Even two full calendar years after the launch of America Unearthed in December 2012, each airing of the show—even in reruns—produces a flurry of traffic on my website, and often a barrage of email from viewers who are looking for more information about the program, and particularly those who are outraged that I would seek to evaluate the show’s claims in anything less than worshipful terms. Show host Scott F. Wolter, a professional geologist specializing in concrete stability issues, refers to me as a “hate-blogger” and has accused me of being part of a conspiracy to attack him, so it’s hardly surprising that his fans follow his lead. If you are one of the new readers coming to this blog for the first time because of the season premiere of America Unearthed, I invite you to read the full background on my interactions with Scott Wolter which I outlined last year in my review of the second season premiere, including a threat of legal action against me A+E Networks, the parent of H2, made on his behalf. To this I must unfortunately add also more recent events, in which Wolter lashed out at me again for a news article I wrote in early 2013 noting that the honorary master’s degree he had claimed to possess for two decades was not an officially recognized award. Writing in September, Wolter threatened future legal action against me: “While the debunker’s post falls just short of the bar necessary to initiate legal action, future events could change the current situation.” BackgroundAmerica Unearthed returns from a long hiatus with shiny new graphics and a slightly different focus than it has had over the past two seasons. Publicity materials released to promote the new season depict a program widening its scope to find new material to keep the show going and audiences interested. This season Scott Wolter will be doing less of his trademark questing for Knights Templar, Holy Bloodlines, and pre-Columbian European visitors (though all of that is coming this season) in favor of more mainstream mysteries, such as the Lost Dutchman Mine, giants, and Bigfoot. The season premiere, S03E01 “Secrets of the Alamo” is firmly in the camp of expanding the show beyond Da Vinci Code fans and fringe history true believers with an appeal to patriotism, nationalism, and the and one of the seminal events in the heroic myth of the American frontier. The myth of Davy Crockett is as American as a story can get: A civic-minded frontiersman sacrifices everything to fight for freedom in the far parts of the wild frontier, surviving on wits and weaponry, giving his life to protect the liberty of others. The popular version was embodied in 1960’s The Alamo, with John Wayne as Crockett. But it was never that simple, not least because the freedom he died to protect was that of American colonizers seeking to detach the part of the state of Coahuila y Tejas now known as Texas from Mexico. According to popular legend, Crockett died at the Alamo on March 6, 1836, felled in defending the site against the forces of the Mexican Gen. Antonio López de Santa Anna. This version of events is supported by testimony from Madame Candelaria, speaking in 1890; Felix Nuñez, speaking in 1889; and Captain Rafael Soldana, as well as American newspapers accounts from the time. The legend, however, has been challenged repeatedly. A self-published 1955 Spanish-language text claiming to be a transcription of the diary of Mexican soldier José Enrique de la Peña (translated into English in 1975 to much controversy) asserted that Crockett actually surrendered to Mexican forces and was executed shortly thereafter by an irate Santa Anna. According to de la Peña, he was tortured and killed with swords. While the diary’s authenticity has never been confirmed, in fact similar claims from other eyewitnesses had been in print since the 1830s. The New Orleans Post-Union reported, for example, that Crockett had attempted to surrender to Santa Anna, who refused. In September of 1836, a letter from George M. Dolson to his brother appeared in several newspapers, and it claimed that a Mexican soldier had told Dolson that Crockett had been captured and taken to Santa Anna, the “monster,” who in a fit of pique ordered Crockett shot to death in front of him. A fictitious diary of Crockett’s was published in 1837 under the title Col. Crockett’s Exploits and Adventures in Texas, and it similarly claimed that Crockett had been captured alive and executed by Santa Anna: “…a dozen swords were sheathed in his indomitable heart; and he fell, and died without a groan, a frown on his brow, and a smile of scorn and defiance on his lips.” Thanks to Walt Disney’s Davy Crockett series and the 1960 Alamo movie, any revisionist claims that failed to cast Crockett as a hero became grist for America’s endless culture wars. But nearly all of the accounts agreed on one thing: No matter how he died, Crockett was dead. However, from time to time faulty claims that the great hero had survived the battle of the Alamo resurfaced, notably in a widely reprinted secondhand account published in The New-Yorker on May 7, 1836, which forms part of the “evidence” for the Davy Crockett conspiracy featured in the third season premiere of America Unearthed: Col. Crockett not dead yet.—We are much gratified in being able to inform our readers that Col. Crockett, the hero and patriot, it is said, is not yet dead. This cheering news is brought by a gentleman now in this city, directly from Texas, and who left the Colonel, as he states, three weeks ago, at the house of his brother-in-law in Texas, where the Colonel was lying quite ill, but gradually though slowly recovering from his wounds. It’s not really much to go on, one secondhand account against all the accumulated testimony of history, but when has that ever stopped Scott Wolter? Coupled with the fact that Davy Crockett joined the Freemasons while serving in the U.S. House of Representatives (his apron is still housed at Tennessee’s Weakly Lodge), and you have all the foundation a conspiracy theorist needs to imagine that Crockett had a secret second life as a sort of frontier Cincinnatus. The EpisodeWe open at the battle of the Alamo and the end of Davy Crockett in one of the standard cinematic recreations typical of America Unearthed. The production values are higher this year, and the letterboxing gives a suitably movie-of-the-week flavor to the wordless proceedings as dramatic music swells. The version of Crockett’s death from the fictitious Col. Crockett’s Exploits (or, more likely, a sanitized version of the de la Peña account, subtracting the torture) is depicted, but rather than watch Crockett die, the reenactment departs from the 1837 narrative by making Gen. Santa Anna offer Crocket his hand in friendship.
