I’ll be honest: I just wasn’t feeling this episode. Maybe it’s because I’m not quite back to full speed after the Thanksgiving holiday, or maybe it’s because I’ve never really felt comfortable exploiting human corpses for entertainment, but Ancient Aliens S07E10 “Secrets of the Mummies” just bothered me. To judge by the subdued tone and the relative lack of aliens, the producers were not too enthused either. I was, though, intrigued to note that the show reverted back to its old pyramid-style title card. Segment 1
We open the show with shots of Pope John Paul II’s corpse, and then we tour other famous corpses, including those of Lenin, Stalin, Ho Chi Minh, Kim Jon Il, etc., and the show falsely identifies the preserved corpse of Mao Zedong as the “emperor” of China. Oddly, after the parade of atheist Communists, the talking heads tell us that mummies represent a belief in eternal life—and odd choice since the Communist mummies represent the exact opposite of any supernatural religious impulse. But then we’re off to Egypt to look at Egyptian mummies with Egyptologist Ramy Romany. We review the mummification process and listen to speculation about the afterlife. This leads David Childress to suggest that the god Anubis was an alien in a halfhearted attempt to link William Henry’s spiritualist nonsense about supernatural souls to something vaguely related to the original concept of Ancient Aliens. Segment 2 In the second segment, the show talks about 96 Chinchorro mummies found in Chile, the oldest known in the world, dating back 7,000 years. Then we look at 63 Wari mummies from Peru found last year. One of the royal mummies was found with gold trinkets depicting winged beings, which Childress and David Wilcock compare (weirdly) to the ibis-headed god Thoth, who invented mummification. Thoth did not have wings. Wilcock says this proves that there was a “global culture” of bird-people who came from beyond and taught mummification. At the Utcubamba Valley of Peru, we look at clay sarcophagi of the Chachapoya. The show says there are six sarcophagi even though the photograph shows at least eight, and moments later Ancient Aliens shows photos of different sarcophagi from the same culture. Childress says that the Chachapoya can’t be traced to any known origin—an oblique reference to false claims that they are Caucasians. David Wilcock calls mummification “technology” and says it has some mysterious goal “we” don’t understand. Segment 3 This segment starts off with a Japanese mummy from 1783. The Buddhist monk practiced self-mummification, and I can recall seeing a segment on this guy decades ago on some show or another. I think he’s even been on Ancient Aliens before. The process involves caloric restriction and the consumption of poison, followed by starvation and asphyxiation. This exercise in morbidity, with loving shots of the grinning skulls, serves to remind us that the monks believed they would ascend to another realm by killing themselves slowly. The show doesn’t really pretend this has anything much to do with aliens. So instead we rehearse the life of Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha, and his magic powers of teleportation. Childress remembers that the show has covered this before (when the teleporting was attributed to technology) and compares him to a Star Child. The narrator tells us that Buddhist monks believed that suicide was a path to becoming an alien like the Buddha. I imagine that no one who works on this show realizes how dangerously close their narration comes to endorsing the beliefs of Heaven’s Gate, the UFO cult that believed suicide was a one-way trip to communion with quasi-divine aliens trailing the Hale-Bopp comet—and acted on that belief in their 1997 mass suicide. Segment 4 After the break, we rehearse one of Ancient Aliens’ greatest hits: the pharaoh Akhenaten. He’s been covered so many times over the years that there is nothing left to say. Even the fringe claims are by now utterly familiar: The monotheist pharaoh worshiped a shining disc (the sun disc) which had to be a flying saucer, and his strange physiognomy is due to alien DNA or plastic surgery to emulate the aliens. Giorgio Tsoukalos thinks he was an alien. But now we’re off to look at elongated skulls—another Ancient Astronaut chestnut—and this time the show is recycling material from In Search of Aliens, citing the genetic anomaly that some elongated skulls are missing their sagittal sutures to claim these skulls are “of extraterrestrial origin.” The show brings in Brien Foerster to discuss his DNA tests of the Paracas, Peru elongated skulls, samples of which he admitted to smuggling out of the country. Foerster claims that a geneticist confirmed that the skulls’ DNA is not human, but Foerster changes his tune a lot. Originally, he reported that the DNA said the skulls were from a non-Homo sapiens human species. Later, he