Today I will conclude my review of Tom DeLonge’s and Peter Levenda’s new ancient astronaut book Sekret Machines: Gods, which has proven to be a rehash of standard ancient astronaut material with a good deal of Graham Hancock’s fantastical universe of altered consciousness and lost civilizations thrown into the mix thanks to Levenda’s admitted fascination with Hancock’s ideas. This all culminates in the book’s full-throated descent into a paean for religious belief and spirituality to counter the supposed horrors of science, secularism, and materialism. It’s depressing how frequently ancient astronaut claims turn into religion by proxy. Chapter 6 To that end, the sixth chapter opens with speculation about why immortality is linked to the stars, but Levenda has eyes only for space travelers (who are somehow also divine spiritual essences), unwilling to consider that the fact that the circumpolar stars were considered “immortal” because they never set may be reason enough, with no need to imagine that humans have a genetic memory of panspermia. He then goes on to resurrect the favorite chestnut of all fringe writers, the idea that pyramids around the world must be connected just because a tapering shape is the most stable architectural form for a tall building prior to the age of steel. To support this, he turns to various hyperdiffusionist arguments about cross-cultural contact in the distant past. Some are plausible, particularly when nearby Old World cultures are concerned, but others are speculative at best, particularly the claim that Tibetan culture derives from ancient Egypt. He approvingly cites Robert Bauval, Graham Hancock, and Robert Schoch as evidence for the diffusion of an ur-culture from a sunken lost continent to the Old World and the New, and that a cosmic event caused the flooding at the end of the Ice Age remembered as the Flood of Noah. None of this has anything to do with aliens but it does speak to the love Levenda has for the Hancock school of fringe ideas. To make it connect with aliens, Levenda, having spent chapters trashing Zecharia Sitchin, decides that he is right after all and that aliens came to Earth to make humans as a slave race: “thus our thesis leans more towards Sitchin than it does a purely accidental, if not transcendental, explanation without embracing Sitchin’s theories completely or abandoning the ideas of directed panspermia, for instance.” The bottom line, he says, is that the answers to humanity’s origins are to be found in studying religion, not science. Like every astronaut theorist before him, Levenda finds a way to restore the importance of religion and undo the existential terror unleashed by the Enlightenment. He even claims that religious ideas of heaven came from a cargo cultist stowing away on a spaceship and returning to tell the tale! Following this, Levenda describes various rituals around the world that pay homage to or connect people to the stars, and he claims these as evidence of a space alien connection. He neglects to mention similar rituals that connect people to water, the sun, the Earth, the ancestors, and all manner of other natural phenomena that have nothing to do with aliens. In context, they are nothing special, but he tries to make them so by comparing out of context bits and pieces to modern discoveries. For example, he speaks of Daoism’s seven “dark stars” of the Big Dipper, invisible to the naked eye (and different from the two invisible stars of the Dipper in standard Chinese cosmology) and claims them to be an anticipation of the modern conclusion that the first of the stars were made of “dark matter.” “It is almost too easy to draw comparisons between the dark stars of Chinese astronomy and the dark matter of the physicists,” Levenda writes. He offers no source for his discussion of the seven dark stars, and I have been unable to identify a source for it. According to scholarly accounts I read, the T’ang dynasty developed the concept of the two dark stars of the Dipper from the Indians, who had tried to account for lunar eclipses by claiming dark planets passed in front of the moon. Clearly, this is not the same as secret knowledge of dark matter. “All religion is UFO religion,” Levenda says, appropriating for himself every expression of spirituality on Earth, from chthonic gods to Earth mothers, and especially Abrahamic faiths. Whether they worship the divine in the water, on land, or inherent in all creation, it doesn’t matter. As long as they mention the stars or the sky, they must be based on space aliens. Levenda seems to think this is stunningly new, but he apparently hasn’t met Ancient Aliens producer Kevin Burns, who said nearly the same thing last year: “[Hindu] religion is totally based on extraterrestrials as, by the way, all