It doesn’t even make for good comedy. As with the previous episode, the “jokes” barely count as humor, and it’s somewhat disturbing how seriously Riggle seems to be taking his role as cable TV “mystery” investigator, even though it must have been obvious to him that this was stupid. The humor component is even smaller than the previous episode, and aside from a few bits of insult comedy and some half-assed quips, this could have been passed unchanged as an episode of America Unearthed. Expedition Unknown is funnier, and more factual.
The episode opens with the Knights Templar in 1187, during the Crusades, and things are off to a bad start when Riggle misidentifies the Templars as controlling “the Temple of Solomon,” which the show illustrates with a CGI mockup of the Temple. Solomon’s temple was destroyed in 587 BCE, and even the second Temple, which replaced it, was long gone when the Templars arrived. The Dome of the Rock, then as now, stood on the site. Riggle asserts that the Templars found the cup Jesus drank from at the Last Supper beneath the Temple, a conflation of a number of twentieth century conspiracy theories, including modern claims that the Templars found the Ark of the Covenant beneath the Temple Mount. Riggle outright asserts that the Templars spirited the Grail to Scotland, a claim that has no basis in fact, and none in myth, either. It is a modern fabrication. He then shows Templar tunnels in Gilmerton near Edinburgh, with some fake news footage. He meets with Tony McMahon, a blogger who appeared on America Unearthed last year to offer conspiracy theories about the Templars, and on Forbidden History before that. Once again, he is described as a “historian” although his only published work on the Templars is a novel. Riggle jokes that McMahon’s droning history of the Templars “made me sleepy,” and he isn’t wrong. Riggle travels to GIlmerton Cove to look at the “Templar” tunnel system, which he presents as a new discovery, although it has been open to the public since 2003. Although the show asserts directly that the Templars carved the entire cavern system, there is no archaeological consensus that the caverns are the work of Templars. Many believe it was the work of blacksmith George Paterson, who was the first recorded owner of the site, in the 1700s, and who lived in it. The show’s “expert” on tunnels immediately links Masonic symbols carved in the tunnels to Templars, and Riggle asserts without evidence that many people “believe” that the Masons are the continuation of the Templars, though there is no evidence for this, especially with the 400-year gap between the two organizations. Naturally, the tunnels are empty, so Riggle plans to use ground-penetrating radar in the hope of finding more secret tunnels that could house the Holy Grail, though—and it’s hard not to emphasize this—there is absolutely no evidence that the Holy Grail ever existed, had been found in the Middle Ages, or had been brought to Scotland. This episode is emptier than the Forbidden History episode that also wanted to find the Grail in the U.K. Next, Riggle travels to Temple, Scotland, which the show weirdly insists was named “Town of Warriors,” though that was never its English name. The town, once known as Balantrodoch, which translates as “town of warriors,” was the location of the Templar preceptory until the suppression of the order. The show’s next “expert,” Karl Ude-Martinez, claims that the Sinclair family housed the Templars after the fall of the order and William Sinclair used them to fight a 1314 battle near Rosslyn, after which he erected the infamous Rosslyn Chapel. This cannot be true. Rosslyn Chapel was built by William Sinclair, 1st Earl of Caithness, in the mid-1400s. For a moment, I thought the “historian” was referring to a ruined structure that predated Rosslyn Chapel, in Roslin Cemetery, but he specifically spoke about the current Rosslyn Chapel. While named as a “military historian” on the show, Ude-Martinez identifies as an actor. His previous nonfiction TV experience involved presenting stories about horses on Animal Planet. I could find no record of any historical work by him. Fiona Rogan, whom you’ve seen on every other Templar pseudo-documentary of the past decade, shows Riggle around Rosslyn Chapel, and Riggle accuses her of hiding the Grail and “the embalmed head of Christ” among other fictitious items in the chapel’s pillars. Riggle claims that Rogan “slipped up” by revealing the existence of a sealed vault beneath the chapel, leading to a badly staged bit of prop comedy involving Riggle’s sledgehammer. Riggle offers a number of conspiracy theories and describes an illegal excavation that uncovered a tunnel from the chapel to the River Esk. Riggle meets with Iain Grimston, another supposed historian who is not. Grimston’s website says he is a novelist and a former journalist and manager at Rosslyn Chapel. Once again, Riggle starts scanning for hidden tunnels, this time with LiDaR, with Grimston offering quasi-factual information about “Templar” tunnels to a chapel built 150 years too later to have anything to do with Templars. Grimston takes him to a tunnel along the river that the show claims is medieval. Riggle crawls into it and finds nothing but the bones of a dead animal and a dead end. More staged comedy about Riggle’s hammer follows. The show ends with the claim that the tunnels would have connected with Rosslyn Chapel. Riggle speaks with archaeologist Klint Janulis, who specializes in the Paleolithic and has appeared on other shows from Discovery’s portfolio of shitty documentaries. Janulis tells Riggle that the tunnel could be medieval, though he offers no evidence for his reasoning. He then, apropos of nothing, asserts that it could be associated with the Templars (dating would be sort of important for that) and tells Riggle to find artifacts from the Templars in the tunnel. [Update: On Twitter, Janulis told me that he did not identify the tunnel as medieval, so it seems that his comments were edited.] Riggle ends the show by claiming, facetiously, like every other cable host, that someday he’ll get a permit and do the actual archaeological work to prove the Holy Grail is hidden inside the tunnel, but until that day he will continue to make bad TV for big bucks. Sorry, wait… that last bit was my joke, and also funnier than the stale half-assed quips that passed for comedy in this woeful hour of recycled internet conspiracy garbage. So what, exactly, is Rob Riggle: Global Investigator? It isn’t funny enough to be a comedy. It isn’t factual enough to be a documentary. It’s just another pseudo-history “mystery” show recycling the same old tired lies, just with an even more ignorant asshole presenting them.
