According to my on-screen cable guide and the History.com episode guide, this episode of Search for the Lost Giants, S01E04, has no title. It is simply “#5,” even though it is the fourth episode to air. History.com lists the show title as “The Giant Curse” elsewhere on its website, so we’ll go with that. “To disrupt the holy ground that once belonged to past rulers with supernatural powers would be breaking the law,” says the opening quotation, attributed to King Nahmwarki of Nan Madol, but actually taken verbatim from a fringe history website. (It also appears in copied text on travel websites; I can find no record of it elsewhere, though it may be somewhere I do not have easy access to.) It is no ancient text but a modern one, and Nahmwarki isn’t a person but a title for a high chief. If the tourism website is correct, the line refers to the efforts of F. W. Christian to survey and explore Nan Madol in 1896, but the line does not appear in the racist book Christian wrote about Pohnpei in 1899. There, Christian describes the natives in racist terms and paid the king a $5 fee to bypass the restrictions on entering holy ground. It is possible that the line might come from a Spanish language account to which Christian refers; I do not know. We open with a recap of the previous four episodes, edited to suggest that the brothers Jim and Bill Vieira have actually discovered something related to giants. One of Jim Vieira’s neighbors, Al Peiropan, tells Vieira about the Micronesian stone city of Nan Madol on Pohnpei, where Peiropan recalls locals telling him not to violate the sanctity of the ancient citadel. I’m not aware of a close association between Nan Madol and giants, but David Hatcher Childress, writing in Ancient Micronesia, reported that an islander told him he had found a femur twice the size of a normal human femur. Japanese archaeologists, working to establish imperial claims over Micronesia after receiving a League of Nations mandate, claimed to have found “taller” skeletons that proved that the current population were not the first inhabitants of the island and therefore had no inherent rights to it. The Japanese took over Nan Madol from the former colonial power, Germany, and Search for the Lost Giants records some false information about the colonial governor dying from a curse. This was on Ancient Aliens, from the same production company, and the researchers simply recycled old research without correcting it. Therefore, my criticism from Ancient Aliens S06E09 still stands: Dr. Viktor Berg, the German colonial deputy governor of Pohnpei at the time, in fact died of sunstroke and exhaustion, according to the official records, shortly after excavating the tomb of Isokelekel. Later excavators of the tomb suffered no ill effects. The show fails to note that the “curse” was invoked at the time because Berg had been hated by the natives for his imposition of harsh German colonial policies, including disarmament and restrictions on cultural expression. It was part of native efforts to resist colonial rule, a constant source of tension during the German administration of the island. Isokelekel was the son of the Thunder God, but he is not typically described as a giant, so Peiropan is being a bit deceptive in arguing that Berg went hunting for giants. Nevertheless, the show rehearses the deaths of several people who went searching for giants in order to establish the claim that there is a curse that affects those who seek out big bones, and the Vieira brothers are in danger. And yet the Vieira brothers still live. The brothers take off for Catalina Island in California, where earlier this year Nephilim researcher L. A. Marzulli helped them to find archival information about the “giants” supposedly unearthed there by a con man and fraud, Ralph Glidden. Marzulli made an upset blog post after the Vieira brothers’ show declined to include Marzulli in the episode or give him credit for finding a particular photograph of a “giant” in the archives of Glidden’s museum. Terje Dahl, a Norwegian giant hunter who worked with Thor Heyerdahl, speaks with the brothers by video chat link and tells the brothers that Catalina Island may have been an outpost of the same legendary giants from Pacific Islander mythology. Jim Vieira and Ancient Aliens pundit Hugh Newman (now described as a “giant hunter”) contact a forensic sketch artist to ask him to draw a picture of a giant. To what end, I don’t know. After the break, the show tries to fabricate a giant “curse” by exploiting Terje Dahl’s hospitalization upon his arrival in Los Angeles, in a hospital that conveniently allowed a television crew to film in his hospital room. Dahl had trouble breathing after deplaning, and he asserts that “archaeologists” have told him that “my research on giants can be dangerous.” Dahl, an elderly man, suffered blood clots in his lungs, but the show seems to want us to believe that there is a supernatural component to the giants. Dahl, oddly enough, manages to have a “giant” tooth somewhere underneath his hospital gown, and he gives it to the brothers. He tells them that the tooth is actually a “replica” modeled on one from the Denisova Cave in Russia. The real tooth does in fact exist and belonged not to Homo sapiens but to the genetically distinct population of Denisovans, another branch of the human family tree. You can read about the tooth in National Geographic, where the conspiracy conveniently hid it from giant hunters. Oh, right: No one hid this. Dahl believes that the Denisovans were “more advanced than us” (meaning Paleolithic Homo sapiens) and populated the Pacific and North America, becoming the giants of old, the men of renown. Meanwhile Hugh Newman from Ancient Aliens is in New York City gathering data on giants for creating a sketch of giants, and Newman focuses on learning about double rows of teeth. He meets with a dental anthropologist Shara Bailey, who says she’s never seen double rows of teeth. She discusses supernumerary teeth, which she says were not uncommon among Native Americans, and especially not uncommon among taller Native Americans. On Catalina Island, the Vieira brothers go to the Catalina Island Museum and pretend to “discover” the material that L. A. Marzulli directed them toward earlier this year. The brothers look into Glidden’s research, and make notes about the skeletons Glidden found, including one with a 28-inch thigh bone. It’s hard though to credit Glidden’s reports since he faked so much of his research for financial gain. Next, the men review the specific photograph Marzulli directed them toward, and they present this as their own discovery. They say they will have it analyzed, but the show drops this point, presumably to make it a dramatic revelation in a future episode. As I noted back when Marzulli complained about the Vieira brothers, the photograph offers little by way of evidence since it appears to be staged and there is no way to determine whether the bones seen in it are genuine or are among the fabrications and fakes Glidden acquired alongside genuine bones he imported from other sites around the world to create a morbid museum of charnel curiosity. Even the Vieira brothers notice that Glidden’s records are so slipshod that there is no way to determine whether anything he found was genuine. The Vieira brothers are upset by Glidden’s museum and feel it disrespectful to the dead to disturb their rest any longer. Nevertheless, Bill Vieira takes a helicopter to shoot photos of Catalina Island, which reveal some of Glidden’s old excavation sites. Jim Vieira feels that the island has “bad mojo” because of the desecrated graves, though I am at a loss for why looting these graves is worse than the brothers’ plan to excavate what they believe is a “giant” grave in Goshen, Massachusetts. Is there a magic number of desecrated graves that turns science into horror? Or is it only that Glidden displayed the bones for profit and for the entertainment of his museum’s visitors, while the Vieira brothers only want to display any bones they find on national television for the entertainment of their audience?
After another break, Newman continues working with the sketch artist to waste time. The Vieira brothers are now in Arizona to meet with Carlos Hayes, son of the ethnologist Paxson C. Hayes, who claimed to have discovered a lost city of giants and dozens of giant skeletons on both sides of the Mexican border. In 1929 Paxson Hayes claimed that in New Mexico he found well-preserved seven-foot-tall mummies, which had slanted eyes and sloping foreheads, and that these mummies were preserved with resin and had their burial clothes bound in fiber. Needless to say, these mummies were never presented to the public. In 1950, at Barranco de Cobre, Paxson claimed to have found blond-haired giants who lived in buildings that he said resembled Arabian structures: “The ancient buildings in the cave,” Hayes told the Tucson Daily Citizen on November 15, 1950, “were constructed of a cement-like masonry mixed with bamboo. The huts looked much like mosques.” Cement and bamboo. For blond giants. This is rather surprising considering that on August 25, 1933, Paxton told the Brewster Herald in Washington State that he believed that the lost race of giants were about six-foot-seven, and had long black beards. They were “slant eyed” Mongoloids from Asia who used crossbows and lived around 4000 BCE. Oh, and their feet were only six inches long! Carlos Hayes tells the Vieira brothers that he believes his father really did find giants and a lost civilization, but provided no evidence of them. The younger Hayes hopes that the Vieira brothers can find the evidence needed to prove his father right. Jim Vieira and Hugh Newman look at a sketch of a giant, which is based on pretty much nothing but hearsay about big jaws and double teeth, and the result is—well, it’s a picture. It’s based on Native American physiognomy, so I guess that excludes the Levantine and Aryan giants, like the blond guys Paxson Hayes was after, or the “slant-eyed Mongoloids,” also like the ones Paxson Hayes was after. This is just a big Native American stereotype with a big jaw. The narrator helpfully informs us that all that is left is for the Vieiras to find “one conclusive piece of evidence.” Oh, is that all? As the hour screeches to an unwieldy halt, the Vieira brothers announce that the University of Massachusetts will be excavating the Goshen Tunnel, so the remains of any giant therein can be displayed for the entertainment of all the show’s viewers—which is somehow completely different from Glidden’s museum of morbid skeletal curiosities because these guys are trying to prove something by demonstrating that at least one person in the past attained heights of seven to eight feet, the same heights documented throughout history and still attained by individuals today. I still don’t see how one skeleton will prove anything about a “lost race” of giants.