We go to a revised version of the opening credits, with shiny new graphics even more closely modeled on those of Fox News than earlier versions. After this, Scott Wolter talks about his love of the 1950s Disney Davy Crockett TV series, and he outlines Crockett’s biography. Jason Nelson, a tipster, tells Scott Wolter that he has a land grant signed by Davy Crockett after the hero’s death, in 1859, which in turn proves that Crockett lived out his days in Winston County, Alabama. The land grant gives to a David Crockett a tract of land, and it is signed by James Buchanan with the presidential seal. Nelson’s mother shows Wolter the 1836 newspaper article copied above, from what she says was an earlier printing in April, which Wolter finds “compelling.” “If anybody can get to the truth, I think I can,” Wolter tells Nelson, and Nelson’s mother tells Wolter that she believes Davy Crockett is buried on her land. There’s a fairly obvious rejoinder: A presidential decree is a public record and therefore hardly a convenient way of hiding. Nelson brings up some irrelevant information about the Indian Removal Act, instigated by Andrew Jackson, and Wolter suggests that Crockett purposely used the Alamo as a way to fake his own death after falling out with Andrew Jackson, who had already left office, over Indian Removal, and that Buchanan, twenty years later, gave Crockett land as a payoff. If you followed any of that, you are a better man than I because this makes precious little sense. The conclusion seems to be that Wolter wants to appear as a friend to Native Americans rather than a Eurocentric fantasist and therefore is looking for ways to fold protection of Native Americans into his historical revisionism. After the break, Wolter gives archaeologist Mike Arbuthnot the order to start scanning the Nelsons’ home for human bones, which Arbuthnot tells Wolter will require notification to the medical examiner’s office should any emerge. Wolter takes off for the Alamo to learn more about Crockett because he finds the Nelsons’ documents “compelling.” One might think that the first step would be to check local records to see if anyone named David Nelson lived in the region in the 1850s and 1860s, or if the signature on the land grant matched known signatures of the famous Davy Crockett. A Google search found several David Crocketts in the 1850s. At the Alamo, Wolter suggests that the Ave Maria logo on the Catholic mission is really a secret Templar-Freemason logo, but drops it to talk with historian Michael Wallis about Crockett’s actual life defending and protecting Native Americans against Andrew Jackson’s efforts. Wolter takes Crockett’s side and goes some way toward repairing his Eurocentric image, though the show fails to note the irony that Crockett, for all his love of Native Americans and disapproval of Indian Removal, died fighting to detach Texas from its sovereign government and turn it over to people who would replace Native populations with white rule. After the break, I realize that we are nearly halfway through the show but Wolter has done not a lick of actual investigation, even as Wallis tells Wolter more about Crockett’s early life, which is irrelevant to the issue at hand. Wallis repeats the information about the Alamo we heard at the top of the hour, with the same reenactment, but this time Wallis is on hand to offer some additional details. Wallis explains to Wolter that he believes that de la Peña’s version of Crockett’s death is the one most likely to be correct, but Wolter offers no background on the controversy over de la Peña’s manuscript. Wallis tells Wolter that despite Wolter’s insistence that Crockett could have survived, the only thing to survive the Alamo was Crockett’s legend. We go into yet another commercial—H2 seems to have added an extra break this season—with a decidedly different tone to America Unearthed. This time, the producers have let the expert have the last word and to directly contradict Wolter’s ideas without being shouted down. If this represents an effort to make the show less fringe, less controversial, and more mainstream, it also has the unintentional effect of making the show less entertaining. Seriously, at 9:30—halfway through the show—there has been just about one minute of actual content. The rest is just filler. In the second half of the show, Wolter visits a Masonic lodge in Minnesota to talk with Jack Roberts, a Crockett expert, about his Masonic connections. Gen. Santa Anna, we hear, was a Freemason as well as Crockett. (So, too, was Andrew Jackson, Crockett’s enemy, for that matter.) Wolter is shocked that Freemasons were on both sides of the Texas conflict. He believes that Crockett was privy to a Masonic sign of distress that was actually Templar in origin—despite their being no such documentation of any such thing among the medieval Templars except in conspiracy literature—but Roberts suggests that Crockett escaped the Alamo by appealing to Santa Anna’s Masonic affiliation with the Masons’ sign of