In the penultimate episode of the third season of Forbidden History, host Jamie Theakston went in search of Satan, in an episode that never quite rises to the level of the infamous Ancient Aliens episode that asked viewers to worship Lucifer as the embodiment of cosmic good. “Inside the Cult of Satan” (S03E05) instead is overly concerned with whether people enjoy sex too much, and if this might threaten Christian morality. To make that case, it tells us that there are more than 100,000 Satanists in the world, a number that is growing according to ghost hunter Richard Felix because of a rejection of puritanical Christianity in search of hedonism. “Hallelujah! Praise the new Lord,” Felix proclaims sarcastically. Heather Osborn, a fringe radio host, engages in moral panic by proclaiming that “dark” television programs are leading teenagers to embrace Satan, with the implication that this is why they are sexually active. Granted, 100,000 Satanists would be roughly double the reported number of Scientologists, but it’s fewer than just the number of American Quakers, which stands at more than 350,000. And nobody talks about panic over global Quaker takeovers. Felix, though, alleges that thanks to the Church of Satan, Satanism is huge in America because Americans love “cults.” Only in an offhand way does the show concede that the Church of Satan isn’t actually a Satan-worshiping cult but more of an anti-Christian protest movement.
Theakston, though, will have none of it and instead alleges that the worship of Satan is “as old as our civilization” but kept “underground” due to Christian oppression. This is undoubtedly untrue since Satan as a figure only develops around the time of Christ, and didn’t really take off until Christianity was established. Similarly, the eighteenth century “Hellfire Club” Theakston next explores isn’t a Satanic cult but rather the Order of the Friars of St. Francis of Wycombe, a hedonistic club where, along with others that imitated it, rich people would gather to have orgies and make fun of religion. Even Felix manages to correctly identify that this club had nothing to do with Satan, but Heretic Magazine’s resident imbecile Andrew Gough lustfully declares the club “the real Fifty Shades of Grey,” apparently without recognizing that Satanism and BDSM are not synonymous or interchangeable. The show gives an enormous amount of time to a libertine club that wasn’t really Satanist, but the youthful guide to the club’s underground meetinghouse suggests that the club “indoctrinated” lords and ladies into pagan rites, which again are not the same as Satanic rites. “It was more of a pagan sex club than it was anything else,” Gough concedes, and the producers of the show seem unable to distinguish between paganism and Satanism. This is hardly different from the Romantic spirit that animated Gothic fiction, which drew on the same mix of the occult and the medieval in search of an antidote to Enlightenment. Just before the halfway point, we finally change topic and move on to exorcism, and the show films a “recreation of a typical exorcism” conducted by an exorcist, Chris Thompson, who says that business is booming. This is nothing new; 15 years ago Michael W. Cuneo documented the rise in exorcisms and attributed them to a number of causes: first to the movie The Exorcist in the 1970s, and later, in the 1990s, to the explosion in biblical fundamentalism as an extremist counterpoint to perceived secular materialism. The decline in mainstream religion, therefore, Cuneo said, led to more extreme religious belief among a smaller number of people and demonic possession became a sort of proof of faith. Thompson doesn’t know if demons are real, but he exorcizes them anyway. Gough believes that exorcisms are simply a show in which the exorcist and the possessed participate in a theatrical folie à deux, or even a fraud, and here he is supported by Cuneo’s research. Stopped clocks are right twice a day! Felix alleges that demonic possession is Christian in origin, though this is also untrue. I have a book on my shelf called Possession: Demoniacal and Other by T. K. Oestererreich that, for all its faults, documents that what we call demonic possession—and therefore exorcism—is found everywhere on earth and all times, not just among Christians. The show’s producers are either intentionally catering to Christian chauvinism or are genuinely ignorant of the