The other day, archaeologist David S. Anderson posted an article on Adventures in Poor Taste discussing the Marvel Comics villain Apocalypse and why he is associated with ancient Egypt. In the piece, Anderson traces back fascination and fear of all things Egyptian to the 1922 opening of the tomb of Tutankhamen and the resulting media frenzy surrounding both the tomb opening and the subsequent allegations that a pharaonic “curse” had felled several of the participants in the excavation. I know Anderson slightly from Twitter, so I hope he will forgive me if I dissent a bit from his analysis. In the article, Anderson provides a simple and direct line of succession from Tutankhamen’s “curse” to Apocalypse: Tales quickly emerged that the tomb was cursed. One such story garnered special attention, as it was told by none other than Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. […] During an interview about the discovery of Tut’s tomb, Conan Doyle suggested it might have been cursed. […] The mania surrounding Tut’s tomb and alleged curses spiraled into a ground-breaking moment for the modern genre of horror films when Boris Karloff’s The Mummy was released in 1932. With the emergence of a deadly walking mummy on the silver screen, the ancient past was now alive and dangerous in ways it never had been before. […] The rise of Apocalypse is built upon the back of the mummy as a movie monster. Anderson’s analysis is both correct and also incomplete.
Anderson is quite right that Tut created a wave of Egyptomania that led to the Mummy movie, but the Mummy drew as much on nineteenth century living-mummy fiction (and there was a surprisingly large amount of it) as it did King Tut. The movie was designed to capitalize on the decade-old Tut story, but it was an original story taking inspiration from Doyle’s 1890 “Ring of Thoth” and the life of Alessandro Calgliostro—of all things. It’s probably overstating the case quite a bit to say that the ancient past came alive with The Mummy in ways it had not previously. After all, Dracula was a living corpse from the Middle Ages, and the very origins of Gothic fiction trace back to The Castle of Otranto, in which a medieval knight comes back from the dead. The Mummy may have taken the theme further back in time, but not in a way significantly different from Victorian mummy fiction, or from H. P. Lovecraft’s contemporary stories about monstrous aliens from previous eras of Earth’s history returning from their timeless slumber. It would take a book to explore the theme of ancient evils in literature, but at a gross level there are only three places to put evil: the past, the present, or the future. So, by default, most evil has to come from the past, since the future is unknowable and there is much more past than present. But let us turn to the specific question of Egypt. As I have written in the past, the origins of the curse of Tutankhamen’s “curse” aren’t to be found only with Doyle but fall more on Marie Corelli, who, in 1923, linked the death of Lord Carnarvon, the sponsor of the Tut dig, to medieval legends of cursed Egyptian tombs: “According to a rare book I possess, which is not in the British Museum, entitled ‘The Egyptian History of the Pyramids’ translated out of the original Arabic by Vattie, Arabic professor to Louis XVI of France, the most dire punishment follows any rash intruder into a sealed tomb.” She was referring to Murtada ibn al-’Afif’s History of Egypt, which was itself a partial copy of the Akhbar al-zaman (a.k.a. The Digest of Wonders), a medieval digest of legends about Egypt which included influential stories about cursed tombs, secret wisdom, magical artifacts, and the antediluvian history of the pyramids—all elements that found their way into modern pop culture views of Egypt. How this came to be is a fascinating story that I have told many times, and which I might be turning into a book in the next year or two. The appearance of Murtada’s book in French translation and a later English edition electrified artists and literary types, who saw in it a source of unfamiliar romantic legendry well suited to art. It happened to be published around the same time that Athanasius Kircher claimed to have deciphered hieroglyphics (he had not) and revealed some of the “true” history of Egypt—which turned out to be based on stories copied from the Akhbar al-zaman. These medieval legends are the true origin of cursed tombs and tales of magical Egyptian wonders and the dark powers of Egyptian sorcerers. They have their basis in Biblical and Quranic stories of Egyptian magic, but the medieval versions canonized the now-familiar pseudo-archaeological tropes of death-traps in tombs, moving and talking statues, magical potions, curses, ancient wonders predating all known civilization, and