Graham Hancock has released the description of his new book, America Before, which is due out in April. According to the description, Hancock will be examining claims that the Americas were populated 130,000 years ago, and he will argue that North America was the homeland of his lost civilization before it was destroyed by a comet at the end of the Younger Dryas, a claim previously seen in Ignatius Donnelly’s Ragnarok: The Age of Fire and Gravel (1883), where the author similarly proposed a comet strike in the North American Arctic, affecting a civilization that stretched across North America and northern Eurasia. I remain interested to see what new evidence he has accumulated.
After describing the standard model of world population, which sees anatomically modern humans leaving Africa and populating Asia 70,000 years ago, Australia 60,000 years ago, Europe around 50,000 years ago, the Americas around 20,000 or so years ago, and Polynesia in relatively recent times, the America Before description challenges the timeline:
We now know that something of immense importance is missing from this long-established picture, and that the Americas were first peopled more than 130,000 years ago – many tens of thousands of years before human settlements became established elsewhere. Yet because of the dominance of the former – and now entirely discredited – theory of the late peopling of the Americas, and of mental blocks associated with that theory, scientists for too long focussed only on the ‘Old World’ in their search for the origins of civilization and have not considered the revolutionary possibility that those origins might in fact be found in the ‘New World’.
The reference to the 130,000-year date must surely refer to the paper published by Steven R. Holden et al. in Nature last year alleging that mastodon bones found near San Diego showed evidence of having been butchered by an unknown species of human. The study was controversial because it made dramatic claims without categorically excluding alternative explanations. At the time, archaeologist Tom Dillehay pointed out that the study did not exclude the possibility that the marks on the bones were the result of natural processes rather than intentional butchering.
Earlier this year, six experts, led by archaeologist Joseph V. Ferraro, published a communication in Nature challenging the original study. The authors did not question the age of the site but provided evidence, including examples from comparable sites, where natural processes produced the same damage to bones. They faulted the original authors for failing to consider disturbances to the site over the past 130,000 years, evidence for which they said was present in the original data. Citing the “equivocal” nature of the damage and the lack of supporting evidence for human presence in California at that early date, the authors concluded that “caution requires us to set aside the claims of Holden et al.” Holden and co-authors then replied with a rebuttal, and this spring Ruth Gruhn of the University of Alberta concluded that the breaks in the bones could not have been caused by modern heavy machinery, thus making them “an anomaly.”
A new excavation was planned for this year, but I don’t believe anything has been published yet.
I will be interested to see what additional evidence, if any, Hancock uses to defend this date, and how he sees the supposed human occupants of 130,000 years ago as connected to the Atlanteans who were said to have died around 9600 BCE—some 120,000 years later!
I also just want to tease the writer of the description just a little bit for an odd turn of phrase. After the part quoted above, the writer calls the book a “mind-dilating exploration of the mystery of ancient civilizations.” I believe “mind-expanding” is the more usual phrase (“Mind’s Dilation” is a card from Magic: The Gathering), but mind-dilation is certainly both more colorful and evocative, if somewhat frighting to consider too literally.
10/12/2018 08:45:51 am
While the Clovis First paradigm has collapsed entirely, the entry date would seem to be 50,000-40,000 BCE, during that opening of the Berringia Corridor.
10/12/2018 12:16:42 pm
".... whose controversial take on the past, once anathema to archaeologists, has been overwhelmingly vindicated by recent discoveries,..."
10/12/2018 08:34:47 pm
Hi Machala -
10/16/2018 11:02:03 pm
"My guess is that these last were the result of the consumption of human growth factor from harvested human pituitary glands."
10/12/2018 01:09:41 pm
Here we go again. This is like someone using an isolated fake rune to suppose Vikings had come to America. It would take several sites like the Mastodon find in order for this to be accepted yet here we go with a whole book based on that. If I remember correctly the only thing indicating the Mastodon site is real were hammerstones and no projectiles or any other material remains. Scanty at best. One would hope Hancock has more "evidence" than that.
10/12/2018 08:15:22 pm
I believe he meant "mind-diluting exploration of the mystery of ancient civilizations.”
10/12/2018 08:52:25 pm
That makes sense. My thought was that since Mr. Hancock likes to trip (NTTAWWT) it was a reference to dilated pupils.
10/13/2018 05:31:53 am
New Agers will always be ahead of mainstream Biblical scholars because they know about the DMT origins of the Bible. There are even webpages that reveal the information about how to produce the DMT.
10/13/2018 08:47:19 am
I think I need to share with all of you some fundamental differences in the approaches of these authors.
10/13/2018 09:20:55 am
10/13/2018 03:54:29 pm
Collins has a new one coming out in 2019 on the same topic. Hancock mentioned Collins book Denisovan Dawn at a conference several weeks ago.
10/15/2018 12:34:19 pm
While it would be more PC to wait for a book to be published before commenting on its contents. I won't.
11/27/2018 06:30:09 pm
In the meantime, in the real world a 31 km wide impact crater has been found in Greenland under 2 miles of ice - entirely consistent with (already existing) sedimentary evidence of an asteroid impact around 12,000 BC - a cataclysmic event is therefore not that far fetched is it?
11/27/2018 07:48:38 pm
Actually Bhicks the articles says the date may range from 3 million to 12,000 years ago - a pretty wide range. We'll have to wait a bit for more information.
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply.
I am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab.
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Terms & Conditions
Please read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.