Late yesterday, Nephilim theorist L. A. Marzulli held a live global symposium in Los Angeles in which he and a team of misfits presented the results of DNA tests they conducted on an elongated skull from Paracas, Peru. Yes, regular readers will remember that Marzulli already conducted DNA tests on a similar skull and released them as part of the Watchers DVD line. The difference is that this time he released the results via a four-hour pay-per-view $9.99 online live stream, with a DVD and companion book available for purchase. Probably the best part of the farce was Marzulli’s admission that they put together the whole event and all of the supplementary materials before they even had the DNA results.
I may be willing to sit through any amount of boredom, but one thing I won’t do is spend good money to listen to amateurs and true believers rant. I did not spend money to live stream Marzulli’s event. Only after it ended did I discover that MUFON apparently didn’t get the memo about charging $10 per view and had made it available for free. They promised to have a recording of the video up for 24 hours of free viewing on Sunday.
And it’s a good thing I didn’t pay. According to comments posted on Marzulli’s Facebook page, the live stream suffered from massive technical difficulties. The video, which viewers described as resembling cheap webcam footage, was down for some of the broadcast and choppy for the rest, and the audio was inaudible for long portions of the four-hour event. Many viewers reported being extremely disappointed, but as of Saturday morning Marzulli had not said a word about the failed broadcast nor the DNA results that no one actually heard him reveal.
If word does get out about what, if anything, they said, I will update this post over the weekend.
Before it even began, there were already serious questions about the DNA results. Marzulli’s previous efforts to test the DNA of an elongated skull came under withering criticism because of poor collection methods, which Marzulli helpfully documented on video, showing clearly the many ways that his poor protocol left the door open for contamination. There was little guarantee that the new results would not suffer from equally problematic protocols. In both cases, Marzulli trumpeted the discovery of “European” DNA, which he took to be evidence of the diffusion of Bible Giants to South America, but which more likely represented contamination from the Euro-American researchers sampling the DNA. Marzulli’s research team also did not inspire confidence. According to his promotional materials, his presenters included:
What is at least somewhat interesting is that the Peruvian Ministry of Culture allegedly endorsed some of the work that Marzulli’s team undertook. Gonzalez states that he has been working with the Ministry “to ascertain a more definitive genetic history of the Paracas People group.” I was unable to find any confirmation of the Ministry’s involvement on its website or in the Peruvian media. If they are working with Marzulli’s team, or even just Gonzalez, they are keeping it a closely guarded secret and, obviously, declined to participate in the news conference. The claim, incidentally, also contradicts Brien Foerster’s statement from 2013 that Marzulli’s group was out of the DNA business because of cultural sensitivity issues. “Any future results will be the property and domain of the Peruvian government, and thus Peruvian people,” Foerster said, claiming that all material had been turned over to a “Peruvian archaeologist.” (It can’t be Gonzalez; he’s a native of Oregon.) Obviously, with two DNA announcements in two years, this claim was rendered moot by the potential for profit. This brings me to the most important problem: If Marzulli and his team genuinely believed that they had proof positive that would change the history of the world, surely, they would have invited the actual mainstream media and trumpeted their findings to Kingdom Come. They wouldn’t restrict the results to paying customers. [UPDATE] Late on Saturday, Marzulli apologized for the technical difficulties and promised to stream a recording of the conference tomorrow. He also tweeted that the DNA evidence “points to the Middle East” as the origin of the Paracas people, a claim he has previously made based on a rough analysis of haplogroups. It looks like the new results are more of the same. [SECOND UPDATE] Late on Saturday, some information about the elongated skull DNA test from Brien Foerster appeared online. It was, as I suspected, more allegations about haplogroups. Here is his statement, as given online by a viewer who witnessed the presentation: The DNA results actually were incredibly complicated… It’s gonna take me some time to actually figure out what the results mean. What it does show for sure is that the Paracas elongated skull people were not 100% Native American. They were a mix or even you could say, in some ways, a hybrid of different people. Their blood types are very complicated as well, they should be blood type “O” if they’re 100% Native American and that’s not the case. We are likely looking at a sub-species of humanity as regards to the Paracas… Seems to be a lot of DNA evidence from extreme eastern