Before I review America Unearthed S01E04 “Giants in Minnesota,” let me stipulate that in the course of the hour Scott Wolter uncovered no evidence whatsoever of giants in Minnesota, or the Norse visitors he ties them to. He admits this, so it is not just me saying it. This, sadly, means that there is little factual material to examine, leaving me to critique this show as a television performance. In that light, we can look at the episode as a triumph of editing in trying to make three pointless investigations add up to more than the sum of their parts through carefully cross-cutting among them and avoiding dwelling too long on the inevitable disappointments. The way the show subtly switches from the proposed topic to others designed to garner support for its star is masterfully executed but deeply manipulative. We begin with a dramatic reenactment of a flannel-clad man using dowsing rods to find hidden treasure. (This is presented in shadowy tint as a flashback but was actually a scene from later in the episode re-shot from the dowser’s point of view.) I’ve been reading some fascinating material about the origins of dowsing rods in a misunderstanding of the mythic importance of specific tree branches thought to be related to the thunder-god’s lightning, but this isn’t the time or place for that. The gruff man mumbles about “giant bones,” and then we’re off to the opening credits.
The dateline tells us we’re at Saker Farm in Twin Valley, Minnesota to investigate the bones of an alleged giant. A farmer named Roger Saker tells series star and forensic geologist Scott Wolter that the Minnesota state archaeologist came out to view some Native American bones found on his land, one set of which was unusually large. He did not provide a date for this, but it is implied it was a recent event, though the hard-packed ground and tall weeds growing atop the grave suggest otherwise. “They wanted to get this thing buried as fast as possible,” he said, implying a conspiracy to suppress the truth. Reburial is no conspiracy; in fact it is merely U.S. law, which mandates respectful treatment for Native remains and reburial, except in extraordinary circumstances. You don’t get to play with old bones like they were toys, nor are human remains there for your amusement. The farmer talks about how he ripped apart the bones and played with them. This made me sad. Wolter displays for Saker an 1880s newspaper article about “giants,” one of hundreds published in those decades. Such reports of giants were typically the remains of wooly mammoths, or outright hoaxes. One wooly mammoth skeleton spent much of the century on display as a Biblical “giant,” despite scientists identifying its real species. Wolter, though, thinks the bones Saker found belong to a race of 7 to 8 foot tall Norse colonists. He never explains why he thinks that the Norse were giants, and I am at a loss to imagine how. Wolter measures the surface of the alleged grave of an 8’ 6” giant under a burial mound on Saker’s property, which we must take on faith; without a skeleton, we aren’t able to confirm this. Humans, however, could occasionally grow to seven feet, especially with hormonal problems. Such individuals may well have been considered sacred or holy and given special burial. But all we have to go on here is Saker’s claim that the head and feet reached to stone landmarks placed atop the burial mound. Saker explains to Wolter that the archaeologists “covered up” the burials, and he accuses them of a conspiracy. Again, federal and state laws require respectful treatment of graves, and thus after their Native identity was confirmed, they were reburied. Not content with this, the farmer called in a dowser to probe the burial mound magically. Wolter claims dowsing really works, based on the authority of Einstein, but as with all the show’s other “research,” this is another lie. There is no published confirmation Einstein said any such thing, and the Einstein Archive lists only two mentions of dowsing, where Einstein expressed curiosity. Supposedly the dowser found a 10 foot giant, but let’s not kid ourselves. This is primitive folk magic, the kind that has been practiced in America since the founding and was the same type of magic that Joseph Smith was an expert in and used to create Mormonism. Wolter tries to “prove” dowsing is real by hiding a metal knife and asking a 70-year-old dowser to find it. Noting the obviously disturbed grass, the dowser easily finds it, attributing the discovery to his magic rods. Funny, isn’t it, that so many trust in the power of dowsing, when in Europe dowsing was traditionally believed to only work when using the wood of the rowan, and only on certain saints’ days, taken over from when they were formerly sacred to Odin or Thor, for the rod was a piece of lightning made wood, the begetter of great boons. All we need to know, though, is that there is no scientific evidence dowsing works. Farmer Roger Saker, in turn, explains that investigation of the mound is limited because he doesn’t want to disturb the corn, not because it is illegal to rob Native American graves. H2 is careful to avoid breaking the law, but they won’t tell viewers what that