Many of you have probably heard about the phenomenon of “peak TV,” a term for the overabundance of television programs currently airing across the broadcast, cable, and streaming spectrums. According to an analysis conducted by the FX network, primetime alone saw 1,415 television series in 2015. Obviously, no one could watch them all. However, in releasing their analysis, FX provided us with some data that cable networks have been trying to keep secret, namely the total number of viewers who watch their programs. In the case of programs touching on subjects of interest to us, this is the first time that we’ve seen some of these numbers. The reported ratings include all viewers over the age of 2, and FX used the highest reported rating for a program, which may not accurately represent its overall average viewership. Among the interesting entries:
A few shows had too few viewers to be measured, including Ancient Case Files and UFOs Declassified. And this is just a selection of series on historical mysteries and monsters; I didn’t even list all of the paranormal, psychic, and ghost themed shows, nor did the FX list account for one-time specials like History’s 2-hour Atlantis documentary. What’s particularly intriguing about the ratings is how the viewership of these programs fails to correlate to the media attention lavished on programs with far fewer viewers. For example, the critically acclaimed Inside Amy Schumer—a program I like very much—had 1,440,000 viewers but commanded media attention in a way that the much higher rated Oak Island or Hunting Hitler simply did not. More to the point: FX’s Fargo, with 3.1 million viewers, Golden Globe winner Mr. Robot, with 2.743 million on USA, and E!’s Keeping Up with the Kardashians, with 3.2 million viewers, all attract fewer viewers than Oak Island and yet dominate popular culture, primarily through the media attention given to them in excess of their actual viewership. In raw terms, only 1 out of 100 Americans watches one of these shows, yet some dominate the conversation online and in the media, while others do not. It’s astonishing that more people watched a dud like Superstition Mountains than Doctor Who or Hannibal. The issue, of course, is that programs that command news media attention are aimed at a specific segment of the audience—young, wealthy urbanites—while those that don’t make it into the mainstream media’s eye are those who aren’t part of the most coveted demographic, those middle aged or older, those with less disposable income, and those who live in rural areas. These also happen to be large segments of the audience for history and monster shows. The companies that own both the cable channels and the news media are happy to keep things this way since it funnels interest to the most demographically desirable viewers, who are flattered into thinking themselves representative of the public as a whole, while simultaneously racking up ratings among general audiences for legacy advertisers (read: stuff for old people), but the result is that the news media turn a blind eye to what large sections of America are consuming and crap goes unchallenged and unacknowledged outside the sliced-and-diced demographic bubble cable channels create around it.
27 Comments
Bob Jase
1/28/2016 11:02:27 am
Myth Hunters is actually a fairly skeptical show except for any Christian relic claims.
Reply
1/28/2016 11:08:18 am
They're not all fringe shows. Expedition Unknown isn't either. I put in whatever I could think of that covers historical mysteries. It just happens that most shows in the genre tend to be completely nuts.
Reply
E.P. Grondine
1/29/2016 10:02:18 pm
Hi Jason -
DaveR
1/28/2016 11:23:26 am
Shouldn't "Finding Bigfoot" actually be called "Searching for Bigfoot?" Because "Finding Bigfoot" implies they're actually going to find a bigfoot, which isn't going to happen, unless they just go out and get some hairy guy with gigantic feet.
Reply
orang
1/28/2016 12:03:22 pm
Glad to see Oak Island doing well because it's about a real, legitimate mystery, unlike something like Finding Hitler (which, unfortunately, is also doing well.) Watched Expedition Unknown last night for the second time, and it is pretty good, unlike host Josh Gate's previous show whose name I can't remember.
Reply
Time Machine
1/28/2016 12:22:01 pm
How do you know Oak Island Pit wasn't a natural sinkhole later used by those engaged in the American War of Independence that was later emptied
Reply
orang
1/28/2016 03:09:48 pm
I don't believe that it's a sinkhole because of the coconut fiber distributed under part of the island's beach sands, because the original shape of the money pit hole would have been unusual for a sinkhole, and because of the several platforms at periodic intervals in the money pit hole, and because of the unusual way the water eventually filled the money pit hole--i.e. the breaching of the final platform apparently somehow triggered a flooding of the hole, thus indicating a sophisticated waterworks system, along with the coconut fiber for filtering, to possibly protect the hole.
Time Machine
1/28/2016 03:51:04 pm
Are you saying that coconut fibre was unknown to those who engaged in the American War of Independence, just to retain the aura of mystery. That's classic mystification process.
