Nephilim Theorist Wants to Canonize Book of Enoch, Declares World Pyramids Work of Fallen Angels5/5/2016 Last year a Christian Nephilim theorist named David Netherton self-published a book called The Rapture 2028: America’s Countdown to Apocalypse. In it, Netherton claims that he made the surprising discovery that the Bible should have a “perfect” 70 books and not the current list of 66 in most Protestant Bibles. To make up the difference, he does not turn to the Catholic Bible, which has 73 canonical books and three apocryphal ones, or even to the 14 apocryphal books in the King James Bible (which are largely the same as the “extra” books of the Catholic Bible) but to the Dead Sea Scrolls. Why? Because that’s where the Nephilim are. Netherton’s immediate concern is with the prophecies of Armageddon, which he believes began to come true on September 11, 2001: “The twin towers in New York City were destroyed by men from the Middle East. I think this was a sign of the opening of the first seal.” But to understand the End of Days, Netherton feels that we need more of the Bible than we currently have, and he blames the Pharisees for deleting the two Biblical texts he feels should be canonical, as they are in Ethiopia: The Book of Enoch and the Book of Jubilees, both telling the story of the Fallen Angels and the rampaging Nephilim. To this he adds the Book of Jasher and the Epistle of Barnabas, an early Christian text that declared that Christians had taken over God’s covenant from the Jews. “These four books can be easily purchased on Amazon,” Netherton adds helpfully. The interesting thing is that Netherton goes much farther than other Nephilim theorists like L. A. Marzulli, Gary Wayne, or Steve Quayle in that he would canonize the books of Enoch and Jubilees in order to bring in evidence for the Nephilim that his competitors use only cautiously. He does so because he believes these books were canonical in the time of Jesus and therefore should be for us as well. Netherton goes all out with his beliefs in the literal truth of these texts, asserting that Moses himself wrote Jubilees and that Enoch was the actual author of the book that bears his name: Enoch was an eyewitness to this period and recorded it in history. […] I have a live eyewitness with an exact time and correct narrative of their (the Nephilim’s) visit on earth. Enoch is God’s recorded eyewitness, and I have a copy of his deposition in the Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Netherton believes that Nephilim-based Christianity isn’t just the one true faith but will prove that all of time will last exactly 7,007 years and will be coming to an end shortly, when the Millennium (the final thousand years) begins between 2028 and 2030 CE. For someone who devotes more than a small part of his book to explaining why Islam is evil, it’s funny to see that his cosmic timescale ends up agreeing almost entirely with the Islamic chronology of Ibn ’Abbas, Muhammad’s cousin: “The world lasts for one week of the other world; and these weeks are comprised of days of a thousand years. Six thousand years and many hundreds of years more have already passed. There are still a few hundred years to come” (Akhbar al-zaman 1, my trans.). It would be funnier if the “seven-day theory” wasn’t also a pillar of Christian young earth creationism, based on the idea that a thousand years are to God like a day, so the seven days of creation presage a seven-thousand-year span for the Earth. It should go without saying that the three Abrahamic religions all derive such claims from the same early sources. “This book will set you free from the deceptive philosophies of Darwinism and the misunderstood theory of ancient astronauts,” Netherton writes, and in the book he reveals himself to be a follower of Zecharia Sitchin. He rejects, of course, Sitchin’s claims that the Anunnaki are aliens, but he accepts Sitchin’s identification of the Anunnaki of Mesopotamian lore with the Biblical Nephilim and re-centers Sitchin’s narrative on the Nephilim and Fallen Angels as the driving actors in the cosmic drama. Does Sitchin’s influence know no bounds? Anyway, Netherton takes a rather unreconstructed view of ancient astronautics, merely substituting Nephilim for aliens in repeats of claims that even Ancient Aliens no longer makes: “The bad angels who fathered the Nephilim built these Mayan and Aztec ancient cities before the flood.” He adds, following Chris Dunn (but more likely Ancient Aliens) that the Great Pyramid was built as a power plant for Nephilim technology before the Flood, and that there are additional power plants in the Bermuda Triangle and Devil’s Triangle. The Fallen Angels also built “all these mysterious ancient pyramids and mounds.” He’s also committed to the familiar claims of gigantologists the world over, specifically that there is a conspiracy to suppress information about giant bones that would prove the Bible true: The giant skeletons and strange skulls are part of the fossil record. My fellow believers in Christ, take a look at the fossil record; bones don’t lie. This is forbidden archaeology among evolutionists and even some religious leaders in America. The Nephilim skeletons and skulls are all over the earth. It just happens that no one can provide one for examination. Fortunately, though, Netherton has Zecharia Sitchin’s work to help him discover the true history of the Anunnaki Fallen Angels, and he relies on Sitchin for the (false) etymologies of the word “Anunnaki.” Using Sitchin as a rough guide, he claims that they fathered a “kingly” line in 3114 BCE and died out in the Flood of 2317 BCE. But not to worry! They’re coming back again and will pretend to be aliens to fool us all.