law is, either. The obvious course would be to dig up the damn giant’s body, but since they know that is illegal, they dig instead far from the burial mound where they can plausibly claim no bodies were likely to be found. (The trouble with digging up human remains is briefly noted later on, rendering moot the entire premise of the episode, the search for GIANTS!) Wolter brings in Michael Arbuthnot, a Florida archaeologist specializing in underwater sites, to investigate the farm, and Wolter shares the legends and myths of ancient Norse in Minnesota. Wolter even notes that the area is filled with Scandinavian immigrants, but he fails to make the obvious connection that the nineteenth century immigrants who settled Minnesota brought with them a sense of their own cultural history and sought to create an imaginary historic landscape of ancient Norse settlers to help make the land truly “theirs” rather than, say, the Native Americans’ or even the Anglo-Americans’. This process has occurred across time and space, with old ruins appropriated by new settlers and incorporated into their history. As a brief example, the nineteenth century English attributed Neolithic remains in Britain to the Druids, whom they saw as their true ancestors, in contradistinction to the decadent Romans, identified with the Continent, the home of Britain’s rival and enemy, France. So, anyway, all these characters start digging and found a chunk of cut bone, which I suppose must be animal since they didn’t stop digging and call the authorities, as required by law. After the commercial, we head into the second half of the show and two other plot lines. Wolter first travels to George and Becky’s Café in Detroit Lakes, Minnesota to view an alleged Viking sword supposedly pulled from the earth. Wolter frames this in terms of the Kensington Runestone, a century-old hoax that Wolter attempted to rehabilitate using dubious geological testing. The Runestone is composed in Swedish of a mixture of medieval runic alphabets, including words unattested in medieval literature, suggesting a hoax. Swedish linguists find the text fake. However, the program does nothing to discuss the stone beyond letting Wolter assert that his geologic tests “proved” its age. Bad Archaeology has much more about why it’s a fake, and here is Richard Nielsen's explanation of why Wolter's geological claims about the stone are also wrong. It's a damning report that all but confirms that Wolter's geology is driven by ideology, not science. Do read it and learn just what Wolter is hiding about his Runestone investigation. All of this is prelude to our look at the “medieval” Ullen sword dug up in 1911, at the height of early twentieth century Viking fakes, when such objects were excavated with surprising frequency thanks to a combination of hoaxing and wishful thinking on the part of Scandinavian immigrants. The sword, at first glance, simply looks new, due to a polishing given it in 1911 and not disclosed in the program. It has none of the patina of age around it, but the camera doesn’t linger long enough to really get a good look at it. There’s a good reason for that. The Ullen sword looks nothing like medieval Viking swords and exactly like nineteenth century German military swords, which even this program is forced to admit anon. But this “investigation” is clearly going nowhere, so we introduce another, lest we get bored trying to follow one from start to finish. Wolter wastes some time traveling to look at a tumbledown house whose foundation was apparently built with boulders allegedly carved with runes. But, as Wolter himself mentioned, the nineteenth century settlers of Minnesota came from Scandinavia, so there is no need to assume that a “runic carving” was necessarily ancient. The boulders can’t be seen, so we won’t be back until the house is torn down “tomorrow.” Back at the farm, the Arbuthnot and Saker discovered that the farm had previously served as a farm (shock!), and had once been a Native American settlement. No Vikings, no giants. More digging follows as we go into commercial. After the commercial, the show seems to concede that none of the three plotlines is going well. We keep intercutting between them, and we are treated to some destruction-porn as we watch the old farmhouse with its rune-boulders get destroyed. Wolter goes looking for the runic boulder in the ruins, and he finds some scratches on one stone that he identifies as “manmade characters.” They look like tool marks to me, since they have no relationship to any alphabetic or runic characters and are (at best) three in number. Even Wolter seems to recognize this, though he tries to obscure the fact by, essentially, hoping viewers look away. He quickly expresses shock that some random guy with a tattoo has runes as his tattoo, and he is delighted to find they spell the man’s name as he slowly translates them, pretending that the tattooed man is ignorant of his own tattoo’s mysterious meaning! Oh, my… that had no purpose whatsoever beyond wasting another 40 seconds of airtime and distracting viewers from the inconclusive tool mark discovery. The program seems to want us to remember “boulder” and “runes” and