This morning I had two tabs open in my browser. One of them was an op-ed piece about the apocalyptic nightmare vision in Donald Trump’s speech accepting the Republican presidential nomination. The other happened to be an older piece on Tor.com from a science fiction writer explaining how he developed a vision of post-apocalyptic America. I must have clicked the wrong place while reading the first article, and I ended up in the second. The frightening part is that the two articles merged together so seamlessly that I did not notice the jump from one to the other for several paragraphs. In many ways Trump’s speech was the culmination of the great national freak out that began with 9/11, curdled now into a revitalization movement that promises a fiery purge to purify the world. The Tor.com article opened with a still frame from Planet of the Apes, the famous closing scene in which the ruined Statue of Liberty testifies to the fall of human civilization. That movie was a sort of inverted ancient astronaut theory—no surprise given script writer Rod Serling’s interests—but it also reminded me that the longing for a revitalized country and a savior to purge and cleanse the world of sin is also one of the key themes of fringe history. Ancient Aliens, for all its goofball stupidity, was the canary in the coalmine, testifying to that existential longing for a new cosmology and ideology that the old order of liberal democracy and scientific rationalism have been unable to satisfy. Despite the very obvious differences between Trump and Ancient Aliens, Ancient Aliens shares with Trump an eclectic disrespect for every form of traditional authority, a celebration of the dilettante and the amateur, a lust for overturning and destroying anything and everything to satisfy petty grievance, and an obsession with vague conspiracies tied, ultimately (though often without the participants’ knowledge) to ideologies of hate. And both imagine a transcendent future where the will of the people and the niceties of democracy and civil society are subsumed before the benevolent rule of a savior figure—but not until the world has been purged through a nightmarish reign of terror and fear, where people are no longer safe in their own homes and mysterious forces of unimaginable power can strike them down at any time without warning. Ancient Aliens rarely makes this dystopian vision explicit, unlike Trump, but it is always present behind the façade of quasi-scientific “investigation,” a sort of New Age parallel to the lustful longing for the Apocalypse that has animated Christian death cults for a thousand years or more. But enough of that depressing thought. Instead let us discuss this depressing episode, which joins Christian conservatives in denying the reality of evolution in favor of a supernatural origin for each human and prehuman species. Segment 1 Our episode opens with UFO abduction research by David Jacobs and the oft-repeated claim that space aliens are performing genetic experiments on human beings during anal probing abduction events. Jacobs alleges that abductees’ hallucinations of seeing alien-human babies in flying saucers really happen in the physical world, but the show doesn’t bother to go into this in any detail. Within seconds we are off to South Africa to discuss the 2013 discovery of a new human ancestor, Homo naledi, which as of today has yet to be dated and therefore cannot be placed in the human evolutionary tree. David Childress describes the existence of various human species 50,000 years ago or so as “like something out of Lord of the Rings,” while the narrator suggests that the existence of different human species requires a rewrite of Darwin’s theory of evolution. No one on this show understands evolution, least of all Nick Redfern, who alleges that evolution would predict “a steady, slow progression” from one species to the next. Punctuated equilibrium, proposed decades ago, has long since offered an alternative to “steady and slow,” while the existence of many related species of animals such as cats (lions, tigers, lynxes, pumas, etc.) and birds ought to be enough to prove that the earth can and did hold more than a single species of a given type at any one time. The show then alleges that mythological accounts of failed first versions of humans (such as the Wood people of Mayan mythology) provides a correct account of aliens trying out a few different forms before settling on special old us. In discussing this, the show quotes nearly verbatim and without acknowledgement part of Zecharia Sitchin’s Twelfth Planet to the effect that “Sumerian texts, too, speak of deformed humans created by Enki and the Mother Goddess (Ninhursag) in the course of their efforts to fashion a perfect Primitive Worker.” (The text really does exist; there is a poem about Ninhursag getting drunk and creating barren women and eunuchs. It is known as “Enki and Ninmah (or Numah)” and appears in Sumerian Mythology by S. N. Kramer, from which Sitchin learned of it. A more recent translation is here. However, it is only one variation on the creation myth and is contradicted by several others.) Segment 2 The second segment deals with the so-called Hobbits of Flores in Indonesia and the Denisovans in Russia. Redfern doesn’t quite understand the idea of isolated populations developing their own genetic traits, so