I’ll be honest with you: The quality of fringe history claims has declined markedly over the last couple of years as the great fringe history boom of 2009-2014 finishes fizzling out. Some days, I don’t really have anything left to talk about. The clickbait websites have reduced themselves to cheating their own audiences. I can’t tell you how many times a Google News alert has keyed me to some “new” fringe posting about ancient aliens, Atlantis, or whatever, and when I click through, I find that it’s actually a reposting of a video (and it’s always a video!) from two, three, five, or more years ago. The amount of actually new content being produced is shockingly low. Consider, for a moment, that there are thousands of websites that produce fringe history content, generating, in theory, hundreds of articles a day. Yet almost none of that content offers anything new, or even an original take on previous material. Not that this is unexpected; recycling claims is their bread and butter, but it’s the quality of the recycling that’s lacking. In the past, newly published articles would have more substance to them, but now the clickbait trash outweighs everything.
I thought about, for example, writing about the recent claim that a Mayan sculpture is a carving of a Grey, but I couldn't gin up the enthusiasm for a fantasy that lacked evidence and substance. It looks like a fake from the picture provided. It is getting difficult to find 365 new things to write about each year. I think there are a few factors at work. First, the crescendo of interest in crazy claims about ancient history that grew up in the wake of the success of Ancient Aliens was unsustainable. One by one, the imitation and emulation programs have faded away. In Search of the Lost Giants, America Unearthed, In Search of Aliens, Unsealed: Alien Files, and countless more have gone to that glowing UFO in the sky, whether officially canceled or lying in wait for the next fringe history boom. As I noted a few years ago, when we hit peak fringe history, there were entire days when interested viewers could follow programs like these from channel to channel around the clock, never watching anything else. That much of a glut of similar programming couldn’t help but cause a rating crash. Only the strongest of these shows—mostly Ancient Aliens and Curse of Oak Island—survived. Their audiences, though, are rapidly aging. The Ancient Aliens spinoff on Viceland in which rapper Action Bronson watches the show while high on marijuana has a small following, a but a new study this week finds that its target audience, teens, find the Vice brand “uncool.” The second factor, though, is that much of what started as the goofball claims of cable TV shows has been politicized in our partisan environment, and it is now an ideological article of faith rather than a pretended scientific mystery. That means that it is less something to write about to “investigate” questions and more a faith-based identity statement to be included in a polemic. To that end, much of the energy in fringe history has moved to conservative fantasies about gay Nephilim, creationism, and white supremacy. But discussions of such topics are often restricted to true believers, who aren’t looking for evidence but rather for affirmation. The third factor, related to the preceding, is that modern political discourse is so riven with conspiracy theories and fantasies that there isn’t much mental space left for additional conspiracies. The current White House is riven with conspiracy theories about practically everything. Its media supporters have coopted so much of the energy behind fringe history that we actually see bizarre events like last week’s claim on televangelist Jim Bakker’s show that Donald Trump is God’s anointed and that God will curse the children and grandchildren of his critics. Here’s Mary Colbert speaking to Bakker after identifying Trump as God’s chosen vessel: “And if you come against the chosen one of God, you are bringing upon you and your children and your children’s children curses like you have never seen.” How do you compete with crazy claims like that?
40 Comments
E.P. Grondine
4/5/2017 12:36:17 pm
Hi Jason-
Reply
Shane Sullivan
4/5/2017 12:40:55 pm
This must be that Singularity the sci-fi nerds are always talking about.
Reply
Brian
4/5/2017 12:43:30 pm
Hey, you're doing important work. But you don't need to do it every day (and sometimes twice a day). Cut back to once or twice a week. You've got the passion, you're pointing out important links between the fringe and what's happened to our politics.
Reply
Clete
4/5/2017 01:10:30 pm
Jason, I agree with Brian, what you do is important and needed, but with the fringe saying the same things over and over and repeating themselves you end up pointing out the same things about their theories. This can get tiresome both to you and your followers on this blog. Take a break, everyone needs one once in a while. The fringe types are not going away, they have nowhere to go to except to beat the same dead horse over and over. When they return with more wild theories, you will be there to repute them and point out their errors in scientific logic and thinking.