distress, since apparently Masonry is more important than politics or even war. “Dead men can’t sign their names,” Wolter says, emphasizing that the “land grant” is strong evidence that Crockett lived on after the Alamo. He has yet to do even cursory research into who actually lived on the land in the 1850s, which should be the very first step in research. Instead, he and Arbuthnot are scanning the Alabama homestead hoping to find human bones. After another break, there is just fifteen minutes left in the hour, so Arbuthnot and Wolter decide to use a backhoe (!) to roughly excavate what Wolter suspects is a nineteenth century human burial on the site. The backhoe cracks into something hard, and Wolter jumps into the hole and discovers—a rock. Wolter takes off for Rutherford, Tennessee, to talk with a descendant of Davy Crockett, Joy Bland, and compare the land deed signature with one of Crockett’s authentic signatures. Bland tells Wolter that he’s full of it and Davy Crockett would never have kept quiet for 23 or more years. She tells Wolter that David Crockett was a common name at the time, and she personally knows of at least two or three others of that name from the time period. She gives Wolter a photocopy of Crockett’s signature from 1829, and we go to another commercial. After the break, Wolter announces that there is no archaeological evidence of Crockett at the homestead. Wolter also acknowledges that a handwriting expert declares that the signatures from 1829 and 1859 are different and not written by the same man. Wolter, however, asserts that he knows better than the expert and therefore rejects the expert’s conclusion. He therefore chooses to authenticate the signature based on what he reads as the similarities. Arbuthnot, however, notes that his research determined that the land deed was likely made out to David Crockett Cagel, a resident of the area. But Nelson’s mother and Scott Wolter both reject this because Cagel failed to sign his full legal name. She is right to be skeptical, but for the wrong reasons. As pointed out in the comments by Warren Lawrence below, Bureau of Land Management records show that this piece of land and another nearby were both sold in 1859 to David Crockett and Clark Crockett, two brothers whom genealogical records indicate were the sons of Samuel and Lucinda Crockett. This is more evidence that America Unearthed failed to do even cursory research. “I’ve seen a lot of evidence here that really questions the established history of Davy Crockett,” Wolter says, and he therefore validates the Nelsons’ beliefs as something that cannot be disproved. And that’s the end. If this is the new direction for the show, it’s a boring one. There was even less content than last year, making it a protracted exercise in patience to watch from beginning to end in hopes of seeing a rare burst of fringe-worthy ranting. On the other hand, Wolter successfully dismissed all of the expert opinion he solicited, from the archaeologist to the historian to the handwriting analyst, asserting that he has more expertise than all of them combined, so perhaps the show is not that different this year.
110 Comments
EP
11/8/2014 02:19:40 pm
"If this is the new direction for the show, it’s a boring one."
Reply
Bored
11/8/2014 02:27:46 pm
Does anyone take this seriously? I only watch it because of special effects, ridiculous theories that rival the Assassins Creed games (and are partly inspired from them) and because it's not painful to watch like Ancient Aliens.
Reply
EP
11/8/2014 02:30:45 pm
People like this guy take it seriously (which to anyone other than Wolter and his kind would be a warning sign):
Reply
Jason D.
11/12/2014 02:20:54 pm
I always kinda felt it was the other way around. Wolter to me always seemed to true believer, the guy that 15 years ago would have been making his living studying concrete by day and posting on fringe message boards by night. Tsoukalos always seemed to be riding Von D's coattails into trying to get as much money and fame as possible and saying what he thinks he needs to to achieve it. Maybe I'm wrong.
Reply
Coridan
11/8/2014 02:32:41 pm
At least they have left in a lot of the opposing evidence this time, and for that I give them credit.
Reply
CHV
11/8/2014 02:40:14 pm
Once again, Wolter chooses to adopt Creationist-style reasoning (e.g. despite a truckload of evidence to the contrary, unless one was actually at a historical event when it occurred, it opens the ball up for valid counter-conclusions.).
Reply
Coridan
11/8/2014 02:46:52 pm
Maybe Davey Crockett was also an ancestor of Andy Kauffman and they're both laughing it up at some secret place with Elvis and Hoffa.
Reply
EP
11/8/2014 02:59:08 pm
I am Davy Crockett! :D
Margaret McCleskey
12/24/2015 12:10:49 am
You should know that if David Crockett survived the Alamo. Susannah Dickenson who did survive would have known it. You should also be aware that his widow received a land grant from the Republic of Texas for his service and that she is buried at Acton, Texas.