Now, why would he choose 3114 BCE? Because that’s the start of the Mayan Calendar, which is the Nephilim’s own timekeeping device!
20 Comments
Only Me
5/5/2016 10:44:14 am
Oh, joy. Another weirdo serving a smorgasbord made from the fringe's greatest hits.
Reply
Uncle Ron
5/5/2016 11:35:59 am
There is an irony here in that these apocalyptic theorists (hypothesists, really) put so much stock in their precise dating, based on no more evidence than several-thousand year old texts, and yet reject modern science which disproves with hard data the chronologies on which their pipe dreams are built. There is more going on here than simply a search for the meaning of life which religion satisfies in many, and I don’t think it’s a search for money. Perhaps these folks have actually lost their religion but can’t accept the alternative and so they cling to their religion that much more tightly hoping that it will all just stop. Yay! The end is coming!
Reply
Only Me
5/5/2016 12:12:04 pm
I don't know what this particular fella believes, but it's obvious he's ignoring Matthew 24:36. I don't think he understands as much as he thinks he does.
Reply
Time Machine
5/5/2016 01:20:09 pm
Matthew 24:36
Time Machine
5/5/2016 01:28:56 pm
There are no references to the Second Coming in first century Christian literature. Paul never refers to it in any of his letters, for example. There are only references to the coming of the Lord (which never happened,. of course).
Ken
5/5/2016 12:05:21 pm
Nephilim and apocphryca are as popular today as they were back in biblical times - which is precisely why the Council of Nicea left them out of the canonical bible. Apparently people back then loved gossip and good bullshit stories as much as they do now. The purpose of the bible was to keep people in line - not entertain them.
Reply
Kathleen
5/5/2016 12:23:58 pm
Bingo!
Reply
Time Machine
5/5/2016 01:21:45 pm
Hey Ken,
Reply
Ken
5/5/2016 03:17:34 pm
And a very popular one at that!
Jonathan Feinstein
5/7/2016 06:04:49 am
I'm a little late to this rodeo, but it might be worth bringing up the fact that canonization is a subtractive process at least as often as it is a subtractive one. Enoch was canonized, but it was canonized out, not in along with many other apocryphal scriptures.
Reply
Jonathan Feinstein
5/7/2016 01:03:37 pm
Just reread that... I meant it was subtractive as often as it was additive...
causticacrostic
5/5/2016 02:34:58 pm
Does this guy not realize that the Spaniards actually encountered and walked through existing Aztec and Mayan cities? Notre Dame cathedral predates Tenochtitlan, but no one claims that angels built that. I guess only white Europeans are able to built monumental buildings without the aid of magical creatures.
Reply
Time Machine
5/5/2016 02:41:40 pm
You're right - Marina Sabina, the Mazatec curandera who taught Wasson about the psilocybe mushrooms was a devout Roman Catholic.
Reply
E.P. Grondine
5/6/2016 09:15:28 am
What do the Maya think? "Stupid Gringos".
Reply
Cesar
5/5/2016 03:09:52 pm
The Epistle of Jude cites Enoch 60: 8 and 1: 9.
Reply
Time Machine
5/5/2016 07:36:11 pm
> He cometh
Reply
Alexander Stallwitz
5/6/2016 12:00:19 pm
Didn't World net daily sell or tried to sell an bible that had the book of Enoch? it also had an complete hoax that was written to provide that the British settled North America or something like that?
Reply
hef
5/6/2016 12:04:15 pm
These posts are so boring and meaningless. What a waste. No wonder this site has dramatically falling numbers.
Reply
Time Machine
5/6/2016 01:54:46 pm
hef,
Reply
Bob Jase
5/6/2016 03:52:05 pm
Smart man! He allowed for twelve years of book sales & promotional tours to line his pockets.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
October 2024
|