History Channel Doubles Down on Paranormal and Conspiracy Programming in Presentation to Advertisers3/29/2019
“Both The UnXplained and In Search Of strive to solve some of the world’s most intriguing mysteries and it’s this truth seeking that resonates most with our viewers,” History Channel executive Eli Lehrer said in a press release. “These shows will offer credible answers to questions about mysterious phenomena, while others will remain unexplained. Who else better to transport audiences through this journey than William and Zachary, whose passion, curiosity and perseverance to present every side of these enigmas beam on screen.”
We can laugh privately at the idea that any History Channel “answers” will be credible. I imagine it says something about the History Channel that they proudly listed in the press release the large number of speculative programs about space aliens that they show. According to the press release, Shatner’s six-episode series will explore tired topics including Florida’s Coral Castle and trendy year-old mysteries from the news like Japan’s “Suicide Forest” that gained fame when YouTube personality Logan Paul gawked at the body of a man who died there and posted footage of the corpse to the video service. The show will also discuss aliens—because it is on the History Channel—and will look at “bizarre rituals.” That phrasing doesn’t exactly promise a respectful treatment of other cultures’ beliefs and practices, does it? In what is clearly no surprise, The UnXplained will be produced by Prometheus Entertainment and executive producer Kevin Burns, the forces behind Ancient Aliens and Curse of Oak Island, the shows that define the History Channel brand. Burns and Prometheus are the massive black hole sucking in facts and crushing them in the enormous gravity of their boundless ignorance. History claims that 80 million Americans watched at least some of an Ancient Aliens episode in 2018, though this number is likely counting the same viewers many times over. Nielsen figures suggest fewer than 1.5 million people tuned in to any given episode. The network also claims 19 million sampled In Search Of. Nielsen figures put its ratings in the 1 million range. Shatner has hosted similar programs for decades, beginning the 1970s when he fronted films about UFOs and ancient astronauts in the style of Rod Serling’s In Search of Ancient Astronauts. That film served as the pilot for what became the original In Search of…, and now Shatner is once again imitating In Search Of. In the 2000s, Shatner hosted Weird or What? in Canada, which examined ancient mysteries alongside other unusual phenomena. The producers for that show contacted me and dangled the possibility of an appearance in order to pump me for free research that they later used in the show. This week’s announcement comes on the heels of History’s recent decision to air Tom DeLonge’s Unidentified: Inside America’s UFO Investigation™ this May. (History styles the title with the trademark symbol in its press materials.) That program will feature not just DeLonge but a roster of To the Stars Academy personalities, including Hal Puthoff, the ESP researcher turned interdimensional UFO chaser who sits at the center of a network of fruitless government and private UFO research work dating back to the 1970s. While the show was only announced recently, U.S. trademark records indicate that the History Channel had already filed for a trademark on the show’s title in February. Trademark records also show that after the success of the Ancient Aliens fan convention AlienCon, the History Channel has registered the name H: HistoryCon for a fan convention for the network’s other programs. A+E Networks already operates HistoryCon conventions internationally.
22 Comments
gdcteixeira
3/29/2019 09:05:31 am
I only watch History channel for two shows: Pawn Stars and Forged in Fire. Nothing else in their program interests me in the least.
Reply
William Fitzgerald
3/29/2019 09:46:02 am
I used to like Pawn Stars and American Pickers. But, eventually I got bored with these shows and the people in Pawn Stars were never endearing and mostly disgusting. My father, who has never watch the show, somehow got it in his head to visit the Pawn Shop in Vegas and see what he can get for a watch; he didn't end up selling it and the whole place just re-enforced everything I thought about that place.
Reply
Joe Scales
3/29/2019 10:01:18 am
"Nielsen figures suggest fewer than 1.5 million people tuned in to any given episode."
Reply
“Disco” God of Studio 54 in the 70’s.
3/29/2019 10:34:28 am
Okay then, fewer than 1.5 million and ten people watched.
Reply
Joe Scales
3/29/2019 01:34:31 pm
If you follow such things, you'll realize that shows can substantially increase their overall ratings with today's delayed viewing options. Case in point, Project Blue Book. That show would more than double its initial broadcast night ratings within the week thereafter, as I pointed out to Jason previously. Hence why it was successful enough for the History Channel to renew despite Jason's blog posts making it appear not to be doing so well. Never watched it myself, but hey... let's be fair here.