Randy hallenbeck
2/18/2015 05:38:03 am
I agree...people don't change...unless his brain was altered by brain trauma at the Alamo...or by Ancient Aliens. Though I find the show entertaining, on NONE of his shows I have seen has Wolter actually "gotten to the bottom of things...the real new truth". Like ALL reality tv, the reality is that it's meant to be "for entertainment purposes only" ...meaning to make ratings for A&E(actually entertainment). Not much different than the pseudo news were fed in tv and newspapers...to thorough "discovery and due diligence" or bibliography required to cite assertions/ideas as fact.
Reply
Only Me
11/8/2014 03:23:16 pm
I caught the last twenty minutes, and hooooo shit!
Reply
CHV
11/8/2014 03:33:27 pm
Scott Wolter is a lot like Rush Limbaugh in that he tends to cling to "evidence" that supports his theory-du-jour and ignore all other data that debunks it - even (and especially) if that data is overwhelming to anyone who bothers to look for it.
Reply
Only Me
11/8/2014 04:26:02 pm
Agreed. It's especially telling that Scott goes totally apeshit when anyone challenges his work, but he has qualms about disregarding the work of other experts with ease.
pat
5/5/2015 04:39:20 am
rush limbaugh voices political opinions. name a "theory" he supports. i am fairly certain you have never actually listened to him. political opinion has nothing to do with wolters dbaggery, and you invoking it reflects on the level of your reasoning
Walt
11/8/2014 07:14:58 pm
I wouldn't mind tossing out a handwriting expert's analysis if it were the only piece of evidence that contradicted all other evidence. They don't all have a great track record. Anyone who sees the handwriting experts on Pawn Stars should google it. That's a fun read full of screw-ups and lost money.
Reply
Only Me
11/8/2014 08:24:54 pm
I got to see the whole episode when it re-aired, so his dismissal of the handwriting expert's analysis was even more ridiculous. 11/8/2014 10:30:01 pm
I had more content in the "Background" section I wrote in 30 minutes that they had in the whole hour. There's no reason they couldn't have spent a chunk of time discussing the different people who claimed to have witnessed Crockett's death, as well as the controversy over the Pena manuscript, or the cultural impact of the Disney version. It isn't about cutting down the show to 60 seconds but offering enough in the hour to justify the run time. 11/9/2014 02:19:55 am
This is definitely a different track for AU. Coincidentally, this week there was a discussion on a vexillological forum concerning the flags that flew at the Alamo during Santa Anna’s siege. American and European volunteers from New Orleans --- the “Greys” --- formed companies and traveled to Texas in 1835, and flew a flag at the Alamo which was captured by Santa Anna.
EP
11/9/2014 02:30:41 am
Walt, what are *you* successful at?
Walt
11/9/2014 05:11:58 am
Only Me, I agree. I can't remember any evidence they presented other than Wolter's rejection of the signature that supported the theory. There were no loose ends for me. But, at least they presented enough information for viewers to draw their own conclusions. AA doesn't even do that much.
CHV
11/9/2014 07:01:11 am
Wolter's casual dismissal of the writing analysis of the Crockett signature (whoever did it) was pretty arrogant. But what baffled me more was his blowing off the (very apt) statement by Crockett's great-granddaughter that had he survived the Alamo the last thing Crockett would have done was lived quietly in some backwater town in Alabama.
Barry Elder
11/8/2014 04:41:21 pm
Thank you Mr. Colavito. Your blog is fresh air in world that seems hell bent on dumbing down everyone. I just don't understand how the " History" channel can call itself that. Maybe America Unearthed will do an " in depth" investigation of the relationship of the "History Channel " to actual history. Please keep up the good work.
Reply
T
11/8/2014 05:59:44 pm
The History Channel has a secret land grant on the truth and therefore must obscure it. Only the initiated few "producers" choose to leak a few clues out at a time.
Reply
Brent
11/8/2014 05:38:59 pm
How many times did we see those guys get bayoneted? Lol
Reply
Bryan
5/23/2015 07:18:03 am
How can you be sure two hands in the air isnt a Masonic sign? Are you a traveling man?
Reply
Dan
11/8/2014 05:44:46 pm
I got a good belly laugh out of the silly claim that both hands in the air signal of surrender somehow is a secret Masonic message. Wolter is really off his rocker these days.
Reply
EP
11/8/2014 06:23:12 pm
It is also rather ironic given Scott Wolter's only real credentials...
Reply
CHV
11/9/2014 07:03:10 am
>>>>But the discovery of a meaningless rock as the only result of his excavation of the Alabama property is pretty much symbolic of entire nature of this series.