forget that they aren’t connected in any way. After the commercial we get a recap of the non-findings so far, and we return to Saker Farm to look at still more bone artifacts, evidence of Native American settlement. But there isn’t anything European, nor anything from a giant race. (I still don’t see how the Norse and the giants are the same, but at this point, who cares? Neither one is there.) So, I guess that closes this one. No one bothers to use any sort of non-invasive testing to measure the alleged giant skeleton in the mound, nor does anyone bother to consult the state archaeologist’s report about the site—at least not on camera. And we will soon see why. Back at the Ullen sword investigation, a medieval sword expert shows us the exact page in the German sword catalog where the Ullen sword had been ordered from Germany in the 1800s, and this entire plotline wheezes to a sclerotic close, much to Wolter’s disappointment. Wolter says that the facts have “convinced” him that the sword is modern (good to know), but in a non sequitur he then insists that the Kensington Runestone is truly medieval. This is infuriating because this show is not about the Kensington Runestone, which means that viewers have only Wolter’s word to go by since no evidence or discussion of the stone occurred outside Wolter’s assertion about its age. This whole program is gradually becoming a bait-and-switch designed to convince viewers that the Runestone is real while avoiding the need for evidence. We finish with a visit to the Minnesota state archaeologist, Scott Anfinson, whom Wolter questions about the alleged cover-up of the “giant” skeleton. Anfinson states that he did not actually view the bones and therefore cannot answer the question. So who reburied the bones? The show doesn’t say. Anfinson has been the state archaeologist since 2006, so presumably the dig occurred sometime before then under a different archaeologist. Wolter informs us that the bones of the “giant” were typical of a 5’3” individual, and Wolter presents Roger Saker with this fact. Since we did not hear Anfinson give this information (and indeed he said he wasn’t aware of it), it must have come from Wolter reading the state archaeologist's site report, in turn suggesting that both Wolter and the production team knew there was nothing to this story before they showed up to “investigate” it. Saker responds that there is a conspiracy afoot: “These people, they’re up to something,” he says, insisting that he saw a giant no matter what the facts say. The farmer seems to have become confused by the disarticulation of the bones, which, falling out of their joints, thus appear larger than the body would have actually stood in life. The show concludes with another assertion—without evidence—that the Kensington Runestone is genuinely medieval, thus “proving” that the Norse colonized Minnesota. Since none of the three stories investigated in this episode provided any evidence of Norse colonizers, the entirety of this “investigation” seems custom-designed to create a circumstantial scenario to provide spurious support to Wolter’s assertion about the Runestone, which he declines to expose to the scrutiny of a mass television audience. This was a subtle, manipulative hour that asked us to believe in an imaginary conspiracy, to believe that emotional responses count for as much as scientific inquiry, and to believe that Wolter’s word is good enough to accept without proof.
84 Comments
Pamela
1/12/2013 06:08:50 am
I think you and I were separated at birth. I don't know why I'm surprised, but from the outset of the series, the manipulation of facts to lend credence to Wolter's theories get more ridiculous and bold with each episode. The bulk of (dis)nformation being presented on purported "educational" television amounts to no more than the garbage that is reality tv on other networks. Sadder still is that parents and even some educators recommend these channels as educational viewing.
Reply
Randy Edevold
4/7/2020 10:17:54 pm
I can't believe how much of a negative person you are. It is too bad you didn't use your intelligence and angles to help move this story instead of trying as hard as you can to discredit it as bull. Shame on you
Reply
Steve
1/12/2013 07:37:08 am
I have seen episodes 2, 3 and 4 and find this show to be incredibly entertaining. . .for all the wrong reasons. Reading Jason's reviews just adds to the comedy (this of course is intended) this show provides.
Reply
Thorne
1/20/2013 03:34:54 am
I wondered the same thing! The dowser went through the farmer's backyard and they had many flags planted. The next day they brought in the metal detector and planted more flags, but they never showed whether or not there was any correlation between the dowser's flags and metal detector's flags. And they only seemed to dig where the metal detector had hits, which doesn't bode well for finding giant bones.
Reply
Roger
1/25/2013 03:56:40 pm
In-credible is correct, as in not credible.
Reply
Richard "Dick" Neimeyer
12/7/2013 07:16:18 am
I wondered about the spots marked by the old man and his dowser. The "digger" came along and made his own spots using a metal detector. What gives here?
