Monday Odds and Ends: Recycled News, Jacques Vallee in Argentina, and Arabic Treasure Hunting Guides
Here we go again! A geologist claims that he has discovered definitive proof that Jesus and his wife Mary Magdalene were buried in Jerusalem’s Talpiot Tomb with their son Judah—and the geologist isn’t even Scott Wolter! Dr. Aryeh Shimron says that chemical tests done on the so-called James Ossuary, the one inscribed with the phrase “James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus,” prove that the ossuary was originally deposited in the Talpiot Tomb. The bigger question is this: Why is this news now? Shimron made his claims in the spring of 2015, but Britain’s Sun newspaper decided to write about them now, for no discernible reason.
Meanwhile, the eminence grise of ufology, Jacques Vallée was in Argentina to participate in the filming of an alien abduction documentary. While there, Vallée was to be asked about his belief that a non-human intelligence is manipulating human culture. Argentine UFO writer Alejandro Agostinelli described it thus:
For decades now, he has focused on ancient sightings, such as those that he developed in “Wonders in the Sky” (with Chris Aubeck, 2011 [sic]), or contemporary ones that he considered unexplained. In such cases, he seeks to establish connections or draw parallels in the service of a hypothesis that has been in the works since the seventies, the so-called Control System Hypothesis, according to which for millions of years a “not necessarily extraterrestrial” intelligence has shaped the evolution of human consciousness. UFO mythology, for Vallée, is part of a reinforcement program which determines the opinion of the masses by creating illusions of design, something like holographic representations with which this intelligence influences our religious institutions, cultural structures and political systems. (my trans.)
This is a summary of Vallée’s 1975 claim, expressed in The Invisible College, that this “intelligence” speaks to us through myths and legends and thus defines our worldview. “What I do mean is that mythology rules at a level of our social reality over which normal political and intellectual action has no power.”
In 1978, for example, Vallée told Fate magazine that he thought UFO sightings and even alien abductions were designed to create specific mental impressions to change our culture:
But perhaps we're facing something which is basically a social technology. Perhaps the most important effects from the UFO technology are the social ones and not the physical ones. In other words the physical reality may serve only as a kind of triggering device to provide images for the witness to report. These perceptions are manipulated to create certain kinds of social effects.
Vallée himself fell victim to a “control system” and over the intervening forty years failed to consider whether the “social effects” and “illusion of design” that he observed were not intentional productions of an intelligence whose actions he deemed “absurd” but rather, as the evidence suggests, a self-generated myth that emerged from a specific (human) cultural context and persisted because of its perceived utility for its believers in understanding the world. Vallée falls into the folly of the creationists, seeing the hand of a designer in the random workings of chance.
The documentary Vallée will be shooting is called Humano: La Llamada Guarani and will be examining alien abduction in light of the mythology of the Guarani people of Paraguay and Argentina.
I also feel like I should call your attention to a pair of Ancient Origins articles by Chris “Mogg” Morgan, an occultist, occult book publisher, and investigator of magic and the occult. Morgan wrote about seventeenth century treatises on the treasures of Egypt and described the Pharaonic curses and magical powers attributed to ancient Egypt’s tombs. One book was the Colloquium heptaplomeres attributed to Jean Bodin, and the majority of the article discussed something he calls the Book of the Buried Pearl, though he gives no information to identify what he says is a sixteenth century Arabic text. He says only that it is a treasure-hunting guide, and he describes its content. All I know of the text is that Morgan says that a French translation was published in 1901. He does not give its title or editor.
I wondered if he could be referring to Khalid ibn Yazid’s Kitab al-kharazat (Book of Pearls), a famous treasure-hunting guide, though that book was allegedly written before 704 CE. Khalid was, according to legend, the first Arab alchemist, having commissioned translations of Christian and Greek Hermetic works of Late Antiquity.
It took me quite a bit of poking around to discover the actual text Morgan referred to: Ahmed Bey Kamil’s translation of the Book of Buried Pearls and Hidden Treasures, which was published at Cairo in either 1900, 1901, or 1907 depending on which source I consulted. I was not able to find a copy of the text, so I do not know its contents.
It makes me angry that fringe writers refuse to give clear citations to the works they cite.
Since I don’t know anything about the Book of Buried Pearls, I can’t really talk about it except to say that if Morgan was interested in early (rather than late) Arabic views on ancient Egyptian treasure, magic powers, and cursed tombs, he might have done well to check out the Akhbar al-zaman, from c. 1000 CE but incorporating much older material. It is full of so many wild claims about buried Pharaonic treasure, mystical enchantments, and curses to keep Morgan in business for years to come.
9/19/2016 10:28:01 am
>>> decided to write about them now, for no discernible reason<<<
9/19/2016 10:38:57 am
I'm a little confused why that Talpiot stuff would be news at all. The core controversy, as I remember, was whether or not the entire epigraph was authentic, or whether all or part of it was created later. Where the ossuary came from was a much lesser issue, and it being from the Talpiot tomb wouldn't prove much, except that whoever faked the James inscription used a ossuary known to be missing from one particular tomb opened fairly recently.
9/19/2016 10:49:26 am
What cannot be disputed is that the statisticians backtracked after the documentary was released. They immediately revised their claims about the chances of the inscription.
9/19/2016 11:25:12 am
Oh Great. A Wolter copy-cat...
9/19/2016 04:05:23 pm
And a TreasureForce Commander copy-cat as well
9/19/2016 05:58:45 pm
Shouldn't that be a CueCat? ;)
9/19/2016 11:42:21 am
"Vallée himself fell victim to a “control system” . . . a self-generated myth that emerged from a specific cultural context and persisted because of its perceived utility for its believers . . ."
9/19/2016 06:29:20 pm
I doubt it makes him much, at least by his standards. The guy's a successful venture capitalist and millionaire; to him, any cash he makes out of UFOs must seem like chump change.
9/19/2016 11:51:37 am
Chemical tests done on the so-called James Ossuary, the one inscribed with the phrase “James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus,” show that the ossuarywas treated with toothpaste proving Jesus' breath was minty fresh.
9/19/2016 04:41:27 pm
I read a lot of commentary nowadays which claim UFOs are simply a result of psychological factors, a claim made frequently by pseudointellectuals which has the convenience of allowing them to pontificate off the seat of their pants.
9/20/2016 03:06:44 pm
A claim you clearly don't actually understand if that's what you think. No, I'm serious. The vast majority of "UFO sightings" are brains trying to fill in the blanks and doing it wrong. Brains, after all, are made to identify things by comparing them to other things. So those sightings SHOULD be "UFO" in the literal sense--"UNIDENTIFIED flying objects"--but instead they're being identified as "alien spacecraft" because of overexposure to the concept in media. Other sightings are exploitation of media on the part of people who want attention, money, or both. Both of those things are, by definition, "psychological factors." If you can't understand basic high school psych concepts, the problem isn't "pseudointellectuals," it's your own uncorrected ignorance on the subject. I suggest you work on remedying the problem.
terry the censor
9/21/2016 12:17:16 am
Orang, this is not pontification, it's been tested.
9/19/2016 11:02:21 pm
"...fringe writers refuse to give clear citations to the works they cite."
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply.
I am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab.
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Terms & Conditions
Please read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.