Last week, I discussed Expedition Unknown host Josh Gates in his role as a trustee of the Archaeological Institute of America, a nonprofit which “promotes archaeological inquiry and public understanding of the material record of the human past to foster an appreciation of diverse cultures and our shared humanity.” I criticized the AIA for giving a prominent role, both administratively and in terms of public events, to Gates because his program had included some dubious content and awful guests. Gates has occasionally spoken in glowing terms about the ancient astronaut theory, and his show airs on a network owned by Discovery Communications, a conglomerate responsible for some of the most damaging pseudoscientific series of the past few years, such as Legends of the Lost. In response to my tweet tied to that blog post, Gates tweeted a response repudiating the ancient astronaut theory in absolute terms, and then quickly deleted the tweet.
However, it was more than interesting that his repudiation of the ancient astronaut theory and its space alien connections disappeared in time for the announcement of a new Gates-led spinoff series, Expedition X, which will revive the old Destination Truth format and once again send Gates, along with cable TV talking head and scientist Phil Torres and ex-Nerdist broadcaster and paranormal podcaster Jessica Chobot, in search of ghosts, cryptids, and space aliens. Expedition X will focus on, basically, pseudoscience, while the mothership series will retain its focus on more history-based “mysteries.” With the revival of Gates’s participation in hunts for space aliens, ghosts, and other paranormal claims, this heavily undercuts the arguments that Gates has repeatedly made in public events that his current show falls on the more responsible end of the cable spectrum and serves to generate interest in archaeology and science. It’s hard to see another paranormal show, and one on the main Discovery Channel rather than its low-rated sister stations, as anything but more glorification of knowingly fake “mysteries” and pseudoscience. Granted, Destination Truth was never obsessed with pseudoscience, spending more time on local cultures and folklore, but Gates happily trumpeted fake Yeti evidence to promote that series, and the new show will have heavily lifting to do to in order to prove itself anything other another cable paranormal show. The new series will begin airing Feb. 12 and will be the third Gates-helmed series airing on Discovery, alongside Expedition Unknown and Expedition Unknown: After the Hunt. The three shows will air in a block. Gates also hosts a fourth series on Discovery’s Travel Channel, Legendary Locations.
46 Comments
Heavenly Gates
1/17/2020 08:37:33 am
Easy money. That's for sure. And the stuff he peddles will never lose its popularity. The BBC definintively debunked Erich Von Daniken in "The Case of the Ancient Astornauts" in 1977 and that subject matter has risen in massive stature in those 43 years since that documentary was aired. Exopolitics has been invented to buttress flying saucers.
Reply
White person
1/17/2020 10:06:27 am
So called scientist have always been correct about everything.
Reply
ANOTHER WHITE PERSON
1/17/2020 10:15:07 am
Even mainstream zoologists from Universities were looking for the Yeti in Arthur C Clarke's Mysterious World documentary series - that was way back in 1980 - which was 40 years ago. Nothing has been found to date.
Reply
Hickory Dickory
1/17/2020 10:51:22 am
I think we all know what Arthur C. Clarke was looking for.
ANOTHER WHITE PERSON
1/17/2020 02:00:51 pm
I was referring to the guests on the documentary series, not to Arthur C. Clarke.
ANOTHER WHITE PERSON
1/18/2020 01:09:04 am
Josh Gates is no different to those New Testament scholars. Now those are REAL bimbos.
crash55
1/17/2020 11:35:02 am
Personally, I will reserve judgement until we at least see the first episode.
Reply
Brooksie
1/17/2020 11:58:00 am
In American English the “e” is dropped in the word “judgment.”
Reply
Crash55
1/17/2020 12:16:14 pm
According to Merrimack-Webster both are acceptable but the use of the version with the e is older. Without the e is more popular in the US.
Brooksie
1/17/2020 12:19:31 pm
I’m just trying to help you not to appear illiterate. You’re welcome.
Crash55
1/17/2020 12:23:31 pm
No you are nitpicking to try an make yourself look intelligent. For some reason that is a common theme on this blog. There is a wide gap from using British spelling to illiterate, especially in these days of spellchecking.
Brooksie
1/17/2020 12:33:46 pm
Well, you appear to be the type of person who stubbornly refuses to admit when he’s wrong in the face of clear evidence. Perhaps that explains your station in life?
Crash55
1/17/2020 12:39:22 pm
And you appear the type of person that likes to nitpick. I am seriously wondering if you are really Kent under a new screen name.
Bill
1/17/2020 12:46:25 pm
@CRASH55 - Don't feed to troll. No point in arguing since they have already decided they are right no matter what evidence is presented. Maybe they have a hatred for the letter "e", not sure why anyone would care otherwise.
Brooksie
1/17/2020 12:47:07 pm
Christ on a bike, that’s exactly why there was a question mark at the end of the sentence, Mr. Illiterate!
Crash55
1/17/2020 12:52:33 pm
@Bill
Crash55
1/17/2020 12:58:56 pm
Mr/ms troll,
Brooke Shields
1/17/2020 12:53:42 pm
"I'm just trying to help you not appear to be illiterate."
