L. A. Marzulli Claims to Have Found "New" Giant Skeleton by Just Outright Making Up Measurements1/11/2017 In Slate magazine last night, book critic Laura Miller has a review of a new volume called Scratch in which writers famous and obscure describe how much and whether they get paid for the work that they produce. The general consensus is that writers aren’t paid enough (which is true), but some of the reasons the writers gave were a little less than compelling. I’ve published many books, which by most measures would be impressive, but I’ve learned the hard way even selling thousands of copies won’t make enough money to pay the bills. Prometheus Books, the publisher of my first book, made big promises and delivered to me about $0.24 per copy. You can understand, then, why I feel no sympathy for Cheryl Strayed, who complained that she wasn’t able to survive on her $400,000 advance for the book Wild, later a major Hollywood movie. She whined that she had to use the money to pay off her credit card debt and support her family, a real challenge since she had “only” received $100,000 for her previous novel, spread over four years. The solutions are quite obvious: Either write more books, or produce shorter works for pay to fill in the gaps. But anyone who complains about half a million dollars in income from only two written works over five or six years does not have my sympathy, particularly since those advances eventually translated into a continuing royalty stream she continues to receive today. Similarly, Miller says that feminist writer and professor Roxane Gay’s $150,000 income in 2014 is not commensurate with her fame and influence. She wrote four books, two of which were published in 2014, but neither of which I had ever heard of. Frankly, I had never heard of Gay either. The writers in Scratch talk of the love of writing, somewhat like a carpenter who speaks of a love of hammering. It was always my impression that writing was a tool and that one must first have something to say before trying to say it. Maybe it is different for fiction writers. Novelist Alexander Chee marveled that his nonfiction work and journalism is similarly devalued relative to the effort it takes. A fun fact is that H. P. Lovecraft received the same pay in nominal dollars in 1926 that many publications still pay today, pennies per word. With inflation, today’s pay rates are so low that even Depression-era writers would have tried selling apples on the street rather than bother. And do not get me started on the publications that want people to write for free while they profit off of it... This extends not just to professional writing aimed at the public. It also extends to commercial writing for businesses. The average rate a freelance writer can reasonably charge hasn’t changed since I started 15 years ago. Worse, clients don’t want to pay even that. A few weeks ago, a potential client told me that charging the industry standard rate was ridiculous because he could get his corporate website written by a writer from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk or a similar freelance website for only $3 or $4 per “unit” of 250 words of text. (Yes, writing is now sold in “units.”) I assume you can calculate yourself the speed one would need to write “high quality professional” text to make anything more than minimum wage at that rate. I also assume you can imagine the type of “high quality professional” writing one gets for that price. Since companies now believe that no one actually reads text, they only need the words to meet Google’s indexing standards to improve page ranks. And that was hardly the first time a client has declined to pay a living wage because foreign writers will work for pennies, albeit with inferior results. One client said he would bump the pay up to $7 per unit, but wanted the text to be researched with interviews and references from current business literature. The time that would take knocked the price right back down to minimum wage. Fortunately, not all clients are like that, but a growing number certainly are thanks to a combination of indifference to quality and the perceived benefits of outsourcing to foreign writers and desperate students. But I have gone on too long about this. This week Nephilim theorist L. A. Marzulli produced a video from an “undisclosed location” in the Poconos in which he reported a truly ridiculous claim about the “discovery” of a new “giant” in the photographic archive of Catalina Island. His co-producer of the Watchers DVD series was combing through the archives of Ralph Glidden’s museum when he found a photograph depicting two skeletons buried in the fetal position with a small round object with a hole in it between them. There is nothing in the photograph to establish scale, so Marzulli decided to invent a way to turn the bodies into giants. The object with a hole in it could be any size, but Marzulli says that by “assuming” that the rock is “around six inches” across, his team could then calculate the length of the skeleton at seven and a half feet tall because they estimate that the larger skeleton is fifteen times longer than the round object. He conceded, however, that the object’s true size is unknown and might have been four or five inches across, though he declined to note that doing so would reduce the size of the skeleton to around five feet. Marzulli also falsely claims that the skulls on these two skeletons are “elongated,” but in a way unseen in other cultures, claiming that there is no forehead. It looks like a skull within the normal range to me, though I can’t claim special expertise in forensic anthropology.
“The point is, if it’s six inches, then we’re looking at […] an entity that is well over seven feet tall with an elongated skull. That shouldn’t be there! It’s an incredible find!” It isn’t. He literally made up the measurements and then crowed about how anomalous they are. Marzulli finished up his broadcast by citing Scott Wolter of America Unearthed as his continuing inspiration for proving history is wrong, and he ended with a commercial asking viewers to buy his products, including the Watchers X DVD that he admitted last year incorrectly reported that a taxidermy hoax was the likely body of a demon fairy. He is selling an 11-DVD Watchers set for $99.99 plus shipping and handling. I guess in these times you have to make money however you can.
23 Comments
Uncle Ron
1/11/2017 11:40:07 am
I estimate that the object with the hole is a glass bead approximately 1/2 inch in diameter. Therefore the two skeletons are indeed demon fairies.
Reply
Jim
1/11/2017 12:25:26 pm
Good Lord !!!!,,, what if that object is 16.5 inches across,,,,,,,,,
Reply
Shane Sullivan
1/11/2017 01:40:03 pm
Yeah, my first thought was that he was going too low. He's missing a real opportunity to make a claim for honest-to-God, 300-cubit apocryphal Nephilim.