Europe and extreme western Asia. More specifically I’m talking about the area in between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea where ancient elongated skull people lived I think about 3000 years ago. So I think we are looking at a migration pattern starting in the Caspian Black Sea area and then entering through the Persian Gulf and then moving eastwards eventually winding up on the coast of Peru. So that’s the hypothesis Im developing now. 10 of the Paracas elongated skull’s blood were tested and they should be 100% type “O” because that is Native American, but it’s turning out high percentages of type “A,” a small percentage of type “B,” very high percentage of type “A-B” and less than half is “O.” So the Paracas were an incredibly complex ethnic mix of people… There are a number of different haplogroups that were found in the DNA tests of the Paracas elongated skulls and these haplogroups, which is your genetic ancestry, they don’t fit in with the history of Peru in any shape or form…. It appears that the largest elongated skulls on the planet have been found, “A” in Paracas, Peru and “B” in the Caucasus area in between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea… so my theory is that there was a sub-species of human which we are going to be eventually calling Homo-Sapiens-Sapiens-Paracas, and they were living in the area in between the Caspian and Black Sea. They were invaded by somebody… and so they were forced to flee. By studying the wind and currents of the oceans I’ve been able to come up with the following concept… they moved southwards until they found the Persian Gulf and then they sailed down through the Persian Gulf and once they left that area the boats were probably taken by the prevailing currents and winds which would have taken them eastward into the Pacific ocean. Over the course of a period of time, maybe tens of years or hundreds of years, they began to breed with people in the Pacific and that’s why we’re getting such a complicated reading of blood-types… They made it to Tahiti, from Tahiti they were able to sail south to New Zealand and then once they hit New Zealand they were able to catch the Humboldt current that took them up the coast of South America. They were looking for a good harbor to land their ships or boats and when they hit the largest natural bay on the coast of Peru which is Paracas, that’s where they stopped and that’s where they decided to establish themselves because almost nobody was living there at the time… over the course of time they had to breed with local native people otherwise their bloodline would become to concentrated… eventually they found Paracas probably about 900 B.C. and they lived in relative peacefulness… in 100 A.D. the invasion of the Nazca people happened from the north and when the Nazca entered the area, they slaughtered the elongated people who were the only royal class of people. We had 3 medical experts with us – Dr Malcom Warren (Chiropractor), Rick Woodward (Anthropologist) and Dr Michael Alday (Medical Doctor) and all 3 of them stated quiet emphatically that because of the abnormalities found with some of the Elongated Skulls from the Chongos cemetery in Peru they have no other choice but to state that some of these ancient Paracas were a sub-species of humanity… it had to be genetic, they had to be born with these abnormalities. They had dark red hair… the royal Paracas were the ones with elongated heads, not the common people… the royal family of the Paracas, they lived in subterranean underground houses and I think the reason for that is that they had light-colored skin, probably sensitive eyes because of the extreme sunshine…
Ah, the old Nephilim breeding their superior genes into all those sexy brown women trope! But seriously: Foerster and the decidedly inexpert medical people spun an elaborate fantasy out of genetic and skeletal data they barely understand, substituting their own ignorance for facts. The findings they note seem actually to be consistent with the identification of some ancestral Native American populations as hailing from central Asia. Five years ago, for example, National Geographic reported on genetic studies of Native Americans: “Nearly one-third of Native American genes come from west Eurasian people linked to the Middle East and Europe, rather than entirely from East Asians as previously thought, according to a newly sequenced genome.” So, basically, Marzulli and Foerster found exactly what science already knew and tried to explain away known results with a bizarre Biblical hypothesis because they do not accept that Eurasian people gave rise to the Native Americans and that real scientists already knew and accounted for this.
60 Comments
Jim
2/3/2018 09:53:19 am
You know it's bad when Pulitzer can put out a superior product using his phone.
Reply
Machala
2/3/2018 10:49:24 am
After reading your blog, I placed a call, this morning, to a friend of mine , who works for the Ministerio de Cultura Peru in Lima. He did a little investigating and emphatically stated that in NO WAY is the Ministerio envolved with the Marzulli's DNA project and are absolutely NOT associated with, working with, cooperating with, or even speaking to Mundo Gonzalez.