15 Comments
Knee
3/16/2020 04:57:52 pm
You know you have problems when Monty Python's Search for the Holy Grail has as many or more elements of fact in it than some programming that presumes to be documentary in nature.
Reply
Kent
3/16/2020 08:35:40 pm
Look at the graphic for the program. It's not meant to be taken seriously. Untwist thine undergarments!
Reply
Bubba Sinclair
3/16/2020 09:45:29 pm
I think we are all familiar with the old saying about horseshoes and hand grenades. The star of the show is a comedian especially noted for goofball roles. The clue phone should be ringing loudly about the intended light-hearted nature of the show. On the other hand the various fringe loons that Riggle frequently shares the spotlight with are advertised by the Discovery Channel on their website as "experts and scholars". This fiction is pushed in their on-screen descriptions. Unless Riggle is making full use of his comedic talent to poke big holes in chucklehead theories and expose pseudo-experts and pseudo-scholars then you can't fault those who have developed a twist or two in their step-ins.
Reply
Vinny
3/17/2020 03:09:06 am
Expedition Unknown and Expedition X are good quality and fun entertainment.
Reply
An Anonymous Nerd
3/17/2020 09:35:14 am
The show may be intended as a joke of some kind but there's an important point to be missed: My impression, based on how the show is described here and presented on the lead idiot's Twitter page
Reply
Kent
3/17/2020 12:20:20 pm
Life is too short to worry about babysitting other people and their intellectual fabric. It's beyond unrealistic to expect a corporate website to say in essence "We kinda suck."
Reply
Ojo
3/17/2020 02:01:14 pm
It's beyond realistic to expect a corporate website to say in essence "We kinda suck."
J Carucci
3/17/2020 03:27:45 pm
Hopefully people will not be overly perturbed by the fact that a skeptic wrote a skeptical review for a skeptic blog of a show that makes significant use of the sort of fringe talking heads whose work skeptics tend to write skeptical reviews of on skeptic blogs. Even when taking Mr. Riggle's brand of "pull my finger" humor into consideration.
Jim
3/17/2020 12:25:46 pm
" one idiot at a time and one curious but uninformed regular person at a time."
Reply
Jr. Time Lord
3/17/2020 03:04:53 pm
These responses to Rob Riggle are funny. Someone has handed finger-paints to a large passive-aggressive moose and you all are expecting a masterpiece. I wonder if the "G.I." is a play on him being a lieutenant colonel in the military?
Reply
G.I. Joe
3/17/2020 06:19:56 pm
An important point of these reviews is that you are not going to get a masterpiece no matter who you put in front of the camera in tthis type of programming. Doesn't matter if it is Riggle doing frat boy humor, Megan Fox playing the role of sex kitten in search of the truth, or ex-jock Scott Wolters smugly telling us that everything we learned about history is a lie. All tripe. The only issue is which formula will strike a cord with the gullible and make money.
Reply
Doc Rock
3/17/2020 08:07:14 pm
Bubba could be onto something. Why not a show where a guy like Riggle who is a combination of wiseass and Brother Bluto goes on a Borat style quest to investigate mysterious (read: hoaxes). But do it the opposite of how this stuff generally works.You know, like when Wolter gets a legitimate scholar on-camera under the guise of doing a serious interview but then cherry picks sound bites to make it look like they are agreeing with him. Instead lure fringe spokespeople on-camera and let the wiseass hit them with a bunch of gotcha questions developed by people like Colavito. Then do a lot of cherry picking of scenes of them looking like moerons and getting flustered, along with supplemental commentary by the wiseass and/or the real scholars who came up with the gotcha questions and can point out the myriad ways that the person is wrong and a wingnut.
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
3/17/2020 09:30:51 pm
Personally if we're going to do a fringe-show parody sitcom, I'd prefer Rhys Darby channeling Ashley Cowie, talking about how no past civilization could have built shopping malls.
Reply
Amber Miserreri
3/24/2020 12:10:08 am
It appears you don't understand what a conspiracy theory actually is.
Reply
Frank Burns
3/24/2020 06:16:52 pm
The concept of conspiracy theory takes on a particular meaning when looking at pseudoscience. That is because pseudoscientists are uniform in using it to explain why they can't get any where near proving whatever outlandish claim that they are making. its because of conspiracies great and small to suppress their work and any evidence that supports it.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
January 2025
|