Reply
Roger's Daughter
5/8/2017 02:41:47 pm
Because the state of MN immediately stopped any further action on this.
Reply
Jan Pospisil
1/12/2013 12:12:07 pm
I've been interested in fake swords found in America for a while, but didn't know of the Ulen sword. Thanks for that! ;)
Reply
Coridan Miller
1/12/2013 10:36:43 pm
This show just saddens me, because the opening starts off with telling us what we learned in school is wrong. That statement is true, but instead of being a TV version of Lies My Teacher Told Me or 1491, it is just more bullcrap. Real history is incredibly interested and could be presented in their same overly dramatic style to be entertaining and still be factually correct.
Reply
Paul Stewart
1/13/2013 03:39:30 am
The Ulen sword is not really a fake...its just not a Viking artifact. It was a ceremonial sword...and contains a maker's mark from the early 1800s. The big issue with all of the many "artifacts" unearthed in the US of odd origin is that they have to be either real or fake...very black and white- with no one ever considering that perhaps another option exists- which is that it is neither.
Reply
1/13/2013 04:31:01 am
I noted in my review that it was a German military sword of the 1800s; it is a sword and is "real" in that sense. But the owners claim it is a Viking sword of medieval date, and in that sense it is a fake, even if its manufacturer did not mean it to be one. Every artifact, even hoaxes, is real in the sense that it has a physical presence.
Reply
Paul Stewart
2/11/2013 10:09:31 am
Jason- Agree wholeheartedly with your comments. Of course the sword isn't "real". The owners were simply misinformed..but I don't think they actually knew the truth prior to being set straight. So, I wouldn't call it a "hoax" in the classic sense of the word. Its a subtle difference. The KRS has a similar problem- there are two camps- real/not real...neither side has ever considered a third option, which is that it could be neither. Its not real but it wasn't created to hoax anyone. I compare it to buildings here in DC which have Greek columns, Latin and/or Greek inscriptions- certainly not real, but its builders aren't trying to hoax anyone either. You've got a great blog.
Varika
2/15/2013 09:53:46 pm
Mr. Stewart, the best fakes takes something real and add something not-real to it, usually an inscription, to give it more "authenticity." The fact remains that the artifact is not what it is claimed to be--hence, "fake." I could, for instance, buy a real Native American arrowhead from a museum bin--in some areas they come up every time the blows bite the fields, including my area--and scratch a rune picture for "find" in it, then bury it somewhere and wait for it to surface again. The arrowhead would still be a real Native American arrowhead--but as proof that Norse lived with/married into/whatever the local tribe(s), it's a fake.
Reply
Paul Stewart
5/26/2013 04:44:01 am
I'm not sure I understand your point. I get it in the general sense- that you take something old, alter it, and rebury it to create an anomalous artifact- and thus a fake, but that's not what the Ulen sword or KRS are. Both claim nothing...its their interpreters who do. The Ulen Sword isn't authentic or fake...its simply a German sword from the early 1800s which was misidentified because it was unearthed rather than purchased, and promoted as something it never was- either intentionally or not. So, its an authentic German sword from the 1800s...but not a Viking sword. No hoaxing involved unless the owners are the ones who buried it- just bad scholarship or a nose for gullible people who would pay $$.
Paul Stewart
5/26/2013 04:44:13 am
I'm not sure I understand your point. I get it in the general sense- that you take something old, alter it, and rebury it to create an anomalous artifact- and thus a fake, but that's not what the Ulen sword or KRS are. Both claim nothing...its their interpreters who do. The Ulen Sword isn't authentic or fake...its simply a German sword from the early 1800s which was misidentified because it was unearthed rather than purchased, and promoted as something it never was- either intentionally or not. So, its an authentic German sword from the 1800s...but not a Viking sword. No hoaxing involved unless the owners are the ones who buried it- just bad scholarship or a nose for gullible people who would pay $$.