Time Machine
1/28/2016 04:09:11 pm
To paraphrase someone else's verdict on another mystery and transpose that over Oak Island Pit:
orang
1/28/2016 05:42:54 pm
i can buy into the revolutionary war origin of the money pit or about 100 years earlier due to the pulley that was found above the depression in 1795. If it were any earlier than a century sooner than the revolution then one would think the pulley would have rotted or rusted away. the most plausible explanation i've ever seen for the money pit on Oak Island is the story of William Phipps which would be about 1690. No one will sway me from my belief that it is an artificial hole, however.
DaveR
1/28/2016 12:40:28 pm
I watched a few of the "Finding Hitler" episodes and did find them entertaining, however they're ignoring many facts to arrive at the conclusion that Hitler escaped Berlin during the final advance of the Russian Army.
Reply
Colin Hunt
1/29/2016 11:25:33 am
As Time Machine posits, it could just be a sink hole. A sink hole in that area would not be unreasonable and, being so close to the sea, it would not be unreasonable, even probable, that sea erosion through fissures would eventually flood it. It is common practice to use holes, however formed, as dumping grounds (like people throw shopping carts into canals today, same mentality) so it could be expected to contain the castoffs from earlier civilizations, i.e. a hole full of detritus and unwanted debris. As plausible theory as any other!
Reply
Time Machine
1/28/2016 12:23:10 pm
>>>Doctor Who or Hannibal<<<
Reply
Kathleen
1/28/2016 12:39:10 pm
People seem to like watching people acting like idiots. Many of these shows have idiots that are more relatable to the broad, less desired demographic. I know I would be included in some of the numbers. I am in the yelling at the TV in disbelief and disgust demographic.
Reply
Kal
1/28/2016 12:50:44 pm
Was Oak Island pit by chance used as an out house? That would be ironic if they were trying to uncover centuries of poo down there.
Reply
Time Machine
1/28/2016 03:48:19 pm
Holy shit
Reply
Bobby B.
1/29/2016 12:12:56 am
Indeed it was. In fact, the flood tunnels are old sewer drains. You see, a long time ago, giants used to live exclusively on Oak Island, they weren't anywhere else in the world but Oak Island. The money pit, often thought to be a natural sinkhole, was actually a toilet for the giants. Unfortunately, the sewer clogged, the giants couldn't fix it, thus leading to their extinction, and complete disappearance from the world/history.
Reply
Kal
1/28/2016 12:51:42 pm
We've found it. The Commodus. Oh...oh god. It's like a bad Vacation spin off movie.
Reply
DaveR
1/28/2016 01:22:24 pm
I can them, squatting down in that hole in the ground, gently fondling some cylindrical brown debris.
Reply
DaveR
1/28/2016 01:42:18 pm
Sorry about the typos, I should pay more attention to proof reading a less attention to my chocolate chip cookie.
Duke of URL
1/29/2016 10:35:47 am
Kal, you owe me a fresh cup of coffee and a clean keyboard...
Reply
Shane Sullivan
1/28/2016 03:09:33 pm
This is why I was unhappy to see The Soup leave the airwaves. It at least held popular fringe shows and garbage reality TV accountable for their garbaginess, even as they lavished MORE attention on them.
Reply
David Bradbury
1/28/2016 04:00:26 pm
Some UK (BARB Top 10s per channel) "Live + 7 days" figures from the week ending 17 January. I could only find three genujinely relevant ones:
Reply
Ph
1/28/2016 05:33:23 pm
If you look at the torrent downloaded / seeds numbers for some of those shows, the numbers are totally different.
Reply
Phillip
1/28/2016 08:01:37 pm
Glad to see you mentioned Hannibal, sad that it was canceled. It was rare, fine quality television usually not found on network television.
Reply
Ryan
1/29/2016 01:14:04 am
I would take these numbers with a grain of salt. Tradtional television ratings metrics, particularly The Nielsens have a number of serious problems. The chief one is their sampling methods. They do not actually count the number of people watching the television shows on any given days. They use a an incredibly opaque sample of usually unstated size. None the less for a very long time its been well establish that Nielsen "families" provided with the tracking equipment don't line up with a proper representative sample. The sample size appears to be too small, and skew much older and much whiter than the general population. In fact last I looked into to qualify you have to have a house hold with a minimum number of members. And those members need to bracket into specific demographic blocks by age and gender. So the system tends to under represent smaller house holds. Young people, the unmarried. And from what I've heard the samples come from a pretty geographically limited part of the US. Then that (too small) sample size is extrapolated out to a percentage of the estimated total viewing audience on a given night, and number of estimated viewers. Its a lot of hand way, unpublished math. With its reliability mostly based on Nielsen's deeply embedded relationship with traditional broadcast TV and advertisers.
Reply
Mike Jones
1/29/2016 10:39:53 am
At least Mysteries at the Museum is usually about real, historic, events. It's a bit depressing that Oak Island draws five times as many viewers.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
March 2025
|