The one remaining detail of the Arabic pyramid legends whose source is unclear is that of Philemon (Arabic: Aclimun, Filimon, etc.), the mythical chief priest of Egypt who was deeply involved in preparations for the Flood. His story is confusing, and the efforts of the various Arabic historians to massage it into something intelligible perhaps provide a key to unlocking the mystery. The legend itself is too long to give in the original (I’ve made translations here and here), and it is a bit problematic because it exists in several versions, each more complex than the last. The name of Philemon, and the tendency to describe pharaohs with particularly non-Arabic and only vaguely Egyptian names, suggests that the underlying story is Greek. (M. A. Murray did a comparison and seems to have proved that the Arabic list of pharaohs derives from a bad copy of Manetho from a lost Greek chronology, likely that of Annianus or Panodorus.)
The oldest version of the story is that of Al-Hakam (before 871 CE), and Philemon doesn’t do much in it: Surid, the king of Egypt, had a dream of a great earthquake, that the stars fell to earth, and that men were taken to two mountains by a flock of white birds. Philemon merely took some measurements with his 129 fellow priests and declared the coming of the Flood. In a subsequent version, that of the Akhbar al-zaman (c. 900-1200 CE), Philemon does the same but offers his own dream to complement that of Surid. He dreamed, he said, that the sky crashed to the ground and that the sun god explained the astrological progress of the heavens as a cycle of 360 orbits. The Akhbar adds a second adventure of the same priest set 300 years later, as the Flood is about to strike. Philemon has another dream in which the angels descend to earth to spank naughty people with iron rods, and they tell him to seek his salvation in the Ark. Another dream had birds in a garden giving him the same message. Philemon hears of Noah and the monotheism Noah was preaching in Chaldea. He therefore contrives to escape the evil pharaoh Far‘an with his wife, two children, and seven disciples. Noah converts them to monotheism, and they help him build the Ark, eventually escaping the Flood in it with the rest of the righteous.
Al-Maqrizi, attributing the story to Ibrahim ibn Wasif Shah, relates most of the same story as the Akhbar al-zaman, but he reorganizes it, combining all of Philemon’s dreams and placing them as one event in the time of Surid. In another place he gives the story of the Ark told above, again from ibn Wasif Shah. He later reports another version of the story, from what he says is a long chain of transmission dating back to Muhammad ibn Ali bin Sakhr Al-Tamimi (whoever that was; all I know is that he predates 834 CE, since the first author who cited him died then) that gives a similar story without mentioning any names. According to this version, some Muslim scholars studied an old document from the time of Philip the Arab in the monastery of Abu Jeremias (Abu Hirmis), which Al-Maqrizi and all the historians of the time wrongly believed (based on a bad translation) was the House of Hermes Trismegistus. This document claimed to be a copy of a primordial account written by the son of the one righteous Egyptian who had escaped on the Ark after warning Surid, who “raised a house (temple) in the Delta and in the Saïd and engraved on their walls the details of science, astronomy and prognostication, the stars, alchemy, art, medicine, and all the useful or harmful things.” The majority of the text is identical to that of the earlier versions, leaving no doubt that Philemon was the intended subject.
The various versions are clearly related, but the details differ enough that their exact genealogy is a bit unclear. To make matters worse, Al-Maqrizi sometimes exchanges the name of Philemon (Aqlimun) with the magician-pharaoh he named Qlimun, as in 2.2, when citing ibn Wasif Shah, he claims that Qlimun returned to Egypt after riding out the Flood in the Ark to read science off of Egyptian stones.
I can’t help but wonder if Philemon was named for Ovid’s myth of Baucis and Philemon, itself also related in some sense to the Flood. In that story, told in Metamorphoses 8.621-696 a disguised Zeus and Hermes visit Philemon and his wife, who show them hospitality unlike all the other people of the town. Zeus warns them to flee, and he destroys the town by flood, leaving Philemon and his wife to turn into a tree beside their house, made into a temple. The idea of a temple guardian with foreknowledge of the Flood and an association with a “tree” (= wood for the ark?) seems too close to be coincidental. The story was well-known to Christians, as evidenced from Acts 14:11-12, where Paul and Barnabas are hailed as the disguised Zeus and Hermes.
