Filmmaker: Give Me $20,000 So David Childress Can Tell You Why the Olmec Were Actually African10/3/2014 Afrocentrism doesn’t sell as well as Eurocentrism to judge from the miserable performance of a diffusionist Kickstarter campaign promising new claims from a familiar face. A production starring ancient astronaut theorist David Childress is seeking $20,000 in donations to fund an Afrocentric documentary on the Olmec. In a poorly written press release distributed online yesterday, producer Lee Sullivan announced his and David Childress’s belief that the Olmec became the guardians of the Ark of the Covenant in 600 BCE and directed interested fans to his website, whose URL misspells the name of the Olmec, testifying to the care with which he is approaching this bizarre hypothesis. As of this writing, $325 has been pledged to the campaign since it launched on September 17. On Ancient Aliens David Childress previously speculated about the Ark of the Covenant being hidden in the United States or Canada, and in his 1980s books he speculated about a Near East location. In his 1989 book Lost Cities & Ancient Mysteries of Africa and Arabia, Childress asserted that Jewish bankers, particularly the Rothschilds (the “Jewish banking family that has controlled Europe’s monetary wealth for hundreds of years”), were conspiring with the Illuminati to hide the Ark as part of a plot to control the world’s economy and bring about the Apocalypse of Revelation. As with so many of Childress’s early claims, that one, too, is no longer operative since joining Ancient Aliens full time and embracing the ancient astronaut theory he for so long claimed to find illogical. In a YouTube video Sullivan, who is black, discusses the “distinctly African characteristics” he sees in Olmec and Central American sculptures, a claim that originated in the nineteenth century and has been repeatedly debunked for more than 120 years. Olmec sculptures bear their closest physiological resemblance to the indigenous people of the Olmec heartland in the Mexican state of Oaxaca, and other Native art from Mesoamerica similarly reflects the traits of the people who lived in and around where it was created. Sullivan states that the Ark of the Covenant passed through Barilles, Panama and was stored in the volcano of Chiriqui. He attributes the claim to “some researchers.” One of them is Edna Houx, a UFO witness who lives near Barilles and claims that a heavily stylized statue found there depicts a Chinese man riding on the shoulders of an African man. According Houx, the Ark was found in Barilles (and apparently covered up somehow), though she did not tell travel writer Jim O’Donnell who did the discovering. Houx, who owns and operates the Barilles archaeological site according to her beliefs, claims that Chinese and African colonists founded Barilles around 1000 BCE to take advantage of its “healing stones.” Archaeologists, however, believe the site was at its height around 650 CE, a number Sullivan transforms to 650 BCE to better align with Biblical chronology, which has the Ark disappear sometime around 587 BCE. Radiocarbon dates suggest that the site was founded around 300 CE and was occupied until around 900 CE. Although there were likely people living in the region in 650 BCE, there is no archaeological evidence for a major settlement or monumental architecture at that time.
Sullivan takes Houx at her word and believes that Panama was colonized by Chinese and African explorers who bequeathed their superior culture to the barbarous natives while leaving behind no Old World artifacts, objects, or plants. Sullivan describes his first meeting with David Childress, which he said occurred when Childress barged into a classroom where Sullivan was contemplating Panamanian prehistory, looking for directions. “I realized that was the person who might have the answers to this question” of the Chinese-African origin of New World civilization. He tried to chase down Childress, who had already sped away, prompting Sullivan to show up at a Childress book signing in Arizona. Childress, according to Sullivan, agreed to participate in Sullivan’s documentary if Sullivan would buy two of Childress’s books. The two subsequently went on a world tour of ancient sites, though at whose expense Sullivan does not say. Sullivan asserts that the New York Times calls David Childress “the Indiana Jones of our times.” A ProQuest database search of the New York Times from 1851 to today failed to turn up any results for this alleged quotation, or anything similar. The phrase “real-life Indiana Jones” was part of Childress’s self-written promotional materials during his “maverick archaeologist” phase in the 1990s, before being called out for calling himself an archaeologist without possessing a degree in the subject or working professionally in the field. That claim, too, became inoperative after he joined Ancient Aliens.
59 Comments
Matt Mc
10/3/2014 02:02:00 am
I find it really hard to fault any filmmaker when they go to places like Kickstarter (although there are better places to go with less fees) to fund a Documentary or Movie.
Reply
10/3/2014 03:00:10 am
You've made a good point, Matt, and I really am not half as interested in the fact that Sullivan is trying to fund his film as I am in the fact that he seems not to understand the subject matter and wants donors to pay him to make a film based on false premises and wrong information. I've amended the sentence to remove the remark about profit.
Reply
666
10/3/2014 03:35:39 am
>>no archaeological evidence for a major settlement or monumental architecture at that time.