34 Comments
11/26/2014 03:29:07 am
Since your so good at tracking down the origins of these oft repeated memes of fringe History. I'd like to know where the claim that there was a King of the Franks named Francio who died in 11 BC came from?
Reply
11/26/2014 04:04:24 am
Francus (or Francio) was a medieval invention proposed as a rationalization for the name of the Franks. Francus was alleged to be a Trojan who fled the Fall of Troy, just like Aeneas. He was an artifact of Merovingian historiography looking to give the Franks a Trojan heritage, on par with the Romans. This is comparable to Snorri Sturluson's identification of the Norse gods with the Trojans several centuries later.
Reply
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
11/26/2014 04:14:15 am
It's funny how medieval thinkers compulsively labeled peoples as either descendants of Trojans or of biblical peoples. Partly, the newly powerful nations of Europe wanted to imagine some tenuous connection with the classical past—Francus for the Franks and "Brutus of Troy" for the British. But how many non-European peoples got labeled as Lost Tribes of Israel? Apparently, Europeans had difficulty imagining that new peoples they encountered could have been off their radar the entire time. 11/26/2014 09:20:05 am
Francus who fled Troy wouldn't be linked to specially 11 BC however? That's the specific mystery I'm looking for. 11/26/2014 09:29:52 am
As far as I can tell, that later Francio was an interpolation to fill a hole in the succession from the primeval Franks to the Merovingians. He was probably given the name to serve as the eponymous ancestor specifically of the West Franks rather than all Franks.
Clete
11/26/2014 03:32:47 am
I think there is a mistake. "The Giant Curse" is that some network executive put this travesty on the air.
Reply
Scott Hamilton
11/26/2014 04:17:28 am
I love how fringe researchers just incorporate whatever scientific headlines they see on Yahoo into their theories. Denisovans were more advanced that H. sapiens at the same time? What possible evidence can Dahl have for that statement? From what little we can tell about Denisova culture, it was hard to distinguish from H. neantherthalesis, and in any case we're talking about populations living 500,000 to 40,000 BP -- long before any kind of history, so how could the Denisovans be "men of renown?"
Reply
11/26/2014 04:36:18 am
That phrasing was my own, not his, for dramatic effect. He did say the part about them being more advanced, and he suggested that they were the inspiration for the giants of myth. I phrased it as "men of renown" to allude to Genesis 6:4, which is clearly what he was trying to imply.
Reply
11/26/2014 05:55:27 pm
"The fossil was found with modern technology and ornaments, including a very beautiful bracelet" So says Johannes Krause, a researcher at the institute that examined the findings in the Denisova cave. The fossil is about 40.000 years old. We homo sapiens did not have modern technology and beautiful bracelets at that time!
Reply
11/26/2014 05:57:59 pm
You can read my articles about giants on my webpages here: http://www.sydhav.no/giants/giants.htm
Gary
11/27/2014 01:43:59 am
Will you please provide links to the photo of the bracelet and the advanced technology? What technology are you referring to and how was it dated to the same era as the tooth?
Gary
11/27/2014 01:27:14 pm
The link had no mention of what this technology was that was found in the cave. It says that it was carbon dated to 40,000 ya. Is it made of wood, this "modern technology"? Also, no photo or description of the bracelet. What was it made of? I asked for more information on your claim, but you chose not to supply it.
EP
11/27/2014 02:15:48 pm
This is so confused! Dahl's own article says that the elongated skull was found "a few hundred kilometres away from the Denisova cave in Altai Krai, just south of the city of Omsk". These elongated skulls, which have indeed been found there, have NOTHING to do with Denisovans OR giants OR a distinct superior master race!
Mark L
11/27/2014 09:02:21 pm
Hey Terje, thanks for visiting this site and being willing to take part. You mentioned a bracelet in your post, but the link you provided doesn't actually give any evidence of the existence of the bracelet. As I'm sure you can understand, I'm sort of unwilling to just take someone's word for it when it comes to something as strange as this - could you provide photos of this amazing find please?
Only Me
11/28/2014 06:47:43 pm
@ a critic's critic, AKA JAD
.