all the other pulp trappings that popular writers have used for the past two centuries. Murtada’s book found favor with the Romantic writers. Percy Shelley famously became so obsessed with it that a friend had to throw it out of the window to make him stop reading it. The Akhbar al-zaman caused a sensation when published in French at the end of the nineteenth century. In between, partial translations in the Operations of Col. Vyse introduced the same legends to readers of history and science, and they had an influence on science. It was from the Akhbar al-zaman and its accounts of antediluvian civilizations in Egypt that the great Egyptologist Gaston Maspero found his “proof” that the Sphinx predated Egypt, a theme that the Theosophists were quick to pick up and which found its way into pop culture, not least when H. P. Lovecraft incorporated the idea into “Under the Pyramids,” the Weird Tales story he ghostwrote for Harry Houdini. Some of these elements influenced non-fiction stories about “cursed” Egyptian artifacts that predated the discovery of Tutankhamen’s tomb, such as the claim that the British Museum’s Egyptian coffin lid of a woman, known as the “Unlucky Mummy,” is cursed and responsible for various deaths and catastrophes. The claim goes back to the early 1900s, and it obviously draws on the Victorian and Gothic traditions, with their echoes of medieval Arabic lore, born of European Orientalism. By the time King Tut was unearthed, there was already large body of literature about cursed tombs, ancient evils, and other such Egyptian mysteries. What Tut did was to spark the largest wave of Egyptomania in modern times, though one that has antecedents going back at least to Napoleon’s conquest of Egypt, and amplify existing conceptions of mystical Egypt circulating among adherents of Arabic legendry and the various occult groups. Western civilization has seen Egypt as a land of deep antiquity, ancient wisdom, and potent magic since at least the time of the Greeks, and it is no wonder that the tradition has continued unbroken down to the present. The specific form this belief has taken in modern times, however, is traceable to the influence of medieval Arabic legendry on Romantic writers and Victorian scholars.
31 Comments
Jockobadger
11/28/2018 01:19:13 pm
Thanks Jason. Nice write-up. Back in 1978, a bunch of artifacts from King Tut's tomb went on display at the Pacific Science Center in Seattle. I was in HS and my mom insisted we go see it. I recall being skeptical but was surprised at how cool it all was. The funerary mask and the "coffinette" that held some of Tut's internal organs were truly beautiful. The craftmanship/artistry surprised and amazed me.
Reply
Priceless Defender
11/28/2018 02:59:33 pm
I have an issue with "The only real difference being technological advancement." There are WAY TOO MANY examples of artifacts which couldn't be duplicated without "modern technology". I would suggest is our level of sharing and cooperation has changed. There are still feats achieved in Antiquity which cannot be duplicated today.
Reply
American Cool "Disco" Dan
11/28/2018 03:13:39 pm
Name one. Just one will do.
Jockobadger
11/28/2018 06:01:19 pm
Hey Priceless,
Priceless Defender
11/28/2018 08:31:49 pm
I apologize. My words were incomplete. Modern technology or without tools, materials, or mathematics supposedly inaccessible, or unknown to the particular culture, and or time period.
Reply
American Cool "Disco" Dan
11/28/2018 08:45:11 pm
Okay, Epic Failure. The Greeks understood gears and arithmetic and they looked at the sky because there was no TV. So the Antikythera Mechanism is a non-starter.
An Anonymous Nerd
11/28/2018 09:05:28 pm
[Antikythera Device]
Priceless Defender
11/28/2018 10:22:56 pm
You have missed the point. Every culture you've mentioned has built upon them. NO ONE has ever duplicated those stones.
American Cool "Disco" Dan
11/28/2018 11:16:09 pm
The challenge stands. NAME ONE.
An Anonymous Nerd
11/28/2018 11:20:30 pm
[You have missed the point. Every culture you've mentioned has built upon them. NO ONE has ever duplicated those stones. ]
Priceless Defender
11/28/2018 11:21:28 pm
In my efforts to avoid retaliating for the name calling, . I forgot to mention how you have misread read my words. I was using the Antikythera Device as an example of the supposedly unknown tool, materials and in the case JUST THE MATHEMATICS.
An Anonymous Nerd
11/28/2018 11:30:56 pm
[In my efforts to avoid retaliating for the name calling, ]
Priceless Defender
11/28/2018 11:37:14 pm
If you did not rrsort to name calling, maybe that part wasn't directed towards you. I already feel like I'm back in junior high.
An Anonymous Nerd
11/29/2018 07:36:48 am
[If you did not rrsort to name calling, maybe that part wasn't directed towards you.]