religions are.” The remainder of the chapter is an extended discussion of religion, shamanism, and the nature of consciousness, and Levenda implies that the dramatic conclusion of the book series, in volume 3, is that the UFO phenomenon traces back to interdimensional powers that interact with our consciousness. He thinks this is a revelation, which means he hasn’t been watching Ancient Aliens speculate on this exact same line for the past eight years. Chapter 7 This chapter rehearses standard ancient astronaut claims about ancient Persia and India, from gods that ride in winged discs to flying vimanas. Levenda wrongly attributes the English words “divine” and “devil” to the Vedic devas, but they are not directly related. Instead, scholars believe all of these words share an ancestral origin in the Proto-Indo-European word *deiwos (as reconstructed from its descendant words), which first meant “celestial” and later “god.” Levenda purposely downplays the Indo-European heritage shared from Britain to India in order to make it seem as though shared elements derive from an outside source rather than from a shared origin in Indo-European myth and cult. Somehow this leads us back to Zecharia Sitchin and the Nephilim because Levenda identifies them as another expression of mythic wars between angels and demons, wars he believes different cultures participated in on different sides, thus accounting for why some cultures seem to worship other cultures’ devils and vice versa. Diabolizing other people’s gods is a longstanding tradition, as St. Augustine amply demonstrated, and there is no reason to imagine gods and demons are real to explain why. Nor, therefore, must we attribute Nephilim-giants and their extinction to a “war” among the “races” of humanity to purge genetic “misfires.” For a man so concerned about purging the ancient astronaut theory of Nazi and white supremacist doctrines, he seems unconcerned that he envisions the past as a race war to ensure the purity of the bloodlines. By his own logic about genetic memory and cargo cults, this makes the Nazis “right” because they have a distorted genetic memory of the ancient race wars. Levenda rhapsodizes for a while about Vedic religion and then laments that “technology has replaced religion as the opiate of the people.” He goes on to discuss Asian philosophy and religions in mind-numbing detail that I will spare you, and he enters into evidence a divine wheel that the Buddhist Pāli Canon says rises up from the eastern ocean and enters the mansion of a king destined to win in battle. This wheel was like a second full moon. Levenda tells us that this is proof that peoples of the subcontinent saw flying saucers, for otherwise they would never have accepted the idea of a flying heavenly wheel. The flying wheel image, originally associated with the sun, was a longstanding Indo-European tradition, and it would not surprise me at all if this Buddhist wheel is an indirect derivative via the Vedic or Hindu traditions from which Buddhism borrowed. Levenda quotes information about the Buddhist ideal wheel from secondary sources and omits that it is only one of eight ideal possessions of a king, among the others being an ideal gem, elephant, and wife. In context, the similarity to a UFO fades away, particularly when we compare the symbolism of wheels and mills across both Eastern and Indo-European cultures. To make a very long chapter shorter, Levenda describes many different types of mythical wheels, including swastikas, and calls them all flying saucers, just like the ancient astronaut theorists he ridicules for doing pretty much the same thing. He wrongly says that his insight—that mandalas and wheels reflect spacecraft—was “not imagined by many ‘ancient alien theorists.’” At least three episodes of Ancient Aliens specifically connect mandalas to space aliens, like this one. Levenda adds that he believes, based on Jacques Vallée’s research (whatever that is worth), that UFO sightings peak in years when Tibetan Buddhists hold mass initiations. Fortunately, Vallée provides “peak” years for 7 out of 15 years in the middle twentieth century, so some year is bound to align with some event or another. It’s almost 50-50 odds! Chapter 8 This chapter deals with Greek mythology, opening with the perspectives of Max Müller, who, while brilliant, was a Victorian solar myth proponent and more than 130 years out of date. Levenda discusses Hesiod’s Theogony but omits its clear debt to Hittite myth, and through it Mesopotamian mythology. As a result he presents as “confirmation” of the Nephilim the Greek story of the Giants, a story that he doesn’t know (or doesn’t care) that scholars like Jan Bremmer had long ago argued were in conversation with the Semitic account. Bremmer argued, persuasively, that