Apparently another group has claimed to find Noah's Ark on Mt. Ararat in Turkey. This article does a good job explaining many reasons it likely isn't true. But I wonder this--even if we ignore that carbon dating to 600 AD or the lack of evidence for a flood--how do we know this was Noah's ark and not the Ark of Utnapishtim, the Sumerian Noah who survived the Flood three millennia before the Bible was committed to paper? Amazing the way it's only Noah's ark that shows up ever few years. Poor Utnapishtim, poor Deucalion and Pyrrah.
I am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab.
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter, The Skeptical Xenoarchaeologist, for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Terms & Conditions
Please read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.