At the dawn of the UFO era, Ray Palmer, the editor of Amazing Stories, told his readers that the fantastical tales Richard Shaver spun of underground and interstellar races and their spacecraft were all true but had to be disguised with a romance storyline and the trappings of fiction. And many readers believed the lie, even if a large number recognized the truth. I’ve related this information many times before, but I have to keep bringing it up because it maintains a strange relevance in the face of new claims that fiction hides facts too important or dangerous to reveal. The latest exemplar comes to use from the punctuation-challenged pen of Kevin Day, the air intercept controller serving aboard the USS Princeton during the so-called “Tic-Tac” encounter with a UFO by servicemembers in the Nimitz carrier group in 2004. Skeptics have raised a number of questions about the incident, and no evidence of extraterrestrial or extradimensional origins for the apparent object in the sky has been produced. The incident became famous in December of last year when the To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science publicized infrared video of the incident in conjunction with a New York Times report revealing the existence of a Pentagon program to study unidentified aerial phenomena. Members of that program and its Robert Bigelow-controlled subcontractor had joined To the Stars at its inception two months earlier. Day claims that he wrote about the incident in 2008 in a short story entitled “The See’r” (sic) in his collection Sailors Anthology Book’s I and II (sic). In a recent interview with Mike Damante of Punk Rock and UFOs, Day said that “writing it as fiction provided me a way of attempting to describe the very nature of what we had encountered. To capture the weirdness of it.” I have difficulty imagining that it is necessary to make up fake facts and imagine fake people to describe one’s own experiences. The autobiographical novel has a long tradition, and many writers have claimed that it allowed them to explore emotional truths that facts alone could not, or that it gave them the ability to protect the innocent by disguising them. Several memoir writers, like James Frey, admitted to fabricating parts of their own life stories to make for better than real tales. But in all these cases, the mixing of fact and fiction muddies the waters. They may speak to emotional truths, but they are worthless as factual reports. But the more Day talks, the less reliable he becomes. As he speaks, we learn that he displays signs frequently associated with fantasy prone personalities. He claims that merely witnessing the “Tic Tac” UFO has given him what Punk Rock and UFOs calls “advanced cognition,” which manifests as apocalyptic dreams of a coming disaster. The dreams I began to have in 2008 can be loosely described as eschatological; world-wide disasters, comets causing tsunamis, epic floods, earthquakes, plane crashes, (and) end of the world scenarios. […] I remembered the “nightmares” the next day and those dream-memories would trigger acute anxiety, which I experience daily even now many years later. Sometimes the anxiety becomes so intense that I flashback – remembering the dream surfaces other real memories and I suddenly “zone out” for a short time. It is sometimes so intense that other people present have asked if I am OK, which I am after the extremely unpleasant episodes are over. If not for the anxiety, perhaps the dreams themselves would not bother me so much. They’re just dreams. Imagining himself a prophet is certainly one way to interpret these experiences, but it strikes me as the least likely. But rather than pursue what science and logic would tell us are more likely causes of his anxiety and troubled dreams, he instead cites Jacques Vallée and Eric W. Davis—two ufologists associated with Robert Bigelow and To the Stars, directly or indirectly—to support his claim that a UFO gave him mental superpowers. In 2003, Vallée and Davis published a paper through a Bigelow-funded group claiming that UFOs could provide the key to a new understanding of physics. This paper is popular among ufologists, but (if I may steal from my own analysis of the paper in a private email), the authors make two fundamental errors in their zeal to make a case for imaginary physics. First, they reason backward by assuming that “the phenomenon” is (a) singular and (b) correctly understandable from human perception of it. What we see isn’t necessarily what is actually there. When you watch a cartoon, you might report that the drawings move, but that’s just your perception creating a false reality from still images passing very quickly before your eyes. It doesn’t mean that “animation” is a miraculous phenomenon that brings drawings to life. Similarly, to deduce a “phenomenon” from witness reports is to reason backward and bias the results.