claimed they were Northern European Aryans. L. A. Marzulli said the same results showed they were the descendants of fallen angels. But the scientific reports have never been released (so far as I am aware), so we can only go by what fringe theorists with their weird ideas tell us. Segment 5 After the next break, we talk about the mummies of the Inca kings, which were treated like living beings during royal rituals. The show seems to want us to think that the Inca really thought mummies were alive and in communion with the gods at a literal rather than a symbolic level. David Wilcock throws in a brief reference to the idea that the Inca gods who share their names with mummies are aliens, and Tsoukalos suggests that mummies were meant to recall aliens’ suspended animation, necessary for long distance space travel. This completely contradicts the “mummification technology” argument from earlier in the hour, and it also fails to give credit to the late Alan Landsburg, who so far as I know (or at least can recall offhand) was the first to suggest this silly idea in The Outer Space Connection (1975). Segment 6 In the last segment, the show looks at a Mexican technique to rehydrate naturally mummified corpses to given them the semblance of life. I really don’t want to look at any more corpses. Apparently the show wants to nauseate me. Then we talk about a 1968 experiment to determine the blood type of King Tutankhamun. The narrator wonders whether sequencing Tut’s DNA could lead to the resurrection of Tut through DNA. This is an epistemological problem, for the show wants us to see cloning as resurrection, but clones are no more the original person than a man is his own twin. David Wilcock seems to think that our memories are embedded in our DNA and can be extracted through a “technology” that hasn’t been invented yet. The narrator concludes that someday we will reanimate the dead and resurrect the aliens. This was a really boring episode and only brought the crazy in the last five minutes. What a waste of air time. If the show is called Ancient Aliens I expect a full hour of nutty ideas, not just six or seven minutes spread over 42 plus commercials.
34 Comments
EP
11/28/2014 02:33:53 pm
"the Communist mummies represent the exact opposite of any supernatural religious impulse"
Reply
Shane Sullivan
11/29/2014 06:55:20 am
"No mundane secular restraint"...?
Reply
EP
11/29/2014 11:00:51 am
LOL 11/29/2014 09:51:19 am
It was figurative language. I didn't mean it literally.
Reply
Susan Paxton
11/28/2014 03:06:32 pm
The Buddhist fellow who self-mummified was covered in a segment of National Geographic's "Mummy Roadshow." Back when the cable channels actually showed decent programs...
Reply
Dan
11/28/2014 04:24:48 pm
Wow, this was the most lukewarm and non-committal of all of the AA episodes. I kept saying "so...Aliens", but the narrator never followed through. It took almost 40 minutes for Giorgio to appear and before things get loopy. Even then, it was the same "elongated skulls" thing that has been debunked many many times before. And then there's the complete fraud Foerster who really should be in prison. So this episode was basically 30 minutes of yawns, a few growls at idiot Childress, a few guffaws at Giorgio, and then screaming at the criminal fraud of Foerster.
Reply
me seyz
11/28/2014 06:05:22 pm
the recent Lost Giants episode was better...
Reply
Alaric
11/29/2014 02:46:34 am
"One of the royal mummies was found with gold trinkets depicting winged beings, which Childress and David Wilcock compare (weirdly) to the ibis-headed god Thoth, who invented extraterrestrials."
Reply
11/29/2014 03:47:45 am
You're right. I fixed it. I make some silly typos when writing late in the evening.
Reply
Shawn Flynn
11/29/2014 03:12:38 am
Memories in our DNA? That is in Assassins Creed. It has plently of Ancient Alien-like stuff in it, but I never heard of the DNA/memory thing before that game. Is it established fringe or did they get it from Assassins Creed?
Reply
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
11/29/2014 06:35:52 am
I think it has shown up in science fiction before, regarding certain species of you-know-what.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
11/29/2014 06:51:27 am
I heard it in reference to past-life regression prior to Assassin's Creed.
Reply
EP
11/29/2014 10:45:42 am
It's one of those things different stupid people who don't understand how genes work are bound to invent independently.
Reply
Jason D.
11/30/2014 01:27:43 pm
In Frank Herbert's Dune series, there is ancestral memory. The Bene Gesserit are a group of humans that possess the ability to essentially communicate with their past female ancestors, once their mind is awakened. The Kwisatz Haderach is a legendary figure in their lore that can communicate with both sides (male and female). They actively work toward the KH through a selective breeding program.
