In cable television, as in politics, there is no shame, no depths that the purveyors of conspiracy theories won’t plumb in the endless quest to wring out just a little more money and power. The History Channel, though, must surely notice that the brand of anti-science, anti-fact, antisocial conspiracy that they have spun for years now has not only poisoned out democracy but is also getting some relatively heavy pushback. The question, of course, is whether they care. That answer is almost certainly no. In the nihilist marketplace of fracturing media, holding on to a small but loyal army of extremists is more important than either civic responsibility or mass appeal. Consider this rather extraordinary review of an anodyne retread of the format of the old Fact or Faked show from the Syfy channel, now reused for History’s The Proof Is Out There, which premiered last night, its title shamelessly piggybacking on The X-Files. This is the traditionally conservative New Hampshire Union Leader writing about it in its typically milquetoast what-to-watch TV column: The proliferation of cable series offering “proof” and credulous speculation about ghosts, aliens, Bigfoot and mermaids is hardly a new phenomenon. It’s hard to say if such programs help create or merely reflect a kind of popular selfishness and soft-headedness that encourages people to treat science and evidence as mere “opinion.” And that’s the column about what’s on TV! Meanwhile, down in Georgia, a former treasure hunter who appeared on History’s Curse of Oak Island conspiracy-cum-male-bonding series, J. Hutton Pulitzer, the ex-business partner of ex-History Channel host Scott F. Wolter, testified to the Georgia state senate about his “evidence” for voter fraud claims. Pres. Donald Trump made reference to some of the same conspiracy theories in his controversial Saturday phone call pressuring Georgia’s secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, to overturn the certified results of the presidential election. Raffensperger’s office issued an extraordinary statement condemning Pulitzer: In another election disinformation filled hearing, a small group of Republicans in the Georgia State Senate featured the claims of failed inventor and failed treasure hunter J. Hutton Pulitzer as a star witness. In his presentation, Hutton Pulitzer, formerly J. Jovan Philylaw, claimed without providing any evidence that he had “hacked” a poll pad. He then went on to claim that meant that the entire voting system was compromised even though the poll pad, like the poll books which they have replaced, are never connected to the rest of the voting system. For years, supporters of cable TV disinformation and fake history shows criticized me for arguing that these programs had consequences that stretched beyond cable TV and paperback books.
But does cable TV learn? Of course not. Discovery Communications, the parent company of the Science Channel, the Travel Channel, and other purveyors of fake science and paranormal programs just launched Discovery+, a streaming service that will feature new pro-paranormal and paranoid anti-government conspiracy programs. They are also going to air this month a retitled version of American Runestone, a Swedish pseudohistory series about the Kensington Runestone, once again featuring Scott Wolter as an “expert,” that at least one Swedish newspaper condemned last year as supporting historically racist Eurocentric narratives. As long as these shows capture somewhere between 500,000 and one million viewers in a country of 300 million people, it doesn’t matter how much damage they do. They’ve turned a profit, can get shunted off to Discovery+, Netflix, Hulu, or some other streaming service to live on forever.
26 Comments
The channels don't care
1/6/2021 10:30:33 am
The channels don't care -- so long as they are laughing all the way to the bank through revenue from advertising. Facts don't sell. Dreams and fantasies make a fortune.
Reply
Brian
1/6/2021 12:13:18 pm
Oh, they'll keep this crap coming as long as there's a single boob left with a single nickel in his or her (most likely his) pocket. But it is really encouraging (or am I just desperate for encouragement?) that the NH Union Leader and Republican officials are starting to call these scam-sucking cons for what they are, and making the link to our science-hating fundamentalist culture.
Reply
Doc rock
1/7/2021 04:50:44 pm
Have you looked into the political leanings of the people pushing BS woo and conspiracy theories on Gaia TV?
Reply
New netflix parascience series
1/6/2021 09:01:42 pm
This will be called "Surviving Death". At least two well known parapsychologists promised to give messages from beyond the grave passing info to open combination locks --- and we're still waiting...we're still waiting...
Reply
Bill
1/6/2021 10:25:28 pm
I actually watched American Runestone and thought they did a pretty good job of discrediting SW. I had expected them to support his wacky theories and was pleasantly surprised when the show equally, or better, said he was full of shit.
Reply
Paul
1/6/2021 11:26:20 pm
Yeah, but when Stolmare, sorry if I got the name wrong, stands in front of the stone display in the museum and says, to the effect that the stone is real because it says so on this plaque, makes one kinda go huh?
