This week self-described “mouth of the South” Micah Hanks published an article at Mysterious Universe covering the April 17, 1897 airship crash at Aurora, Texas widely cited as a UFO event. It has already been the subject of a 1973 MUFON investigation and several cable television documentaries. Hanks not only fails to add anything new to the story, he manages the neat trick of ignoring pretty much all the investigative work done after 1973 in the name of promoting a “mystery” that almost certainly never existed. The story started when S. E. Haydon reported in the Dallas Morning News on April 19, 1897 that an airship crashed in to a certain Judge Proctor’s windmill in Aurora and exploded, killing its pilot. This inhabitant “was not of this world” and probably from Mars, locals concluded. (H. G. Wells’s War of the Worlds had just started its serialization in Cosmopolitan’s April issue, which had been on newsstands for a few weeks at this point.) According to Haydon, who was a local cotton merchant, the craft, destroyed when it crashed into a windmill on land owned by Judge Proctor, was built of an alloy of aluminum and silver and weighed “several tons.” The pilot was to be buried on April 20, but strangely no one reported on the funeral of earth’s first Martian visitor. Haydon had written hoax articles before, and there isn’t much reason to suspect this one was anything but, as we shall see. But first, if you’re interested, here is the article: Aurora, Wise Co., Tx., April 17—(To the News)--About 6 o'clock this morning the early risers of Aurora were astonished at the sudden appearance of the airship which has been sailing throughout the country. You’d think he’d have led with SPACE ALIEN LANDS ON EARTH, but who am I to question his priorities, or that of the Dallas Morning News, in not giving a SPACE ALIEN top billing? In fact, the News was silly enough to place this major news event on an interior page amidst fifteen other of the editors’ “favorite yarns” about outrageous aerial events, according to Skeptoid. One story told of an “aerial monster” piloted by New Yorkers, and another about an airship filled with Jews from the Lost Tribes who had been hiding at the North Pole. Hayden’s piece was one of the sixteen crazy airship stories. Obviously, it was intended as humor.
Hanks traveled to Aurora to view the grave of the supposed occupant of the airship. I’m not sure why he bothered traveling all the way to Aurora to take photographs of himself in the cemetery since his article betrays no original research. Instead, he summarizes the UFO case from Jim Marrs’s Alien Agenda (1997) and contributes exactly nothing to the story that others haven’t gone over a hundred times. In fact, he leaves out a very important and salient point: At least one person is on record telling anyone who would listen that the author of the original article reporting the crash of the airship made the whole thing up. “Hayden wrote it as a joke and to bring interest to Aurora,” an 86-year-old named Etta Pegues told Time magazine in 1979. “The railroad bypassed us, and the town was dying.” Pegues was a reporter for the Fort Worth Star Telegram and a local historian who wrote a book about the town of Aurora in 1975. In the 1890s the town of Aurora had suffered enormous catastrophe—a devastating fire, a boll weevil infestation, and epidemic disease outbreaks—that left the place a shell of its former self. Its decline cause the Burlington Northwestern Railroad to cancel plans to expand to Aurora. Hanks does note that “others” claimed that the article was a hoax, but he doesn’t seem to know the source he pluralizes and summarizes. It is clearly Pegues because Hanks cites and criticizes her statement about the town windmill. Pegues had told Time in 1979 (and others in 1973) that there was no windmill in town, but recent investigations that uncovered the foundation of a windmill showed that she was wrong on this point, almost certainly because the windmill had long vanished—Pegues was four at the time of the supposed incident, and the windmill was likely gone before she was 10. We might well conclude that she simply had no memory that one ever existed, and by 1979 most who might have remembered it were already dead. (According to Marrs, Pegues asked the then-current owner of the site, who had lived there since 1945, if a windmill stood on the property, and the owner said no.) By pluralizing Pegues into “others” and generalizing her specific misstatement into a community-wide assertion, Hanks gives the impression of a cover-up that is unlikely to have actually occurred. Marrs, as Hanks happily notes, alleged that “the government” cleansed the site of all traces of alien artifacts before Marrs showed up to investigate in 1973. Marrs also claimed that in 1973 he