Reply
Franklin
1/17/2020 01:09:09 pm
I didn't go to college but wouldnt knowing both of the correct spellings of a word indicate the opposite of illiterate?
Reply
Kentypoo
1/17/2020 01:27:43 pm
Yes, Franklin, Crash55 knowing both terms is the opposite of illiterate.
Doc Rock
1/17/2020 01:47:05 pm
Try reading Brooksie's comments using the voice of the comic book store owner on the Simpsons.
Crash55
1/17/2020 01:48:14 pm
The generally understood definition of illiterate is being unable to read or right. It can also be used to suggest little to no education or a lack of knowledge in a particular subject. See the link at Webster’s if you care: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/illiterate
I love the name brooksie!
1/17/2020 01:54:13 pm
At least Kent is coming up with some cute names for his latest sock puppets.
Kentypoo
1/17/2020 02:07:28 pm
That comic book store owner on the Simpsons had a master's in Greek mythology. I remember that from the episode where Bart and Milhouse buy a limited edition comic.
Brooksie fanboy
1/17/2020 02:18:38 pm
Returning to the main subject, do you think Josh Gates spells the word “judgment” or “judgement”?
Squidward
1/17/2020 02:30:05 pm
I don't know about his spelling choice for judgment but he has been known to write "wheel barrow" on occasion. But it is okay because he used to use a typewriter.
This damn ankle monitor
1/17/2020 04:26:37 pm
Kent has been on court-ordered home detention since the Ancestry.Com DNA "sample" incident. He has been blackballed by every escort service in town. All the 900 chat number services have blocked his phone number. None of the pets in the neighborhood will go near his house. His death row pen pals quite answering his letters six montgs ago. So he has plenty of time on his hands to create catchy sounding aliases.
Jr. Time Lord
1/17/2020 01:48:10 pm
"...Expedition X, which will revive the old Destination Truth format and once again send Gates, along with cable TV talking head and scientist Phil Torres and ex-Nerdist broadcaster and paranormal podcaster Jessica Chobot, in search of ghosts, cryptids, and space aliens."
Reply
Jim
1/17/2020 01:55:26 pm
I think too much is made of Gates degree in archeology.
Reply
Crash55
1/17/2020 02:17:12 pm
The degree is used to give him some credibility which is more than the hosts of similar programs have. It also probably helps him get into actual digs, which he has done several times in the past.
Reply
Jim
1/17/2020 03:53:46 pm
Sure, his degree lends him an air of credibility, I'm just not certain whether it's deserved or not.
Brooksie
1/17/2020 04:46:16 pm
How much of an “air of credibility” would you assign to me if I told you that I have an advanced degree in English? Would you still clepe me a “troll” when I graciously provide expert advice like I did supra in the “judgment versus judgement” discussion?
Crash55
1/17/2020 06:13:22 pm
@Jim
Suprastar.
1/17/2020 06:14:09 pm
Clepetomaniac: One who suffers from the urge to condemn imaginary spelling errors.
Crash55
1/17/2020 06:18:56 pm
@Brooksie
Crash55
1/17/2020 06:21:20 pm
And before anyone nitpicks I admit to typos in the above post. Spellcheck and a small screen without reading glasses sometimes lets one down
Earl
1/17/2020 06:28:15 pm
All undergraduate language degrees are worthless unless accompanied by a teaching certification. A two year degree in HVAC from the local JUCO would be more useful.
Brooksie
1/17/2020 08:37:14 pm
I learned about the “judgment versus judgement” issue when I was about 15 years old. Anyone with a modicum of formal education is familiar with the history of the dispute, including William Safire’s famous contribution. The fact that you did not previously know about this issue prior to my raising it to you today understandably makes me question your level of literacy.
Crash55
1/17/2020 08:53:26 pm
If you haven’t figured it out now one but you appears to care about whether or not there is an e in judgment / judgement. In today’s world spelling is left to spellcheck and three different ones I have used in writing replies today have all allowed both.
Not Kent
1/17/2020 10:40:38 pm
"I have an advanced degree in English..."
Crash55
1/18/2020 10:39:08 am
The discussion was degrees equal credibility. As in having a degree lends you a certain basic credibility in your field.
Bill Sapphire
1/18/2020 01:12:41 pm
Brooksie strikes me as the type of person who really does have an advanced degree but never accomplished much of anything with it. To compensate they engage in this type of behavior.
Kent
1/17/2020 10:34:35 pm
Y'all are really some fucking idiots.
Reply
Not Kent
1/17/2020 10:56:03 pm
❤️
Reply
Kent
1/18/2020 01:05:24 am
No different from those shit head New Testament scholars who try to brain wash us all into believing that the Gospels date from the first century - they all want their testicles removing. Josh Gates is "bad" ?? Hah !!
Crash55
1/18/2020 09:32:15 am
Only a few scholars put the gospels in the first century. Most put them in the second century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Testament Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
September 2024
|