Second, there is no evidence that “the phenomenon” is singular. Lights in the sky might have many causes, and there is no historical evidence that supernatural abductions, cattle mutilations, flying ships, or any other part of the “phenomenon” was associated with lights in the sky before ufologists made it so in the middle twentieth century. To start from that assumption is to work backward from a myth to a justification for it. One might equally well try to reason backward from Greco-Roman reports of appearances of the gods (e.g. Ovid, Metamorphoses 8.611ff. with Acts 14:11-12) to investigate the physics of how Zeus and Hermes walked the earth. Despite these foundational problems with the underlying assumptions in this article by Vallée and Davis, Day wants to give the cover of science to what in other cultures and other times would have been labeled a divine revelation or madness. Day believes that he is being watched at all times and that UFOs will give people the power to “manifest things” out of thin air and to spontaneously heal. These are the kinds of “miracles” associated with prophets and demigods, but Day sees them as science, based on Vallée and Davis: “Basically, microtubules in our brains get vibrated by tremendously high frequency (THz) or terahertz radiation. We are affected at the quantum level, (and) therefore this is a technology and scale problem.” The right vibrations—a favorite term of the spiritualists—give people magical powers. According to Punk Rock and UFOs, Day is in talks with To the Stars to work with the organization on the UFO phenomenon. Day says that he cannot comment while negotiations are ongoing. I will await, likely in vain, proof that Day’s visions have any reality outside of his own mind, or that flying saucers give ordinary people the powers of Apollonius of Tyana.
42 Comments
A Buddhist
10/10/2018 10:18:34 am
The write vibrations
Reply
Scott Hamilton
10/10/2018 10:39:23 am
That quote from Day sounds a lot like some of the letters John Keel was writing in the run up to writing The Mothman Prophesies. Fantasy prone and paranoid, sure that a disaster was going to happen.
Reply
Machala
10/10/2018 10:46:46 am
Writers often mask the truth through fictional devices. Historically, observations and critiques of social, religious, and political life has been couched in satire, and fictional characterizations have been used to attack real people.
Reply
V
10/10/2018 11:50:38 am
Narrative therapy is a legitimate tool for dealing with traumatic experiences...but if you're not doing it under the aegis of a counselor trained in narrative therapy, it's not narrative therapy, and it's probably not actually helping you deal with traumatic experiences.
Reply
Kal
10/10/2018 02:18:57 pm
So this Day guy decided one day he read a report of a UFO that it was visionary, had dreams about disconnected end of days stuff, and then imagined he too encountered the UFO.
Reply
Tom Mellett
10/10/2018 03:04:36 pm
Jason,
Reply
Machala
10/10/2018 09:30:06 pm
It is so amusing to watch how wisely the U.S. Government spends your tax dollars.They won't spend a time or take the time to do something about climate change ( except to deny it and exacerbate an already dire situation ), but they will focus their attention on investigating a 14 year old incident of a UFO sighting with a dubious history and questionable veracity.
Reply
Dan
10/10/2018 11:02:40 pm
"Advanced Cognition and Apocalyptic Dreams”...
Reply
The Laughing Buddha
10/10/2018 11:29:34 pm
Are you an Arhat?
Reply
Dan
10/11/2018 12:27:15 am
No. But that’d be cool, right?
Reply
Kal
10/11/2018 12:29:25 pm
I met Whitley Strieber, onto one of the commenters. He was way out there, even in the 1990s, but also in the same decade, there was college life, which also was way out there.
Reply
AmericanCool"Disco"Dan
10/11/2018 05:59:06 pm
No one ever said it was a weather balloon, because it looked like a meteor on the way down. The gummint seized it because they knew it was a Russian satellite payload. They didn't just "stumble on this site".
Reply
Kevin Day
10/11/2018 01:39:00 pm
To Jason, and his loyal followers, I have not and will never utter prophetic statements. I have told my story about what happened, explained how it affected me personally afterwards, and I am now asking questions and expressing my concerns about what I've been through over the last 14 years. You suggest that asking questions is prophecy? Maybe asking questions is considered prophecy in your own little debunker world, but not in mine. I'm not even religious.
Reply
Colin Smith
10/11/2018 04:15:21 pm
Kevin Day - well said sir. Unfortunately some people will deny what happened to you and the other sailors aboard despite multiple testimony from credible observers and supporting videos sourced from the DoD. So do not stoop to their level or feel discredited by their petty comments designed to further their own agendas. Can you disclose when you will discuss your experience with the Senate committee? Until then stay strong.