Bob Jase
1/11/2017 03:06:31 pm
My first thought exactly.
Reply
DaveR
1/11/2017 12:43:43 pm
I've seen some of the freelance writing that comes from foreign locations and it can be hilarious. You truly get what you pay for, which is why so much of the fringe stuff is a joke.
Reply
Kal
1/11/2017 12:51:05 pm
The skeleton appears to be of a child, if the bead in the photo is a bead or small stone. The 'elongated' part is merely that is is lying sideways.
Reply
Clete
1/11/2017 12:59:48 pm
The photograph of the two skeletons looks like something I have seen before and is probably two children. Also, to truly get a true idea of size, one must put something in the picture to provide scale. When I was a geology major years ago, what was used to provide scale was a standard rock hammer, which I think was about a foot long.
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
1/11/2017 01:05:05 pm
Yep. Survey rods, crack gauges, quarters, dollars, even your boot. ANYTHING verifiable or comparable for scale. Without that you're too subject to interpretation errors.
Reply
Jim
1/11/2017 02:04:16 pm
What ? A donut doesn't do it for you ? (insert smiley face)
An Over-Educated Grunt
1/11/2017 02:31:46 pm
I'm not putting my precious breakfast pastries on rock faces and bridge decks.
V
1/11/2017 09:08:32 pm
For fabric samples, it's a quarter or a ruler in inches--or metric, if it's from outside the US. I've also seen one of those black and white squares that I assume are a standardized size in archeological photos.
Reply
Tom
1/11/2017 01:17:27 pm
It seems to me that the only inspiration Mr Marzulli gets from Mr Wolter and AA is that these people have found conventional history too difficult to understand so rather than admit ignorance they feel justified in making up their own version of history.
Reply
Only Me
1/11/2017 02:24:52 pm
Since assumptions seem to be the order of the day, I'm going to assume the object between the skeletons is nothing more than an ordinary earthen pot. The skeletons would therefore be of normal human size.
Reply
Tom
1/11/2017 03:18:03 pm
Thank you, I agree once this object is identified as a pot its presence and the scaling of the skeletons becomes more reasonable
Reply
Bob Jase
1/11/2017 03:05:19 pm
"The general consensus is that writers aren’t paid enough (which is true)"
Reply
Frank Johnson
1/11/2017 04:40:20 pm
Excellent article and I totally agree with the writer/income issue. In fact, we've emailed about it previously.
Reply
Skywatcher
11/18/2018 10:31:24 pm
Did you happen to view the many shows in which he humbly apologized to his audience? He also explained how the investigative scientists were also duped, and he was genuinely sorry that they hadn't discovered the hoax before it was aired.
Reply
V
1/11/2017 09:14:47 pm
I will say, Jason, that there is such a thing as love of the process of writing in and of itself, and that many writers of fiction do actively enjoy it. I certainly do--I've written novel after novel without even ATTEMPTING to be published, just for the joy of crafting a story. But then, I also deeply enjoy the process of building things, regardless of the end product, too. Sure, the end process determines whether you're any good at it or not, but you can still love to do it even if you're TERRIBLE at it. Why else would karaoke be so popular?
Reply
Kal
1/12/2017 01:45:17 pm
I was going to go into a long explanation for the Catalina photo, but there are too many obvious photoshop fakes, including a better one of a fake man superimposed next to a blow up of another skeleton.
Reply
Ian Francis
1/14/2017 09:52:49 am
You guys who can't see that this is a gigantic skeleton and that the skull is elongated must be blind. Also, L.A. Marzulli has done some excellent research ton the giant skulls of Peru, including the famous red-haired Paracus skull. Genetic testing was done, determining a human mother, but on the paternal side the results were "no known human race or animal". It won't be long till the fact that there was once a race of giants on the Earth who exceeded us in intelligence and technology becomes an irrefutable fact to academia. {Yeah, like the megalithic structures in Peru were built by the Inca, ridiculous. The Inca themselves have continually refuted this}.
Reply
Chris
1/17/2017 12:14:23 pm
The skull in the Catalina photo is not "elongated", it is merely (relatively) long. Human skulls naturally vary -- some have a width measurement (ear to ear) much closer to their front-to-back measurement and are referred to by anthropologists as "round-headed". Others have a noticeably longer head front-to-back than side-to-side and are "long-headed". Local or isolated populations often tend toward one or the other, but of course there is variation all along the spectrum from one to the other.
Reply
Only Me
1/17/2017 02:29:58 pm
Marzulli's "excellent research" determined a taxidermy hoax was the remains of a "demon fairy". The tests on the Paracas skull were most likely contaminated and therefore inconclusive. The Inca did build those structures and a race of giants has never been proven.
Reply
Skywatcher
11/18/2018 10:36:22 pm
That's right! Furthermore, if the critics on here would DARE to look at other pictures of the skulls, they would find that the ocipitol plates are different from those of a homo sapiens, and that the skulls are severely elongated, which ISN'T done by "boarding". You probably know as well as I do, that boarding was a very poor excuse for explaining what these creatures really were...Nephilim. They aren't coming back; they are already here! Thank you, for standing up for LA too! There are so many couch critics who don't know much about what they're criticizing, but they're all "experts"! I've seen it too many times.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
November 2024
|