Paul Stewart
5/26/2013 04:44:51 am
I'm not sure I understand your point. I get it in the general sense- that you take something old, alter it, and rebury it to create an anomalous artifact- and thus a fake, but that's not what the Ulen sword or KRS are. Both claim nothing...its their interpreters who do. The Ulen Sword isn't authentic or fake...its simply a German sword from the early 1800s which was misidentified because it was unearthed rather than purchased, and promoted as something it never was- either intentionally or not. So, its an authentic German sword from the 1800s...but not a Viking sword. No hoaxing involved unless the owners are the ones who buried it- just bad scholarship or a nose for gullible people who would pay $$. 5/28/2013 11:49:36 am
For Paul Stewart 5/28/2013 11:51:41 am
For Paul Stewart 5/28/2013 11:52:51 am
For Paul Stewart 5/28/2013 11:53:10 am
For Paul Stewart 5/28/2013 11:53:27 am
For Paul Stewart 5/28/2013 11:54:50 am
For Paul Stewart. 5/28/2013 11:55:46 am
For Paul Stewart. 5/28/2013 11:56:10 am
For Paul Stewart.
Sword Skeptic
6/27/2013 12:35:45 pm
Myron,
Richard "DIck" Neimeyer
12/7/2013 07:18:39 am
I got the impression when I looked at the "Norse" sword that it seemed more ceremonial (if not faked) than an actual sword used in battle.
Reply
12/9/2013 12:00:47 pm
This may have been an officer's sword. Most officer's swords of any age are ceremonial to identify rank. This well crafted sword was still deadly in close, unexpected hand to hand combat.
Sword Skeptic
12/10/2013 05:35:15 am
Myron, there is no need to speculate about the sword. The only speculation is wondering how a mid to late 19th century theatrical prop sword ended up in a farmer's field.
intelligentheating
1/13/2013 09:51:37 am
"Wolter informs us that the bones of the “giant” were typical of a 5’3” individual, and Wolter presents Roger Saker with this"
Reply
1/13/2013 12:53:01 pm
I don't get screeners like professional critics, so I'm working from notes I take while watching the show. I may have missed the state archaeologist say that others had seen the third skeleton and given its size. My notes only say that he disclaimed personal knowledge of the site and speculated on reasons Natives could grow to 7 ft.
Reply
TV Gremlin
1/14/2013 02:25:49 pm
Try
SierraVistaHiker
1/23/2013 03:24:20 pm
Oh, another laugh-out-loud moment for me in the Unearthed show was when Wolter was told by the Minnesota State Archeologist that he was 99.99 percent certain that the bones found on the Saker farm were not from a giant nor from a Norseman. Wolter responds by saying he hasn’t seen anything convincing to him that there was a giant there, “BUT, THAT DOOR IS STILL OPEN A CRACK.” Ha, that reminded me of a scene from the movie Dumb and Dumber, where the Jim Carrey character asks a gal if he has a chance with her. Here is how that goes down:
Reply
Sword Skeptic
1/14/2013 03:24:10 am
For further reading on the Ulen sword and how it was debunked, see these discussion threads:
Reply
Aj
1/15/2013 12:19:48 pm
If disturbing the grave(s) is(are) illegal, there are other options to examine them, am I wrong? Why not try something like an xray and metal detectors? I don't know the name of it, but they use it to find buried bodies and such by measuring soil disturbances in layers. I am sure there are many other tools that can be used without disturbing the remains.
Reply
1/15/2013 12:56:25 pm
Yes, there are noninvasive methods that could provide some information about what's buried in the grave. They didn't use them because they know from the archaeological report that there is only a 5'3" skeleton in the "giant's" grave. It's cynical mystery-mongering.
Reply
Aj
1/15/2013 01:09:06 pm
Thank you for the reply. I just watched the rest of the episode. It's not horrible...but nothing really factual either. I didn't take anything worth remembering or educational from it. As you implied and other comments have stated it really just seems like another show glorying speculation, just like Ancient Aliens. 1/15/2013 01:12:24 pm
This was the one episode so far when Wolter debunked the weird claims. In the previous episodes he enthusiastically endorsed almost certainly false claims.
Allan Shumaker
1/18/2013 12:10:23 pm
I thought this episode was a total waste of time. However there are 'noninvasive' methods that could have been used such as ground penetrating radar that might have revealed details of the size of the excavation for the giant grave. It is unlikely that it would detect the size of the skeleton. 1/18/2013 12:23:44 pm
I didn't want to get into the technicalities, but according to Minnesota state law, the state archaeologist has controlling authority for the excavation and relocation of any Native American remains, even on private land. Disturbing such remains without permission is illegal. See: http://www.osa.admin.state.mn.us/documents/PrivateCemeteriesActProcedures.pdf
Joe
1/16/2013 06:19:50 am
Jason, I am really enjoying your reviews. I found your site doing my own research on Scott Wolter after watching a couple episodes and deciding I just had to know more about the guy.