We have some clues, though, about where Philemon came from. Panodorus attributed to the Watchers a 360 degree zodiac, which the Arabs said Philemon saw in a dream, like Enoch before him. According to Maqrizi, ibn Wasif Shah reported that Philemon returned to Egypt after the Flood with all his disciples, and they recovered manuscripts and the sciences written on the walls of the temples, and they restored the science of alchemy, just as the second Hermes does in the account of pseudo-Manetho.
In chapter 2 of the Akhbar al-zaman, which cared nothing for consistency or coherence, a very familiar story plays out before the Flood, with the earliest Egyptian king, though the author has included details that, bizarrely, have made Philemon admirably near-immortal:
The first who reigned in Egypt before the Flood was Nekraws. After the sons of Adam, who had committed injustice against each other, were delivered into battle, control had passed into the hands of the sons of Cain, sons of Adam; then Nekraws the giant, son of Mizraim, son of Merakil, son of Dawil, son of Arbak, son of Adam, with seventy horsemen and some descendants of Arbâk, all giants, sought a place to live apart from other men. This company walked until they had reached the Nile, and then they walked along the river and, having seen the extent of the country and its admirable beauty, they said: “This is a country with crops and fruits,” and they made their home there. This is the race that built the tallest buildings and most magnificent monuments.
For what it’s worth, al-Maqrizi, in Al-Khitat 1.7, repeats the story nearly verbatim but leaves out references to giants, referring to the “great” instead. As mixed up as the story seems—it combines elements of the Watchers-giants myth and a big chunk of the Jewish extra-canonical legend of Nimrod (involving giants, the Tower of Babel, and elements of the Watchers myth)—it seems clear that we see the same reflex in this story as in the previous few: Philemon is enacting the role of the second Hermes, the one who lived after the Flood and restored the knowledge hidden by the first Hermes. Just as Surid usurped the role of the first Hermes, Philemon fills the role of the second Hermes.
The characters of the first and second Hermes were never clearly differentiated; the Greek chronographers invented them to explain how Hermes could live both before and after the Flood according to the various legends they accepted uncritically. But their composite characters were both closely modeled on Enoch and his ilk from the apocryphal literature of Judaism. Thus, we find that just as the Greeks made two Hermeses, they also made two Misr (Mizraims), so stories told of the antediluvians and the post-diluvians could both be kept without picking between them. Al-Maqrizi, in Al-Khitat 1.7, offers a revelatory explanation for it, writing that while everyone agrees Egypt was named after Misr or Mizraim, most wrongly identify him as “Misr the son of Ham, while in reality he is the son of Hermes, son of Herdush, son of Bitun, son of Rawa, son of Lithi, of Yunnan (Ionia; i.e., Greece). It is from him that Egypt has taken the name Misr, which is a Macedonian name.” According to Al-Maqrizi, a lost work of Al-Mas‘udi, the Akhbar al-zaman (a different one) said that after the Flood, Philemon proposed renaming Egypt after a different Misr, Noah’s descendant, and his co-religionist. Thus, Egypt had two namesakes called Misr, giving it the title of Mizraim, the land of two Misrs.
Even in a euhemerized account of Egyptian history, we run time and again into Hermes! Such an account, which makes no sense coming from an Arab pen in the Islamic era, must be a product of the Hellenistic, Roman, or Christian period when Greek speakers had good reason to assert a Macedonian or Greek supremacy over Egypt. I suspect we see the pen of Annianus lurking behind this, too.