world beyond the Bible. Next Theakston discusses the life and times of Aleister Crowley, whom Felix takes pains to tell us “was not a Satanist” but rather a sex-obsessed occultist. The show keeps emphasizing Crowley’s sex life and his cult’s Sicilian orgies, and there’s more than a hint of puritanical titillation behind the producers’ choices. Gough agrees that Crowley was an occultist and a practitioner of ritual magic, which again forces us to ask whether a show ostensibly about Satan has any actual Satanism in it. Crowley, Felix says, was probably “a dirty old perv,” though no one, he says, knows for sure whether he was really in contact with spirts or aliens. Again, though, despite the gleeful descriptions of bisexual orgies and Gough’s speculation that Crowley engaged in human sacrifice, there’s not a hint of Satan. However, the program then discusses the Order of the Nine Angles, a 1980s Satanic group that combined ritual magic, Aryan supremacy, and space colonization, though with no further discussion. One talking head, Aron Paramor—identified as an “occult historian” but better known as an actor (he has never published any occult history so far as I can find)—describes the various types of Satanism, including the Temple of Set and the Order of the Trapezoid, which he says has “an H. P. Lovecraftian feeling.” Here we’re getting into Lovecraftian ceremonial magic, with its intentional claim that Lovecraft had a real connection to the Old Ones, who are not Satanic. This type of Satanism, as the show notes, is Satanism in name only rather than a genuine veneration of Lucifer. Next up we discuss the Black Mass, the ritual inversion of the Catholic mass, though even Heather Osborn, no deep thinker, doubts the polemical descriptions of the Black Mass. Paramor thinks that our society is becoming more Satanic, and Gough believes that Satanism is a better fit for our times because, again, of Fifty Shades of Grey, which he feels symbolizes the libertinism that opposes traditional morality. Theakston concludes that Satanism is a “protest vote against the Church,” which is weird on two counts, first because in England (especially compared to America) religious belief is markedly low, and second because the 100,000 alleged Satanists identified at the start of the hour represent a vanishingly small percentage of the world’s 7.1 billion people. The show and its talking heads didn’t actually go in search of the cult of Satan; instead, they delivered an hour-long polemic in favor of Victorian social mores by doing what the Church once did: declaring the enjoyment of sex to be representative of communion with demons.
54 Comments
Time Machine
4/4/2016 11:46:20 am
> Christian morality
Reply
Time Machine
4/4/2016 11:54:36 am
> in England (especially compared to America) religious belief is markedly low
Reply
DaveR
4/4/2016 11:47:10 am
Let's see, go to church every Sunday and listen to how I'm a bad person and I'm going to burn in hell for all eternity, then they demand my money, or go to a pagan sex orgy? Hmmmmm...this is tough choice.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
4/5/2016 01:43:05 pm
Watch your step around those pagan divinities, though. If I learned one thing the Pirates of Caribbean film franchise, it's that Calypso has crabs.
Reply
Clete
4/4/2016 11:55:39 am
This being an election year, it is hard not to believe in demonic possession. All one needs to do is attend a Donald Trump rally.
Reply
Time Machine
4/4/2016 12:03:06 pm
President Donald Trump.
Reply
DaveR
4/4/2016 12:29:21 pm
Since you appear to have amazing powers of precognition, would be every so kind as to provide me with next week's winning Power Ball numbers? Thanks.
Time Machine
4/4/2016 12:33:48 pm
It's Obama who made Trump the next President.
DaveR
4/4/2016 01:04:40 pm
That's not answering my question.
Birds of a Feather
4/4/2016 05:54:48 pm
Time Machine has exhibited wishful thinking many times before. SSDD.
Time Machine
4/4/2016 07:14:06 pm
Correction: It is not "wishful thinking".
Birds of a Feather
4/5/2016 04:54:18 pm
Put it however you want. I have no love for Hilary either but I'd love to hear your reasoning behind how you think Trump would be any better.
Time Machine
4/6/2016 01:19:32 am
The candidates for the next Presidency are ALL a bunch of jerks.
Birds of a Feather
4/6/2016 11:26:43 am
You dodge the question. So what makes your precious Trump any less of a "jerk"?
