Yesterday I began my review of America: Nation of the Goddess, the new book by Alan Butler and Janet Wolter that accuses the Grange of being a pagan cult dedicated to suppressing the truth about Jesus and worshiping the Earth Goddess. I must admit that I am having difficulty reviewing this book because it contains no source notes, and the bibliography contains virtually no sources, meaning that the book is simply a series of opinion-based assertions predicated on the reader’s familiarity with and acceptance of Alan Butler’s earlier books and Scott Wolter’s TV show. As I continue my review, I’m going to need to be a bit more selective in my coverage since I realized that the book has 21 chapters, and yesterday 2,000 words covered only three. Chapter 4 This chapter covers the Merovingian conspiracy theory famous from the Da Vinci Code, which asserts that the Church killed Dagobert II in the early Middle Ages because the Merovingians knew that Jesus was Mary Magdalene’s husband and the father of her children, the true kings of the earth. The Merovingians, being the descendants of Christ, are therefore Butler and Wolter’s fetish object, and they want to look for the last Merovingians, presumably so they can either worship them or help them rule the world. Butler and Wolter tie this to the quest for the New Jerusalem in the Book of Revelation, which he says is “connected” to the Book of Enoch (because the Watchers must appear in all fringe history books) “even though their authorship may be divided by over a thousand years.” To take the most extreme dates for both texts, the divide is only about 400 years; if we prefer the more recent date for Enoch, 200 at best. Anyway, Butler and Wolter claim, on the authority of Christopher Knight, that Newgrange in Ireland was built by the Watchers and is one of the primal origins of the goddess-Mason-Venus cult. They also claim that Masons had Enochian rituals in 1740, before the recovery of the Book of Enoch in the late 1700s, and they show laughably little insight into how the Book of Enoch was transmitted to Europe, mistaking the arrival of the complete text in the 1700s for ignorance of its contents beforehand. The material appeared, in distorted form, in medieval Jewish texts, and fragments were preserved in George Syncellus’ work, available in the West from 1652, for example. They talk about conspiracy theories around the Crusades, designed to acquire Enochian treasure from Jerusalem, and the other standard Templar conspiracies, but Butler (acknowledged as the guiding hand here) claims that this was all in service of creating the free enterprise system, clearly the goddess’s own preferred economic system. (Any change that makes society more like our own is necessarily good and part of the goddess-worshipers’ plans, whereas anything that deviates is retrograde suppression of such plans by the forces of evil.) They conclude with the foundation of the Templars as exemplars of the new world being born. Chapter 5 This chapter describes the Talpiot Tomb conspiracy, well known to readers of this blog, which alleges that a tomb in Jerusalem held the bones of Jesus. Butler and Mrs. Wolter disagree with Scott Wolter in denying that the skull and crossbones had anything to do with pirates until Robert Louis Stevenson made it so, instead arguing that the symbol always represented Jesus’ corpse rotting in a bone box. They claim that the Templars were privy to the tomb and passed on its secrets to the Freemasons. They argue that the Gnostic gospels are the true account of Christ and Mary Magdalene’s undying love, that Solomon worshiped the Goddess in the form of Astoreth, that the Ark of the Covenant (the Templar treasure) was proof of the Goddess’s worship, and that Judaism was inspired by Akhenaten. The last point they cite to Scott Wolter’s Akhenaten to the Founding Fathers, closing the circle of stupid. They then falsely assert that the Book of Enoch says that the Watchers told Enoch to build two pillars of wisdom, and that the Templars sought this wisdom. No version says that. Read it yourself; the text, first given in Josephus, isn’t in the Book of Enoch and has nothing directly to do with it. It has always seemed likely to Alan that the “pillars” were probably the distorted and misunderstood name given to scrolls, which may have been placed in cylindrical containers to protect them, as indeed was a regular practice. Butler, who never bothered to read the original texts (which I have helpfully provided) isn’t aware of the deep origins of the myth in the Babylonian legend of the pre-Flood wisdom tablets, so he’s free to reconstruct the story from the source he does know, the late Masonic version of the legend. He attributes to the wisdom that the Templars found in these texts the math skills needed for Gothic architecture, dismissing the claim that contact with Islamic scholars and architects could have contributed skills or knowledge.