Reply
D Haverly
2/3/2018 11:29:47 pm
First OF all it's "Involved" with AN "I" and SECOND of ALL putting EVERY other WORD in CAPS doesn't make you credible. Thirdly, all I see on the website is criticism from the Blogger; who obviously wrote his own bio. I mean c'mon all you have to do is "say" "Internationally recognized" but I have never heard of him so therefore I cannot prove he is, and neither can he. However, It's very telling when others criticize in the way Jason does, that they either feel threatened by hearing another POV, or their own lack of knowledge on a given subject, leaves them feeling stupid and therefore they rant and rave like a child because they are agitated at them selves. My point here is that it's fine to criticize based on evidence, for or against your/their theory and methods. Thats acceptable, but Jason seems to have a rather unhealthy hatred for LA Marzulli, and therefore has to make his criticisms (which by the way could be better said by like maybe a teenager, because like they'd try to be like nicer and all) petty, and at the same time sort of "self righteous". I don't know... maybe he's an atheist and thats really what his beef is about. Instead of criticizing about the cost of LA's video feed, quality and presentation, how about looking at the results, keeping an open mind like a REAL grownup scientist? It's how LA makes a living... WAIT A MINUTE, THATS HOW JASON MAKES A LIVING TOO! Oh my... we don't have a problem with LA's science... we have a problem with LA being a competitor! Wow, now I know the real reason Jason is acting like a child. He doesn't want anyone to steal his thunder! LOL Well this has been quite entertaining, but I need to get back to my real life. Goodness... Jason are you selling other peoples books??? So you're also a book seller. Funny I don't see that any of the books were written by YOU? Huh... what was your background and education again? OH wait don't answer, I'll look it up myself and post my results on FB and or Twitter; making sure to pick you and your site apart in the most childish way I can. Hopefully I can find some of your "Actual Field time" studies. You know... where you actually leave the confides of a library or lecture hall, breathe some fresh air, get your hands dirty and all that.
Reply
Americanegro
2/4/2018 12:49:30 am
I see someone who has deep-seated issues centered around the Enter key who has made it his mission in life never to use paragraphs. On the bright side he's comfortable with looking like a mental patient. What I wonder is the age-old question: Where is he institutionalized? 2/4/2018 08:36:18 am
How, may I ask, is one to criticize evidence that Marzulli won't share except for paying customers? That's the very opposite of the science that Marzulli pretends to conduct.
Hi D, I'm an expert on ancient DNA who does "actual" field work (but mostly laboratory work), and I can tell you that Jason is spot-on with his criticisms. L.A. does not even come close to doing reputable work (setting aside the whole issue of ethics).
Rapture ready randy
2/4/2018 01:00:00 pm
My dearest Brother (or is it Sister?) Haverly,
Machala
2/4/2018 06:44:36 pm
J.Raff,
V
2/5/2018 05:45:53 pm
I'm amused that this childish temper tantrum on the part of D. Haverly accuses Jason of behaving childishly. D, darling, you nitpicked grammar, denied that someone might have international acclaim because you, personally, had never heard of him (despite the fact that he does in fact have international acclaim in academic circles, a place where I doubt you frequent, on the basis of your tantrum), and equate legitimate criticism of methodology--the EXACT same criticism as one faces in a legitimate peer review--with "hatred" and "atheism." (Hint: Bad science is bad science, and religious viewpoints have nothing whatever to do with it.) 2/3/2018 11:38:13 am
It is interesting that MUFON, the flying saucer fan club, who just went through a racism scandal, would be part of this debacle. MUFON"s tag line now seems to be "It Just Keeps Getting Better". Yes! Except the opposite.
Reply
Doc Rock
2/3/2018 11:55:17 am
I continue to marvel at the fringe folks who are desperate to claim/contrive ANY academic degrees or credentials (and collect such people as part of their research "teams") while rejecting the criticisms of legitimate degree holders because academics don't really know what they are talking about and "you don't really need a college degree to do this stuff."
Reply
Americanegro
2/3/2018 01:37:08 pm
"hilarious science cosplay practiced by UFO and paranormal larpers"
Reply
V
2/5/2018 05:39:19 pm
"Most real scientists aren't interested in their sci-fi fanfiction world."
Reply
Only Me
2/3/2018 02:13:21 pm
Would it have really been too much trouble for Marzulli to have someone like Todd Disotell test the DNA? Disotell has proven willing to test for genetic evidence of Bigfoot and the Yeti, so, I doubt a Paracas skull would be too daunting.
Reply
Doc Rock
2/3/2018 02:40:22 pm
Disotell has gone above and beyond in terms of testing for the Bigfoot crowd (who manage to appear downright sane when compared to the Marzulli crowd). But I seriously doubt that he, or his research center in general, are going to devote time, money, and energy to people with established reputations as crackpots who are trying to claim that skulls resulting from cranial deformation are actually aliens or Nephilim. Next thing you know, Wolter will show up with a fragment of a mummy finger in a bread bag demanding that it be tested because the results will prove that the pyramids were built 10,000 years ago by time travelling Templers who are buried in secret chambers within them.
Reply
Only Me
2/3/2018 02:55:00 pm
True. I wouldn't put it past the fringe to claim anything at this point. 2/4/2018 09:24:16 am
I really doubt Todd would do it, nor would any reputable anthropological geneticist. I certainly wouldn't. It's highly unethical without the permission and support of the descendant community, and wouldn't advance scientific knowledge at all. Plenty of ancient Peruvians have been examined genetically and they look exactly like one would expect (i.e. lineages found in other indigenous American populations).