Reply
Kathleen
4/5/2017 01:33:55 pm
Perhaps you can branch out and add serial fiction or short stories
Reply
Residents Fan
4/6/2017 06:30:17 pm
"Perhaps you can branch out and add serial fiction or short stories."
Graham
4/5/2017 12:54:04 pm
You could always try reviewing Richard Mooney's 'Colony:Earth'...
Reply
Americanegro
4/5/2017 02:20:15 pm
As a wise man once said:
Reply
Walt
4/5/2017 02:44:12 pm
I'm surprised you made it this long covering this stuff.
Reply
Ruth
4/5/2017 02:55:42 pm
There isn't much foreign fringe stuff you can look at?
Reply
Tom Mellett
4/5/2017 03:31:05 pm
It seems to me that the "great fringe history boom" is going bust because it is all founded on finding objective scientific evidence to prove the ancient or the alien hypotheses.
Reply
Only Me
4/5/2017 04:04:42 pm
This means you have more time to collect more source material used by the fringe to argue for aliens or whatever. Maybe translate those texts you find interesting. Work on another idea for a book. Look around the house for any future projects you might want to do. Don't worry, the fringe binge cycle will eventually return (sigh).
Reply
Tom Mellett
4/5/2017 04:25:11 pm
Wait a minute, Jason! As soon as I sent you my comment above, I came across this news story, which may just be the story you need to investigate and write about. Everybody loves a mystery, right, especially ones about UFOlogists who suddenly vanish.
Reply
Bob Jase
4/5/2017 04:39:35 pm
How do you compete with crazy claims like that?
Reply
Mike Morgan
4/5/2017 04:58:38 pm
Well, you would have plenty to write about when, or really IF EVER, some (the un-dynamic duo XplrR team for example) would deliver the goods on revealing their "secret" projects they have been working on and teasing about for years, their promised "papers" -maybe even "peer reviewed", White or other colors, promised books - new or long over due, promised "full length feature documentaries" suitable for television and/or theater, etc., etc.
Reply
4/5/2017 05:49:19 pm
Well, Zena Halpern's book is finally out, but I can't say I want to spend $17 to get it.
Reply
4/5/2017 05:50:52 pm
Oh, I see that the eBook version is finally out for $7. I guess I can spare the $7!
Reply
Mike Morgan
4/6/2017 12:02:00 am
Great! So looking forward to review. If I understand correctly, this will be the first time we are exposed to a good portion of the "c-document".
Reply
BigNick
4/5/2017 06:05:33 pm
Fringe theorists have had nothing new to write about for 30 years, but that hasn't stopped any of them. Besides, isn't history going to make a 3d Jesus face this weekend? That's gotta be something.
Reply
Americanegro
4/5/2017 06:41:43 pm
Does anyone know about a Graham Hancock-like book that probably came out 1990-2006 and toward the end it tells you how to derive the Megalithic Yard using a pendulum? I lent it to a friend and surprise, never got it back. Can't remember the title. Thanks!
Reply
BigNick
4/5/2017 07:41:09 pm
My magic crystal Google ball suggests Uriel's Machine.
Reply
Americanegro
4/5/2017 10:01:18 pm
Damn, I totally forgot about Google! No, that's not the one.
MarkGanzeveld
4/5/2017 07:12:24 pm
Sometimes you have to find a way to make what you do more enjoyable. Maybe fun posts about personal favorite theories that make you laugh. The reddit post with the flat earth shadow on the moon was a good example of fun at the expense of fringe theories. There are so many fringe theories out there, you have to have some that sound "squatchy" to you.
Reply
Campblor
4/5/2017 07:40:27 pm
Bigfoot is still on the loose, until they bring him to justice there will be plenty of shows/crap out there for years to come
Reply
Mountain Monsters is back this week. Grab a pint of Pa's shine and ride the ride.