Chapter 6 This chapter attempts to link the Templars to the Freemasons, which I laid out in my article on the same. Butler (again the acknowledged force here) adds nothing to the earlier claims except to tie them to the theme of courtly love, arguing that all of chivalry and the medieval veneration of the Virgin Mary were outgrowths of suppressed Great Goddess worship, which he and Wolter suggest was the first and predominant human religion. Again, this suggestion of a prehistoric gynocentric world is a controversial claim famously advocated by Robert Graves but taken by our authors as a fact so obvious it requires no support. Butler also falsely asserts that Chretien de Troyes created the legend of the Holy Grail, which almost certainly had earlier antecedents. Butler asserts that the Grail symbolizes stars near the constellation Virgo and thus the goddess. He says this is based on a text by Marcus Manilius (Astronomica 5.234-250, not that Butler would tell you), referring to the constellation Crater (the Cup), located near Virgo and said in the poem to represent the cup of Bacchus (Dionysus), though the more common version relates it to Corvus and Apollo (Eratosthenes, Catasterismi 41; Hyginus, Astronomica 2.40). The authors conclude that the constellations movements in the sky were a mystical symbol of the Goddess and that this transferred through Rosicrucian beliefs into the occult layers of Masonry. Chapter 7 After this we move on to trying to connect the Templars to the so-called Venus Families. This begins with an account of the end of Templars, and Butler and Wolter assert as fact that the Templar fleet departed from La Rochelle in the middle of the nights, speculating on King Philip’s shocked response. The fact is that there wasn’t a fleet, and the story springs from a lie told under torture many months after the fact. Anyway, the Templars supposedly entered into the protection of the Venus Families, eco-friendly and libertarian Goddess worshippers, whom Butler had previously referred to as “Star Families,” “The Continuum,” “The Illuminati,” or “The Golden Thread” before falling under the Wolters’ spell. (Given all those names, forgive me if I just call them “Venusians” for short, since that both reflects their Wolter-given name and the Theosophical/Watchers origin that also gave rise to the Venusian space men of the 1950s, who share more than a little in common with these folks.) Despite failing miserably at their stated aim, these families, the authors believe, seek to establish libertarianism around the world by destroying oligarchy and dictatorship. They are also acolytes of Enoch and the Watchers. They identify Thomas Jefferson as a Venus Family member, and they assert that the United States as the ultimate embodiment of Venusian ideals, created to free the Venusians from the corruption of evil old Europe. Chapter 8 This chapter is about the Kensington Rune Stone, mostly because this is a Wolter family project, so it’s sort of a requirement. It has no immediate connection to the preceding chapter (indeed, transitions are almost nonexistent in this book), and it lionizes Scott Wolter for discovering the “truth” about the stone and accepts the claim that the hoax stone is not only a medieval artifact but contains a secret code from the Knights Templar claiming all of the Midwest for the Venusians. Along the way the authors note that Scott Wolter’s TV show brought the two authors together. They then repeat Wolter’s false claim that Thomas Jefferson ordered Lewis and Clark to find Templar/Welsh/Venusian survivors among Native American tribes. No such document exists to support this claim. The authors say that many of their ideas, and Scott Wolter’s, come from Freemason William F. Mann (not to be confused with William J. Mann), a fringe writer who became friends with Wolter at a conference in Nova Scotia in 1999—either contradicting Scott Wolter’s repeated assertion that he had no inkling of any conspiracy theories about history before he began working on the Kensington Rune Stone in 2001 or proving that everyone who befriends Mr. Wolter becomes a conspiracy theorist. Anyway, Butler and Mrs. Wolter say that they gleaned knowledge from Mann’s novel The 13th Pillar, which they claim contains hidden truths about Freemasonry that can’t be given in nonfiction form. It’s warmed over material from Frederick Pohl’s old claims about Sinclair visits to Native Americans, dressed up in Andrew Sinclair’s rewrite to sub in Knights Templar. Chapter 9 In this chapter the authors decide to rope in Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis (1627) as a secret blueprint for the Venusians New World Order. The authors assert that Bacon’s book is nonfiction masquerading as an allegorical novel, with the inhabitants of the idyllic Bensalem being none other than the Venusians. Even though the novel omits many of the major claims the authors attribute to the Venusians, notably the worship