Although I have not yet read Graham Robb’s new book The Discovery of Middle Earth: Mapping the Lost World of the Celts, which was published in the U.K. as The Ancient Paths, the book’s major claims straddle the border of alternative history and deserve a mention, even if it might take me a while before I get to reading the book. The information below comes from a number of reviews of the books published recently.
Robb holds a Ph.D. in French literature but became famous as a historian for his 2007 book The Discovery of France, which I read and much enjoyed. His other major works were biographies of French literary figures, unread by me. However, Robb has ventured out beyond his field of specialization to make bold claims about the archaeoastronomy of the ancient Celts who occupied what is now France, Spain, and Portugal before the Romans.
Robb believes that modern historians have systematically underestimated the intellectual achievements of the Celts and have devalued their accomplishments. He points to the widespread dismissal of rhomboid Celtic four-sided enclosures as “irregular” even though they can be inscribed within an ellipse, and he also argues that the Celts must have used well-built gravel roads in order to support the heavy wagons they are known to have built. He suggests that archaeologists attribute to the Romans roads originally constructed by the Celtic peoples from Gaul to Scotland.
Here is where Robb begins to exceed the evidence, according to reviewers. Robb argues that Celtic enclosures were purposely made in rhombus shapes because they were constructed within a symbolic ellipse meant to represent the path of the sun. There is, of course, no evidence to indicate that the Celts viewed the sun’s path as elliptical, or that the buildings were intended as solar structures.
Robb, however, makes some interesting observations that immediately recall the more outlandish claims of the alternative historians. He suggests that the Celts organized their settlements and structures according to an elaborate grid created through astronomical alignments. Here, I think, he has something interesting to say. Alternative historians have been very big on imagining a similar grid constructed along fictional “ley lines” and at the site of “energy centers.” Instead, Robb suggests that the Celts used a complex system of trigonometry based on the observed position of the rising sun at the winter solstice, the path of which they marked on the ground of Iberia as the Via Heraklea. It was later covered over and superseded by the Roman Via Augusta. This is interesting, though I am not sure what proof he has that the Via Heraklea predates the Greco-Roman (or Phoenician-Carthaginian) occupation of Iberia.
He also believes he’s found evidence of “shouting stations” used to relay news across the Celtic world, which should not be terribly controversial since Caesar (Gallic Wars 7.3) recorded the existence of such a thing when he saw how fast news spread when Genabum was attacked:
The report is quickly spread among all the states of Gaul; for, whenever a more important and remarkable event takes place, they transmit the intelligence through their lands and districts by a shout; the others take it up in succession, and pass it to their neighbors, as happened on this occasion; for the things which were done at Genabum at sunrise, were heard in the territories of the Arverni before the end of the first watch, which is an extent of more than a hundred and sixty miles. (trans. W. A. McDevitte and W. S. Bohn)
Robb also places a great deal of weight on the 29 Celtic sites named Mediolanum (with a possible 80 or so more suggested by modern place names), of which Milan is the most famous. The name looks Latin, but it comes from the Gaulish, another Indo-European tongue, literally meaning the place “in the middle (medio) of the plain (lanon = Latin planum). Robb asserts that most of these places are too far from anything to be worth living in, suggesting that they existed as mathematical outposts for calculating trigonometric measurements for the layout of sacred roads. Because that makes much more sense than the idea that farmers would live amidst plains; most of these settlements, such as Le Mayollant in Saint-Jean-de-Bournay, France, are still occupied today, suggesting that somebody found them useful for reasons other than trigonometry.