V
11/29/2018 03:43:15 pm
Your difficulties, I think, come from a basic lack of understanding of the Six Basic Machines of physics. More specifically--and this is not an attack on you; our education system is SHIT about explaining this--the fact that every single advanced device we have today is a conglomeration of the Six Basic Machines. Cranes? Pulleys and wheels. Gasoline-powered motor? Wheels and gears. Professional stone-cutting saw? Pulleys, gears, and wheels. Every piece of equipment we have now for building is made up of the same basic building blocks, just like every word in the English language is made up of the same 26 basic letters, just strung together in hugely different combinations.
American Cool "Disco" Dan
11/28/2018 11:43:16 pm
"Unless your birth name is Kal-El , you all wouldn't have faired to well in neighborhood, I grew up in. Way to show your internet intestinal fortitude!"
Reply
Riley V
11/29/2018 10:38:20 am
Slightly OT.
Reply
Priceless Defender
11/29/2018 11:02:21 am
Well. Thank you boys and girls for taking me back to Junior High. Seriously. It made me realize, yesterday was the 27th anniversary of the State Football Championship my senior year. Won with a core group of guys who all met in junior high. A core group so close and competitive, we only lost two games in 5 years together. The only two games I did not play. Good memories to have come rushing back. Thank you. Only two of us ever discussed ancient mysteries. We had enough Street Smarts to know better.
Reply
Joe Scales
11/29/2018 01:06:55 pm
You imbecile, the reason there is no equipment made these days to move heavy stones is because we use concrete now. Lacking this, the ancients had to make do stacking rocks on top of rocks. You'd think if some advanced alien culture came to our planet way back when, they'd have maybe taught them to mix concrete, or used some other advanced technology. Now begone imbecile, sulk away and come back with yet another moniker as if we're not able to see right through that as well.
Reply
Jockobadger
11/29/2018 03:25:57 pm
Thanks Joe - exactly correct. In fact, the Romans developed some exceptionally good concrete, used primarily in their seriously durable roads. They clearly understood the concepts of slaking and hydration and already knew about reinforcing. I don't know if earlier civs used real concrete - as opposed to clay/brick.
American Cool "Disco" Dan
11/29/2018 05:58:29 pm
Yes! I thought everyone knew the Romans had concrete. I apply the "Geez, if I know it..." rule of thumb.
gdave
11/29/2018 01:09:04 pm
@Priceless Defender:
Reply
American Cool "Disco" Dan
11/29/2018 03:28:34 pm
"It made me realize, yesterday was the 27th anniversary of the State Football Championship my senior year. Won with a core group of guys who all met in junior high. A core group so close and competitive, we only lost two games in 5 years together. The only two games I did not play. Good memories to have come rushing back. Thank you. Only two of us ever discussed ancient mysteries. We had enough Street Smarts to know better."
Reply
Doc Rock
11/29/2018 04:37:25 pm
My liquid lunch went extra innings today, so I must claim extenuating circumstances in having trouble following this discussion. Is it being argued that the largest stones at Baalbek and Temple Mount were fashioned and put in place prior to recorded civilization in the area and no one since has been able to replicate the size and positioning of the stones although later societies built over and around them?
Reply
American Cool "disco" dan
11/29/2018 06:08:52 pm
No. The point is that PRICELESS DEFENDER is a lying ass and should honorably make suicide.
Jockobadger
11/29/2018 09:01:48 pm
I admit to being confused on this, too. Is that the deal, Priceless? If so, Doc and I would appreciate it if you’d expand on it a bit.
An Anonymous Nerd
11/29/2018 08:21:48 pm
[Regurgitating facts at me which, I already know proves nothing. ]
Reply
American Cool "Disco" Dan
11/30/2018 12:23:09 am
Actually we do have machines that can deal with those stones so PRICELESS DEFENDER can SUCK IT. But that's nothing new.
Reply
Jim
11/29/2018 09:56:10 pm
Anyone interested in Wolters interview by Jimmy Church:
Reply
American Cool "Disco" Dan
11/29/2018 11:40:40 pm
Wolter, who is at best a dim-witted mental patient and at worst, well, Wolter, has eased up on what he will allow to be posted on his site, easily findable through the google machine. A lot of people are going after him hammer and tong so get in there while the getting's good or just enjoy the spectacle.
Reply
Priceless Defender
12/1/2018 01:41:10 pm
I would first like to apologize to the owner of this blog, and ALL of the respectable commentors for inadvertently sidetracking this thread. This was in no way, shape, or form my intention. Until, if, and when Mr. Colavito brings up the topic, I will expound further. For now, I'll leave it with part of what "Doc" told me. "Kid, those stones are archaic". When living, Doc was a semi-retired archaeologist with a PhD.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
September 2024
|