of the sacred feminine, they claim the omissions were done on purpose to hide the truth. Thus, what confirms their story is evidence and disconfirming evidence is also made into confirming evidence! In this line of reasoning, they conspiratorially assert that the colony of Virginia was named not for the Virgin Queen but for the Earth Goddess as the constellation Virgo. The authors also falsely assert that the Venusians and academics are working together to suppress the truth, the former to hide their power and the latter because they refuse to “accept any alternatives to the Christopher Columbus view” of the discovery of America. As I’ve shown countless times, this hasn’t been the case since the 1830s, but who’s keeping score? Textbooks of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries routinely ascribed the discovery of America to the Vikings, even before physical evidence was found at L’anse-aux-Meadows. Just one example should suffice: Charles H. McCarthy, writing in 1919 in his History of the United States, a then-standard Catholic school textbook, stated: “The first white men who ever came to America were Northmen. Our continent was discovered through accident in the year 1000, by a Northman named Leif, who was on his way to proclaim the Christian faith in Greenland.” The authors conclude the chapter with conspiracies about Venusian influence on Colonial Williamsburg (via the Rockefellers) and the Declaration of Independence. They argue that the Venusians have “unbelievable patience” in waiting for their utopia to come to pass, seeing as it hasn’t for the past 500 years in which the authors feel they’ve been trying to create it. One might think that would mean they don’t exist, but who am I to judge? This ends the first part of the book. The second part is on a completely different subject, Isis worship in Washington, D.C., so I will save that for the third and (I hope) final part of this review. I should be able to summarize it faster since it’s comprised largely of recycled material from America Unearthed.
60 Comments
Nobody Knows
11/18/2015 10:08:10 am
The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail a la 2015.
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
11/18/2015 12:19:45 pm
Yep. Pretty much. Just with more American flavor, which is especially rich because ideally, American society is free of aristocracy - which means these Venus Families should have no special place for themselves.
Reply
Americanegro
8/21/2016 07:51:59 pm
"Freemason William F. Mann (not to be confused with William J. Mann), a fringe writer who became friends with Wolter at a conference in Nova Scotia in 1999"
Salt
11/18/2015 02:03:46 pm
And people accuse goddess worshippers of making shit up. After having perused hundreds if not thousands of witchcraft, Wiccan, pagan and neo-pagan websites and read an untold number of books on the same over the years, I have never, ever, come across anything close to this kind of mind-tripping hogwash. If the Wolters and the rest of their ilk want to believe their ancient (white) ancestors had to have been created by a superior civilization from outer space, and have to concretize myth and metaphor into absolute fact, that's their psychosis. They can't deal with the reality of the world today. True Believers (their fans, since they're making a nice living in this reality) never can.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
11/18/2015 02:04:53 pm
"...arguing that all of chivalry and the medieval veneration of the Virgin Mary were outgrowths of suppressed Great Goddess worship..."
Reply
11/18/2015 02:12:41 pm
Despite their claims to all be on the same page, Alan Butler's views seem to be predominating in this book, and it shows.
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
11/19/2015 10:06:33 am
Oh for crying out loud...
Pam
11/18/2015 03:29:08 pm
Mary's special place within the early Church was there almost from the beginning and is not unusual given the Jewish understanding of kingship and from that, of course, Christian understanding.
Reply
Nobody Knows
11/18/2015 03:47:00 pm
Wolter hasn't "confused" anything - he's a whiz kid jumping on the bandwagon while he's got the chance.
Pam
11/18/2015 04:04:14 pm
Nobody,
Shane Sullivan
11/18/2015 05:33:04 pm
"I speculate that the Wolters confuse the Church's suppression of the worship of Mary, as happened at various times, especially the Middle Ages."
Nobody Knows
11/18/2015 07:03:00 pm
Pam,
Pam
11/18/2015 07:15:48 pm
Nobody:
Nobodty Knows
11/18/2015 08:37:28 pm
Pam.
Pam
11/18/2015 08:46:41 pm
Gee, Nobody. I thought we broke up and weren't speaking. You need to let go and move on.
Only Me
11/18/2015 08:50:48 pm
Wait a minute, Nobody. You've said the following:
Nobody Knows
11/18/2015 08:55:49 pm
Only Me,
Nobody Knows
11/18/2015 08:59:23 pm
It's similar to the Passover Meal. We know that exists. But about Moses who introduced the custom, there's a question mark over his existence.