Doc Rock
2/3/2018 03:08:56 pm
Why shouldn't they? With at least a couple million people around at any given point willing to pay for self-published books, reality shows, videos, pay-per-view performances, etc. that cover everything from fake moon landings to Egyptians in the Grand Canyon, it's a ripe market for those with a strong entrepreneurial spirit and low morals.
Reply
Riley V
2/3/2018 11:48:13 pm
Please don’t judge Bossier Parish Community College by Mr. Woodward. My nephew received an Associate of Business Degree from that College, and now owns his own auto repair business.
Reply
alan
2/4/2018 03:25:25 am
Discredited as misfits in blog above are the people who actually try to work out who these people of Paracas were. All criticism is irrelevant because the experts are the people who actually work in the field of elongated sculls but not the people in the office with diploma on the wall . All of them are famous scientists in the field of archeology and anthropology only because they stick to official version of human evolution and treasure they seat above the truth.
Reply
No, the actual experts working in this field are people like Dr. Lars Fehren-Schmitz, who studies the genomes from people in the region. Guess what? They're not from the Middle East, or from outer space. For anyone actually interested in their history and genetics, here's a place to start (sorry it's behind a paywall) http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.21135/full
Reply
V
2/5/2018 05:36:26 pm
Experts will ridicule him because they HAVE looked into the issue and into the evidence; it's sort of part of how they became EXPERTS. You discredit your own words when you show such abysmal ignorance of the very definition of the word expert.
Reply
Doc. Oebius
2/4/2018 05:55:33 am
This sad debunker posts bullshit like all other debunkers with no fact, no evidence. No one believes ass wipes like you because you’re just a denier. Or a CIA shill. Or an asswipe.
Reply
David Perkins
2/4/2018 08:15:24 am
The Paracas skulls are not cranial deformation. You can change the shape of a skull that way, but not the size. The brain cavities are considerably larger for their size than human brain cavities. Also, there is no sagittal suture on these. There is a sagittal suture on every skull of every human that ever lived. Also, orbitals are different, eye sockets larger. These are features plainly visible in photographs. To call these human skulls with cranial deformation is just lazy and no credit to the observational skills of the commenter.
Reply
2/4/2018 08:29:20 am
We've been over this many times before, David, which is why I didn't feel the need to repeat myself here. But since the nineteenth century, it has been recognized that a small percentage of skulls lack sagittal sutures, and the most common reason for that is compression due to cranial deformation in infancy, which forces the plates together prematurely and causes the bones to grow together rather than to suture later. Since the process has been understood for almost 200 years, though not always given in textbooks since many alive today have never seen such modifications in a living person, I didn't consider it necessary to repeat here.
Reply
Hanslune
2/4/2018 01:52:14 pm
Howdy Jason and friend
V
2/5/2018 05:29:25 pm
Please provide evidence for your claim that the cranial capacities differ in a statistically significant way. Right now, I'm feeling like you're falling into the "taller, narrower glass holds more juice" fallacy, more. Particularly since the orbitals and eye sockets are going to in fact alter shape as the rest of the skull does, simply because the skull is moving upward instead of out in a bulbous shape. Anyone who works with clay can show you a simple demonstration of how using the EXACT same clay decoration can be extremely different in shape when you put it on different shaped bases.
Reply
Denise
2/4/2018 02:52:54 pm
Well AN I am starting to warm up to your idea that some here are institutionalized. I am amazed that "grown adults" (I assume) simply can't tell the difference between a critique and hate talk. So much so they use the same tactics they claim to decry.
Reply
Americanegro
2/4/2018 05:21:20 pm
I THINK that was satire. Go on, touch it. Touch it.
Reply
Rapture Ready randy
2/10/2018 07:00:47 pm
Dearest Sister Denise,
Reply
Marzulli Victim
2/10/2018 07:39:41 pm
I've experienced disassociative states such as you describe ever since Mr. Marzulli touched me where my bathing suit covers.
Americanegro
2/4/2018 09:13:50 pm
Wait. What. Is he actually saying that all full-blooded Injuns necessarily have type O blood? To steal from George Will, that sounds risible, or as Billy O'Reilly would say "Luuuuuuudacris".
Reply
Naghtius
2/5/2018 09:02:32 am
Did they only test for haplogroyps or did they do a autosomal test?
Reply
E.P. Grondine
2/5/2018 11:09:55 am
HI Jason -
Reply
Americanegro
2/5/2018 01:07:12 pm
You're like a dog with a bone or Hitler with the Jews with this theosophist thing. They're responsible for everything is the view that comes across. Probably behind the Federal Reserve too.