Reply
1/16/2013 09:02:58 am
I'm so glad you're enjoying the review. You've made excellent points, and while some of the issues can be put down to H2's fear of short attention spans (compare, for example, the digs shown on the British show Time Team that they used to rerun), it's very clear that they were just trying to make a mystery out of nothing.
Reply
Thorne
1/20/2013 03:44:02 am
Just want to add my thanks for what you're doing here. I found this site through a link at FreeThoughtBlogs and, coincidentally, caught this very episode on TV that same evening. I'm glad to know that some of the same idiocy I saw in the show were found by so many others. And even better, that there was so much that I missed that you and others have pointed out.
Reply
LS
2/5/2013 11:27:11 am
Dare I say it this show seems a good deal worse than Ancient Aliens! I haven't been able to watch it all the way through yet so I thought I would skip to your review. Correct me if I'm wrong here but it sounds like this programme can't even manipulate the facts successfully enough to suite their premise! AA at its best could definitely do that, just think of their manipulation of the Mahabharata and obscure camera angles they pull on various artifacts.
Reply
2/5/2013 11:48:29 am
In terms of sheer audacity, yes, it pales before Ancient Aliens, which covers many topics per hour, doesn't have to pretend to care about any one for very long, and can simply pick and choose material to best fits its dumb ideas. America Unearthed thinks it's doing serious work, and it suffers from its own attempts to pretend toward a seriousness it will never achieve.
Reply
harry
1/14/2014 04:01:39 pm
In other words you say that Ancient Aliens is not serious? The cientists and other People there are also not serious? Are you serious?
B L
2/6/2013 09:06:13 am
I know I'm arriving late to this conversation, but indulge me. I just watched this episode again. The reason I watched it AGAIN, you ask? I was suffering from the flu and had no motivation or energy to turn the channel after my wife turned the television on. In retrospect all I accomplished was adding an aspect of mental anguish to my already unbearable physical illness.
Reply
Plentsje
2/9/2013 10:51:13 am
i realy enjoy these reviews, just found them out today. This was definitely an atempt to justify Wolters authentication of the Kensington Runestone, and desperatly put the vikings in Minisota, i realy liked the part where the guy from the arms museum told him the KR was a hoax, and then he came the unconvincing retort, like th guy didn't know Wolter is an advocate for the authenticity of the KR so the guys not convinced and give his argument against it then, cuz Wolter is expecting something different, he starts telling the guy what his next step will be in his investigation in to the bones, and from the look on the guys face he has no idea what the hell Wolter is talking about, superb this show should realy take up the same format as AA they don't have "mainstream scientists" so they can make up what they want without any argument against it. clearly Wolter is not suited to go up against people who give arguments.
Reply
2/15/2013 01:16:13 am
Jason,
Reply
2/15/2013 05:36:20 am
I'm not sure what you expect an email discussion would accomplish. Two of your four premises are undoubtedly true (#1 & #4), and the other two are completely unsupported by any modern scientific investigation. You appear happy to rely upon nearly century-old texts and appear uninterested in more recent research.
Reply
harry
1/14/2014 04:10:35 pm
I supose that JAson dont have the references you're thinking he should have. For my opinion he hase almost nothing on hand. By the way, an german arcaeoligist told me 20 years ago that on Maya Steles she discovered swords from the Vikings ...
Reply
2/15/2013 03:56:01 am
CORRECRION
Reply
Varika
2/15/2013 10:15:28 pm
Point 1: Yes, there is documented proof that Scandinavians were in North America 1,000 years or so ago, in the form of archeological sites along the northeast coastline and in the form of sagas and writings from travelers who returned to Iceland.
Reply
2/16/2013 06:18:37 am
Jason
Reply
2/16/2013 06:18:59 am
Jason
Reply
2/17/2013 11:03:27 am
Re: Lenape were still in western Minnesota in 1362.