11/29/2014 07:21:46 pm
his take on the Denisovans IS unique...
a critic's critic
11/29/2014 07:51:11 pm
we have been looking at Neandertal craniums for 150 years
Only Me
11/29/2014 08:13:10 pm
Dickey, there is no reason to be polite when someone like Dahl claims the Denisovans were "Nordic" people and became the "divine kings" ruling over all others. It is especially unnecessary when he further claims their downfall came from interbreeding with non-whites. That is racism, pure and simple. In other words, to hell with being polite.
.
11/30/2014 06:51:27 am
spooky had an interesting post that says their
Only Me
11/30/2014 01:37:46 pm
*Sigh* 11/30/2014 04:20:08 pm
I was given the tooth by the producer of the show at the time of the filming and was told that it was a replica of the Denisova tooth. Lying in a hospital bed and with cameras rolling I had no chance to check. I remember I was thinking that it did not look exactly like the Denisova tooth from the cave that I had seen on the internet but I also new that picture was from one side only. And that it was found two teeth in the cave, this might be a replica of the other one?
EP
12/1/2014 07:10:58 am
@ Terje Dahl
[jad]
12/2/2014 10:48:59 pm
some of the Gigantopithicus teeth found in China, although Maybe the Nephilim weren't necessarily literally giants if they existed. Many interpret the word as derivative of the Hebrew word for "fall" and take it to mean "fallen ones" or "fallen" or "apostates" or "ones who have fallen" or "those that cause others to fall down" or "the ones falling" or "the ones falling upon their enemies." Some other translations include "ones who are appointed," "ones who are bound," or "the violent ones." The Bible states that the Nephilim are the offspring of the "sons of God" and the "daughters of men." In this case "sons of God" is referring to heavenly beings. Some extrabiblical texts expand on this narrative saying that an angel named either Samyaza or Azazel depending on which text you read led a group of angels who would be known as the Grigori or the Watchers to swear an oath to sin against God and choose human mates. These angels fit the description of what many would consider fallen angels. Sons of God is used elsewhere in the Bible to refer to angels. So this means that according to the Bible there was a period of time on Earth where there were half-human half-heavenly being people. Perhaps these are what many people believed to be demigods or half-god half-men, such as Hercules or Theseus or Perseus, who in mythology are considered men of renown. If this is the case, then many mythological stories of demigods would be true. Just an idea.
Reply
Terje
12/10/2014 05:01:10 pm
You are of course into something important - if you believe in the Christian bible or not (there were Gods in all religions, and most of them were described as giants)! Read an article I have written today - here: http://www.sydhav.no/giants/history_channel.htm
spookyparadigm
11/26/2014 04:50:27 am
Ancient Aliens, both the tv show and the general larger "community/field" occasionally involves fraudulent artifacts or claims, but by and large is outlandish ideas based on logically or methodologically problematic speculation.
Reply
Kal
11/26/2014 07:54:42 am
In the Japanese cartoon Macross, called Robotech in the US, the Zeltreadi giants call humans 'Micronians;. They are 50 feet tall. The Micronesians however were not necessarily little people. Are they basing this name on a translation mistake? If they were micro people, then anyone regular height like 6 feet would look like a giant. And PT Barnum was right. As for the tooth that isn't there, I wonder how long it took for him to make it out of soapstone? And you cannot know from just a tooth what the creature was. Humans have canine teeth and yet we're not dogs. By their logic, anything could be something old, literally, and that discarded chicken bone in the back yard is really a fossilized micro human femur.
Reply
FrankenNewYork
11/26/2014 02:36:04 pm
Some of the worst acting I've seen so far. The "looks of concern" in the hospital room recreation sent me into fits of laughter. Also good for a laugh was- it serves no archeological purpose, without a smile, a touch of irony or self consciousness the man says it serves no archeological purpose about the hoaxes of a known charlatan whose unverified (at best) evidence he then uses to support his own claims. Wow.
Reply
Steve in SoDak
11/26/2014 04:30:05 pm
I've tried to watch this show, but it really makes some of the SyFy channel original movies look like they put some effort into it. Don't get me wrong I love bad movies when the people that make them know they are bad, but these clowns with the giant search think they are actually doing something, thus I haven't made it to the end of an episode without falling asleep. Just in case History channel is keeping track I fall into the 18 to 49 male demographic.
Reply
Dave Lewis
11/29/2014 06:13:31 am
I think Jason channeled H. P. Lovecraft when he wrote, "a morbid museum of charnel curiosity."
Reply
G-II-G-A-N-T-O-P-II-T-II-C-U-S
12/3/2014 11:11:59 pm
its my tooth from 1oo,ooo years ago.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
October 2024
|