Jack Sarfatti Claims UFOs Are Time Machines Powered by Metamaterials

3/26/2020

With nearly a third of Americans sheltering in their homes under government order and many of the other two-thirds staying in out of prudence and caution, television viewing numbers are growing. Ancient Aliens saw some interesting ratings changes this past weekend. Its total number of viewers did not rise significantly—coming in at 1.043 million—but the number of younger viewers watching nearly doubled. A chunk of the show’s older viewers tuned out (they seemingly flocked to cable news coverage of the corona virus), but younger viewers switched to Ancient Aliens to make up the difference. Oddly, The UnXplained with William Shatner, which previously had more total viewers and more viewers 18-49 than Ancient Aliens, saw its ratings fall to just 883,000 viewers as younger fans apparently sated themselves on Ancient Aliens and turned the channel or went to bed.

As you might imagine, COVID-19 has limited the amount of fringe history being discussed, so there isn’t a lot to talk about right now. I feel like I should mention physicist Jack Sarfatti’s claims on a recent The Hidden Truth with James Beslo podcast that the so-called Tic-Tac UFO seen by the USS Nimitz in 2004 is a time machine, but the octogenarian Sarfatti also claimed on Coast to Coast AM last year that about seventy years ago a sentient computer from a Tic-Tac UFO contacted him and spilled space secrets. He’s been into time travel and warp drives for ages, and there isn’t anything new here.

However, I do want to highlight how he has absorbed the stream of nonsense claims about “metamaterials” coming out of To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science. Sarfatti claims that UFOs are composed of “metamaterials”—a claim he can’t possibly have evidence to prove—and that such metals can travel through time when zapped with electricity—another claim he can’t prove: “What happens is that if you pump electromagnetic energy into the material, it will have a certain resonance. In that resonance, the speed of light inside the material can go down to a very small number.” Does anyone seriously doubt that he only speaks about metamaterials because TTSA has been hyping them?

Sarfatti claims that he wants to meet with White House officials to discuss his ideas. I’d usually call that ridiculous, but, really, who can say anymore?

78 Comments

Joe Scales

3/26/2020 11:24:03 am

"Sarfatti claims that he wants to meet with White House officials to discuss his ideas. I’d usually call that ridiculous, but, really, who can say anymore?"

Why? Trump has publicly distanced himself from your Fringe UFO folks no matter how badly you'd like to link them to him. If you're going to use gratuitous political smears to distract from your thoughts, why not be accurate.

Jim

3/26/2020 12:32:25 pm

Of course Trump would distance himself from UFOs.

https://i.redd.it/fkb60xpss0e31.jpg

An Anonymous Nerd

3/26/2020 12:46:09 pm

Calm down, Mr. Scales. I, for one, didn't read Mr. Colavito's statement the way you did. It's telling that that's where your mind went. In this case, however, the more-supportable, logical conclusion is that Mr. Colavito was being politically neutral.

Consider these facts.

-When Mr. Colavito wants to say something negative about Donald Trump he is not subtle.

-Mr. Colavito has discussed Democratic officials with Fringe connections too. The paradigmatic example is John Podesta, who has worked in the White House and appeared on Ancient Aliens during the course of his career, and has been trashed (properly) by Mr. Colavito on these very pages.

All told, my reading is more-likely to be correct, and you've flipped out for nothing. If I am wrong I will survive, but I'll also be very surprised.

Either way: You need to realize that Donald Trump in all likelihood neither knows nor cares about you. Nor do any other of your favorite celebrities.

-An Anonymous Nerd

Joe Scales

3/27/2020 12:44:36 pm

"Either way: You need to realize that Donald Trump in all likelihood neither knows nor cares about you. Nor do any other of your favorite celebrities."

Irrelevant nonsense, yet telling nonetheless. Though I don't support any political party and trust no politician, it would appear by your aside that you might believe that politicians you favor care about you personally. Please name them, if I am correct in my assumption. Just for clarity's sake. And for a bit of much needed amusement...

An Anonymous Nerd

3/29/2020 11:21:08 am

Looks like I missed a stealth reply. Let's see here. The key phrase, really, is this:

[ I don't support any political party and trust no politician,]

*sighs* There you go again, Mr. Scales.

Well let's see.

I'll start with an instance where you promoted a wild conspiracy fantasy, in order to support President Trump and the Republican party.

In a reply to this post:

http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/the-same-russian-troll-accounts-tweeting-election-propaganda-were-also-tweeting-about-ufos-and-ancient-mysteries

you peddled a wild conspiracy theory regarding the Russian hacking of the DNC. You did the same here:

http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/friends-of-david-wilcock-say-he-resigned-from-gaia-tv-over-bad-pay-poor-working-conditions-and-lucifer

except there I also debunked it.

In this post:

http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/survey-how-would-you-like-to-see-this-blog-handle-comments

and this post:

http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/on-anti-semitic-conspiracy-theories

you attempted to argue that Mr. Colavito's refusal to sign onto your love of your favorite reality TV star, President Donald Trump, had somehow made him sloppy. Your doing so in the latter post, wherein Mr. Colavito called President Trump to task for utilizing another wild conspiracy theory to his advantage, is particularly offensive.

You did something similar here.

http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/acting-attorney-generals-bigfoot-and-time-travel-claims-plus-kentuckys-governor-blames-zombie-tv-for-mass-shootings

Here's another instance of you defending President Trump, a Fringe figure as I have noted, against a perceived assault by our host, by quoting one of the President's favorite phrases to use against a news outlet that dares challenge him.

http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/the-new-york-times-runs-major-feature-on-ancient-aliens-casts-ancient-astronaut-theorists-as-friendly-lovable-rogues-searching-for-god

Oh, and here's one of my favorites, wherein you assert that I would advocate murdering immigrants if I thought they were going to vote Republican (you also defend the President in this one):

http://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/the-spring-2018-edition-of-alien-con-finds-ancient-aliens-stars-musing-about-humility-opening-star-gates-and-disclosure

There's other examples too but really I don't have time for more.

For someone who does not "trust" any politician, why take all this time defending one? Maybe you don't consider President Trump to a "politician?" Many of his supporters seem not to, based on stuff they way in public. (Maybe someone will study and quantify, or at least explicate more fully than I feel like doing, this phenomenon one day.)