spoke with an 83-year-old named Charlie Stephens, who recalled seeing a UFO explode over the town in 1897 but wasn’t allowed to go investigate because his father said he had to finish his chores. On the other hand, Robbie Reynolds Hansen, who was 12 in 1897, told Marrs that her father had told a visitor that day that the owner of the land where this all occurred, a local judge, “outdid himself that time,” an odd an inconclusive statement Marrs does not explain. This seems obscure until we consult a fuller version of the story given by Bill Potterfield in A Loose Herd of Texans in 1978. Hansen told him that her father, Constable J. D. Reynolds, was referring to a joke. The judge, J. S. Proctor, fancied himself a satirist and published humor pieces in the Aurora News. He wrote a humor piece about the airship event taking place on his own land. Reynolds read it and “roared with laughter.” According to Potterfield, Reynolds said, “The judge has really outdone himself this time.” Reynolds must have gotten a big laugh from the reference to T. J. Weems as an authority on astronomy. The real Weems was a blacksmith and farrier who knew nothing of the stars. Few other survivors of the nineteenth century recalled anything of the event except what they knew from people who had read the newspaper back in 1897. According to Marrs, Mary Evans, who was 92 when he talked to her, said that she remembered the incident from when she was 15 years old, but despite have witnessed a spaceship from another world “forgot” about the incident until MUFON came to town in 1973! When asked what happened, she too said her parents wouldn’t let her go see the crash site. In describing what her parents told her of the event, she could recall no details that weren’t part of the 1897 news article or subsequent UFO lore. What’s interesting is that Marrs presents these accounts in the opposite order, saving Stephens for last. Doing so lets him build up the impression that in sifting through the varying versions he was slowly getting to the truth. When placing the interviews in the order I have offered, they don’t seem to build toward a revelation but rather depict people who have folded half-memories of the attempted hoax into their own personal narratives, with a strong assist from the MUFON publicity. One approach isn’t necessarily better than the other, but it suggests that the author’s point of view heavily influences the reader’s impression, even when presenting facts from multiple points of view. Hanks also places great weight on Marrs’s statements that mysterious non-magnetic iron was found at the crash site, tested in 1973, and baffled the researcher who studied it due to its strange properties. Both men omit the fact that the researcher involved, physicist Tom Gray, later concluded that the material was actually an iron-zinc alloy used in roofing material. Its particular processing made it non-magnetic. So well-known is this that you can even read about it in The Great Airship of 1897 (2010) by J. Allen Danelek—a fringe source published by David Childress which nonetheless debunks most of the claims about the Aurora “crash.” You can also read about it on Wise County’s official website. The long and short of it is that Micah Hanks had available to him all the evidence he needed to produce a more comprehensive and useful article—this one took me a little more than an hour to put together—but despite being on location in Aurora and (presumably) having access to Google, he once again has misled his readers by relying primarily on one unreliable source (Marrs) and failing to engage in the kind of cursory review of evidence and literature that would produce a fuller picture of events. Even if he would eventually conclude that there was an alien involved, it’s somewhere between lazy and dishonest to actively ignore vast swaths of evidence just to fill column inches with a “mystery.”
72 Comments
spookyparadigm
3/31/2015 05:46:42 am
Huh, I didn't know someone had actually made a site of ostension.org
Reply
EP
3/31/2015 06:18:48 am
Wait, what?
Reply
Scott Hamilton
3/31/2015 05:59:57 am
Not only to the UFO believers have to take the original article out of context of the paper where it published and War of the Worlds, but they have to ignore the line describing the craft as "THE airship which has been sailing throughout the country." (Emphasis mine) Clearly, the story was written in response to the mystery airship craze that started in November of 1896. So to accept the Aurora story as real you either have to accept that aliens really were flying a blimp around the Western US in 1896-97, or you have to accept the incredible coincidence that a real alien spacecraft just happened to crash at the same time newspapers were full of stories about unidentified blimps.