Reply
tm
11/8/2014 06:59:41 pm
I would think a 73 year old man with a huge tomahawk scar on his forehead might have created quite a stir in Winston county Alabama in 1859. Wonder how he avoided that kind of attention then, and where did he hide for the 23 years before he moved there. Why not just live on the land grant his wife Elizabeth claimed in his name in Texas in 1853? Just southwest of Ft Worth. She lived there until she died in 1860.
Reply
11/8/2014 10:31:22 pm
Hush! Clearly he must have been trying to fake his death to get away from his wife even though he was apparently living in "secret" under his own name!
Reply
Gary
11/9/2014 12:34:10 am
I was raised in Texas and was taught that everyone was killed at the Alamo, fighting for freedom. Only later did I discover that there were women and slaves there that were not killed and that the "heros" were fighting for the right to keep their slaves, against the anti-slavery Mexicans. I remember when a historian first published on that Mexican officer's diary describing Crockett being captured and executed. He got death threats.
Reply
EP
11/9/2014 02:35:21 am
"When I jokingly asked my elementary school teacher if he was the Yellow Rose of Texas"
Reply
Gary
11/9/2014 02:39:35 am
Thank you, EP. My fellow students thought it was pretty funny, too.
CHV
11/9/2014 07:07:05 am
The Alamo historian that Wolter spoke to on the episode was (IMO) very correct in pointing out the difference between "David Crockett" and "Davy Crockett" - the latter being the folk hero puffed up by American pop culture.
Reply
Me
11/9/2014 02:05:27 am
"Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand." - Albert Einstein
Reply
EP
11/9/2014 02:32:16 am
Are you related to Only Me, by any chance? :)
Reply
Only Me
11/9/2014 03:43:18 am
Nope! I, for one, don't misuse the wisdom of great or educated men to defend the likes of Scott Wolter.
Mark E.
11/9/2014 03:03:47 am
Einstein quote duel!
Reply
Will
11/9/2014 02:35:37 am
It is bad enough this show has no respect for the scientific method or basic logic.
Reply
Illuminity Melgarius
11/9/2014 02:42:10 am
My god you are empty. Spend years watching TV you know you are going to hate and then write how much you hate it. How meaningless and worthless can people be.
Reply
EP
11/9/2014 02:44:14 am
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mc4oajSpxC1qzytg1.jpg
Reply
Only Me
11/9/2014 03:41:06 am
Since when did someone's *hobby* have to be fulfilling, meaningful and worthwhile to YOU?
Reply
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
11/9/2014 07:19:25 am
Jason's best-known work seems to be these cable-show reviews, which get testier as the shows get ever more repetitive and content-free. But his most valuable work (at least in the realm of fringe debunking) is in tracking the evolution of ideas that fringe theorists use, providing the context that the theorists say nothing about. Do a site search for "watchers." The concept of nephilim/watchers/ancient giants have an incredibly convoluted history, just in the ancient and medieval texts. I don't know that anybody in academia, let alone the fringe universe, has traced them in as many different directions as Jason has. Even though he's building on the work of other scholars, he had to do a lot of tedious research to write those blog posts. I think he should turn that research into another book.
EP
11/9/2014 07:27:14 am
It's funny you should mention that. Jason and I have been discussing the possibility of a genuine connection between the Nephilim and the Anunnaki recently. (As opposed to Sitchin-style fantasies.) Well, I suggested that there is a case to be made for it, at least. I wouldn't call it tedious, personally. But then, I am weird :)
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
11/9/2014 08:56:44 am
I have my own hobby research projects, and I end up doing a lot of stuff for them that most other people would find tedious but I find fun. I don't have quite enough interest in the Nephilim to apply that same degree of patience to researching them. And I certainly wouldn't have the patience to track down 19th-century primary sources with ridiculous biases and florid language, or translations of obscure Arabic texts that are hard to Google because of inconsistent transcription systems.
EP
11/9/2014 08:57:55 am
Are you kidding?! That's, like, half the fun! :) 11/9/2014 01:42:59 pm
You seem like the kind of person, Illuminity, who doesn't get Mystery Science Theater 3000 either.
Reply
L Bean
11/10/2014 01:43:10 am
B U R N !
Clete
11/9/2014 05:14:59 am
I wondered later how much actual content was in the show. I figured about fifteen to twenty minutes. There were a lot of commercials and of Scott Wolter driving from somewhere to somewhere else. It finally dawned on me who he reminds me of. Drumroll please...Dick Tracy from the old Chester Gould comic strips I read when I was younger. The same box shaped jaw line, the same steely gaze. The same battle for his own warped sense of reality.
