This week Graham Hancock appeared on The Joe Rogan Experience for a three-hour discussion of fringe history, which is the length of two feature movies. If you made it through the entire three hours in one sitting, you have much more patience than I do. It’s a mind-numbing slog through Hancock’s id, and it was one that came complete with his now-frequent claim that attacks on his work hurt his feelings. “I’m human,” he said, “and it hurts.” Over the course of the three-hour discussion, Hancock discussed attacks on him and how archaeologists are working to discredit him almost a dozen times that I counted—and I skipped over some parts. The pity party overshadowed pretty much everything else in the discussion. This interview differs from Hancock’s others in that he is joined by Randall Carlson, another a fringe theorist whose work on geology Hancock used in his new book, Magicians of the Gods, even though Carlson has no education or credentials in geology. Both Hancock and Carlson admit that their views on ancient history (human and geological respectively) are shaped by psychedelic drugs, as we shall see. Both Hancock and Carlson had some trouble understanding that The Joe Rogan Experience is a podcast, primarily accessed as audio (though there is a video version), and so they came with a PowerPoint presentation and some photos that Rogan told them that most of the audience can’t see. Hancock has trouble perceiving irony, and he did not recognize that he was describing himself when he announced that scientists are not objective but instead identify their personalities with their theories, and thus “any attack on that idea becomes an existential attack on you yourself.” Since a half-hour earlier Hancock talked about how he found attacks on his ideas personally painful to his ego, I am dumbfounded that he is unable to see his own reflection in the mirror. Joe Rogan agreed with Hancock wholeheartedly, and he endorses that idea that “academics” are refusing to investigate or teach material that disagrees with their paradigms. “It makes your education look like shit,” he said after pausing to think about how college professors use what Hancock calls a “knowledge filter” to impose orthodoxy. I am not a regular consumer of the podcasts of Joe Rogan, so I was not aware that he was a full-fledged anti-academic conspiracy theorist and not just a goofy fringe/New Age proponent. Hancock says that archaeology is “ideology” that follows the view that civilization moves from the primitive to the sophisticated in linear format, leading to use as the apex and pinnacle of a teleological evolution. This was the view of the Victorians, after Henry Lewis Morgan proposed in 1877 that humanity moved from savagery to barbarism to civilization in linear form, but that hasn’t been the case in anthropology or archaeology for many decades. Claude Levi-Strauss was a notable opponent, arguing that barbarism was primarily the province of those who would describe others as barbarians. Modern scholars, as usual, have a number of competing views. The other important takeaway is that all of these characters are essentially stuck in the 1990s. Joe Rogan talks about how he gained his information about these ideas from the 1993 Mystery of the Sphinx documentary, and that he read Fingerprints of the Gods in the 1990s. Hancock talks at length about the various battles he fought against archaeology in the 1990s, and he seems to be attributing to archaeology Clovis-first paradigms also not supported since the 1990s. Carlson, who says that he got many of his ideas from nineteenth century catastrophist textbooks, claims that global elites are trying to suppress the truth about asteroids and their role in climate change in order to promote a political ideology of social control that they can blame on global warming. Carlson also denies that human beings could cause the extinction of megafauna, and based on this he concludes that humans are not able to cause mass extinctions; ergo, climate change-driven mass extinctions are a political hoax used to impose global control. Carlson returns to the idea that climate change is not caused by human beings over the course of the three hours, and the more he talks, the more his politics leak out around the edges. (Carlson has expressed similar views for several years.) In a new claim, Hancock denies the Bering Strait hypothesis of the peopling of the Americas and speculates that the ruins of his lost civilization were destroyed by a comet that crashed into North America, where it was located, perhaps remembered as Atlantis. No trace of this civilization exists, but he speculates that the comet simply destroyed it all. In the second hour, Hancock returns to his hatred of archaeologists, to which he adds climate scientists, and announced that he believes that astrology is “an ancient science” that he thinks, based on a book he read, may have a real impact on human consciousness. Hancock says that elites use “ideological tools” and “arguments from authority” to make it impossible to “think outside the box” by imposing beliefs about astrology, climate change, and ancient history that all right-thinking people must believe. This leads to a lengthy discussion of altered states of consciousness and Hancock’s belief that modern society does not sufficiently recognize and reward imagination, creativity, and dreams, the last of which he suggests may be actual messages from another dimension. Carlson spends his part of the hour endorsing various catastrophist views of how the end of the Ice Age created what is essentially Noah’s Flood. The third hour begins with Hancock, now becoming hoarse from speaking, blasting archaeologists again for authoritarian tendencies and exposing his own uneasy relationship with the middle decades of his life by explaining that authority figures have failed us and lied to us at every level, especially in politics, which is why we must therefore question human history. In short: Nixon was a crook, so archaeology is also a fraud. Rogan wonders why Hancock writes books, which he says are an inefficient way to change public attitudes. “There are a lot people that won’t read a book,” Rogan said. “Documentaries are so easy. All you do is open your stupid mouth, lay down, turn on Netflix, and bam! You know, you can absorb it. People are lazy.” And there in a nutshell is the problem! Even a lengthy documentary will contain a fraction of the words of a long-form magazine article, let alone a book, and they rely more on emotion than logic. Hancock, however, says that he needs the audience to go out and buy the book that he says archaeologists don’t want you to read: “That is the best way to put one finger up to the mainstream,” he said. Hancock claims this is the first time he has ever begged a show’s audience to go out and by a book. He would like it to be a rallying cry against authority of all stripes. There was almost another hour after that, but that was really the climax of the show. The remaining time Hancock spent summarizing various claims from his book about supposedly anomalous archaeological sites covered in Magicians, including his claim that Atlantis can be found worldwide, including in Indonesia. Hancock denied being a Freemason and said that he wouldn’t join the Freemasons. Indeed, Hancock denies that there is a Masonic global conspiracy. (“Most of them are in it for the beer. Freemasonry is mostly a male drinking club.” – He specified that’s after hours drinking, not during meetings.) However, Hancock did assert that Masons have “ancient knowledge,” and all three men can’t understand why dollar bills have a pyramid on the back (“Why can’t it just say ‘one dollar’?” Rogan asks), none of them recognizing that the image is the Great Seal of the United States, which is, I imagine, what they mean to question. Rogan feels that the all-seeing eye represents the pineal gland while high on drugs. Meanwhile Carlson babbles on about how the Masonic statue of the weeping virgin is a catastrophist drug metaphor based in the resurrection of Osiris. He argues that Father Time’s sickle is really a representation of a comet and that the virgin weeps for the destruction of the antediluvian world before the comet destroyed it. In quick flash of some slides that Carlson didn’t mean to be seen, there were references to Enoch, and this is (sigh) yet another Watchers story, filtered through Masonic conspiracies. In actually, the image was created by Amos Doolittle to illustrate a book by Jeremy Cross in 1819 as an allegory for the death of Hiram Abiff and the discovery of his body, the key narrative of Masonry’s Third Degree. This is not a secret, or at least hasn’t been since the original texts slipped into the public domain more than a century ago. (There was a late Victorian conspiracy theory that it was an astrological allegory, which I imagine is the source Carlson is ultimately reliant upon.)
The show concludes with Rogan, Carlson, and Hancock discussing the drugs they enjoy taking and praising voters for legalizing marijuana in several U.S. states. Hancock says he looks forward to visiting each state where pot is now legal, and he is positively giddy about continuing to use the marijuana he previously identified as causing extreme paranoia in him. I don’t disagree with his assessment that adults should be able to make their own decisions about drugs. but I disagree that such drugs help to produce better evidence for ancient history. Carlson, who said he did acid and peyote for months on end, claims that his acid trips are what inspired him to oppose mainstream geology and embrace catastrophism after he realized that the land is, in its own way, alive.
66 Comments
Time Machine
11/22/2015 11:07:12 am
>>>three men can’t understand why dollar bills have a pyramid on the back<<<
Reply
V
11/22/2015 05:34:54 pm
Don't worry, we don't. We also don't confuse YOUR Freemasonry with the real thing, GIGO.