he believes that these different species popped up independently of the rest of humanity. Here the narrator brings up the concept of punctuated equilibrium, but David Childress doesn’t quite understand what the narrator just finished saying about this view of evolution. Therefore, instead of following the narrator in suggesting that space aliens are creating the conditions that lead to sudden change, he and the other talking heads speculate whether species “come out of the incubator” on the aliens’ timetable. The narrator asserts that aliens killed off other human species to make room for us. Segment 3 The third segment discusses Neanderthals and their relative cultural sophistication and mental acuity. Redfern alleges that aliens killed the Neanderthals to “purify” our species because humans were having too much sex with Neanderthals. George Noory says that the aliens used Noah’s Flood to do this, despite the show having literally done whole episodes devoted to placing Noah’s Flood in other time periods, specifically at the end of the last ice age. Segment 4 The fourth segment deals with haplogroups, particularly haplogroup X, which is shared by people in both the Old World and the New. The show alleges that science cannot explain this (untrue: the same variant of haplogroup X occurs in native Siberians, the likely origin of Native American haplogroup X) and therefore aliens must be involved, via the Giants (the Nephilim), whom David Childress thinks were carriers of this haplogroup. This lets the show discuss the familiar old material about the Smithsonian records of giant bones, and the Adena burial mound that the show filmed back in January, and which I discussed back when they did the filming. William Henry alleges that the Smithsonian has been suppressing these reports, a claim that David Childress invented out of whole cloth in the early 1990s. Henry says that giant bones prove evolution is false, and Childress offers up the giant bones as proof that the Sons of God really did mate with human women. This is about as logical as arguing that the existence of fire proves Prometheus was real. Segment 5 The isolated and unusual Basque language, and the Basque population’s high concentration of Rh-negative blood, are used to suggest alien intervention. This is because Rh-negative blood is incompatible with Rh-positive blood, and none of the talking heads can fathom the idea of a mutation emerging spontaneously in an area such as Europe. George Noory says that Rh-negative people “evolved” from a “different species” than other humans. This is roughly like arguing that people with blue eyes come from another planet. It’s hard to convey just how little these people understand about even the most basic high school level evolutionary concepts. However, rather than harp on it, I will instead remind you that Ancient Aliens borrowed this material from a common claim circulating among David Icke, Nick Redfern, and online clickbait sites, which in turn has also given rise to wildly racist rants. Segment 6
As the show grinds to an ignominious close, David Wilcock tells us that human beings are currently undergoing rapid evolution, recycling false claims from earlier episodes that human genes are 7% different than in 3000 (or 5000) BCE. William Henry tells us that the aliens are changing us into “celestial beings” who will fly off into the stars. Linda Moulton Howe has a darker vision, and she says that we are “being replaced” by a new hybrid alien species. In other words, illegal aliens are outbreeding us into extinction and taking over our country through their fertile, fertile loins—a Trumpian notion entirely of a piece with the current political climate.
68 Comments
Ph
7/23/2016 12:12:41 am
I am seriously in need of a dose of Richard Dawkins after that.
Reply
Time Machine
7/23/2016 03:47:50 am
Richard Dawkins reminds of a baby that was marooned on a desert island that had never heard of God, religion, miracles or The Bible,
Reply
Only Me
7/23/2016 12:24:19 am
Such...virtually nonexistent...understanding of evolution, mutation, environmental factors that affect them and genetics. Now I know why it's aliens. These people really don't know what they're talking about and lack both imagination and the ambition to learn.
Reply
bkd69
7/23/2016 01:39:14 am
They're actually beginning to convince me. I can see where mere humans might be unable to understand natural philosophy and all its attendant branches, without the intervention of aliens, uplifting them, and granting them the gifts of critical thought, reasoning and deduction, and even the ability to transit the boundaries between educational institutions and the rest of the planet.
Reply
TONY S.
6/29/2019 12:49:22 pm
Have you see what they've claimed about marine life? There is no branch of science these imbeciles understand in the slightest; none they won't insult with their drivel.
Reply
John
7/23/2016 04:50:28 am
"William Henry tells us that the aliens are changing us into “celestial beings” who will fly off into the stars."
Reply
Time Machine
7/23/2016 05:38:02 am
And the Apocalypse
Reply
David Bradbury
7/23/2016 11:27:56 am
Time Machine:
Time Machine
7/23/2016 11:49:32 am
The accounts of Jesus Christ given in the Gospels is given in past tense, therefore the Apocalypse is depicted as something that is going to happen in the future..