Reply
Doc rock
1/7/2021 06:56:05 am
Well. You've got someone that is supposed to be a professional geologist who either committed fraud or made a royally boneheaded misidentification of a rock; claimed a coffee cup was an honorary graduate degree; thinks that Templars masquerading as vikings were traipsing all over North America leaving coded messages and diddling Indian chicks; and who preaches scientific research but loses it in the faces of even mild criticism; and panics at the prospect of meeting colavito face to face. He is pretty much self-discrediting even dealing with someone like Stormare .
Reply
I think this is the wrong approach. If one channel learns the lesson, another channel will take over. We have to think this through from another perspective.
Reply
Nick Danger
1/7/2021 11:49:40 am
There are facts and there are non-facts. Both-sidesism and whatabouts do not change that.
Reply
The word "facts" does even not appear in my contribution. I can only guess what you want to say. There are facts, indeed. And both-sideism in clear cases is not legitimate. For example it is a fact that the climate changed in recent decades.
Darold knowles
1/7/2021 01:22:43 pm
Thanks for “explaining” how liberals and science are the real villains here.
Reply
Darold Knowles, intentional misunderstandings will not help you out of the problem. If you want to better a situation, you have to start with yourself. There is a bad dialectic going on between exaggerations on both sides.
Nerd11135
1/7/2021 09:40:26 am
Kudos to Mr. Colavito on the extremely timely post. Kudos of a different sort to one or two of the posters here who prove Mr. Colavito's point by pretending that denying settled science is skepticism.
Reply
NERD11135, it depends on the quality of the arguments whether dissent is legitimate. Settled science has always the potential to become unsettled again. And who decides which science is settled? I would prefer that scientists decide this, not politicians and journalists, and that scientists who dare to dissent with good arguments are not put under pressure, as it is today often the case.
Reply
Kent
1/7/2021 06:09:01 pm
One man's "settled science" is another man's Al Gore nonsense. Inconvenient but true.
Reply
Lyn McConchie
1/11/2021 02:49:05 pm
perhaps vaccines? Many have been around for decades - as has the nonsense about them causing autism.(igh, AND that's now being applied to covid vaccines which is going to make a lot of us vulnerable to covid if our neighbours refuse to be vaccinated.)
Paul
1/7/2021 10:47:00 pm
If there is a disparity in acceptance of science by ideology, instead of denigrating others, there may be some use in attempting to understand. Here is a useful paper that pops up, https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1251&context=carsey
Reply
Higher education and beign liberal (in the current meaning) are correlated in our days. But higher education does not prevent people to follow peer groups and being influenced by the spirit of the times. Higher education and intelligence are not the same. Intelligence leads to balanced views, not to liberalism. A key problem with this study is this general idea of trust in science. Science is an imperfect realization of an ideal, and trust should therefore be limited. It always makes sense to listen to a scientist, and ideally to more than one, but just trusting them because they are scientists? Rather not.
Reply
Leif
1/9/2021 01:13:51 am
One curious thing about the article you linked to– it has nothing to do with trust in science. Instead it measures one's willingness to accept an appeal to authority.
Reply
Leif Allmendinger
1/9/2021 12:38:40 am
‘The History Channel, though, must surely notice that the brand of anti-science, anti-fact, antisocial conspiracy that they have spun for years now has not only poisoned ou[r] democracy but...’
Reply
Zina bash
1/9/2021 12:14:57 pm
Middle age people here can't have an intelligent conversation about the dangers of left-wing conspiracy theories about a half Mexican, half Jewish/Polish woman allegedly flashing white power gestures on national TV. What makes you think that that people of their children's age can demonstrate greater intellectual prowess.
Reply
Kent
1/9/2021 04:15:23 pm
Are you the real Zina Bash or someone using the name of a fairly well-known person? That's kind of against the rules. If you're using your own name it's just stupid.
Doc Rock
1/10/2021 01:25:45 pm
Zina,
Chief justice obvious
1/10/2021 11:08:02 pm
If joe Kent is concerned about rules he should read the primary one pertaining to vulgarity, personal attacks, and irrelevant posts. In other words the rule he has flagrantly violated under numerous aliases for years.
Jim
1/15/2021 03:08:53 pm
Has anyone noted that on the Curse of Oak Island they think they have their very own Serpent Mound, and they are conflating the mound with the Knights Templar !
Reply
John Buck
12/22/2021 09:43:48 pm
When I saw J. Hutton Pulitzer, Treasure Force Commander, pop up during the election, I about died. Couldn't believe it was him, but it was him.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
December 2024
|