-An Anonymous Nerd

"I Am a Assistant Professor"

3/29/2020 10:20:04 pm

Anonymous Nerd. Your posts are very long. Please self-edit.

An Anonymous Nerd

3/30/2020 07:33:04 am

[Anonymous Nerd. Your posts are very long. Please self-edit.]

Looks like your post could do with some editing -- a simple thought like this doesn't require a full line. Next time try: "tldr, lol, u suk."

Spouting bunk is easy, and requires but a few lines, no references required. Debunking is harder, and requires more space, preferably with some references. Also, generally, more-complicated thoughts require more space to convey.

The Right/Fringe's response is usually something like yours -- you spout bunk that requires space to debunk then complain that the debunking takes too long. Or something along the lines of "womp, womp." Who knew the lack of an attention span would be such a political advantage in these times.

*shrugs*

-An Anonymous Nerd

Bezalel

3/30/2020 02:11:19 pm

In response to “I AM A ASSISTANT PROFESSOR”

Gotta side with Anonymous Nerd here... in order to respond to Mr. Scales usually outrageous hypocrisy requires a step-by-step repudiation. Scales has shown himself to be a right lurching, unhinged fringe participant and overly politically triggered, despite his vociferous objections on this blog.

Never did Scales defend the actions of Obama to the level that he jumps to the defense of Trump whenever his idiotic behavior, antics or mouth spew comes into play.

Scales to Colavito: “Leave politics out of your review unless it involves criticizing the left”

Joe Scales

3/30/2020 03:17:29 pm

"I'll start with an instance where you promoted a wild conspiracy fantasy, in order to support President Trump and the Republican party."

So I finally reply to you with an honest question and do I get an answer? No. I don't. Instead, you continue your lies in regard to me somehow promoting conspiracy theories and being part of your fringe.

You can dredge up past posts of mine. That's fine. I am not ashamed of them and perhaps you could learn from them if only you could put aside your partisan blinders and check your compulsion to seek underlying motives that do not exist within your perceived political opposition. If you feel you somehow came out ahead in such interactions, it's amazing that you would feel the need to relitigate them. But your conclusions do not match your links. Par for the course, I'm afraid.

I understand why you'd avoid my question. Perhaps you realized your folly in this regard. But at this point, it is pretty much you trying to set forth an inaccurate assessment of not only my written words, but my political affiliation. Given that I know you to be in error, your continued insistence only solidifies in my mind that it is completely worthless to attempt discourse with you. But go ahead. Try to play fair. Answer the question... and please... be brief. Otherwise, please pester someone else instead. You're just not worth it. My attention, that is. Though I know that may hurt.

Jim

3/30/2020 04:27:53 pm

"So I finally reply to you with an honest question and do I get an answer? No. "

What was your question Joe ?
I can't for the life of me find a question.

An Anonymous Nerd

3/30/2020 07:36:52 pm

[So I finally reply to you with an honest question and do I get an answer?]

There was a question in there? Closest thing is this:

[it would appear by your aside that you might believe that politicians you favor care about you personally. Please name them,]

which isn't a question, exactly, rather it's closer to one of your "you're a lying liar" posts.

I found evidence of your doing what you said you don't do, and you don't like it. It's a simple matter, really.

*shrugs*

-An Anonymous Nerd

Joe Scales

3/31/2020 11:37:29 am

"I found evidence of your doing what you said you don't do, and you don't like it. It's a simple matter, really."

A simple matter for a simpleton, perhaps. Consider this. Do you imagine the ACLU to be a white supremacist group when they defend the KKK? I would hope not, yet I do not get the same courtesy in this regard.

Good day Nerd. Be safe. And try to think things out a bit more without those blinders. There is no truth in politics.

An Anonymous Nerd

3/31/2020 02:17:31 pm

["I found evidence of your doing what you said you don't do, and you don't like it. It's a simple matter, really."

A simple matter for a simpleton, perhaps. Consider this. Do you imagine the ACLU to be a white supremacist group when they defend the KKK? I would hope not, yet I do not get the same courtesy in this regard.

Good day Nerd. Be safe. And try to think things out a bit more without those blinders. There is no truth in politics. ]

Insults are cute and all, and you folks on the Right/Fringe are superb at them, but it doesn't matter for the actual substance. (Sadly it matters for electoral success, and also sadly matters for the flame war you for some reason are engaging in. Sooner or later I'll get tired and leave the discussion.)

Not sure how you find an analogy between yourself and the ACLU. You clearly defending Mr. Trump in a context of agreeing with him, not defending some overall principle. The ACLU can articulate what principle they think they're defending. The best you can seem to manage is that, somehow, Mr. Colavito's politics interfere with the debunking but isn't it funny how you're only concerned with this when it's the Right/Fringe that's at issue? (I note again the connection between the Fringe and the Right.)

As to the question you raise, it's an interesting question, whether or not a free, tolerant, and society can accommodate those who are opposed to the freedom, tolerance, and diversity it stands for. I have no answers for you I am afraid (I never formed an opinion one way or the other), but if memory serves Michael Sandel is a good place to start your reading. I forget if it's addressed in "Liberalism and the Limits of Justice" or "Democracy's Discontent." Broadly speaking I tend to find myself at once mistrusting the ACLU for some purposes and admiring them for others.

Mostly mistrusting. Not as much as I mistrust Leon Podesta though.

-An Anonymous Nerd

Hope Hicks

3/26/2020 02:34:08 pm

White House officials and Trump are not the same thing. His administration has a high staff turnover rate. It is not unrealistic to suspect that someone might end up on staff who could be persuaded to give someone like Sarfetti a fifteen minute sitdown.

Doc Rock

3/26/2020 11:19:35 pm

If Kanye West can get open microphone at the White House then anybody has a shot. But then again, didn't a VIP's ankle monitor go off during a visit to the Obama White House. The bar seems to be set low for invitations no matter who is in the White House. Special relationships, I guess.