Reply
Time Machine
11/22/2015 07:09:55 pm
V,
Time Machine
11/22/2015 07:22:30 pm
Witness the psychic spies in American Intelligence - if those at the top during the 18th century regarded Freemasonry as something special - then that is absolutely no different to how the President of the USA regards Remote Viewing today. Stargate may have been shelved, but the book has not been closed.
Only Me
11/23/2015 01:13:29 am
"Look at all the academic literature out there by University Publishers."
Time Machine
11/23/2015 04:49:19 am
Only Me,
Time Machine
11/23/2015 05:00:34 am
There's psychic warfare and remote viewing in the USA defense department, the Skull and Bones, the American origin of Independence that contains shades of Freemasonry within it (the first president of the USA was a Freemason, for one example), and there's also the Bohemian Grove.
Time Machine
11/23/2015 05:07:34 am
I forgot to mention the Illuminati,
Only Me
11/23/2015 05:23:28 am
Ah, yes. Pointing out glaring contradictions and inconsistencies in your arguments, which calls into question those same arguments, is the result of a conspiracy.
Time Machine
11/23/2015 07:53:27 am
Only Me,
Only Me
11/23/2015 03:05:30 pm
No, GIGO, I'm engaging a buffoon.
Anon
11/22/2015 11:54:24 am
Scientists can be bitchy and irrationally stubborn/ideological - true. Haha, I've taken plenty of science classes and I didn't notice any superior humans sat in there with me.
Reply
V
11/22/2015 05:42:52 pm
Individual scientists can be, but the community overall, not as much. There's something to be said for a community where you say "prove it" and THEY DO. (Or don't. Either way.)
Reply
Can't speak to drugs, never having tried any - assuming caffeine doesn't count - but science, I agree. But then, I would, since I'm a mathematician myself.
ANON
11/23/2015 02:06:19 pm
Ok, buuut, would you be able to spot drug induced art if you had not been told that it was such ?
ANON
11/23/2015 02:26:10 pm
..or let's say you had a picture of an Indian flesh suspension ceremony, or a BDSM session.
ANON
11/28/2015 11:14:42 pm
case in point
Anon
11/22/2015 12:01:09 pm
So I'm watching it, and a few minutes in Carlson references Greenland ice cores.
Reply
Anon
11/22/2015 12:08:58 pm
Lastly... does Hancock have a point about Gobekli Tepe - in that something so complex, and so old, was a scorned idea deemed impossible, until recently ?
Reply
Time Machine
11/22/2015 12:14:03 pm
http://arheologija.ff.uni-lj.si/documenta/authors37/37_21.pdf
Reply
Time Machine
11/22/2015 12:24:08 pm
Another link about Gobekli Tepe
Anon
11/22/2015 12:54:47 pm
Thanks.
lurkster
11/22/2015 12:38:37 pm
Hit Jason's search box above for his excellent debunking of all wacky Gobekli claims.
Reply
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
11/22/2015 04:34:32 pm
There may be some truth in it. In the mid-20th century, the assumption was that the development of agriculture produced sedentary living. Sedentary living produced the concentrations of population and the complex social organization necessary to undertake monumental constructions. Study of pre-agricultural settlements like those of the Natufian culture (in the Levant more than 12,000 years ago) have undermined the belief that agriculture was a precondition for sedentary living. Early signs of activity at Göbekli Tepe go back to the late Paleolithic, far earlier than agriculture, which starts to undermine the idea that settlements are necessary for monumental construction—though the most monumental constructions date to the Neolithic.
Reply
ANON
11/23/2015 02:11:14 pm
Yeah I would have thought it would be hard to say either way what level of settlement a society had just by a monument like GT. Why would they have to have been living right at the thing ? Why not a few miles away in some other undiscovered location ?
V
11/22/2015 05:48:55 pm
Please to be ignoring anything GIGO there provides. He has an Agenda of his own.
Reply
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
11/22/2015 05:59:34 pm
Both of the URLs that Time Machine provided link to works by Klaus Schmidt, the widely acknowldged expert on Göbekli Tepe who led the excavations there until his death last year, so not everything Time Machine provides is junk. It's just that most of what he or she SAYS is junk.