Kathleen
4/4/2016 12:46:46 pm
If Richard Felix believes that demonic possession is Christian in origin, then I think that the Bible disproves his assertion. In the New Testament, Jesus casts out demons from folk who were certainly pre-Christian Jews. And that brings me to my question. Did the Jews have a ritual to remove demons from their people? I am no longer familiar with the Old Testament.
Reply
Time Machine
4/4/2016 12:53:10 pm
Pre-Christian Jews did not believe in the Devil.
Reply
Kathleen
4/4/2016 01:06:36 pm
I think that the Satan and demons were separate entities. I could be wrong, that's why I asked.
Kathleen
4/4/2016 01:11:59 pm
Oh, and Satan was a key figure in the Book of Job
Time Machine
4/4/2016 01:25:09 pm
The character in the Book of Job is different to the Christian devil.
Kelley Price
10/8/2016 06:07:24 pm
Genesis is the first book of the OT (the Pentateuch), the holy text of the Jews, how is it that, "The concept of the Devil within Christianity originated in the Genesis story of the Garden of Eden," and, "There is no devil in the Old Testament." are both true?
David Bradbury
4/4/2016 03:05:39 pm
I'd never consciously heard of Aron Paramor in any context, so imagine my surprise on finding him in this article from 2002:
Reply
David Bradbury
4/4/2016 03:09:38 pm
Oh wow! The following year he appeared in an episode of The Basil Brush Show!
Reply
Kal
4/4/2016 03:16:49 pm
Satan was present in the old testament as well as the new, under various names, not just in the time of Christ when they gave him that name.
Reply
Weatherwax
4/4/2016 04:13:53 pm
King Henry VIII was not genetically unable to have sons. He actually had one son, who died young. That the rest were daughters was just chance.
Reply
V
4/4/2016 06:04:29 pm
1. Henry VIII sired THREE monarchs, not one--beginning with his SON, Edward VI, who was sired on his third wife, Jane Seymour, was crowned at age 9 and died by age 16; his first daughter, Mary I, sired on his first wife, Catherine of Aragon; and then his second daughter, Elizabeth I, who was sired on his second wife, Anne Boleyn, over which the Anglican Church was formed so Henry could divorce the wife he hated and ra...marry a younger model. Your knowledge of history is abysmal.
Reply
Time Machine
4/4/2016 07:06:24 pm
Paul never uses the words "Original Sin" but he describes the equivalent.
Time Machine
4/4/2016 07:26:08 pm
The term "Original Sin" first used by Augustine of Hippo in Quaestiones ad Simplicianum.
Time Machine
4/4/2016 07:32:28 pm
"For as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive" (1 Corinthians 15:22)
Uncle Ron
4/4/2016 03:19:28 pm
The actual movie that (more or less) mimics the Hellfire Club is "Eyes Wide Shut" with Tom Cruise.
Reply
Clete
4/4/2016 04:15:14 pm
I actually went and paid money to see "Eyes Wide Shut". I walked out of the theater wondering how Stanley Kubrick, Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman could make sex boring...but they did.
Reply
Ph
4/4/2016 03:36:06 pm
Satanic is not only what it used to be.
Reply
Joseph Craven
4/4/2016 04:47:46 pm
Of course nobody fears a Quaker takeover. We're a very mellow people. And besides, so many of you outsiders are convinced that we're peaceful, backwards amish analogues that the revolution will take you entirely by surprise.
Reply
Uncle Ron
4/4/2016 08:15:18 pm
Please just tell me that you will continue to make oat meal.
Reply
Joseph Craven
4/5/2016 12:59:02 am
Its consumption will be mandatory in the new order. The Quaker Oats company and their perpetuation of the harmless quaint quaker image was a key element in our subterfuge.