Jack Sarfatti link

3/27/2020 12:18:00 am

Hello Hope
Check with James Angleton and Ron Pandolfi who have mentioned me to POTUS more than once I have been told.
As far as Vladimir Putin is concerned if you look at this Russian News video from June 2016 on then Candidate Trump you will see me twice towards the end.

https://www.5-tv.ru/glavnoe/broadcasts/509155/476/?fbclid=IwAR2JHhn4pqN8jT9XINB63X-62-8VIOxJv2wrMbdRiIqED5yI95nepQiYe-o

Also POTUS appointed Michael Weiner (Savage) to the Presidio Trust Board of Directors today. Michael and I have been close friends since the late 1970s.

Sincerely Jack Sarfatti

An Anonymous Nerd

3/27/2020 11:08:43 am

[If Kanye West can get open microphone at the White House then anybody has a shot.]

Interesting point. Kanye West should be at the bottom of pretty much any barrel he happens to be in.

[But then again, didn't a VIP's ankle monitor go off during a visit to the Obama White House.]

I hadn't heard of this before, but the answer is: Yep! Here's a link for anyone curious.

https://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/rick-ross-ankle-bracelete-white-house-article-1.2607186

Most amusing.

-An Anonymous Nerd

Doc Rock

3/27/2020 10:33:12 pm

Under different circumstances the ankle monitor incident could have gone from a minor lightly reported "amusing" event that nobody really remembers to a hot media topic that makes the books. Just depends on the time and the lens that one is looking thru...

An Anonymous Nerd

3/28/2020 08:51:21 pm

[Under different circumstances the ankle monitor incident could have gone from a minor lightly reported "amusing" event that nobody really remembers to a hot media topic that makes the books. Just depends on the time and the lens that one is looking thru... ]

Surely, it could be one's "lens" that matters most here. Sure could. The attention this matter seems to have been given by the Fringe/Right press lends credence to that idea, surely.

But it also could be a matter of context and association, and less a matter of the lens of the viewer.

Here's what I mean. Per the article I linked to, the context was as follows:

[The rapper was supporting Obama's My Brother's Keeper initiative, which aims to keep young minority men out of the criminal justice system.]

Surely it is not unexpected that someone at such an initiative has had involvement with the criminal justice system.

I submit that it's plausible, therefore, that the event being considered minor, and being treated as such, by most mainstream sources has more to do with context and association than with the "lens" of the viewer.

You provided one explanation, one which you seemed to indicate was an exclusive explanation. ["Just depends on the time and the lens that one is looking thru... "] I've provided an alternative one: Irrespective of the "lens" of the viewer, the controlling factor could be context.

And now, my personal view: I don't think anyone with a pending charge that serious should be that close to any President of the United States. I note that if I'm reading Google's results correctly Mr. Ross eventually was convicted.

-An Anonymous Nerd

Doc Rock

3/28/2020 09:51:27 pm

What you say is context a more objective person used to analyzing this type of thing could argue is just as much a matter of your lens. Thanks for helping to illustrate my point.

An Anonymous Nerd

3/28/2020 11:04:48 pm

[What you say is context a more objective person used to analyzing this type of thing could argue is just as much a matter of your lens. Thanks for helping to illustrate my point. ]

A "more objective" person only if by that term you mean one dedicated to agreeing with you, I guess. I offered an alternative explanation, one based on context instead of "lens." Your reaction is an attempt at a high-brow insult. Throw in some bigger words and you might reach the intellectual heights of William Buckley or Pat Buchanan with that one.

*shrugs* Oh well.

-An Anonymous Nerd

Kent

3/30/2020 05:45:39 pm

Mr. Sarfatti:

As of today The My Pillow Guy (Jack Horkheimer redux) is officially a friend of the President. That's right, The My Pillow Guy is closer to the levers of power.

JACK SARFATTI

10/26/2021 10:46:58 am

I was the first to connect UFOs, WARP DRIVE and METAMATERIALS in Oct 2011 at an invited paper to DARPA-NASA meeting in Orlando.

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20120321-searching-for-a-starship

Incompetent journalist Jason Colavito totally blew it in this article

Jack Sarfatti

10/31/2021 05:10:36 am

Fake news cite your sources.
Two CIA agents I know with access to Trump while POTUS briefed him about my work.

Jack Sarfatti

10/31/2021 05:28:34 am

That UFOs are time machines was already discussed in intelligence community back in the 1970s as shown in a CIA recording of me with Hal Puthoff and Russell Targ from 1973 with an excerpt on my Sound Cloud Channel. This was confirmed by Franc Milburn - Sandhurst, British Army Intelligence ret a few days ago https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6l-ZtXH880

JACK SARFATTI

11/7/2021 06:01:17 am

FYI

John Warner IV below is son of late Senator John Warner and is Chris Mellon’s cousin - both related to Andrew Mellon.

The Insiders
Bigelow Aerospace, lethal extraterrestrial UFOs,
and alien battle tales revealed

Bigelow Aerospace, lethal extraterrestrial UFOs, and alien battle tales revealed
Gary S. Bekkum
June 13, 2010

Dr. Jack Sarfatti, the maverick San Francisco physicist, relates a story he was told about a battle with the aliens.

Updated with additional information.

(STARpod.org) -- It sounds like a Hollywood plot for a 21st century remake of Earth versus the Flying Saucers.

San Francisco physicist Dr. Jack Sarfatti claims to have heard the rumor while visiting London in 2004, while in the company of Nick Cook, the well known aerospace journalist from the private intelligence publisher Janes Information Group.

"I was asked by the 'CIA' not to pursue the story in 2004, but now Bigelow has (allegedly, it seems) opened Pandora's Box on the story."

Sarfatti came forward with the rumor following a remark made by billionaire space maven Bob Bigelow to the New York Times about the dangers of UFOs:

"People have been killed. People have been hurt. It´s more than observational kind of data."

The New York Times had interviewed Bigelow about his recent efforts to build a private space station. In the article, Bigelow was quoted about the lethality of the UFO phenomena, but the basis for Bigelow's statement was not pursued.

According to Sarfatti, the rumor of a battle between Bob Bigelow's employees and otherworldly beings was provided by a mysterious French woman, who was accompanied by a body guard carrying a mystery briefcase allegedly containing "some kind of 'psychotronic' weapon based on alien ET technology."