Reply
Bob
2/22/2013 03:59:57 pm
An excellent review of an episode I also found to be manipulative of the viewer's expectations, presents no real evidence, and make vast assertions about Norse height yet makes no mention of the coincidence of Scandinavian immigrants finding Scandinavian artifacts.
Reply
jens
4/1/2013 02:27:32 am
Actually the stone says : we were fishing a day. Aptir?. We came home to find ten men red of blood and dead. Nothing to say they were witnesses. Nothing to say they were beaten to death. Your translation is deeply flawed. Do you call that scientific i might ask.
Reply
Myron Paine
4/1/2013 10:40:09 am
The Swedish words were verbatim.
Reply
4/1/2013 10:42:15 am
The Swedish words were verbatim.
Reply
4/1/2013 10:42:22 am
The Swedish words were verbatim.
Reply
4/1/2013 10:43:01 am
The Swedish words were verbatim.
Reply
4/1/2013 10:43:38 am
The Swedish words were verbatim.
Reply
Igor Ramos
5/18/2013 03:09:27 am
Great Great Great blog. I just hate these TV shows where people mix ideology and science. Great job!
Reply
5/18/2013 02:28:03 pm
Excellent blog. I am watching the program as I read the piece and although there seems to be a genuine attempt by the History Channel to find the truth your blog provides both questions and answers that provide sincere objective observations. The History Channel leaves out vital information and when all is said and done their credibility is shot. It seems even the best programs use 'intended' plots to heighten the suspense to make the show more intriguing. True objectivity goes out the window. This seems to be a staple for just about all programming on television today, spicing things up to build ratings. Most are pure entertainment with little validity to fact.
Reply
Paul Stewart
6/16/2013 01:51:21 am
For Myron Paine-
Reply
Tyler K
12/17/2023 08:27:00 pm
Norway battle axe. Sauk Lake Altar rock also raises eyebrows.
Reply
andrew
6/22/2013 11:41:03 am
If a giant is buried on this guys farm , dig him up, film it and take it to the press. I dont like the idea of disrespecting a burial site but if a GIANT is buried there that would be a MAJOR FRIGIN DISCOVERY. DIG HIM UP. ......this story is bullshit, otherwise someone would have dug him up by now.
Reply
Alex
7/12/2013 09:23:53 am
When the farmer said he "took off the giants feet" and "ripped off the women's rib cage" he meant with his tractor. Not by hand to play with it like your article suggests.
Reply
Intellectual Violence
7/12/2013 11:21:18 am
Mr. Colavito,
Reply
John
9/15/2013 04:07:01 pm
Say the farmer was right and he did see a giant unearthed on his property........ Why can't it be a giant Native American ? Why a viking? I mean all evidence points to the area being a native settlement in ancient times.... Also lenape means original people in Delaware much like Anishanabe means the same in ojibway.... Len ah pay... Ah nish sha naa bay same meaning since these two tribes are related just a different dialect linquisedly .... I know first hand since I am a member of this tribe (ojibwe) in fact our name for the lenape ir delaware means grandfathers it is told in our oral tradition that we was once one tribe assembled on the east coast at one time.... We have a pretty good oral history and have never heard of us being vikings lol
Reply
John
9/15/2013 04:16:41 pm
Oh and our Religion is called the Midewiin not Christian as someone said above lol at least not our ancient one
Reply
Andy
12/7/2013 12:50:33 am
I'm working my way through the episodes of this show in order. This was the worst one yet, in my opinion. It actually did the best job so far of using data to evaluate ideas. Three dead ends apparently did nothing to change the conclusions of the program, however. It takes real moxie to follow each of these "leads" to ground and not acknowledge that the connection between them may not be a pre-Columbian Norse presence, but a shared fantasy.
Reply
obermans
1/19/2014 11:50:03 am
The Kensington runestone is definitely a fake from one of my ancestors, and he thought originally people might think it a practical joke. He would not find it so funny that this internet is making such a big deal over a fake stone. He even signed it! Sheesh.
Reply
Mark Scoble
3/1/2014 07:33:29 am
Nice commentary - objectivity is king. I was immediately disappointed when they said that the "officials" had determined that it was a Native American body, reburied too quickly. Photographs and samples should have been taken, including soil, hair and tissue for genetic testing, which would have quickly resolved any remaining mysteries - including whether the giant suffered from any known diseases or syndromes causing gigantism. In history, there are instances where animal bones were mixed with human remains as a result of flooding; people who discovered the bones reassembled them to make huge humans and different versions of smaller animals to make them look huge. Some of this has made its way into religious discussions and there are many fundamentalists who believe that these super humans have a place in the Bible.