Reply
FrankenNewYork
11/9/2014 05:17:06 am
I have to admit that I love the part where the backhoe operator hits something, which at that moment we have to allow might be the remains of Davy Crocket, repeatedly with the bucket and then Wolter repeatedly tells him to scrape the object with the heavy equipment. Mainstream archaeology methods be damned! They're only trying to suppress the truth. (He doesn't say that but it's funny.)
Reply
EP
11/9/2014 05:45:51 am
Your comment got me thinking. There is NO WAY Scott Wolter would have been that careless had he really thought that there could have been Davy Crockett's remains there.
Reply
Mark E.
11/9/2014 07:12:14 am
I totally agree, much more care would have been taken if they actually thought it was an archeological site with potentially valuable artifacts.
EP
11/9/2014 07:16:50 am
Exactly.
Clint Knapp
11/9/2014 10:48:13 am
But, backhoes are how manly men dig! Trowels and brushes are for academic lady-boys who never spent their college years chasing balls around fields and patting their teammates on the ass... in manly-man fashion of course, not lady-boy style.
Reply
EP
11/9/2014 10:59:05 am
Sigh...
Clint Knapp
11/9/2014 11:18:44 am
I was born in the Backhoe Capital of the World and find their use on this show offensive. If Wolter can besmirch the good name of the backhoe through inappropriate use, I feel it's only right to point out the logical inconsistencies of using a sports background as a benchmark for manly rightness.
Only Me
11/9/2014 11:21:43 am
@Clint
EP
11/9/2014 12:37:48 pm
I like you guys and everything, but this just doesn't feel like a Scott Wolter thread without an unhinged weirdo or three... :)
Clint Knapp
11/9/2014 12:55:39 pm
I know. It's a shame! There's been like... one guy complaining about Jason having no joy in his life. It's kind of a sad day in Wolterology, but maybe even the staunchest supporters couldn't get behind this abortion of an episode.
Keith Jackson
11/9/2014 06:14:05 am
I was pleasantly surprised and thought he was on something new until the dreaded word "Mason" came out and I started thinking, "Here we go again."
Reply
EP
11/9/2014 06:17:39 am
"the article stated that he was shot in the left arm and looking at the slant of the signature, it was not done by someone who was left handed."
Reply
Kal
11/9/2014 07:02:02 am
I tried to watch this one but it was so stupid I couldn't do it. It's an insult to American culture and to archeology, and to the Freemasons, but mostly to Davey Crockett. I'm not even from Texas or anything. Keep on reviewing this show though. They can claim to sue all they want, but it's free speech, or writing.
Reply
tm
11/9/2014 07:21:14 am
Ah, yes. Square jaw, steely eyed determination, warped sense of reality. And don't forget the convoluted problem solving.
Reply
titus pullo
11/9/2014 08:36:55 am
I doubt the show will last another season. They have run out of historical "mysteries" and are now just reaching for anything..UFOs soon.
Reply
John Dunham
11/10/2014 03:02:50 am
Did not this whole genre of televised paranormal "investigations" begin when the SciFi Channel did a pretty detailed examination of the Kecksburg Incident back in 2003. I may be senile now, but I remember that being pretty good and fair minded. I guess once you investigate bigfoot, ghosts and ufo's 1000 times and don't find anything you need to start making the shows crazier.
Reply
EP
11/10/2014 04:51:04 am
"where did the Anasazi go, why do compasses not work in the Black Hills, what is that weird Indian looking head that you see on google earth in Montana, that a "forensic" geologist could actually investigate"
John Dunham
11/10/2014 06:18:09 am
I'm not suggesting that things are real or that magnetic anomalies are due to UFOs or something, I'm suggesting that there are oddities and topics that are a mystery to the general public that would make interesting TV and that don't involve Knights Templar, Freemasons, or bigfoot.
EP
11/10/2014 06:52:08 am
On that we are in agrrement!
John Dunham
11/10/2014 09:50:33 am
my mistake - alberta
EP
11/10/2014 10:09:27 am
That's awesome!
BillUSA
11/9/2014 03:35:40 pm
I wish I could sit still long enough to watch any of this tripe like you do Jason. A lot of us realize you do it as a service to the intelligence of humanity. But as Scott Wolter and his cronies are apt to do, they distort facts for any of their nefarious purposes. It's easy to sit back and accuse anyone being a hater simply because they don't agree with you. his defensiveness is most telling when he threatens to go legal on you. ("Hater" is a term thrown around so much online that the word "troll" is beginning to fade into obscurity.)
Reply
Coridan
11/10/2014 02:43:12 am
No one seems to have mentioned yet that the "secret Masonic sign of distress" was both hands raised in the air. I always thought that the universal sign for surrender, seems like Masons might get confused.