Kent
3/29/2019 02:24:15 pm
It is sufficient to be unhappy that something is succeeding.
“Disco” Dancing Dude Barth Gamble.
3/29/2019 02:50:35 pm
My mistake, I should have made that number fewer than 1.5 million and 11 people who tuned in.
Evan Evans
3/29/2019 10:27:31 am
Fifteen, twenty years ago I used to watch the History Channel because being interested in History and learning something about topics I was unfamiliar with interested me. Then A & E brought in a woman by the name of Nancy Dubrac to increase rating. Her way to do so was to dumb down the programming. It began with Pawn Stars, which opened the flood gates to more and more quasi-reality bull shit. The channel soon became unwatchable by anyone with an I.Q. over that of the average rock.
Reply
Hilda Hilpert
4/22/2019 01:17:07 pm
I can recall when The History channel was jokingly refered to as The world War 2 Channel. My dad would watch it sometimes.Recall him watching a documentary one day.Asked what it was about, and he said the Battle of Monte Casino. Then he remarked that he had no qualms about bombing the abbey, as it was a legitimate military target. I just said okay.During the war, he had been a flight crew chief and airplane mechanic. And the other reason for the qualms remark was because he had an aunt and two cousins who were nuns, and whatever religious feelings he might have had as a catholic, he still had a job to do.
Reply
Accumulated Wisdom
3/29/2019 12:02:53 pm
The logo for the History Channel should be an "E". A "White E". That says it all.
Reply
Machala
3/29/2019 01:07:30 pm
My god ! Talk about archeological relics. Bill Shatner just turned 88 last week. Well, HC's demographics are such that of course he'll appeal to their ever-aging male white audience and the rest of the semi-literate who tune nightly to satisfy their conspiracy theory fix.
Reply
Joe Scales
3/29/2019 01:40:07 pm
Shatner still has it. He recently did two short seasons of Better Late Than Never on NBC where he joined Terry Bradshaw, George Foreman and The Fonz traveling the globe and getting into (staged) hijinks. Actually, it was pleasantly entertaining, and you'd be surprised how spry the old man still is.
Reply
Lyn
3/31/2019 03:31:49 pm
in New Zealand we don't get any of these programmes on FTA, however even if we did, I think I'd find reading Jason's comments far more interesting/convincing than watching the programmes. I'm not hugely knowledgable, nor a professional in any of the areas, but from what I have read, he's invariably right, and the programmes are rubbish. I can only hope they DON'T come here and preempt time and space where better work could appear. I also suspect I find everyone's comments on them far more entertaining and enlightening than I would the actual programmes. Keep it going, guys.
Reply
Joe Scales
3/31/2019 10:37:24 pm
At least you get Wellington Paranormal.
Reply
Lyn
3/31/2019 11:14:07 pm
well, we did, and shortly we'll be getting the new American version which could be interesting too.
Titus Pullo
3/31/2019 04:09:41 pm
Do not ding the Shat...yes these shows are hogwash but Shatner is an American (ok Canadian) icon! Every red blooded American boy born between 1963-1975 wanted to be Captain Kirk or William Shatner...I realize today Kirk's behavior would be "incorrect" due to some marxist crap about intersectionality or privilege or other HS.....
Reply
Kent
3/31/2019 04:22:58 pm
What is this "1963" nonsense?
Reply
Titus Pullo
3/31/2019 06:52:49 pm
1963-year I was born..ha ha
Lyn
3/31/2019 11:16:23 pm
and does anyone know why in order to leave a small comment I'm required to do several capchas which are an utter PITA since they're so small and dark I can see almost nothing IN them? I mean, I am a member, isn't there some easier way?
Reply
Kent
4/1/2019 09:40:43 am
You're not a member. If the images are small and dark you either have a screen problem or an eye problem. The verification can usually be bypassed by hitting the up arrow key repeatedly after clicking the "Send" button.
Reply
Lyn
4/1/2019 11:26:30 am
Hi Kent,
Reply
Will
6/3/2019 06:59:05 pm
Looking forward to your lengthy dissection of everything wrong with the US Navy Pilots' testimonies showcased on 'Unidentified... '
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
September 2024
|