Sarfatti says the woman claimed to be part of a semi-secret Paris UFO group, and the woman attributed the story to Jacques Vallee, the internationally famous researcher who inspired the French UFO researcher Claude Lacombe in Steven Spielberg's classic UFO film Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

Sarfatti quickly added, "Allegedly Jacques Vallee denies the story, but now Bob Bigelow seems to have gone public with it -- albeit without the details."

Apparently Sarfatti, who in recent years has consulted to Dr. Ron Pandolfi (for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence) on speculative ideas related to reverse engineering hypothetical extraterrestrial technologies, also knows more of this rumor than he is willing to make public.

"I am not divulging details only the general nature of the remarks. In any case Nick Cook heard them also."

In the 1990s, Bob Bigelow funded UFO investigations under a group he founded called the National Institute of Discovery Sciences, also known as NIDS.

Among the many investigations conducted by NIDS was the mysterious case of the so-called Bigelow Skinwalker Ranch in a remote region of Utah, where a variety of paranormal phenomena had been reported.

One experience made public by former NIDS personnel was the report of a nearly invisible being emerging from a tunnel that appeared to float in thin air, which led to speculation of an opening from another world -- a star gate -- built from a spacetime wormhole.

According to Sarfatti's account, the French woman "claimed an actual gun battle at Bigelow Ranch with Bob's paramilitary against aliens out of the wormhole with dead and wounded humans. She was very convincing and Nick Cook heard the strange tale at his private London Club with me and another witness. I debriefed Kit Green and Ron Pandolfi soon after and the story caused a big stir."

Pandolfi and Green are well known for their interest in unusual phenomena and their history of employment with the CIA.

Given the many reports of pilots who have lost their lives pursuing UFOs beyond the safe operating range of their aircraft, Bigelow's comments to the New York Times may have a more mundane explanation.

Until Mr. Bigelow comes forward with a more detailed explanation for his comments about lethal UFO encounters, Sarfatti's expose' of the rumor will only further inflame allegations of a cover-up among the fringe elements of the UFO community.

Update: Following the release of the original version of this article, Jack Sarfatti issued his own release in which he states:

"Bob Bigelow is like Howard Hughes. He has his own private satellite and has funded UFO research. He owns a Utah Ranch where it is alleged that ETs pop out of Star Gates and have had battles with Bigelow's armed staff. We do not know if these rumors are true, but Bigelow's alleged recent remarks to the New York Times seem to support the rumor...We are not claiming the story reported by Bekkum here is true, only that it is very strange and Bekkum does accurately report what I was told in London in late March of 2004 in the same room with Nick Cook."

Sarfatti also confirmed that his reference to "CIA" was actually a reference to Pandolfi and Green. The associ

Kent

3/26/2020 02:03:41 pm

Physicists, even "good" ones, often have weird ideas, e.g. Wheeler's "There is only one electron" which isn't actually all that weird.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-electron_universe
https://io9.gizmodo.com/what-if-every-electron-in-the-universe-was-all-the-same-5876966

"He’s harmless. Part of the free speech movement at Berkeley in the sixties. I think he did a little too much LDS."

Elvis got a meeting with Nixon, Common got a meeting with Obama. Perhaps "Wanting a White House Meeting" is a sort of American "Jerusalem Syndrome" but one where the delusion precedes the actual visit.

All that to say, Sarfatti's not losing me any sleep.

Bezalel

3/26/2020 11:17:58 pm

”Physicists, even "good" ones, often have weird ideas, e.g. Wheeler's "There is only one electron" which isn't actually all that weird.”

You don’t have half the background to know whether or not that concept is weird.

Jack Sarfatti link

3/27/2020 12:20:21 am

LOL, it's LSD genius. I was NOT part of the FREE SPEECH MOVEMENT in 1968. I was a assistant professor of physics at San Diego State University in 1968.

Bug Baby

3/28/2020 03:48:12 pm

It's a quote from Star Trek 4 where a time traveler from the future invents transparent aluminium.

Nick Danger

3/26/2020 03:32:16 pm

Metamaterials can channel "time waves"? I'd LOVE to see the studies behind THAT assertion!

JACK SARFATTI

3/30/2020 01:43:57 pm

Straw Man I made no such claim. Your allegation is word salad. I am sick of idiots who have no competence in physics trying to tell me how to do my job.

Jack Sarfatti

11/6/2021 04:58:57 am

Straw man another stupid comment from an ignoramous who has no understanding of physics.

Darold knowles

3/26/2020 09:58:27 pm

TV ratings in general have risen during this period (except for sports oriented channels which have no live sports to broadcast), but ad revenue will crater.

“Analysts are predicting a steep 19%-20% immediate drop in TV advertising revenue in the second quarter and a drop of more than 10% for the full year. The ad categories expected to lead the decline are among the most crucial for TV sales: travel, retail and automotive.”

https://variety.com/2020/biz/news/wall-street-forecasts-coronavirus-permanent-damage-1203545189/

Broadcast television will look quite a bit different after this is all over.

Jack Sarfatti link

3/27/2020 12:11:31 am

I first suggested meta-materials for UFO propulsion back in 2011 when General Pete Worden (USAF Space-Command ret) then head of NASA AMES flew me to Orlando in October to the DARPA NASA 100 Year Starship. This was years before Tic Tac was disclosed. Two CIA guys I know for years with access to Trump have briefed him on my work. As soon as Trump is re-elected and the CV-19 crisis is over, then I will probably meet with him. Trump knows who I am as does Vladimir Putin. Jason is not my peer. I am a PhD physicist (U California and Cornell) with 60 years in the field not a pop journalist who writes on science for the layman.

Bezalel

3/27/2020 08:09:31 pm

Jack
Thanks for having the balls to post here.
I’ve been interested in UFOs for decades.

Would you please advise this panel to what extent the prevailing evidence you have (or are aware of) suggests these meta-materials you reference were not developed on earth.