Reply
666
10/3/2014 03:38:37 am
>>> Ark of the Covenant being hidden in the United States or Canada
Reply
EP
10/3/2014 05:24:00 am
Clearly, Jason's Black IQ (Intelligence Quotion) isn't very high:
Reply
EP
10/3/2014 05:27:33 am
David Childress: "Afrocentrism makes me look slim!"
Reply
Shane Sullivan
10/3/2014 05:44:20 am
No need to be insulting, EP. Childress actually looks quite good considering that, two decades ago, he was eaten by a dinosaur on an island off Costa Rica.
Reply
EP
10/3/2014 06:07:34 am
"he was eaten by a dinosaur on an island off Costa Rica"
EP
10/3/2014 06:42:58 am
Afrocentrism is the new black! :D
Reply
Shane Sullivan
10/3/2014 05:37:02 am
"... producer Lee Sullivan ..."
Reply
EP
10/3/2014 05:39:44 am
There is only one scientific way to check.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
10/3/2014 06:41:56 am
I got 42 out of 60. I was torn between choosing the answer that was actually correct, and choosing the answer they were clearly looking for... plus, for about two-thirds of the test I was listening to Tower of Power, and for the remaining third I was listening to Danzig. That probably threw my score.
EP
10/3/2014 06:43:50 am
"I got 42 out of 60"
Matt Mc
10/3/2014 07:04:46 am
Wow, if we call others out for promoting racism suggesting or promoting a Black IQ test deserves the same.
EP
10/3/2014 07:13:56 am
You realize it's not a parody, right? It's what someone with this worldview thought is a good idea.
Matt Mc
10/3/2014 07:22:42 am
I know its not a parody and it was made by a black man.
EP
10/3/2014 07:28:11 am
We joke about the Neo-Nazis all the time. How is this different?
Matt Mc
10/3/2014 07:40:20 am
Its there, I just thought this warranted being addressed. It reminds me of jokes that racists make and then use the fact it was a joke as a way to dismiss the very real racial commentary behind it.
EP
10/3/2014 07:44:41 am
So... I don't get it... Are you saying that people who do not share your sense of humor are racists? Or are you saying that jokes that are explicitly and clearly directed at racists are themselves contributing to racism? (Wait, you *are* saying the latter...)
Uncle Ron
10/3/2014 07:45:37 am
@ Matt Mc
Matt Mc
10/3/2014 07:51:11 am
You really just like to argue don't you?
666
10/3/2014 07:53:01 am
>>>A lot of black comedians would disagree. It's called "satire".
Matt Mc
10/3/2014 07:54:11 am
anyone can disagree with me Ron,
EP
10/3/2014 07:55:08 am
"You really just like to argue don't you?"
666
10/3/2014 07:56:10 am
>>>And know I do not think you are racist but jokes like that help promote racism even if it is unintended.
EP
10/3/2014 08:12:04 am
In summary:
Matt Mc
10/3/2014 08:33:26 am
In Summary EP just like to argue and to think he knows everything.
Matt Mc
10/3/2014 08:43:28 am
I am sorry I made a mistake I thought the test was just made when I worked on the Tavis Smiley show but in fact in was made in 1972 it was just one of the things that was addressed on the show,
EP
10/3/2014 08:45:01 am
Fair enough, I was mostly joking around there... Hope *that's* not racist... :)
EP
10/3/2014 08:48:47 am
Oh, and the test you're talking about is not the same test as the one I'm talking about. Mine was "composed and produced by Booty Adams in 1999". Perhaps you should have looked into it better before getting outraged.
Matt Mc
10/3/2014 09:03:47 am
I look at it this way, we are so ingrained in racist beliefs as a whole that even or jokes or mockery of it helps re-enforce and root racist thoughts. I think that is as simple as I can put it, perhaps to simple.
EP
10/3/2014 09:10:50 am
Look at you not being belligerent all of the sudden... Maybe if you'd done what I suggested at the very beginning and actually looked at what I'd linked instead of jumping to conclusions we'd not have the irony of you talking about what I am and am not familiar with... :)
Matt Mc
10/3/2014 09:31:30 am
Like I said I dont mind being wrong and I still think the joke was in poor taste. I also know there are a good deal of people who agree with how I feel that the only way to fight racism is not to empower it whether it is positive or negative empowerment.
EP
10/3/2014 09:37:07 am
As long as you're aware that lots and lots of people (of all races) agree that satire is a great tool for combating racism (and other forms of bigortry and ignorance), there is no reason not to agree to disagree...
Shane Sullivan
10/3/2014 11:16:02 am
Oh, it looks like the arguing petered out while I was away. Cool.
titus pullo
10/3/2014 06:25:26 am
I can't knock the idea to raise money for a documentary or film using kickstart/crowd sourcing-from what little I know (thanks to my son who is hoping to be a director someday) trying to get traditional funding is very difficult. That said $20K would probably cover the costs of some wacky documentary they then could sell on line. I'm sure they have already done the cash flows, the question is what do they want for the 20K? 10% of Gross Revenue?