Time Machine
11/22/2015 07:14:51 pm
Not the Comte de Saint Germain,
Time Machine
11/22/2015 07:18:59 pm
Philip Willan, The Last Supper: The Mafia, The Masons and The Killing of Roberto Calvi (Constable & Robinson Ltd, 2007).
Time Machine
11/22/2015 07:57:09 pm
In March 1981, police found a list of alleged members of P2 in Lucio Gelli's house in Arezzo. It contained 962 names, among which were important state officials, important politicians and a number of military officers, including the heads of the three Italian secret services. [Paul Ginsborg, Italy and Its Discontents: Family, Civil Society, State, 1980-2001, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003]
Only Me
11/23/2015 01:18:22 am
"Don't even think about me and my 'agenda' - witness all the academic literature about Freemasonry disseminated by University Publishers"
Time Machine
11/23/2015 04:52:36 am
The anti-Freemasonry proponents on this Blog are pro-Bible.
Only Me
11/23/2015 05:19:58 am
I'm not anti-Freemasonry. I'm anti-pseudointellectual garbage, and you're the main trash dispenser.
Time Machine
11/23/2015 07:59:02 am
Those conservative Biblical scholars that claim the Gospels date from the first century - that's pseudo-intellectual garbage.
An Over-Educated Grunt
11/23/2015 09:05:08 am
"The anti-Freemasonry proponents on this Blog are pro-Bible... There is no other explanation for it."
Time Machine
11/23/2015 12:08:46 pm
You missed out P2 in relation to the killing of Roberto Calvi
An Over-Educated Grunt
11/23/2015 12:27:05 pm
Ah yes, because you know my worldview so well. Once again, though... you're the one who claimed Masons guided the French Revolution to inspire us to rationality. I'm the one who claimed they weren't in control of events. Make up your mind.
ANON
11/22/2015 12:20:50 pm
...er, not lastly, having watched more - yeah, he does whine a lot doesn't he ?
Reply
Bob Jase
11/22/2015 12:27:34 pm
Hah! I can put up an even bigger finger to ALL publishing by not buying his book.
Reply
Ph
11/22/2015 12:28:31 pm
I've seen quite a bit about Joe Rogan, most of the podcasts as well.
Reply
ANON
11/22/2015 12:47:10 pm
Yeah he's done his own debunking TV series hasn't he ? He's quite hard headed when he wants to be. I expect if someone offered to go on his show and offer some serious refutations of all this he might take them up, if they were polite about it.
Reply
ANON
11/22/2015 02:59:37 pm
...but they'd have to be prepared for a biblical deluge of online hate. :-)
Anon
11/22/2015 12:53:32 pm
I don't really see why Hancock goes with some outside culture as creator of Gobekli, apart from the obvious Atlantis theory. Especially as it's only just been started to be excavated. If as he says there are vast areas from that period now underwater, why would we assume that areas much closer to Anatolia (ie, not in the mid-Atlantic) are not the originating areas of the GT culture ?
Reply
Shane Sullivan
11/22/2015 01:59:22 pm
Hancock's preferred vision of "Atlantis" has never really been situated in the Atlantic, but rather wherever science (fringe or otherwise) allows him to pretend it was, from Antarctica to all the world's now-submerged coastlines to the bottom of a crater in North America. He's perfectly happy to assimilate any Atlantis-like story of a sunken or vanished land as evidence for his claim, but always taking great pains to dismiss or ignore the many details that refute it.
Reply
Jean Stone
11/22/2015 01:13:03 pm
"Since a half-hour earlier Hancock talked about how he found attacks on his ideas personally painful to his ego, I am dumbfounded that he is unable to see his own reflection in the mirror."
Reply
Ph
11/22/2015 01:45:40 pm
After listening to an hour of cherry picking facts i had to give up.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
11/22/2015 01:46:48 pm
Tangentially related, has everyone seen this?
Reply
Anon
11/22/2015 02:11:26 pm
Oop, just heard Carlson make another climate blunder. Claims that global warming began 200 years ago. Claims that glaciers started retreating a century before there was a any 'significant' human contribution of CO2. Omits methane (or is that emits methane?)