By earthlings.

jack link

3/27/2020 12:29:14 am

for the record
see MIT Professor David Kaiser's books
How the Hippies Saved Physics
Groovy Science

CEO at Private foundation
Former Instructor at US NAVY PACE
Former Assistant professor of physics at San Diego State University
Former Teaching assistant at UC San Diego
Former Physicist at United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority
Former Physicist at Tech Ops (CIA contractor)
Studied Physics at University of California, San Diego
Studied Physics at Cornell University
Went to Midwood High School
Lives in San Francisco, California
From New York, New York
Followed by 545 people
Jack Sarfatti
stardrive.org

Jim

3/27/2020 10:40:53 am

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Sarfatti

"Jack Sarfatti (born September 14, 1939) is an American theoretical physicist. Working largely outside academia,"

"According to Kaiser, Sarfatti's politics have leaned to the right since the early 1980s, when he became dependent on a cadre of "politically conservative thinkers who were drawn to certain New Age ideas" for research funding following the dissolution of his relationship with Werner Erhard. He endorses the Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory and perceives the majority of faculty at American universities as constituting "the enemy within."

https://www.academia.edu/37879591/Destiny_Matrix_Making_Star_Trek_Real_The_Metric_Engineering_of_Warp_Drive_and_Star_Gate_Time_Travel_The_World_According_to_Jack_The_Life_and_Times_of_a_Theatrical_Physicist

"Destiny Matrix Making Star Trek Real: The Metric Engineering of Warp Drive and Star Gate Time Travel The World According to Jack The Life and Times of a Theatrical Physicist"

https://www.academia.edu/17018493/Low_Power_Warp_Drive

"Is Low Power Warp Drive Possible?
Breaking the Space-Time Stiffness Barrier
Jack Sarfatti"

http://stardrive.org/stardrive/index.php/all-blog-articles/13654-

" Is our universe a conscious hologram?
Yes, and I have solved it
Post quantum gravity = Conscious Universe "

Do doughnut holes emit anti gravity particles ? asking for a friend.

JACK SARFATTI

3/29/2020 10:29:03 am

I detect a vacuum between your ears. ;-)

Jim

3/30/2020 06:29:21 am

LOL

https://www.5-tv.ru/glavnoe/broadcasts/509155/476/?fbclid=IwAR2JHhn4pqN8jT9XINB63X-62-8VIOxJv2wrMbdRiIqED5yI95nepQiYe-o

(Google translate)

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.5-tv.ru%2Fglavnoe%2Fbroadcasts%2F509155%2F476%2F%3Ffbclid%3DIwAR2JHhn4pqN8jT9XINB63X-62-8VIOxJv2wrMbdRiIqED5yI95nepQiYe-o

Jack Sarfatti, political scientist:

“This is an absolute lie! It is not true. Trump received only one million from his father. He himself built a billion-dollar campaign out of that million. And, by the way, he returned everything to his father. ”

Jack Sarfatti link

3/27/2020 09:34:53 pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHGYprFP9qQ&t=7s
The metamaterials I think will be developed by ME and my group in Italy provided we don't all die in the Apocalypse unleashed by China I think deliberately by the way. This is time travel like in 12 Monkeys. Listen carefully to the video here. It's all there.

Jim

3/28/2020 09:08:42 am

"Apocalypse unleashed by China I think deliberately by the way."

Ya, OK then, you think China unleashed the Corona virus upon themselves with no cure or immunization. Brilliant.

I would really like to hear the reasoning behind why you think this.

JACK SARFATTI

3/29/2020 10:30:14 am

CCP has no qualms to sacrifice their own people.

Jim

3/29/2020 01:40:55 pm

That is your reasoning ? Really ?
It sounds like you just threw out a racist conspiracy theory with absolutely no basis whatsoever. And that, right after you listed all your credentials in an attempt to gain credibility.
Yikes.

What makes your baseless theory any better than the ones floating around that US were responsible for starting it ?

I don't think you are gaining any traction here in trying to get people to buy into the your wild ideas when you blow up your own credibility and show how little you rely on actual data and evidence.

Can you give us a more reasonable explanation for why you think the Chinese unleashed this "Apocalypse" upon themselves?

Kent

3/29/2020 03:40:23 pm

In the spirit of treating Mr. Sarfatti as a guest rather than someone whose every utterance must be knee-jerkedly gainsaid, let me propose this:

-- It was a Tuskegee Experiment that escaped into the wild.

That has the virtue of explaining equally Chinese origin and American origin. Calling it "a racist conspiracy" is actually itself racist.

Bug Baby

3/28/2020 09:46:47 pm

I think it's so rare that the subject of one of Jason's articles responds here that it behooves us (Kent, Jim, Bezalel, eg) to treat him as a guest rather than pounce on him.

Bezalel

3/28/2020 10:57:55 pm

Jack
Ok That’s what I thought.
Dismissed

I’m disappointed you are so naive to believe that, Despite 99.9% of the defense/aerospace organization...right up to the highest classified levels...NOT being familiar with gravitational theory at its depth, That the remaining top people...who have kept things secret for 60 years... dont understand these things either. In fact they have (at the conceptual level)...and have experimented with black projects and secret money to develop craft and allow them to be viewed as otherworldly by the rest of the group.

They are simply trying to determine whether you can figure out what they (those in the 0.1%) have known for decades.

Just like the atomic bomb there have been plenty of physicists who understand what you are talking about and through these last few decades those students and professionals who have studied and understood
Gravitation by Wheeler,
Electrodynamics by Melvin Schwartz,
Lev Landau’s three texts (actually four of 10) on classical fields and waves and relativistic quantum mechanics and the electrodynamics of materials,
ANY text on Gauge Theory,
They also understand it. Especially those (as you imply in the interview) who work with Multi-disciplinary physics.

It may be upsetting to think that there are still some people on the planet who have kept all this secret and who are allowing even the best of us to falsely believe that the progressively sophisticated UFOs that we have seen over the past 6 decades have been developed by aliens, but the actual MORE LIKELY fact is they were developed by US and they’re waiting for the rest of us to catch up...and they want to spend our money to pay you to develop what is already known.
They had to keep this secret, think about it.

You are naive otherwise.

And it’s not that difficult to imagine how to generate and project a local gravitational field (that is 3 to 4 times more intense than the earths field) and use this to cause ships made of special material to fall toward that projected field, already knowing that falling objects (regardless of direction) experience very little distortion.

Kent

3/29/2020 02:02:41 pm

And they're breeding Guild Navigators in tanks underneath the site of the old Heurich Brewery.