Reply
pat keegan
11/16/2014 06:07:59 am
Mn. Giants, I don't discount it. Troy, Soddom & Gemmora, and other legends were eventually proven real by the same science that discounted them for years.
Reply
Jonathan
11/18/2014 06:05:23 am
No carbon dating is necessary for the sword--it is a 19th century theatrical sword made in Germany.
Reply
DisplayName
12/18/2014 10:29:35 am
Awe man!!
Reply
JustSayin
12/25/2015 02:50:20 pm
As I recall, the state archaeologists attempted to explain that when the skin, flesh and soft connective tissue decompose, and the pressure of the earth exerts itself, the bones "spread" apart, causing individuals with no education or professional experience exhuming graves to erroneously conclude that the remains are those of a "giant." That's why the skeletons looked "giant" to a farmer, he was simply lacking the education and experience to correctly analyze what he was viewing. The remains did not look "giant" to qualified archaeologists. Any reasonably well trained pathologist or mortician would have come to the same conclusion as the state archaeologists. Having said that, some of this strident revisionist "history" feels kind of "racist" to me. Perhaps the Scando settlers felt guilt over taking the land from native people and this fueled an emotional need to create myths about ancient vikings in Minnesota? Even if legitimate evidence pointed to the presence of vikings at some point in "pre-history" it wouldn't justify what was done to the native people of Minnesota by settlers who were desperate for cheap/free land. So creating artifacts and myths about an earlier Euro presence in Minnesota justifies the genocide in what way??
Reply
starsailing
7/9/2016 12:28:45 am
Actually....As Fort Snelling was being built at the point on the junction of mn River and Miss. river....When digging out cellar for commander's house they came across an 8ft. skeleton. Post surgeon measured it but crumbled when trying to remove. Expedition coming up to Ft Snelling at Prairie Du Chien, as Frenchman was digging his cellar...home on a mound, they came across 6 buried 8 ft skeletons.
Reply
Normandie Kent
2/12/2017 03:37:29 am
The Settlers and the US government perpetrated the largest Genocide and landgrab the world has ever seen. The Native American taking a little land from anothet Native ttribe is one thing, a completely different invading foreign race from across the sea are another. A bunch of swedes trying to pretend they have some legit claim to being Native to America, losers!
Daniel
10/14/2016 03:28:44 pm
I am a brand-new watcher of America Unearthed. Any show that claims that the history we have been taught is wrong, grabs my attention immediately ... What a sore disappointment. Dr. Wolter, a forensic archeologist, loves to tout the scientific method but seems to dismiss any evidence that might point in another direction. From the get-go I compared Wolter to a marginally better educated version of Todd Hoffman of Gold Rush fame. Todd was, and is, famous for making statements of faith that have no bearing on reality. Enter a guy with a Dr. in front of his name and we have a brand new show that will sensationalize us but leave us asking why the hell we just wasted an hour of our time. There are a lot of big statements made that leave the viewer on the edge of their seat only to be terribly disappointed with the lack of evidence that would back them up. I'm sorry, but anyone who tries to link every rune stone, cave or grave with the Knights Templar has to be teetering on the edge reality. I also question the validity that he has been banned from many of these sites and further question why he is insistent on there being some conspiracy to keep the truth away from us?? Here's a guy with a lab and a microscope who happens to fall ass backwards into a bubble gum TV contract. For better or for worse, I will continue to watch the show - not for its educational value but so I can read Jason's blog and know that there are other people out there that will call bullshit when it's required.
Reply
Roger
11/4/2021 05:42:34 am
Anytime someone finds bones of a giant (person over 7 foot tall) and calls the anthropologist or Smithsonian the discovery dissappears. Its always the same. You find human remains. You report it to law enforcement, they report it to coroner's office,they take remains and turn them over to Smithsonian for examination and decide if it giants, native American Indians or bones of animals.
Reply
Stephen Brown
6/15/2018 12:10:17 pm
Any ,way I could talk to Roger Saker ?
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
October 2024
|