Reply
EP
3/31/2015 06:21:48 am
Isn't it obvious? The alien spacecraft must have crashed because of all the unidentified blimp traffic in the skies over America! :D
Reply
EP
3/31/2015 01:12:08 pm
Speaking of counting, just checking whether Weebly has remembered how to count to three :)
John Dunham
4/1/2015 03:10:25 am
Wow - I never really put two and two together. This happened in 1897, and Frank Baum wrote about it in 1900. This was the crash that brought the Wizard to Oz!
Shane Sullivan
3/31/2015 12:11:00 pm
Steampunk aliens? Count me in!
Reply
Sheriff Luger Axehandle
3/31/2015 08:58:53 am
Everything you know is wrong.
Reply
Hypatia
3/31/2015 10:00:21 am
Considering, was Orson Wells' apology a cover-up too?
Reply
Clete
3/31/2015 10:16:26 am
I remember watching the "investigation" of this by Jim Marrs. I found it interesting that the remains of the alien spaceship were not investigated. They were thrown into a well. I know that if something from outer space landed on my property and I wasn't sure what it was I would toss it into my drinking water.
Reply
EP
3/31/2015 01:16:19 pm
Indeed, if anything from anywhere landed on my property, chances are I wouldn't toss it into my drinking water. Unless it was an airdrop of water purification chemicals.
Reply
Only Me
3/31/2015 11:22:09 am
Who needs Hanks or Marrs, when we have The Aurora Encounter (1986)? :)
Reply
terry the censor
4/20/2015 08:19:40 pm
> Aurora Encounter (1986)
Reply
Bob Jase
3/31/2015 12:04:11 pm
Cohen's 'The Great Airship Mystery', the only book dedicated to the title subject as far as I know, covers the incident pretty well.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
3/31/2015 12:09:28 pm
Ah, Childress. His name turned up in the White Wolf book Secrets of the Ruined Temple from their Mage line. It recommends his Lost Cities books as inspiration for running a pulpy game about the remnants of Atlantis: "... Childress can pull a lost civilization out of two piled rocks and a couple of scratches." =P
Reply
EP
3/31/2015 01:10:55 pm
I think they meant to say "Childress can pull a lost civilization from between two greasy flabs of lard" :)
Reply
Shane Sullivan
3/31/2015 02:18:05 pm
Hey... I heard he lost a lot of weight after Seinfeld.
Shane Sullivan
3/31/2015 02:18:50 pm
Hey...I heard he lost a lot of weight after Seinfeld.
Reply
EP
3/31/2015 01:20:51 pm
Shane Sullivan said: "Steampunk aliens? Count me in!"
Reply
Paul S.
3/31/2015 01:25:59 pm
I used to be big into UFO stuff and read about the alleged Aurora UFO in several places both in print and online. Funny how none of them ever mentioned that the original article was published as part of a collection of editors' "favorite yarns", not as a front-page serious news story! To their credit, at least one UFO-friendly source I read admitted that 19th century correspondents weren't above totally inventing stories for a variety of purposes.
Reply
Clint Knapp
3/31/2015 03:01:58 pm
Kinda makes you wonder how many of those two-to-five inch giant articles are from similar Arts & Entertainment showcases, doesn't it?
Reply
Cliff D.
3/31/2015 03:34:17 pm
Wow, the author of this article has an axe to grind with Micah. He should do research for himself instead of constantly attacking Mr. Hanks. I guess if you can't write good articles write ones attacking others, anything to get the page views. What a loser!
Reply
Only Me
3/31/2015 03:42:44 pm
Well trolled, Mr. Troll. Well trolled.
