reply
Joe Scales
7/23/2019 10:17:36 am
"The oddly consistent ratings for almost literally anything that airs after Ancient Aliens suggests that there is ceiling on the audience for this type of program, and it hovers around 1.2 million people."
Reply
Accumulated wisdom
7/23/2019 11:00:19 am
That’s not unlike what happens when people are forced to read your insipid comments.
Reply
Joe Scales
7/23/2019 02:32:21 pm
Unfortunately imbeciles such as yourself Anthony will never comprehend the difference between those laughing with you and those laughing at you.
Accumulated wisdom
7/23/2019 06:05:47 pm
You’ve gone to the insane level of finding out my real name and you’re actually calling me a cyber stalker? Just how delusional are you?
Joe Scales
7/23/2019 08:30:28 pm
Can't take credit for that.
Accumulated Wisdom
7/23/2019 06:51:03 pm
joe,
Reply
File Under S
7/23/2019 06:58:01 pm
That's a sniveling little bitch comment.
Accumulated wisdom
7/23/2019 08:09:46 pm
Well I’m sorry that you’re married to the “bearded lady,” but there isn’t much I can do to help you out with that pal!
E.P. Grondine
7/23/2019 11:22:26 am
"Since material about the Merkabah as tetrahedrons refers to “ascended masters,” I’d guess there is a theosophy influence, too."
Reply
Stumbled on this site
7/23/2019 06:25:23 pm
Snippy bitchington.
Reply
As recently as this year, Mike Bara has written "Neptune's Great Dark Spot, The Great Red Spot of Jupiter, the erupting volcanoes of Jupiter's moon Io, Olympus Mons on Mars ... and Earth's own Maunakea volcano ... all [are] at, or very near, the 19.5° latitude."
Reply
David Evans
7/23/2019 05:27:06 pm
As far as I can see the erupting volcanoes on Io cover a wide spread of latitudes with no obvious preference for 19.5 degrees.
Reply
Indeed, there are some 400 known volcanoes. The largest of them, Pillan Patera, is at 12° 25' S.
TONY S.
7/23/2019 05:33:43 pm
So I guess Truman disagrees with his fellow fringe wingnut Graham Hancock, who stated in FINGERPRINTS that Teotihuacan was built as a map of the solar system, and that the streets were actually filled with water to measure earthquakes through the principle of resonant vibration.
Reply
Crash55
7/23/2019 06:59:59 pm
The Earth isn’t a sphere but rather an oblate spheroid so is 19.4 actually the correct location?
Reply
David Evans
7/25/2019 01:58:37 pm
The oblateness question is a good one to which I don't know the answer. It would apply to Jupiter (another of his examples) as well.
Reply
Accumulated Wisdom
7/26/2019 08:16:21 pm
I crunched the numbers and the relative location of 19.4 degrees latitude on a perfect sphere compared to that location on a solid with 0.335% oblateness would be different by about the equivalent of three inches in everyday terms.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
March 2025
|