Reply
AmericanCool"discoDan
10/11/2018 05:55:40 pm
"I ... will never utter prophetic statements."
Reply
10/11/2018 07:28:03 pm
I was speaking of your eschatological dreams and claims that UFOs create "advanced cognition." What you saw in the sky is not, strictly speaking, relevant to the claims under discussion here. I did not attempt to debunk you sighting; you saw something, but it is not for me to say what. It is up to the person claiming alien spacecraft to demonstrate its otherworldly origin. To see is not to believe because what we see is only as good as our perception, biases, and beliefs.
Reply
Dan
10/11/2018 09:38:04 pm
Dude Mang?
Reply
V
10/11/2018 11:02:49 pm
Hm, the encounter was in 2004, and you started having dreams in 2008....the same year as a massive recession hit the country and literally millions of people started having similar apocalyptic nightmares, without ever having seen any flying tic tacs.
Reply
Dan
10/11/2018 11:28:11 pm
“I'm more concerned that you have decided that your interpretation of events is the only possible one in the absence of SIGNIFICANTLY more verifiable facts than I am that something MAY have fallen out of the sky into the ocean.”
AmericanCool"Disco"Dan
10/11/2018 11:44:00 pm
Colour me skeptical that NSA has "agents". Even if true I'm calling "borrowed valour" if that's your claim to be "highly trained as an observer". Your grandfather flew in WWII? Congrats, you're a Top Gun pilot!
Bezalel
10/11/2018 11:05:20 pm
Kevin
Reply
AmericanCool"DiscoDan
10/11/2018 11:39:08 pm
"We must have a kill switch, to ensure our best and brightest don't commit some irreversible act."
Bezalel
10/13/2018 07:32:52 pm
(So, um... what's the projected "go-live" date for that?)
Jockobadger
10/15/2018 02:40:41 pm
Kevin,
Reply
Dan
10/11/2018 10:16:01 pm
“...the powers of Apollonius of Tyana.”
Reply
Dan
10/11/2018 10:19:50 pm
Sorry,
Reply
Dan
10/11/2018 10:57:26 pm
*spoiler alert!*
Theo Paijmans
10/12/2018 08:58:38 pm
Interesting as this essay started, the first paragraph is already littered with historical errors. Yes, Blavatsky was quite enamored by Bulwer-Lytton and therefore also by his proto science fiction novel 'The Coming Race' (1871) where he writes about 'vril'. After all, she mentions his vril force in her 'The Secret Doctrine'(1888).
Reply
Dan
10/12/2018 11:39:59 pm
I don’t even know what to do with that post. I keep starting and then stopping again.
Reply
Dan
10/12/2018 11:46:35 pm
...and her little monkey, Henry Steel Olcott, too?
Theo Paijmans
10/13/2018 05:09:00 pm
Dan, old chap - the way you manage to inject certain curse words into what you are actually trying to say is interesting. I sincerely hope this outburst of bad manners and cross idiom is not an engrained character trait of yourself.
Hi Theo,
AmericanCool"Disco"Dan
10/13/2018 03:02:40 am
It's nice to have someone so familiar with Mme. Blavatsky's thought processes posting here.
Reply
Dan
10/13/2018 03:35:05 am
Colin Wilson.
Theo Paijmans
10/13/2018 05:18:52 pm
Hi Dan,
Dan
10/14/2018 11:27:36 pm
Theo?
AmericanCool"Disco"Dan
10/15/2018 12:51:46 am
So, if I understand Theo Pajamas correctly, because Blavatsky believed SOMETHING, the fraud and fakery is okay.
Dan
10/13/2018 03:44:22 am
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WC5FdFlUcl0
Reply
Theo Paijmans
10/15/2018 02:33:10 pm
Dan,
Reply
Dan
10/17/2018 12:30:54 am
I suppose after all that my question to you would be something like, “Why do you want to believe that Helena believed in something so badly?
Dan
10/17/2018 12:36:11 am
Also,
Jeff Bishop
10/15/2018 03:17:57 pm
For me, as with any claim of "extra-terrestrial", I simply remind
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
December 2024
|