Reply
10/23/2015 12:57:25 am
I think the point the euthor here made was exactly that CLiff. Nothing was investigated. The logic used by people such as Micah Hanks is one that often resounds around "well if you cant prove that there weren't spaceship pieces on the bottom of the well then it must hold true that a spacecraft did actually crash there. This is the most blatant abuse of logic and the most common that is repeatedly abused by conspiracy theorists. if A then B. if you prove that the B statement is true(or false) IT DOES NOT MATTER. It proves nothing about the validity of statement A. Furthermore you cannot say something that you did, "well since you didn't go to the well and prove there isn't alien spacecraft pieces there, then the truth of this article is invalid." This is again, poor logic. He's simply disproving the bogus logic from authors and researchers(/emote giggles [funny that is obviously a self-given job title]).
Reply
jeff adamson
3/31/2015 11:22:39 pm
I see the obsession is still raging.
Reply
3/31/2015 11:29:33 pm
He's never made me an offer. If he had done so, I'd have been happy to.
Reply
4/1/2015 10:54:36 am
Jason,
J Adamson
4/1/2015 02:43:43 am
What's really scary about all of this.......
Reply
4/1/2015 10:55:27 am
Jason,
Reply
EP
4/1/2015 03:14:06 am
Man, Micah Hanks has the weirdest fanboys...
Reply
jeff adamson
4/1/2015 05:15:19 am
What have I said that is weird? Not agreeing?
Reply
EP
4/1/2015 06:31:55 am
Actually, you didn't even express disagreement. You just used a bunch of words like "obsession" and "raging" and referred to something that's apparently not the case.
EP
4/1/2015 06:32:48 am
@ jeff adamson [Weebly is still not working properly]
Reply
jeff adamson
4/1/2015 12:19:55 pm
Apparent to you. As I initially said...just turn the damn channel. I do it all the time. An interviewee has a lisp..I stop listening. Someone is bashing conservativrs..same thing. Someone spouting antigin rhetoric...same thing. What I dontndo is start a blog.."That guy on TheGralienReport who was interviewed had such a damn lisp".
Reply
jeff adamson
4/1/2015 12:21:29 pm
Please forgive my fatfingered spelling errors
Rlewis
4/1/2015 07:32:39 am
The weird thing is, this aircraft never appeared on radar. Must be another Smithsonian conspiracy.
Reply
Clete
4/1/2015 08:30:33 am
Not really that strange. It was 1897, radar had yet to be invented. What was seen (if it was anything at all) was probably a meteor.
Reply
Only Me
4/1/2015 12:42:43 pm
@ jeff adamson
Reply
jeff Adamson
4/1/2015 01:24:30 pm
@only ke.
Reply
Walt
4/1/2015 04:21:25 pm
Only Me, it does work for all the people in the rest of the world who have actual lives to live. Jason and a dozen of his "fans" just have a tough time learning, no matter how many people try to explain it. You're all completely obsessed, and it's very unhealthy. Get on with your lives and accomplish something useful. Start by not watching any TV or browsing the web for 90 days. Then do 180 days. There's a whole world out there away from your screens. I realize by now nobody here believes this, but nobody cares about this stuff you've all convinced yourselves is so important. Jason not getting a bump in traffic from his TV appearance should have proved it. 4/2/2015 04:23:25 am
Only Me,
V
4/2/2015 02:32:08 pm
"Micah spends a great deal of his time as a skeptic"
Only Me
4/8/2015 12:37:51 pm
Scotty, Jason did NOT refer to Hanks as a "hillbilly with a website". That was EP, who said:
Only Me
4/8/2015 12:41:43 pm
Walt, do you know anything about me? No? Then stop making assumptions about me or offering advice on how to live.
EP
4/9/2015 08:32:53 am
Holy Red Herring, Batman! Walt's back!
EP
4/9/2015 08:35:14 am
Scotty Roberts, lecturing people about insulting epithets.
Only Me
4/1/2015 01:47:46 pm
"It is just entertainment...need to lighten up"
Reply
4/1/2015 02:30:09 pm
Only Me,
Reply
Only Me
4/1/2015 03:12:22 pm
My problem, Scotty, is this: if Micah is a skeptic, why would he accuse Jason of hubris, based on a post Jason wrote addressing his (Jason's) research into the popular Smithsonian anti-giant conspiracy? That is the sole reason for their disagreement. Really, that's all it is. A disagreement.