We know that the Neolithic and Bronze Age peoples of the Celtic lands had elaborate sacred landscapes that were composed of structures aligned with one another and with the sun and the moon. Stonehenge and its surroundings, including Woodhenge, demonstrate this sufficiently. It’s not impossible that Roman-era Celts continued to settle along favorable paths dictated by solar alignments. Yet, the reviewers I have read make plain that Robb’s case is circumstantial and not proved. Here’s Tom Shippy writing in the Guardian:
Too many coincidences, furthermore, erode belief rather than reinforcing it. Culloden Moor was fought in 1746 on a line bisected by the Dinas Emrys meridian, where King Lludd buried the dragons. But one doubts whether any of Bonnie Prince Charlie's men knew that. The summer solstice line from Dinas Emrys takes you straight to Camelot – Camelot theme park, that is, now closed. I doubt Excalibur ever was thrown into Martin Mere close by, even if there is a local legend about it. One has to be aware, as Robb admits, of "the ruthless ingenuity of the unconscious mind".
Here’s Laura Miller, writing in Salon:
Robb would inspire more faith in his conjectures if he were not so extravagantly speculative about the Druids and their training. There are absolutely no original sources on this aspect of Celtic society (which according to the Romans had some sort of prohibition against writing their teachings down). Robb is too ready to offer up imaginings of the educational system that must have produced the people capable of the sophisticated feats of geography he can’t prove they performed in the first place.
In other words, at its heart Robb’s argument is circular, depending first on the belief that astonishing Celtic systems must have existed in order to see their remains amidst all the data.
I’m not sure what to make his claims; some are almost certainly far beyond what the evidence supports, but I think there’s probably merit in at least some of the archaeoastronomy.
11/4/2013 07:27:36 am
Wow. This actually touches on a subject near and dear to my heart. Vercingetorix has long been my hero of heroes, when it comes to historical figures, with Boadicea not far behind.. I fully support his belief that history has consistently undervalued and underestimated the Celts, though I would suggest that it started with the invading Romans, rather than being a strictly modern phenomenon. I'm not at all sure I can support some of his OTHER beliefs, in the face of a huge lack of evidence.
11/4/2013 01:44:46 pm
Since there are no written Celtic records (to my knowledge) it is very understandable that the Celts are overlooked or not really given as much weight as cultures that did leave written testaments....not to mention massive building projects.
The Other J.
11/5/2013 08:23:49 am
Hmm... I know Ireland and Scotland (mainly Ireland) better than Galicia and Brittany, so any take I have on this subject would be shaped by that knowledge. That said, I think it would be hard to speculate about the complexity of alignments when more sites are still being discovered, or at least uncovered and explored. The alignments of specific, individual sites isn't in question -- Newgrange, Knowth and Dowth at Brú na Bóinne in Ireland all prove that (all built well before Roman occupation of Britain -- before the great Egyptian pyramids, even, and the Romans never made it to Ireland in the first place, so...).
11/5/2013 08:31:22 am
Great questions. I don't have a copy of the book to know how he's defining Celts or what methodology he's using. According to reviews, he noticed that the Via Heraklea aligned to the sun and then looked around for sites near it that he could add to his alignment pattern.
11/4/2013 08:59:00 am
I think the idea of knowing an exact time to plant is somewhat frivolous. Here in Minnesota, I watch the lilacs. They will tell me when to plant, when they begin to form buds. I'm sure farmers were aware of watching for signs of nature to tell them when to plant back then, too. I guess it's always nice to have an exact date, though, just to be sure.
11/4/2013 11:40:29 pm
Yes. There's a nugget of dark matter in it radiating dark energy.
11/5/2013 12:59:46 pm
Well, YES, Gun, and "signs of nature" include celestial alignments such as moon phases, solstices, and equinoxes. Particularly since you don't plant all crops at the same time, and if you want to start with forcing them, it has to be WELL before "the lilacs begin to form buds." It's not like they would have used these things to flip open their printed Gregorian calendars and circle April 8th or something.
1/29/2023 06:09:45 pm
I find it interesting that many of the claims about the ancient Celt are confabulations & speculations. For a number of reasons there are more complete written accounts by the Romans of the Germanic folk. In the lacunae of complete information about the Celts, all sorts of romantic claims and suppositions are made. A common set of claims is that the Celts were somehow more nature loving, peaceful and mystical than were the Germanic folk. The actual written accounts show little justification for the sundry claims of Celtic superiority.
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply.
I am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab.
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Terms & Conditions
Please read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.