David Bradbury
7/23/2016 11:57:57 am
Time Machine, I repeat:
Time Machine
7/23/2016 12:01:32 pm
Matthew 24:27
David Bradbury
7/23/2016 02:39:18 pm
The synoptic tradition includes a concept "the days of the Son of Man", described in similar terms as a future event (e.g. see Luke 21:28) beginning with an arrival everywhere simultaneously, in Mark 13:24-27, Luke 21:25-27, and Matthew 24:29-31. In these synoptic Gospels, the concept is explained by Christ to his disciples, without labouring the point that these events will take place after his apparent death (though in Mark 13:34 he likens the situation to a man going away and leaving his servants to take good care of the house until he returns).
Time Machine
7/23/2016 02:57:17 pm
The existence of written Gospels was first given by Justin Martyr during the second century and his quotations were not identical to what appeared later in Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
Time Machine
7/23/2016 02:59:22 pm
>>>Paul, writing after the Crucifixion and Resurrection<<<
David Bradbury
7/23/2016 04:04:26 pm
From the very first chapter of his very first epistle, what Paul (followed by Matthew) calls the "parousia" ["coming"] explicitly involves a return of Jesus to earth from heaven.
Time Machine
7/23/2016 04:55:16 pm
Paul refers to the Apocalypse, that was imminent.
Time Machine
7/23/2016 05:05:00 pm
"For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first."
A Buddhist
7/23/2016 06:07:54 pm
But David Bradbury, please give a verse from the undisputed verses of Paul that refer to Jesus returning, or coming a second time. I believe that my fellow anti-Ishvarist is saying that within the undisputed verses of Paul that refer to Jesus's coming, none refer to his coming a second time or returning. Does this help you to refute him?
David Bradbury
7/23/2016 06:18:31 pm
From the very first chapter of his very first epistle, what Paul (followed by Matthew) calls the "parousia" ["coming"] explicitly involves a return of Jesus to earth from heaven. However, as also indicated in, for example, Mark 13:32, the return of Jesus from heaven will be initiated by the Father.
David Bradbury
7/23/2016 07:08:45 pm
Dear Buddhist,
A Buddhist
7/23/2016 07:53:17 pm
Mr Bradbury,
David Bradbury
7/23/2016 08:19:58 pm
Dear Buddhist,
A Buddhist
7/23/2016 09:34:10 pm
Mr. Bradbury,
Time Machine
7/24/2016 03:56:51 am
A blind man with a walking stick can see there is no reference to the Second Coming of Christ in 1 Thessalonians 4. And I have cited the passage demonstrating that.
Time Machine
7/24/2016 04:05:56 am
>>>Synoptic Tradition<<<
Time Machine
7/24/2016 04:27:53 am
>>>The letters of Paul, which describe Jesus as born of a woman, of the seed of David, etc. This suggests that Jesus lived upon the Earth<<<
David Bradbury
7/24/2016 04:59:01 am
Dear Buddhist,
David Bradbury
7/24/2016 05:09:24 am
"David Bradbury keeps merging together Pauline texts with the later second century Gospels and refuses to accept that the two very different things just cannot be harmonised."
Time Machine
7/24/2016 05:27:08 am
>>backed up by the word of living witnesses<<
David Bradbury
7/24/2016 06:21:08 am
As I stated:
A Buddhist
7/24/2016 08:18:43 am
Mr. Bradbury,
David Bradbury
7/24/2016 09:13:39 am
Dear Buddhist,
Time Machine
7/24/2016 09:28:21 am
>>>"Paul was not a witness, so he left the work of describing the events in question to those with more authority."<<<
Time Machine
7/24/2016 09:35:44 am
Jesus Christ was another rebooted version of the Son of Man theology within Judaism that originated in the Book of Daniel.
David Bradbury
7/24/2016 10:38:50 am
"The year will be 20016, not 2016 and still there will be no Second Coming because Christianity is just another religion."
Time Machine
7/24/2016 02:54:07 pm
Forget the atheist rubbish
David Bradbury
7/24/2016 03:49:48 pm
"Paul did not believe in a physical resurrection - and because Paul's Jesus was incorporeal that was why his writings were deemed important to the Gnostics,"
Time Machine
7/25/2016 04:48:42 am
I just provided one example from Paul's writings. There are many more examples. The attempt to harmonise Paul with the Gospels is only made by the most extreme Christian fundamentalists (although it should be also noted that extreme fundamentalists hate the writings by Paul, there are two categories).