Reply
EP
4/2/2015 03:30:38 am
jeff adamson said:
Reply
4/2/2015 04:15:05 am
So, let's see... Micah takes a personal trip to Texas, and in the process writes a brief blog post - not an essay, thesis nor book - on an old story, while taking his picture at the gravesite.
Reply
Scott Hamilton
4/2/2015 05:17:27 am
Actually. Scotty, Micah wrote a blog post, and Jason wrote a blog post in response. The "brouhaha" is entirely in your head. The fact that people like you and Micah are so upset by minor factual criticism and have to pretend to be victims of a huge conspiracy doesn't speak well of you.
Reply
4/2/2015 05:35:54 am
Actually, Scott, you're wrong. Well, except for the blog-on-blog thing.
Ghostly Tom Joad
10/23/2015 01:03:28 am
"pathological skeptic" aka logical person
Reply
Hypatia
4/2/2015 05:06:48 am
The problem is, if everyone tuned off and did not debunk the supernatural lunacies to restore some common sense, sanity, critical thinking and education, and let others cash off on the ignorance, pretty soon there would be a restored Middle Ages culture, just like the one that ISIS wants to restore.
Reply
EP
4/2/2015 10:21:52 am
In all fairness, Medieval Muslims were a lot more cultured and humane than ISIS.
Reply
4/3/2015 04:22:29 am
Hypatia,
Hypatia
4/2/2015 01:17:32 pm
True, true, certainly more cultured and tolerant than medieval Europe at the time. I meant that they want to restore their utopian caliphate as described in their selections of 6th century Koranic laws.
Reply
4/2/2015 04:09:31 pm
I would agree with you 100%, Hypatia. However - and its a big "however" - not all supernatural claimants are part of the lunatic fringe. There reasoned thinkers who entertain Carl Sagan's "sense of wonder" that cannot be extricated from the scientific method.
Reply
Hypatia
4/2/2015 08:35:28 pm
There is no arrogance in not being convinced when there is no evidence. It's just common sense.
Reply
Hypatia
4/2/2015 07:25:53 am
What's 'antigin rhetoric'?
Reply
EP
4/2/2015 07:27:47 am
Judging by the content and the literacy level of the rest of the post, I bet it's supposed to be "anti-gun" :)
Reply
EP
4/2/2015 10:19:28 am
I really don't think that Micah Hanks is interesting enough to devote a lot of effort to examining him, but it is worth pointing out why it is so misleading (for Scotty Roberts, Micah Hanks himself, or whoever else) to describe him as a skeptic.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
4/2/2015 03:02:56 pm
You know what, EP? I'm going to pull a reverse Reverend and not only agree with all of what you just said, but I'll add that Jason actually provides fringe theory with the valuable service of teaching/inspiring his readers to learn more about the subject.
Reply
Hypatia
4/2/2015 08:29:45 pm
I certainly had no idea how BIG this GIANTS thing had been and still is.
Reply
Stanley
4/27/2015 09:18:09 pm
As someone who's listened to the odd Micah Hanks podcast, I have to agree wholeheartedly about his odd turns of phrase making him sound like someone who, as Ben Folds might say, is trying to "cover his redneck past." One that especially strikes me is that he always, without fail, says "just as well", instead of well, just "as well." Very odd.
Reply
EP
4/3/2015 08:05:30 am
@ Shane Sullivan
Reply
4/3/2015 02:32:06 pm
Hypatia,
Reply
Hypatia
4/5/2015 06:11:01 am
Scotty,
Reply
terry the censor
4/29/2015 07:15:01 pm
> Hanks also places great weight on Marrs’s statements
Reply
Andrew
2/26/2017 10:44:46 pm
This video does a pretty objective job looking at the case.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
November 2024
|