Reply
John Dunham
11/10/2014 02:56:34 am
Boring does not even begin to cover this one. Unless Wolter went on a rampage at the end. I fell asleep after he repeated that they were going to to a ground penetrating radar survey for the eighth, maybe ninth time.....
Reply
lurkster
11/10/2014 05:27:24 am
"... and often a barrage of email from viewers who are looking for more information about the program, and particularly those who are outraged that I would seek to evaluate the show’s claims"
Reply
Tom
11/10/2014 06:06:00 am
... Over ... to you ... Reverend.
Reply
EP
11/10/2014 06:54:43 am
ANSWER THE CALLOUT, REV!!!
Reply
Only Me
11/10/2014 07:35:39 am
Scott Wolter's hypotheses form the basis of his investigations on America Unearthed and often invoke symbolism and imagery. In this same spirit, I thought I'd try another approach to the repeated playing of the scene where the last of the Alamo's defenders are executed, save Davy Crockett.
Reply
Jerky
11/10/2014 04:57:27 pm
"But Nelson’s mother and Scott Wolter both reject this because Cagel failed to sign his full legal name. "
Reply
Jerky
11/10/2014 06:02:29 pm
"He later sold the land to a Mr. Later a small chunk of the land, that my house sites on, was sold to a man who signed his name only as X (he couldn't spell or write, so an X was sufficient)."
Reply
Only Me
11/11/2014 03:36:45 am
That's awesome, Jerky!
Jerky
11/11/2014 07:22:01 am
Only me, I did too, seeing as I purchased my house and signed with just my first name. And flipping through the title abstract revealed I was not the first person to have signed with a first name only. The oldest deed in the title abstract was dated to 1904. It would seem not much has changed in 110 years, so one must conclude it hasn't changed much at all.
Jacob Atkins
11/11/2014 04:49:05 am
Just wanted to say thanks for writing this, I happened to catch this episode and had serious doubts about how sincere the host was about presenting actual, factual evidence. I figured those people he gathered evidence from were sincere and truly believed what they'd been told for generations, but the way it was presented just left me with a bad taste in my mouth. I suppose it's just too much to ask for the History Channel to present some real, concrete history and not this 22 minutes of drivel that could have been summed up in 2 paragraphs. I regret giving them the viewer credit. Thanks again.
Reply
Warren Lawrence
11/11/2014 05:16:48 am
Scott Wolter's research techniques are laughable. This is just another attempt to add to the myth of Davy Crockett. Alabama, Tennessee and Georgia were full of David Crocketts at that time who were of legal age to obtain a land Patent. SW should have ran a title search of the land tracing down the chain of title holders on the landfollowing Crockett, provided the records still exist after the actions of the Civil war and the propensity for old court houses to burn so they may not be available.. Maybe he did, but the results will not substantiate his "Davy Crockett" claim.
Reply
Dan
11/11/2014 05:31:51 am
Great work!
Reply
11/11/2014 12:34:40 pm
Astonishing research! Thank you so much for sharing this. I will add this to the post above for future readers.
Reply
Seeker
11/11/2014 03:48:17 pm
I Tivoed but didn't watch yet. Thanks for the review, Jason. Now I know I can just delete it. I need the space with so much other good stuff on right now!
Reply
bodie
11/13/2014 04:10:57 pm
My ancestors, Blevins, were early settlers of Winston county(Hancock county),Alabama.They were Unionist in the Civil War.More than one thing bothered me about the show but one which stuck out was no mention of Looney's Tavern, where the people of the county chose representatives to the state convention to decide whether to secede,stay neutral or remain in the Union,if Davy Crockett was in Winston county at the beginning of the war he almost certainly would have been at Looney's Tavern. Unionist,Confederate's and neutral people were there and someone with such strong opinions as Davy Crockett would be there and it would be widely reported.But the show is only entertainment meant to make money not sense.
Reply
Becky Plumlee
11/14/2014 01:01:38 am
why isn't easy to believe that David "Davy" Crockett had a cousin with the same name
Reply
TJ
11/17/2014 08:13:38 am
Hi, just wanted to say that I stumbled across this blog and for a lot of people who really don't like this form of entertainment, you all sure do spend a lot of time watching it. My suggestion is that you pitch your theories to Discovery and get your own TV show, or even your local PBS station. Start of with a government grant. My advice, don't watch it, this will reduce the ratings and his show will be cancelled. Keep watching it and talking about it, this will give more demand for this type of bad programming as you call it. My two cents so respond and tell me how crazy I am.
Reply
Jerky
11/18/2014 12:09:52 am
Yes, well, I don't watch it.