David Bradbury
7/25/2016 08:14:22 am
The non-sequitur remains dumb. You have not understood Paul's function (or his brilliance).
Clete
7/23/2016 11:53:18 am
I can believe in the concept of Aliens continuing to monitor us, their creation, and sometimes making mistakes. That would explain Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Ozzy Osbourne and the Kardasians.
Reply
Clete
7/23/2016 12:08:57 pm
Time Machine...The topic tonight is delivery times for Domino's Pizza in Orange county, California. Could you turn that into your normal, repetitive anti Bible, anti-religious rant.
Reply
Kathleen
7/23/2016 01:35:26 pm
If you ate one last week and then ordered one today, wouldn't the arrival of that pizza be the Second Coming?
Reply
justanotherskeptic
7/24/2016 05:00:55 pm
A second coming would require the first pizza to resurrect.
Sha
7/23/2016 12:56:58 pm
I caught a few minutes of this yesterday and pretty much screamed at my TV about how they didn't understand even the most basic anthropology, biology, and science in general. Then I gave up and settled on Ice Age: Continental Drift. Surprisingly, that movie felt more scientifically accurate, even though it featured a squirrel causing the break up of Pangaea by bouncing around the Earth's core.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
7/23/2016 01:53:23 pm
Gotta love how William Henry thinks people who are seven feet tall don't fit into our evolutionary model.
Reply
V
7/23/2016 03:12:45 pm
"The narrator asserts that aliens killed off other human species to make room for us."
Reply
crainey
7/23/2016 04:53:19 pm
I haven't been watching the show recently but I did catch this one (probably becasue the RNC convention was over and I needed my daily dose of dread.) They stated that H. Sapien and Neanderthalensis overlapped by 1000 years. Wow! That is pretty exact for pre-history. Also the whole alien hybrid thing took me back to the X-Files. I should have just dug out my old DVD of Planet of the Apes instead. (In fact the whole series could have replaced the RNC convention and I'd probably end up feeling better about the future than I do now.)
Reply
Shane Sullivan
7/23/2016 05:32:58 pm
Yeah, that thing about overlap was a little misleading. I assume they meant modern humans and Neanderthals interacted, or at least lived in the same areas, for about 1,000 years; the species actually overlapped chronologically for about 160,000.
Reply
Titus pullo
7/23/2016 05:47:13 pm
Come on Jason the tie in to trump was lacking in logic. Trump isn't the neocon here making the world safe for democracy Goldman Sachs and cronyism. That's Clinton. And he makes good points on trade. Unless you are ready to end tariffs and more importantly end currency pegs it's really mercantilism not free trade. His tendency to be mistaken on the failed war on drugs does concern me but the dystopian narrative was created by the dnc and quickly adopted by the statist press. You are smarter than to take that propaganda. If Bernie had railed against big business crony banks and an out of control fed pull u say he was threatening neoliberalism? Trump is a very flawed messenger but elites on both sides have created a kleptocracy where if u are well connected u do very well. Peter Thiel speech was very good. The so called enlightened classes cling to failed economic theories and justifications that they know best. Turns out they don't. Sound money, free markets, limited govt and peace (no more stupid wars instigated by neocons) are the policies we need. Trump might come off as short but my kids have less chance to be sent to the middle east to fight and die for lets be honest liberals who have other nations on the brain. How many thousands has trump killed in Libya or in Yemen? Liberalism becomes totalitarianism because it must be instituted by force.
Reply
7/23/2016 06:36:30 pm
Trump's policies (or lack thereof) are not the issue, but rather the deep risk he poses to the very concept of liberal democracy through his own hostility toward its norms and values. He's a wannabe strongman limited only by his own laziness.
Reply
Jennygirl00
7/26/2016 05:46:52 am
I totally agree with ur comments on Trump. I don't think he actually graps what the presidents job is. A president doesn't come in and say I want this, that and this to happen. He's clueless. The president if he does want something passed he has to convince the house and senate that what he wants even deserves a bill to be written up sent thru congress and by it gets back to the president the bill usually looks totally different than what was presented initially. Trumps not used to working in an environment where what he wants he most likely won't get. Oh I'm sure he's thinking I'll get what i want thru executive order .. Yea good luck with that trump. He's just a joke. Imagine him meeting with world leaders. He could set our country back in a time wen we need to move forward. What does he know about making policy. He knows how to get lobbyists to do his bidding. I just think if he did get elected it would be so bad for America and depending on what damage he does we could be stuck paying for it for years to come.