Reply
dlefhcie
11/29/2014 03:49:54 am
Another boring rehash with nothing interesting to say. Anyone else bothered by H2's new slogan during the commercials, "2 Good 2 Be True"? Are they admitting their high profile shows are total fiction?
Reply
Dave Lewis
11/29/2014 06:46:37 am
Many years ago when I had only 30 cable channels either the Discovery Channel or Learning Channel had a one hour program on the Buddhist self-mummification. That program only ran once. After watching it I wanted to record it on my VCR but never saw it again.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
11/29/2014 06:53:38 am
Are we certain Akhenaten was even depicted with an elongated heard? Because it always looked like a headdress to me.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
11/29/2014 06:54:36 am
Grrr.
Reply
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
11/29/2014 07:40:06 am
There are sculptures of his daughters with no headdress and very long heads.
Shane Sullivan
11/29/2014 09:32:18 am
Thanks.
spookyparadigm
11/29/2014 10:03:02 am
Also his son, Tutankhaten/Tutankhamun had an elongated head. Since we don't have the mummies of the other members of the family AFAIK, that's as close as we'll get.
EP
11/29/2014 10:53:58 am
I'm not sure whether they were meant to be depicted as having elongated heads, or just look like they have elongated heads (rather than just having such hairstyles/headgear) because the busts are unpainted.
EP
11/29/2014 10:59:22 am
Also, they have identified Akhenaten's mummy (along with several of his relatives) through DNA analysis. None of them have elongated heads. In fact, none of the skull shapes are pathological.
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
11/29/2014 11:31:09 am
Well, there's still uncertainty about that:
EP
11/29/2014 11:48:39 am
I think the DNA study is obviously far from perfect, but it's neither here nor there as far as whether we have mummies of other members of Tut's family (no one denies that, as far as I can tell; people argue over the exact relations between them). It's also neither here nor there as far as whether their skulls are deformed (you don't need a DNA study to tell).
Kal
11/29/2014 12:33:54 pm
The fringe is confusing genetic memory for actual memory. What genetic memory is, is the DNA in cells can replicate because it seems to know how via chemical means. It does not mean thoughts are stored in cells. Cells simply act on what is sent them, nutrients or whatnot, and then act. Cells cannot convey thoughts. DNA does not have hidden codes either. What scientists seem to mean by codes when they say this is that they've made these markers when looking at little bits of cells, DNA and RNA, and in order to see it they have coded it, so they can know where to find it again. It's not a code the DNA makes up. It's a sequence the scientists made up to identify things. The cell does not have a secret code, any more than a rock or a tree. It has patterns and people recognized them. Cells are in living things. Cells seem similar to other cells.
Reply
Kal
11/29/2014 12:34:59 pm
The only cells that can have memory are brain cells.
Reply
Ragnar
11/30/2014 07:29:17 am
Can you post a link where the DNA results are showing that its human? I've heard people say this before, but no one can ever produce links...?
Reply
genxjonathan
11/30/2014 01:28:38 am
Even I have limits. Admittedly I am AnAl big-time believer. I rated this episode a resounding "I THINK NOT!" (Sorry Giorgio).
Reply
Ragnar
11/30/2014 07:27:06 am
Something I've noticed. I've seen Skeptics and those I'll call "Believers". Believers believe everything while skeptics believe nothing. They are both as bad on opposite ends of the spectrum.
Reply
Ragnar, actually being Skeptic doesn't mean denying everything, it impplies critical thinking and search/analysis of proof and data.
Reply
Sekhmet
11/3/2015 03:14:59 am
Akhenaton's, Nefertiti's and none of their daughter's mummies have ever been found. Yes, we have Tut's mummy (which shows no elongation of the skull) but Egyptologists aren't even sure if his relationship to Akhenaton. He could be his son, brother, or even a half brother. There is a great deal about the Amarna period that is unknown.
Reply
rachel
6/22/2016 10:15:21 am
So no one noticed how during segment 4 the man just ripped a big piece of hair out of the elongated mummified skull?
Reply
Damian
12/29/2017 08:41:40 pm
So, that David Wilcock guy says in the last segment, around minute 33, that the word Ayar as it relates to the Inca, means mummy, but I can't find anything on the subject.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
March 2025
|