You say "And it’s not that difficult to imagine how to generate and project a local gravitational field (that is 3 to 4 times more intense than the earths field)" and rather than ask you to explain how it would be done because you state you are imagining, I will ask this simple all-purpose question:

Where does the power come from?

Any solution that begins "Assume a non-existent power source" can be dismissed out of hand.

Bezalel

3/29/2020 10:37:00 pm

“Any solution that begins "Assume a non-existent power source" can be dismissed out of hand.”

Then I suggest you should stop assuming there is no power source needed. I didn’t.

Undergrad pre-Engineering assignment for you: design at least 2 sources of power for the above referenced scenario. No need for calculations at this point, just a block diagram or concept would suffice. A power plant to drive the source is also required, name at least three types.

Trust me you don’t want to assume you’re qualified to pursue this.

Kent

3/30/2020 05:39:02 pm

"No need for calculations at this point, just a block diagram or concept would suffice. A power plant to drive the source is also required, name at least three types."

I look forward to you spelling it out, my Beloved. No one's stopping you. Just answer the simple all-purpose question:

Where does the power come from?

JACK SARFATTI

3/29/2020 10:33:15 am

You are wrong. If they did it before me they would have revealed it by now. Also CIA & DOD. asked me to work on. it in the 1970s. In. any case I have the details and my competition has. bubbkas - vapor ware.

Bezalel

3/30/2020 11:38:34 am

Jack
It’s apparent you believe there are no layers or levels within the Defense Intelligence community that are beyond your awareness horizon.

Given what you SHOULD know about the general intelligence environment in the late 40s through late 50s, and it’s strong coupling with politics and the physics community, it’s hard to believe you believe that.

JACK SARFATTI

3/29/2020 10:36:08 am

Nonlinear Resonant Meta-Material EM Susceptibilities
Desk Top Low Energy Quantum Gravity?

jacksarfatti@icloud.com

March 29, 2020
Year of the CCP Pandemic
San Francisco Bunker

Woke up 4 AM to following “thought” (edited):
Nonlinear response tensors of metamaterials are actually exponential functions whose arguments are the complex susceptibilities.

(1.1)

The imaginary part of the susceptibility exponential function oscillates, and in the negative quadrature it generates repulsive antigravity confined near fields. In the positive region it generates attractive gravity. I compute simplest case parallel plate capacitor attached to a battery voltage with meta-material between the plates.

(1.2)

For simplicity I here only do the weak gravity field Newtonian limit of Einstein’s General Relativity limiting to the static gravity near field Poisson equation, taking the real part:

(1.3)

The Planck distance can grow very large in a resonance giving very low energy quantum gravity

(1.4)

Can be much larger than 10-66 cm2.

OK it’s about 4:30 in the morning and San Francisco and I woke up to this thought actually I’m still in bed haven’t really woken up yet

if you want to see the equations contact jacksarfatti@icloud.com

Kent

3/29/2020 07:12:19 pm

"The Planck distance can grow very large in a resonance giving very low energy quantum gravity

(1.4)

Can be much larger than 10-66 cm2"

I think the judges are going to have to ask for explanation on that. Both magnitude and unit of measure if you please.

Jack Sarfatti link

5/19/2020 11:41:39 pm

Obviously yes, that is my point.

Bezalel

3/30/2020 02:00:23 pm

Jack one other thing said Peter falk:

“The imaginary part of the susceptibility exponential function oscillates, and in the negative quadrature it generates repulsive antigravity confined near fields.“

Any complex exponential is an oscillator, this is undergrad RF and microwave EE, and/or 3rd year physics. Add in the susceptibility term to involve Electrodynamics inside media.

If you’re claiming basic EM fields (monochromatic I assume as the math forces) as the source of your “repulsive antigravity confined near fields” then you’re in the same camp as Leonard Cramp’s “electrogravitic theory” nonsense, among other pseudo-scientists, the most egregiously ignorant of whom is the vastly undereducated Lieutenant Thomas E. Bearden

Hope you’re not doing that

Jack Sarfatti link

5/19/2020 11:43:21 pm

You are all a bunch of clueless idiots without the slightest understanding of physics.

Bezalel

3/29/2020 11:37:57 am

Jack, Thanks for your response, the equations don’t show up so I’ll email you I guess
But
Taking your resonance idea into a different direction is it not possible to formulate a low energy, thus low temperature (say laser induced) method of densifying matter at small scales.
Asking for a friend.

i.e.
Remove the electromagnetic field from any sample of matter (maybe it’s metamaterial, maybe it’s just water, maybe it’s mercury)...by doing so the nucleons should collapse on one another creating a dense bit of matter.

Would not take that much to generate a G field as strong as the earth’s...few ounces maybe...either way this becomes an academic math problem. And 16 elements in the Stress Energy Tensor are reduced to one (that is, Tøø) or at most 4.
And yeah you can still use Einstein’s equation if you want:

Gûv = 8piTûv (ñ/c)*4

with your added index of refraction term, but don’t need 256 equations just 4. No need for quantum gravity either, which is still not understood

If the remaining matter is mostly neutrons (which have a magnetic moment), the new G field can theoretically be contained and possibly projected. This is just one way that black budget money can be used to manufacture a very terrestrial non-time traveling TicTac.

Could’ve been done in the 50s when plasma physics was becoming of interest, lasers were under study and holography was already invented.

JACK SARFATTI

3/30/2020 01:54:55 pm

REPLY
BEZALEL
3/30/2020 11:38:34 am
Jack
"It’s apparent you believe there are no layers or levels within the Defense Intelligence community that are beyond your awareness horizon."

Jack: No one inside USG understands this properly. I am sure of that. I

"Given what you SHOULD know about the general intelligence environment in the late 40s through late 50s, and it’s strong coupling with politics and the physics community, it’s hard to believe you believe that."

Look wise guy, I was there then. My teachers were part that. It's precisely because I was there in the late 1950s at top levels that I know I am right on this. Of course, I could be proved wrong. But the problem is simple and I have solved it (in principle).