Only Me
11/18/2015 09:15:31 pm
I agree, except, we're not discussing what we DO know based on available evidence.
Nobody Knows
11/18/2015 09:39:25 pm
We know next to nothing about the lives of certain artists, but their paintings are hanging in art galleries.
Only Me
11/18/2015 10:33:43 pm
Again, I agree. But, you're avoiding the question.
Nobody Knows
11/18/2015 10:41:17 pm
LOL
Nobody Knows
11/18/2015 10:44:41 pm
NOBODY KNOWS THE NAME OR BIOGRAPHY OF THE PERSON WHO PREPARED THE FIRST EUCHARIST. NOBODY KNOWS THAT. BUT THE EUCHARIST AND THE CEREMONY OF THE MASS EXIST.
Pam
11/18/2015 10:46:33 pm
Only Me,
Ysne
11/18/2015 11:28:55 pm
Pam, don't let Nobody drive you away or shut you up. Your description of what happened is very plausible.
Only Me
11/18/2015 11:30:32 pm
Yes, Pam, it seems I did. Reminds me of the Chinese guy in /Big Trouble in Little China/ that gets so angry, he inflates to the point of exploding.
Pam
11/18/2015 11:45:00 pm
Ysne : Thanks for your concern. Nobody Knows won't shut me up. He hates what he thinks I believe and has no interest in what I actually believe.
nOBODY kNOWS
11/19/2015 03:35:05 am
A THING IS NOT A PERSON
Nobody Knows
11/19/2015 03:44:37 am
There is no need for a Time Machine in this case
Matt Mc
11/19/2015 08:41:23 am
Sorry the "open in plain sight" thing made me laugh, are you channeling Scott Wolter?
An Over-Educated Grunt
11/19/2015 09:57:36 am
"A thing is not a person... you do not need a time machine to research a thing... there is no need for a time machine in this case." So the Sphinx and the Pyramids are now people? You said we could never know their history with any certainty, never mind a combined oral history and scads and scads of associated funerary monuments from Saqqara and Giza. For that matter, your answer to how they were built is "sand. They used sand." Which isn't even accurate to the construction materials, because limestone is mostly deposited calcite from shellfish, and granite is as close to "forged in the fires of Mount Doom" as we get; mica, quartz, and feldspar particles might make up sand, but at that point, they're no longer granite. Therefore, "they used sand" as a complete and whole explanation is straight-up idiotic.
An Over-Educated Grunt
11/19/2015 10:02:30 am
My first post got et by the DoD's slow handling of posting to the Internet and my own impatience, but there's really only one part worth salvaging.
Uncle Ron
11/19/2015 12:18:30 pm
Pam, et. al.,
An Over-Educated Grunt
11/19/2015 12:22:50 pm
Ron - Don't be so harsh on Brother Nobody.
Pam
11/19/2015 12:56:38 pm
Uncle Ron,
Only Me
11/19/2015 01:55:35 pm
Uncle Ron, I don't like the way Nobody takes advantage of Jason's generosity and exploits this blog to push his pseudointellectual nonsense. He is (a) too lazy to invest in his own website and (b) smart enough to know if he did, he wouldn't receive a fraction of the attention he gets here.
Steve StC
11/19/2015 09:41:21 pm
I DO love it when the dogs turn on one another.
Only Me
11/19/2015 10:04:30 pm
You know what's even better, Steve? When someone, like you, is so mentally-challenged they don't even realize I was directly quoting Nobody Knows.
Steve StC
11/20/2015 12:34:44 am
Quite wrong, “Only Me” (or whatever your name is in real life - if you have a real life...) I know I have no impact on this teeny tiny world of Colavito’s blog, in which he watches and reads shows and books which he knows he will despise, and then pronounces to a microcosm of acolytes how much he hated the shows and books, and then they agree how much they hate the book or show that they haven’t seen or read. That’s quite clear.
Only Me
11/20/2015 02:27:26 am
UPDATE
Pam
11/21/2015 01:24:22 am
Steve StC:
V
11/18/2015 02:32:50 pm
The sad part is that none of this ever seems to look at ACTUAL evidence of ancient goddess-worship in Europe, of which there actually is some. I learned about the figure known at the time as "Venus of Willendorf" way back in 1999 (it's now known as "Woman of Willendorf"), which was discovered in 1908. I later found out that there are as many as 144 known examples of this type of figurine, all dating from the paleolithic era, and that they probably indicate some sort of goddess worship. They also have a spread basically from Atlantic to Pacific across Europe and Siberia.