Reply
Kal
11/22/2015 03:38:33 pm
When I saw Rogan I thought Seth Rogan, and that would have been way more interesting a show, but then I realized it was Joe. I have no interest in listening to 3 hours of regurgitated theories and fringe ideas. Thanks for the summary. I won't comment on Hancock as I would rather not receive hate mail from him or his followers. Yeah.
Reply
tm
11/22/2015 05:27:29 pm
Hancock and his followers sent you hare mail? That's despicable!
Reply
tm
11/22/2015 05:29:42 pm
Oops. Hate mail. That's despicable too.
Victoria
11/22/2015 11:18:31 pm
I clicked on something at the bottom of the comment post section. I thought I was authorizing notices when I got comments from my comment. I had no idea that it went to Hancock.
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
11/23/2015 09:11:20 am
If you mean here - it doesn't. Just that some fringe personalities (Scott Wolter and Scotty Roberts come to mind) apparently either attract a fan base that lives to Google their names, or are more the DIY types. So if you upset the wrong person (see elsewhere in this very post) expect a flood of ridiculous comments following yours, for which you potentially receive updates.
tm
11/23/2015 02:15:38 pm
If that's the case, I definitely remember some pointed criticisms of Kal in blog posts here, but I don't remember any hateful posts to him from Hancock or his followers.
Only Me
11/22/2015 05:20:32 pm
Hancock hasn't learned that appeals to emotion are only effective if the audience is willing to empathize with him. He has made his fortune from fringe history, playing fast and loose with his "evidence" and changing his narrative based on which fringe ideas are experiencing an uptick in popular culture.
Reply
Clete
11/22/2015 05:21:57 pm
It sounds to me that Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson would be a load of laughs to party with. After they were totally stoned, if you were also, I would bet their theories and rambling would make sense, at least until you sobered up and came to the realization that they are both full of shit.
Reply
Ph
11/22/2015 05:44:35 pm
Make a drinking game while watching this video.
Reply
ANON
11/23/2015 02:33:54 pm
Ah, but, they would be cunning and insist on swapping the booze for weed and also insist you support your objections without using logical fallacies. Every time you deploy a fallacy, you smoke another.
Victoria
11/22/2015 08:54:06 pm
Well, that explains it. My sister took a lot of acid and is going down the same conspiracy theories that Hancock believes.
Reply
DaveR
11/23/2015 11:48:36 am
Basically they're saying it's fine for them to call credentialed academics names, criticize their works, call them liars and cheats, but NOBODY can do the same to them because it hurts their feelings. It also appears they're saying that drugs have given them insights into history, archeology, and geology, so their form of academic studying is taking drugs.
Reply
ANON
11/23/2015 02:43:19 pm
...mind, he does say some dodgy things about drugs too. I checked, and ayahuasca is not always seen as feminine by the natives. Sometimes it's deemed to be a masculine spirit. There's a lot of New Age projection going on. Not that the Indians have the final say or own the philosophy of the stuff, and people are free to make their own myths if they think it's useful. But it does play into the eschatological thrust of his work as leading to a world enlightenment and restoration of a golden age.
Reply
A.D.
11/23/2015 11:33:50 pm
I really can't stand that cocky bastard.That's why his last name ends with cock for being an arrogant cocky prick.
Reply
R Lewis
11/24/2015 10:21:35 am
"Carlson also denies that human beings could cause the extinction of megafauna"
Reply
charlosjohn12
8/27/2017 03:52:35 am
Thanks For sharing this Superb article.I use this Article to show my assignment in college.it is useful For me Great Work. <a href="https://www.claimsocialauthority.com/spotify-services/buy-spotify-plays/">buy Spotify plays</a>
Reply
charlosjohn12
8/28/2017 02:46:36 am
I know this is one of the most meaningful information for me. And I'm animated reading your article. But should remark on some general things, the website style is perfect; the articles are great. Thanks for the ton of tangible and attainable help. <a href="https://www.minds.com/blog/view/748779357639548928">https://www.lottospielen24.org/</a>
Reply
dan jerry
6/21/2018 12:13:49 am
Welcome to brotherhood Illuminati where you can become
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
November 2024
|