Philemon’s role standing in for Hermes and Enoch (whom Anninanus and his predecessor Panodorus considered the same), at least in the form of the second Hermes, seems to find confirmation in his dream visions, both his own and the dream vision of Surid which seems to have been originally part of Philemon’s story before the Flood before someone relocated it to the construction of pyramids 300 years earlier. There is a strange echo of these dreams in Enochian references in Jewish literature. The medieval Book of Jasher, which incorporates older Jewish lore, said that Enoch reigned over 130 princes for 243 years (Jasher 3:10), just as Philemon presided over 130 priests for the more or less 250 years from Surid’s vision to the Flood. (I didn’t calculate it to the day.) In 1 Enoch 26, Enoch has a dream vision of two massive mountains and a smaller one between them, and there was a lush garden with a terrible valley in the center. The valley is the horrible place where the Watchers and Nephilim shall be punished. This dream vision closely parallels that of Surid, who saw two mountains and white birds, likely symbolizing angels, depositing his countrymen, presumably corrupt Cainite Nephilim, in between, in the dread valley. Beyond that, the dream visions also reflect general Christian apocalyptic motifs. The angels beating people with rods and the birds gathering for the judgment are a close parallel to Revelation 19, where the Son of Man on his white horse smites the unbelievers with an iron rod and an angel, speaking as the sun, calls the birds together to feast on their corpses.
7/11/2015 04:03:48 am
The reference to Philemon taking measurements in an early account is important. We tend to overlook the significance of what are perceived to be mundane acts,
7/11/2015 05:49:32 am
I'm sure it is important; it marks him as an astrologer. Exactly what the importance is, I am not sure. If I had to guess, I'd say it was related to the measurements the angels present to Enoch in 1 Enoch 61. "And these measurements will reveal all the secrets of the depths of the Earth, and those who were destroyed by the desert, and those who were devoured by the fish of the sea, and by animals, that they may return and rely on the Day of the Chosen One. For no one will be destroyed in front of the Lord of Spirits, and no one can be destroyed."
7/11/2015 07:48:26 am
I'd be cautious about thinking in terms like "first and second Hermes". Rather, I think it was just a case of particular names being attached to particular story concepts in particular cultures. And as I suggested a week or two back, some names like "Surid" may have been invented specifically for use in new or imported story concepts (in his case, the covering of sacred buildings with cloth).
7/11/2015 08:10:34 am
Witness how the accounts of Arthur were revised, modified and turned into myths by later generations.
7/11/2015 10:54:21 am
The issue, though, is that we can trace first and second Hermes back to around 300-400 CE (in pseudo-Manetho), while Surid and Philemon seem to show up a bit later and have taken on chunks of the story of the two Hermeses. So, regardless of whether they originally had an independent existence, it looks like they were assimilated to the story of the two Hermeses in a euhemerizing way. On the other hand, according to Murtadi ibn Gaphiphus, even Abu Ma'shar told the story of the Surid and Philemon right after telling the story about Hermes I through Hermes III, so it might not be possible to know for sure exactly which way the influence went.
7/11/2015 09:56:02 am
"angels descend to earth to spank naughty people with iron rods"
7/11/2015 10:43:46 pm
I just love the way True Believers are sceptical towards rationalist thinking. Oh yes, they know how to be sceptical...
7/11/2015 10:50:17 pm
The True Believers demand documented evidence from the sceptics but fail to produce it from their positions and beliefs.
7/11/2015 10:55:18 pm
One example, the hoo-ha over the Chinon Parchment. Anyone would have thought that was a unique one-off document pertaining to the trial of the Templars. When it came down to it, after consulting historical experts on the subject matter, the Chinon Parchment was a typical Templar document as found in the historical archives in Oxford. There was nothing new or unique about the Chinon Parchment at all, except it was one document that had been overlooked by historians.
7/11/2015 10:56:34 pm
That is, the Birth Certificate of Christ on the Turin Shroud.
7/11/2015 11:17:10 pm
Where would the True Believers be without the cherished grey areas
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply.
I am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab.
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Terms & Conditions
Please read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.