V
7/24/2016 01:44:09 pm
*snort* No, your kids would have a much greater chance of being part of concentration camps and war crimes, or victims of World War III, with Trump in charge, because the man's idea of diplomacy is to go out of his way to piss people off.
Reply
Time Machine
7/25/2016 04:21:09 am
Some pea-brained woman with an IQ of 49 interested in UFOs will not pose an electoral threat to Donald Trump, the future president.
Thegrim
7/23/2016 07:44:06 pm
What the f does Trump have to do with this episode you Clinton supporting idiot?
Reply
7/23/2016 07:53:45 pm
Well, if we must be literal about it, nothing, which is why I discussed the thematic connection between the decline of the old political and social order and the rise of fear-mongering ideologies. But, in a more literal sense: Erich von Daniken has advocated for politically conservative politicians (even trying--and failing--to advise Gerald Ford on using UFOs to win reelection) and the ancient astronaut theory as developed through him took on a number of conservative casts, distinct from the socialist/liberal version that predominated in the 1950s and early 1960s.
Reply
A Buddhist
7/23/2016 10:07:48 pm
What is a conservative? and a liberal? these are merely labels that try and fail to reduce complex policy positions into one-word category members.
Time Machine
7/24/2016 04:10:23 am
Donald Trump will be the next American President. Trump has already been nominated as the official Republican candidate.
GEE
7/23/2016 08:16:06 pm
I just watched the episode, and then read through your work Jason, brilliant as usual.. and it seems that I am an Alien, because, I do indeed have RH- Blood. I was so interested in this segment and how it related to the subject of the show. Thegrim, if you actually read the article, you wouldn't of asked such a stupid question with such hostility. Or are you just hear to annoy us ?
Reply
John
7/23/2016 09:58:22 pm
GEE, I saw your post on Andy's blog and didn't know if you got the link to the Amazon fiasco. Here it is:
Reply
GEE
7/24/2016 08:57:28 pm
I did John thank you! I replied on the other blog!!
A C
7/24/2016 10:05:54 am
The 'Enki and Ninmah' story has nothing to do with human origins. Its about the ordering of society and social care for invalids. The point of the story is that the god of wisdom and civilisation can find uses for the natural world's mistakes.
Reply
V
7/24/2016 01:37:58 pm
AC, most creation myths do in face contain some form of myth that talks about the origins of societal structure, as well. In the Greek, it includes the Pandora myth, which no one claims is what created mankind, only the ills that mankind faces. In Norse mythology, it's the story of Heimdall and the three different couples he gave children to, creating the three basic classes of Norse society. In Japanese mythology, it's the story of Amaterasu's grandson and Three Sacred Treasures. None of these stories start out with "And in the beginning, all was chaos/darkness/emptiness/whatever," but they're all part of the creation myth cycles of their cultures.
Reply
justanotherskeptic
7/24/2016 05:12:51 pm
My mom was Rh negative. Does that make me a partial alien? Doubtful as I have no desire to fool with evolution.
Reply
Only Me
7/24/2016 06:04:26 pm
I guess you're one of those new hybrid alien species meant to replace humanity.
Reply
GEE
7/24/2016 09:01:03 pm
@just another skeptic, you can't have partial RH - blood, it's either all or nothing. During the show they stayed that pregnant mothers need medical intervention, you cannot mix the RH - with the new baby's blood, the baby is at risk of dying. This is a true fact as I have two of my own children.
Reply
John (the other one)
7/25/2016 10:26:08 am
So weird when Time Machine takes on the alter ego of The Buddhist. Perhaps one Internet Troll being is not big enough for the over-opionated and under-educated ego of the Time Machine.
Reply
Jennygirl00
7/26/2016 07:05:37 am
Ancient aliens == The Prototypes
Reply
Palpie
7/30/2016 01:04:14 am
"William Henry tells us that the aliens are changing us into “celestial beings” who will fly off into the stars. Linda Moulton Howe has a darker vision, and she says that we are “being replaced” by a new hybrid alien species."
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
November 2024
|