REPLY
JACK SARFATTI
3/29/2020 10:36:08 am
Nonlinear Resonant Meta-Material EM Susceptibilities
Desk Top Low Energy Quantum Gravity?

jacksarfatti@icloud.com

March 29, 2020
Year of the CCP Pandemic
San Francisco Bunker

Woke up 4 AM to following “thought” (edited):
Nonlinear response tensors of metamaterials are actually exponential functions whose arguments are the complex susceptibilities.

(1.1)

The imaginary part of the susceptibility exponential function oscillates, and in the negative quadrature it generates repulsive antigravity confined near fields. In the positive region it generates attractive gravity. I compute simplest case parallel plate capacitor attached to a battery voltage with meta-material between the plates.

(1.2)

For simplicity I here only do the weak gravity field Newtonian limit of Einstein’s General Relativity limiting to the static gravity near field Poisson equation, taking the real part:

(1.3)

The Planck distance can grow very large in a resonance giving very low energy quantum gravity

(1.4)

Can be much larger than 10-66 cm2.

OK it’s about 4:30 in the morning and San Francisco and I woke up to this thought actually I’m still in bed haven’t really woken up yet

if you want to see the equations contact jacksarfatti@icloud.com

REPLY
KENT
3/29/2020 07:12:19 pm
"The Planck distance can grow very large in a resonance giving very low energy quantum gravity

(1.4)

"Can be much larger than 10-66 cm2"

Jack: Obviously that's what I meant.

"I think the judges are going to have to ask for explanation on that. Both magnitude and unit of measure if you please."

Jack: Look Genius I have written the exact equation/prediction for my allegation that any competent physicist will instantly understand.

REPLY
BEZALEL
3/29/2020 11:37:57 am
"Jack, Thanks for your response, the equations don’t show up so I’ll email you I guess
But
Taking your resonance idea into a different direction is it not possible to formulate a low energy, thus low temperature (say laser induced) method of densifying matter at small scales.
Asking for a friend."i

Jack: You and your friend are clearly not competent in physics. Your sentences are nonsense word-salad ill-posed having no meaning to any professional mainstream physicist.
1) we have no need for low termperature
2) "densifying matter" - nonsense irrelevant nothing to do with what is happening here.

i.e.
"Remove the electromagnetic field from any sample of matter (maybe it’s metamaterial, maybe it’s just water, maybe it’s mercury)...by doing so the nucleons should collapse on one another creating a dense bit of matter."

Jack: Complete idiotic nonsense. You are wasting time with stupidity and total ignorance of the subject. I stop reading your not even wrong nonsense here. :-(

Would not take that much to generate a G field as strong as the earth’s...few ounces maybe...either way this becomes an academic math problem. And 16 elements in the Stress Energy Tensor are reduced to one (that is, Tøø) or at most 4.
And yeah you can still use Einstein’s equation if you want:

Gûv = 8piTûv (ñ/c)*4

with your added index of refraction term, but don’t need 256 equations just 4. No need for quantum gravity either, which is still not understood

If the remaining matter is mostly neutrons (which have a magnetic moment), the new G field can theoretically be contained and possibly projected. This is just one way that black budget money can be used to manufacture a very terrestrial non-time traveling TicTac.

Could’ve been done in the 50s when plasma physics was becoming of interest, lasers were under study and holography was already invented.

Jim

3/30/2020 04:00:11 pm

"Year of the CCP Pandemic"

It's not the CCP Pandemic it's COVID 19

Kent

3/30/2020 04:51:43 pm

Mr. Sarfatti:

First, you don't have to quote the entire goshdarn Bible every time.

Second, it's clear that you've spotted that one of our posters is not the most Craftsman of tools.

Third, please 'splain to me Lucy how the Planck "distance" is expressed in square centimeters.

Bezalel

3/30/2020 05:07:26 pm

Sorry you missed my point.
You’re missing the forest through the trees and allowing blunt terminology to stunt your comprehension of what I’m getting on.

We manufactured airships in the 50s and 60s with extreme acceleration capabilities without the use of meta-materials Jack.... whilst right under your nose. You’re stuck in a paradigm that forces you to conclude UFOs are of extraterrestrial origin, because you believe the only known way to manufacture them is with meta-materials, which have only been under development after 2000 or so.

I know you know how lasers work.
I know you know what dense plasmas are.
Laser boosts electrons out of their orbits, even to ionization levels. Relatively high temperature plasmas resulted, but with very small samples of matter this was not a big problem, although stability and containment were challenges just as they were with the bombs.

All the necessary engineering challenges aside for the moment (not the place for that, nor for high level physics discussions, tensor equations or complex exponentials, etc), this is what was needed to generate high G fields at small scales. Enough to propel a small ship, toward said field.

What happens to the volume of a small amount of matter when the repulsive electron field has been removed?
Answer: Collapse
this allows for both high gravity and light bending, just as in the center of a neutron star.

Metamaterials allow for light bending at lower temps yes, but NOT localized high g fields. Something is still missing.

JACK SARFATTI

3/30/2020 04:43:28 pm

All these comments are by stupid people who do not understand the subject and are completely clueless of how stupid they really are.. Very low level of discourse not worth my time.

Kent

3/30/2020 07:06:44 pm

Mr. Sarfatti:

Have you considered the implications of "All these comments"?

That said, it's quite a treat to see you and Mr. Bezalel going at it. As you were.

Jim

3/30/2020 08:57:07 pm

Yup, your time may be better wasted fawning over Trump and retweeting conspiracy theories on twitter.

https://twitter.com/JackSarfatti/status/1244670901095821312

JACK SARFATTI

3/31/2020 12:44:04 am

re: "I asked an honest question ..."
The clueless person asking the question is so ignorant of the subject that the "question" is complete nonsense word salad with no meaning whatsoever in terms of my profession of physics with over 60 years in the field and a PhD in it from University of California.

JACK SARFATTI

3/31/2020 12:53:23 am

Bezalel

3/31/2020 04:22:04 pm

Lmao
Well I must admit it makes perfect sense I am being derided by both Saffarti and Kent
😂

Jack for all your decades in physics it does seem you are inadequately remembering the field of electrodynamics, especially the kind that is Gauge invariant.