Reply
TJ
11/18/2014 02:49:39 am
Perhaps so but he is free to express his views. Don't you think it's a bit sophomoric to dedicate a whole blog to sensor one person or a group of people's opinion? I don't mean to disrespect anyone's opinion here either. Seriously, just step back away from this situation and look at what is being done. Here is a man who has a show on TV. Here is a group of people who wish is debunk every little aspect of the show to include graphics and commercial intervals? I too can see many discrepancies in the shows. As I said, if you don't like it, why justify the show by dedicating so much time to it?
EP
11/18/2014 02:55:54 am
TJ, your comments are ironic in light of your line of reasoning...
TJ
11/18/2014 04:10:14 am
EP- you just proved my point! Instead of rolling out a quip, explain it. That's my whole point.
Reply
EP
11/18/2014 04:47:05 am
Explan what?
Reply
Paul Robinson
11/22/2014 03:43:28 pm
I found the show to be ridiculous. What led me to this blog was a desire to see what others felt about it. I found the idea that 23 years after the Alamo, at the age of 73 that Crockett received a land grant to quietly live out his days. Really! What of the 23 years prior, that is a very long time. What was he doing? Where was he living prior to that? Why if he was trying to hide would he still be going by David Crockett?! At 73 how many more days would someone have anyway in 1859? Even if he survived the Alamo as alleged in the show, how likely is it that he would still be alive at the age of 73?
Reply
Graham
11/24/2014 01:51:01 pm
Kevin Randle of Roswell fame watched this episode and weighed in with his own two cents, his conclusion:
Reply
ShawnO
1/5/2015 08:56:33 am
This case was closed with the first - and only - piece of evidence that was provided, the land patent to David Crockett. One call to a surveyor (that's me), an attorney, the county courthouse, or a Google search would have ended the show.
Reply
john smith
6/5/2016 08:21:36 pm
Great review whilst posing some generally interesting hypotheses they are, as usual, built on little or no substance.
Reply
B Miller
5/31/2017 01:50:23 pm
Of course Davy Crockett lived on... He hid in various alternate forms until resurfacing in the 1980's under his new persona: James "Sonny" Crockett, the famous Florida Vice Detective. This explains his skill with firearms, his fondness for country music, and "Miami Vice's" unquestionable cultural influence. Undoubtedly that show got its starting money from a portion of the lost Templar treasure...
Reply
antonio
3/16/2019 02:10:38 pm
Do you want to be a member of Illuminati brotherhood so that you can be
Reply
Antonio
3/20/2019 03:12:17 pm
Do you want to be a member of Illuminati brotherhood so that you can be
Reply
Wesley Jack
5/13/2019 09:27:47 am
HOW THE ILLUMINATI BROTHERHOOD MADE ME ACHIEVE MY DREAMS IN LIFE BEWARE OF SCAMMERS.
Reply
Smith Kenneth
5/22/2019 08:36:22 am
MY NAME IS SMITH KENNETH I AM FROM USA I AM HERE TO SHARE MY TESTIMONY ON HOW I JOIN THE ILLUMINATI YOU MUST BE CAREFUL HERE, MOST OF THE COMMENT ABOUT JOINING ILLUMINATI ARE FAKE I WAS RECENTLY SCAM BY 8 PEOPLE CLAIMING TO BE ILLUMINATI AGENT. I LOST OVER $10,000 UNTIL A FRIEND DIRECT ME TO A REAL AGENT PLEASE IF YOU WANT TO BE A MEMBER OF ILLUMINATI QUICKLY CALL OR WHATSAPP. MR Justin Scott ( +2347031524375 ) OK Hello my brothers and sisters this message is coming right from the good Temple of Illuminati, Alot of people have been scam and dupe just because they want to join the brotherhood of Illuminati, here is the good news 9 month ago I wanted to join the brotherhood of Illuminati but I was fraud and Scam by the fake people using the website on till I meet the right member called : MR Justin Scott who help me to be a member of the brotherhood today am so happy because money is no longer the problem , is how to spend it ...... If you need the help of my helper you can call or whatsapp him on +2347031524375...... May god baphomet bless and make you rich for ever..
Reply
Wesley Jack
5/22/2019 08:00:39 pm
HOW THE ILLUMINATI BROTHERHOOD MADE ME ACHIEVE MY DREAMS IN LIFE BEWARE OF SCAMMERS.
Reply
apostle
8/19/2019 12:19:40 am
Reply
Want a free novels to read? Here is a wide selection of original novels for you to choose from. Use my invitation code 35159011 to instantly get 30,000 points. Start downloading now:https://zei6iaqu-fey3ybur3q-an.a.run.app/dfnow.html?shareDate=20240601&ggc=35159011%257C3%257C1&t=1
Reply
6/7/2024 06:02:21 am
Your appreciation means a lot! It's like putting together a puzzle—finding the perfect word is like finding that missing piece that completes the picture of your writing. Keep practicing, and you'll definitely see progress!
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
September 2024
|