Kal
4/4/2016 06:52:16 pm
Henry was incapable of producing 'viable male heirs', as the only male one died. Ergo the rather hind sighed comment still applies. Girl baby takes over later. Nine year old boy who dies only 7 years later doesn't count. He banished or beheaded the females he didn't like because they did not make him the children he wanted, and he recreated the church there so he could fool around. History later speculates, not proves of course, that it was because he didn't have as much XY sperm. He had more XX sperm. (Speculation as there is no way to genetically test it).
Reply
Time Machine
4/4/2016 07:11:17 pm
The story of the Garden of Eden is pivotal to Christianity. It didn't mean that much to Judaism (and still doesn't today).
Reply
Clint Knapp
4/5/2016 03:49:53 am
Edward VI died at the age of 15 to illness. That does not qualify him as an inviable heir, merely a young man who died of health issues common to his time.
Reply
Time Machine
4/5/2016 04:19:44 am
Clint Knapp,
Time Machine
4/5/2016 04:24:38 am
That was a 637 word-long message from Clint Knapp - about absolutely nothing.
Clint Knapp
4/5/2016 04:27:01 am
Adorable. The troll who pastes book summaries from Amazon is accusing me of plagiarism.
Time Machine
4/5/2016 04:35:15 am
There have been many claims here on this blog that nowhere in the New Testament is the serpent in the Garden of Eden identified as Satan, That does not matter if the implication exists in the first place. If the implication never existed then the identification would never have been made later on in later Christianity.
Time Machine
4/5/2016 04:48:35 am
Justin Martyr was rhe first Christian to identify the Serpent with Satan (Dialogue with Trypho, chapters 45 & 79).
Birds of a Feather
4/5/2016 04:59:11 pm
Yeah, you didn't write 637 words, you've written untold thousands and we're all still less than impressed, though you are worth a laugh here and there, I'll grant you.
Time Machine
4/6/2016 01:21:39 am
You're less than impressed because you're a stooge of convention.
Birds of a Feather
4/6/2016 11:29:56 am
LOL, oh poor GIGO, he's a lone wolf fighting to enlighten us all about the French Revolution. YAWN
Birds of a Feather
4/6/2016 01:46:20 pm
I do apologise for my silly behaviour.
Time Machine
4/6/2016 05:17:01 pm
I also apologize for my complete inability to grasp anything that hasn't been funneled through the mindset of senile Victorians.
Shane Sullivan
4/5/2016 01:32:34 am
"I have a book on my shelf called Possession: Demoniacal and Other by T. K. Oestererreich that, for all its faults, documents that what we call demonic possession—and therefore exorcism—is found everywhere on earth and all times, not just among Christians."
Reply
4/5/2016 06:37:56 am
Honestly, I picked up the "Possession" book at a used book sale for $1 just because the title looked like the kind of thing a horror movie villain would have on his bookshelf, and I thought it would look amusing next to my copy of "Head-Hunting in the Solomon Islands."
Reply
Shane Sullivan
4/5/2016 01:59:48 pm
Right between the Dee Necronomicon and a dog-eared copy of "Good Eatin' with Ed Gein", no doubt!
Kal
4/5/2016 03:17:33 pm
Henry. As I said, I got most of my info from movies and the net, not from studying English Kings, so thanks for the background, but I will have to later research it. It was not expecting a lecture, but had given one, so that's what I get.
Reply
Time Machine
4/6/2016 01:22:59 am
What has the issue of Henry VIII got to do with anything
Reply
Time Machine
4/6/2016 01:25:46 am
>>Genesis was so a big part of Hebrew texts as it was the beginning where Sin entered the world.<<
Reply
Joey zzzzz
3/17/2018 03:26:01 am
I was blown away by how hyperbolic (and borderline dishonest) this show’s take on satanism was. They constantly convoluted paganism and libertinism with satanism. Not to mention all the “scary” images and filters used liberally throughout to basically convey the message. that everything is satanic. I’m no expert in satanism but I know enough to see right through all the bullshit guests and their editorial stances to make a “documentary” about the imminent rise of satanism and scare the bejesus out of the woefully ignorant!!
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
October 2024
|