Fúv = dAv/dxú - dAú/dxv

Sorry can’t write partial derivatives here lol
Maxwell above can be derived from Einstein‘s field equation (i. e. when the stress energy tensor Túv consists solely of the EM field, that is).* Perhaps you think it’s irrelevant so let’s drop it for the moment.

A more critical point is that you are on the wrong track Jack. Metamaterials are now used for cloaking, not bending space-time. Cloaking was not something we could do in the 50s, bending space-time was.

And if you honestly believe a AAA battery can bend the fabric of space-time like the earth can, then more power to you, but that’s not the physics I was taught! One needs dense matter. I suggest you review Misner Thorne & Wheeler and the original papers on electrodynamics + GR by Einstein to start. MTW will actually help you with the Electrodynamics too, little bit of that in there. Melvin Schwartz did a great synthesizing job in his text with relativity and the 4D electromagnetic tensor, equation seen above. Bet you haven’t studied it. Landau did even better but you must have read him.

Remediation is not a bad thing...it re-orders and refreshes the brain and things learned; I know you know your GR and EM physics better than what you’re portraying.

Anyhoo, back in the day we needed multiple lasers to do the first part of the job (ionization), so that something more like small-scale fusion would take place after that, allowing the localized bending of space-time as a final result. Enough to make you nauseous. Still can’t see how this could occur? Guess you had to be there.

What powered the lasers Einstein?

Various standard and simple power plants could do the job...pick one...any one that can fit inside a 10m or so diameter disk. Power plants have gotten smaller over the years, this has helped.
This has helped.

* MTW pg 471, also Landau vol 2 pg 277

Kent

3/31/2020 06:51:10 pm

"Various standard and simple power plants could do the job...pick one...any one that can fit inside a 10m or so diameter disk."

NO. I'm asking YOU to "pick one...any one". I'm asking you to take off your "I'm Pretending to be a Physicist" hat and back up JUST ONE of your claims.

Once you pick a power source you are saying how much power is needed. That is the issue you are dodging.

Where does the power come from?

I have to accept that Mr. Sarfatti has a degree and has worked in the field. You, not so much.

You talk like someone who's read about physics but doesn't have a degree. Differently, I will tell you upfront that I don't. But I did regularly have dinner with Wheeler's thesis advisor. Often it was lamb and he loved to select the wine. He never mentioned you.

Bezalel

3/31/2020 11:48:49 pm

Emphatic NO

Jesus wept you are a petulant teenager. In no way do you qualify...

Back of the class until you learn

And stop regretting you chose poorly with a Math degree instead of physics

JACK SARFATTI

3/31/2020 06:23:15 pm

"ack for all your decades in physics it does seem you are inadequately remembering the field of electrodynamics, especially the kind that is Gauge invariant.

Fúv = dAv/dxú - dAú/dxv

Sorry can’t write partial derivatives here lol
Maxwell above can be derived from Einstein‘s field equation (i. e. when the stress energy tensor Túv consists solely of the EM field, that is).* Perhaps you think it’s irrelevant so let’s drop it for the moment."

Straw man

Bezalel

3/31/2020 11:45:11 pm

Jack
Don’t get me wrong
I have the highest respect...

You and Sutherland have forged the hero’s journey and actually tranformed Bohm’s revolutionary ideas, bringing them to fruition and evolving them IN SPADES (at least theoretically).

Every moment for every individual quantum computer is characterized by fusing/synthesizing information from the past and information from “the future”.

Genius

I’ve been waiting for this for 4 effing decades
And you have done it.
Nailed it.
100 years hence your name will be associated with an equation. Just hope you are working on how to test these ideas.

But you’re making a mistake when you toy with the idea that any of the so-called UFOs witnessed over the past 75 years were built by aliens.

They have all been us.

And if you couple your work and Sutherland’s and add in your summer 53 episode you will see you were just experimenting with your own empire wave.

If you’re NOT jumping to the alien answer then fine I’ll drop my guard...apologies

JACK SARFATTI

3/31/2020 10:04:08 pm

https://exonews.org/top-physicist-claims-nimitz-ufo-time-travelled-to-reach-19000mph/

Bezalel

4/16/2020 08:14:48 am

A more terrestrial proposal

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a29427713/navy-compact-fusion-reactor/

Bezalel

4/16/2020 08:38:56 am

Another example, published right under my nose
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8871349

Jr. Time Lord

4/20/2020 08:52:09 pm

Mr. Sarfatti,

You don't actually say much in your interview. Briefly, I could see how one could send a hologram back in time. Found it funny envisioning Whitney Houston and Tupac suddenly appearing in the oval office. Being the only two holograms I'm currently aware of.

You lost me claiming the pilots of the tic tac need magnetic boots. What part of a metamaterial would be magnetic? Doesn't that defeat the purpose?

It has been an extremely long time since I've watched "12 Monkeys". All of the copies have been stolen from the local store. Could you elaborate further on the time travel idea?

Thank you!

An Anonymous Nerd

4/3/2020 06:06:13 pm

I've been reading the exchanges here involving Jack Sarfatti, PhD, and based upon what's here this is a particularly interesting case of someone speaking outside of his area in multiple ways and not necessarily taking care to do the core readings in those other areas. And then trying to connect things outside of his area of expertise as though they were within it.

James Randi used to tell a couple of stories about legitimate scientists fooled by magic tricks because they would try to fit what they saw within a scientific framework they understood, rather than realizing the truth: That what they were seeing was an illusion. Paraphrasing Roger Ebert, it wasn't actually happening, only appearing to.

After all, pretty often the explanation that requires the fewest assumptions is more-likely to be correct. Here are some examples. Tic-tac craft likely aren't craft at all but a disparate collection of misunderstood phenomenon. "Meta-materials" likely aren't super-powered metals that can create "quantum gravity fields," but industrial slag. (They shouldn't exist because they never were meant to.)

And, as one final example, the biologists and other scientists who study viruses who concluded that COVID19 is natural, and not created in a laboratory, are more-likely to be correct on this then is a Physicist who believes in the other two examples.

-An Anonymous Nerd

Kent

4/3/2020 10:55:51 pm

"James Randi used to tell a couple of stories..."

James Randi used to get conned by his much younger boyfriend "David" too. The point being, why are you righter than anyone else?

Any answer that includes "something something Adorno" will be rejected out of hand.