Reply
Americanegro
4/5/2017 10:03:43 pm
If you're accidentally soliciting ideas, I'd like to see a piece on "Major Ed Dames".
Reply
PostModernPrimate
4/5/2017 10:30:31 pm
As much as I genuinely look forward to your daily posts, might it be time for you to concentrate on deeper, long-form investigation? I'm certain you could take much of the work you have already done here and combine it with more digging to produce a fascinating (and timely) book on the relationship between fringe beliefs and the resurgence of neo-fascism and the alt-right.
Reply
Joe Scales
4/6/2017 11:33:55 am
Problem is, it's difficult to delve into politics without catering to bias and partisanship; which corrupts discourse.
Reply
Clint Knapp
4/5/2017 11:33:25 pm
Honestly, man, the stuff I like best is the historical delving into roots and origin texts you do- not the fringe-wackadoo-of-the-day articles.
Reply
4/6/2017 06:30:11 am
I enjoy writing the archival stuff, too, but the trouble is that it takes so much time! To translate a text can take days or weeks, and researching each document is time-consuming. For a variety of reasons, I will be cutting back the blog posts' frequency in the coming months (probably to take weekends off) and it would be nice to take the extra time to do more of the research I enjoy rather than whatever the outrage of the day is. But while regular readers like the deep articles, the reactions to current events attract the largest number of readers, presumably from people who are looking for facts about what they saw online.
Reply
David Bradbury
4/6/2017 09:03:22 am
Look on the bright side. Here's a work-in-progress on some real history, involving at least two conspiracies, and some major constitunional questions:
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
4/6/2017 09:42:24 am
Redirect. Tell us about the effects of provable real-world conspiracy on modern conspiracy culture. Since I know it's in your interests I'm specifically thinking about the murder of Franz Ferdinand.
Reply
David Bradbury
4/6/2017 02:15:18 pm
What? They killed the whole band?
Reply
Americanegro
4/6/2017 04:00:46 pm
Someone wanted to take them out.
bkd69
4/7/2017 09:33:44 am
I've enjoyed the examinations of the intersection of fringe history and political ideology. I came to the realization many years ago, that Fox news in the modern incarnation of Lovecraft, which I think dovetails nicely with your interests.
Reply
RiverM
4/7/2017 08:59:10 pm
Your content interests me no matter if the subject is historical, current or all out woo and is usually the first site I check out during lunch time. Take a break every now and then or more. I'll opine with great confidence that all your fans have your back. Do you.
Reply
Byron DeLear
4/9/2017 08:27:11 pm
Congratulations Jason on a good run. A marathon. So much of the recycled stuff has created so many cross links within your site. A question for Jason and the group -- I'd like to hear more about why you think the excitement that used to be generated by fringe/conspiracy stuff has waned. It just seems to have played itself out and the reasons for the ratings crash is it's all so unexceptional and boring. Is it because these identity based conspiracy theories, etc. are so common now and the spate of History shows, other cable offerings, websites with homemade youtube vids etc. have multiplied to the point of making these ideas uninteresting? Has it been the deluge of alternative facts and fake news into the mainstream that has inundated the audience?
Reply
Abraxas
4/10/2017 06:40:08 am
I suppose, personally, I'd trust Jason if he says the fringe science stuff is winding down. But otherwise, I would have guessed that it wasn't winding down; it only seemed like it was, because the amount of recycled content for clickbait is increasing (for both "articles" and videos). I would have thought it would have been a case of information fatigue, since every month that goes by more and more clickbait gets posted, which means more content gets recycled.
Reply
Mike Morgan
4/11/2017 07:55:17 pm
The History Channel is going to supply at least one more "new stuff to write about" with the presentation on Easter of "The Jesus Strand: A Search for DNA".
Reply
nomuse
4/13/2017 02:44:25 am
As another Primate said above, this could be a good time to go deep. Of course you already go deep, deeper than most. But I think there's still space for meta-analysis, for looking at the broader patterns and the social forces behind them (and what comes out of them in turn).
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
March 2025
|