Reply
E.P. Grondine
2/5/2018 01:19:20 pm
AN, What we are watching here is technology at work. At the start it was computer maling lists and desktop publishing. Now it is desktop video, cable and small market "broadcasting".
Americanegro
2/5/2018 03:09:50 pm
You're like a dog with a bone or Hitler with the Jews with this theosophist thing. They're responsible for everything is the view that comes across. Probably behind the Federal Reserve too.
E.P. Grondine
2/5/2018 07:50:53 pm
AN, you still don't get it.
Americanegro
2/5/2018 08:33:20 pm
You're like a dog with a bone or Hitler with the Jews with this theosophist thing. They're responsible for everything is the view that comes across. Probably behind the Federal Reserve too.
Americangro
2/5/2018 03:18:18 pm
Hanslune: "The human brain is an enormous drain on the human cardio vascular system - increasing it by x percentage would mean a notable increase in that system"
Reply
Hanslune
2/5/2018 04:36:19 pm
No, sounds like something you made up in a failed attempt to give me homework.
Reply
V
2/5/2018 05:22:27 pm
Honey, speaking as someone who weighs 400 lbs? Major risks of obesity: high blood pressure, enlarged heart, heart disease. These are, in fact, noticeable increases in the system. Not to mention the fact that my bones already show increased and unusual signs of wear and tear for someone of my age, because of the weight--according to the orthopedist that I saw just last Thursday because of problems with my knees.
Reply
Hanslune
2/5/2018 05:58:19 pm
Howdy V
Americanegro
2/5/2018 06:13:13 pm
Surely you're aware, Sugartits, that the human brain is 1/3 fat? Sorry you've chosen to be obese, but I'm right and you're wrong. Learn it. Know it. Live it.
Americanegro
2/5/2018 06:21:04 pm
Hanslune: "the brain uses 25% of the blood flow" WRONG. That's not how the circulatory system works. Every part of the body uses 100% of the blood flow. That is why injectable drugs and oral antifungals for your toenails e.g. work.
Americanegro
2/5/2018 06:30:16 pm
"You just seem to challenge everyone who speaks for the sheer joy of being mean and nasty."
Americanegro
2/5/2018 08:56:41 pm
In retrospect, "chosen" was harsh since I don't know your situation (cough, small percentage). I apologize for the phrasing I used.
Lurker Un-Cloaking
2/6/2018 06:24:56 pm
http://www.humanneurophysiology.com/cbfo2consumption.htm
Reply
Americanegro
2/6/2018 07:11:55 pm
But NOT "25% of the blood flow" which is the mistake and misconception at hand. The blood in your toes is the blood in your brain and vice versa, as previously explained.
Lurker Un-Cloaking
2/7/2018 01:20:16 pm
You simply demonstrate you have no idea what you are talking about. The basic point being made is that the brain is fed by a portion of cardiac output and oxygen well out of proportion to its size. That point holds, even if the particular values given were a bit off.
Americanegro
2/7/2018 07:49:36 pm
You know that most of the brain doesn't get blood right? It's not that there's extra blood going to your head, rather the brain pulls in more oxygen than other organs. Same blood all over the body, brain to toe. So no, the brain doesn't "use" more blood. Eppur si muove.
E.P. Grondine
2/5/2018 07:57:41 pm
Jason, even if the DNA results come back with the the local native population adoptng skull deformation, the AA folks will simply come back with "So why were they trying imitate aliens?"
Reply
Hanslune
2/5/2018 08:09:15 pm
Howdy E.P. Grondine
Reply
E.P. Grondine
2/6/2018 11:06:22 am
"This little story of theirs makes money for them and gives them attention - they will never let it die."
Hanslune
2/6/2018 12:47:05 pm
EPG
Reply
Mjon
2/7/2018 02:39:08 am
So what are the DNA results? Who has done the testing? This bullshit never ends.
Reply
Rook
2/9/2018 01:07:40 am
The theory put forward by Foerster that a group of people from the Black Sea region sailed halfway around the world -across both the Indian and Pacific Oceans-"looking for a good harbor to land their ships" is simply absurd.
Reply
Susan Harris
3/14/2018 02:39:53 am
Hi, I ran across your blog after reading the latest "elongated skulls" article - concerning the skulls found in Bavaria.
Reply
Hanslune
3/14/2018 01:50:17 pm
He is being paid to say whatever will keep the viewing fringe believers happy. It has nothing to do with science, religion or truth.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
November 2024
|