Reply
11/18/2015 02:54:57 pm
There's no doubt that there was authentic goddess worship in prehistoric times; indeed, some have argued that the Indo-Europeans essentially imposed patriarchal views on a much more egalitarian set of cultures, some of which had supreme goddesses instead of gods. However, there isn't any particular evidence that these pre-Indo-European cultures were female-led, as feminist historians have claimed, or that goddess worshipers formed a secret cult to combat male supremacy. The popularity of Rhea, Cybele, Isis, the Magna Mater, and other goddesses, even among men, argues against a didactic gender wars view of ancient religion. When people argue about this, mostly they seem to be arguing about modern gender issues and conservative Christian patriarchy.
Reply
Only Me
11/18/2015 05:00:35 pm
This is an awful lot of codswallop being stated as fact, without many citations to sources that DON'T have Butler's or Wolter's names attached to them.
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
11/18/2015 08:17:38 pm
No no no. You to WONDER... do all fringe authors work this way?
Reply
Only Me
11/18/2015 08:38:14 pm
So this is SOME KOIND of...esoteric methodology?
An Over-Educated Grunt
11/19/2015 10:15:41 am
My wife makes murderface at me when I start doing my Childress impression. To be fair, I make the same face at Childress himself. He's made it difficult for me to wear one of my favorite hats in combination with my summer field shirts. I don't dare get any off-white long-sleeve workshirts, or I'll look in the mirror and try to kill J. Hutton Pulitzer, and next thing you know I'll be in a psych ward...
Pam
11/18/2015 05:55:41 pm
"I don't think the Wolters even realize that there's a contradiction in the idea that the Church would suppress goddess worship not because it's heresy, but out of misogyny, all while holding the Blessed Virgin in the highest esteem."
Reply
Pam
11/18/2015 05:58:49 pm
Sorry. ..this was in reply to Shane.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
11/18/2015 06:15:25 pm
If only the man in the painting had had a Sacred Heart, Wolter might have a leg to stand on.
Reply
Pam
11/18/2015 06:52:05 pm
"The second part is on a completely different subject, Isis worship in Washington, D.C., "
Reply
tm
11/18/2015 07:55:33 pm
Wolter's resolve may be hardened, but I seriously doubt it's monumental. ;)
Reply
Pam
11/18/2015 08:01:36 pm
*snort* I deserved that for not phrasing my comment more carefully! Now I'm stuck with that image in my head. Thanks. :)
What is this fascination with the Merovingians; as if they were some magical, mystical, fantasy dynasty benevolently ruling over post-Roman Europe. They make it sound like the worst thing that has happened to Europe was their replacement by the Carolingians.
Reply
Pam
11/18/2015 08:17:54 pm
The first time I ever saw the origins of the Merovingian dynasty made into something mystical was in the so-called non-fiction book, "Holy Blood, Holy Grail".
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
11/18/2015 08:21:49 pm
The argument is that the bloodline, which emigrated to the south of France, deliberately married their way into the Merovingian dynasty because of a perceived sacred role of the king as high priest. The contrarian in me wants to point out that this is an argument in favor of the sacred bloodline being the source of degeneracy in the line. Like Jesus is a Whateley. "Come, and I shall make you fish men."
Reply
Pam
11/19/2015 12:24:30 am
I never noticed the degeneration angle before, but you're correct. If the bloodline was special or super in some way it didn't do any favor for the Merovingian clan.
Kal
11/19/2015 12:15:16 am
Nobody knows...get it...
Reply
Only Me
11/19/2015 12:51:46 am
That depends on the context of "worship". According to Deacon Dr. Mark Miravelle, "worship" has been associated with both veneration and adoration. However, he has said:
Reply
Mike Jones
11/19/2015 10:04:49 am
NOBODY KNOWS WHO INVENTED THE "CAPS LOCK" KEY. HIS IDENTITY IS LOST IN THE MISTS OF TIME. YOU WOULD NEED A TIME MACHINE TO KNOW. Or maybe Google.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
October 2024
|