Reply
10/3/2014 06:29:08 am
A chance meeting, dramatic pursuit, gift of information and advice, then ebullient praise. This scenario sounds about as believable as the Afrocentric premise does. Isn't it more likely these guys got together over coffee or a phone call and roughed the whole thing out, including the fable that starts it off?
Reply
EP
10/3/2014 12:01:14 pm
Just to be clear, when we're talking about "Afrocentrism" and "Black Consciousness" we aren't talking about anything remotely like the ideas of, say, either W. E. B. Du Bois or Martin Luther King. We are talking about people like this:
Reply
Pacal
10/3/2014 12:54:03 pm
The idea that the Olmec's were African, or at least their elite was of African origin is one of the most annoying yet pervasive archeological myths out there. The fact that there is zero evidence for it doesn't seem to phase the true believers at all. From the late Ivan Sertima to Graham Hancock to the myriad of diffusionistic theorists we get this bilge. All of it based on the idea that Olmec sculpture "looks like" sub-Saharan Africans. Of course the simple fact that the sculptures look like natives who live in the area today is ignored. Also ignored is the fact that many of the statues are depictions of shamanistic transformation. In this case transformation into a Jaguar! So many of the features are in fact "were-Jaguar" features.
Reply
EP
10/3/2014 12:59:35 pm
Not to mention that they could have worn makeup and false beards. Like Egyptian pharaohs did :)
Reply
Pacal
10/3/2014 02:19:28 pm
Actually one of the more authentic Indian legends concerning the God Quetzalcoatl records that has he was leaving Tollan (Tula) he put on a beard composed of feathers. Of course Diffusionists who talk about Quetzalcoatl being a "White God" invariably forget or just plain don't know that the God is almost always colored pitch black in Mexican codices. In Pre-Columbian society Priests were often called Quetzalcoatl and panted themselves black. This goes back to a myth that in order to get the sun to move Quetzalcoatl sacrificed some of his fellow gods and fed their blood and hearts to nourish the Sun and get it moving.
Shane Sullivan
10/3/2014 03:23:46 pm
Not to mention the fact that parallel to Quetzalcoatl's association with the color white are Huitzilopochtli's ties to the color blue--yet, curiously, nobody ever claims that the Aztecs were visited by Smurfs.
EP
10/3/2014 03:30:04 pm
Y'all need to watch this:
Dave Lewis
10/3/2014 02:01:41 pm
"Houx" is the past tense of "hoax"
Reply
Not Scot Wolter
10/3/2014 02:09:33 pm
"Sullivan asserts that the New York Times calls David Childress “the Indiana Jones of our times.” "
Reply
EP
10/3/2014 02:12:54 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sp3dIyNA2A
Reply
Not Steve St Clair
10/3/2014 02:13:38 pm
Broski, you are way more butch than David Hatcher Childress!
Reply
Not Rev Phil Gotsch
10/3/2014 02:16:35 pm
I have known Scott Wolter for 25+ years as both a personal friend and a professional colleague …
Reply
EP
10/3/2014 02:21:25 pm
What an odd gimmick... I wonder who's behind it... :)
Reply
..
10/3/2014 02:16:58 pm
You are all racist elitists and this article is racist. Well be sure to get it around
Reply
EP
10/3/2014 02:20:06 pm
Before you leave, what's *your* Black IQ (Intellect Quotion)? :)
Reply
Only Me
10/3/2014 04:58:21 pm
.., perhaps you'd like to explain what is NOT intrinsically racist about Afrocentrists trying to appropriate cultural artifacts from a Mesoamerican society whose descendants are still living where their ancestors thrived...in service of their own racial identity.
Reply
Kal
10/5/2014 07:59:06 am
The Ark was taken by the Babylonians when they invaded and lost, despite the lost tribe of Lamba in Africa claiming to have it, but there is not one shred of real evidence of it crossing the Atlantic.
Reply
EP
10/5/2014 08:13:14 am
"The IQ test line was just lame, not a joke, because it is not funny"
Reply
Kal
10/5/2014 04:40:39 pm
I'm not a Scientologist and I'm not going to reveal my whereabouts or race to EP, or any other personal details. Wikipedia makes many posters seem smart. Never heard of the movement till I looked it up, but it ended a long time ago. Wasn't sticking up for the test but just over explaining why racial humor isn't funny. I'll leave social politics to those educated in such things. I prefer talking about how silly ancient aliens are.
Reply
EP
10/5/2014 05:36:46 pm
Clearly ancient aliens and racial politics never intersect...
Reply
Kal
10/6/2014 10:45:24 am
Many posters of these blogs just crib quotes from wikipedia to look smarter. That is what I meant.
Reply
EP
10/6/2014 12:37:37 pm
Sinner, I condemn thee to Hell!
Reply
EP
10/23/2014 06:28:17 am
As of right now, pledges sit at $75, after being down to $25.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
October 2024
|