the stories of the Titans and the Watchers share a close connection. “Such a clear parallel to the Biblical account in Genesis,” Levenda gushes, as though no one had noticed before. The Church Fathers were aware of it, as were the Greeks themselves. Levenda follows the account of the Gigantomachy given by Ovid, but he fails to note that Ovid’s version is erroneous, a conflated account that mixes elements of the Titanomachy, the Gigantomachy, and the assault on Olympus by the Aloadae. His argument, consequently, is without merit since he knows not of which he speaks. He refuses to trace Greek myths to their earliest forms, and he declines to explore the debt that our versions of Greek myths owe to Near East influences—subjects that Bremmer, Walter Burkert, M. L. West, and many other scholars have covered in detail. It is just silly to declare Greek myths to be an independent confirmation of Nephilim contact. Following this, Levenda recycles his earlier discussion of Gnosticism, making the same points again, and again refusing to explore the actual cultural diffusion that occurred between Mesopotamian cultures and the Jews and Greeks. The result is the absurdity of accepting Noah’s Flood as a real event, despite the fact that geology does not support a global flood. He tries to psychoanalyze the Nephilim and suggests that their issues were psychological and not physical, that they had bad brains and bad genes. Some were physical giants, he speculates, because of a “chromosomal abnormality” due to inbreeding. So where are the bones of these giants? Ah, evidence is for losers! We have faith. To that end, Levenda notes the tension between the genetic imperative to procreate with people outside of one’s family and the social imperative to stick to one’s own tribe against foreigners, and he decides—and I wish that I were making this up—that the aliens encoded an incest gene into humans to keep us mating within our “ethnicity” or “race” so we’ll remain genetically weak and ripe for exploiting on our prison/asylum planet. He’s not too clear on degrees of consanguinity, the intricate exogamous systems of hunter-gatherer societies, or how genetic diversity works, so it makes sense in his mind. As we move toward the conclusion, Levenda says that alien abduction stories are preoccupied with sex, genitals, and semen and therefore must be modern Nephilim tales. He claims that humans are “obsessed” with disaster stories and that some outside force must be compelling us to move toward our own destruction, for otherwise we would never have invented the atom bomb unbidden. It quickly becomes clear that Levenda has confused a particular milieu in America for the world as he talks of how “we” as humans are afraid to acknowledge God in public and treat Him as a sop to rubes in exchange for votes. He blames the scientific revolution for disenchanting the world, and he declares that all of the ufologists and ancient astronaut theorists are wrong, that ancient people did not see UFOs and mistake them for the chariots of the gods; instead, we see the chariots of the gods and misinterpret them as flying spacecraft. Levenda declares the mystery of the UFOs to be the mystery of God himself, and the quest for aliens to be the search for the divine. Abductees, he said, have touched the face of an unknowable and vaguely malevolent God: … the abduction is carried out by acolytes of the Unknown God, the Alien God, and the experience is seen through a scrim of sexual manipulation and psychic dislocation. The abductees become an altar in a new Black Mass as the alien forces push their way into their consciousness, impatient and insistent, using whatever sublimated or repressed material they can find buried in their memories or fantasies. The bottom line is that Levenda sees aliens as akin to a Gnostic demiurge, an evil(ish) god that tries to manipulate and control us, blocking us from achieving a true transcendence by pushing past them to the real spiritual powers further up the great chain of being. The remaining volumes of the series, he says, will help us search for a new spirituality to embrace the divine.
In what seems to be a plausible reading, Peter Levenda and Tom DeLonge seem to be laying the groundwork to start a cult and want to use ufology to attract acolytes to their mix of warmed over New Age claptrap, Gnostic obfuscation, and Theosophy-inspired pseudo-Buddhist mysticism. It’s sort of an inverted Raëlism, with the gods masquerading as aliens rather than the other way around, but the difference is one of perception more than fact. So there you have it. The secret of Sekret Machines is that it is not a book about UFOs at all but rather a book about the Nephilim, for the same tired reasons: To prove the Nephilim real is to make the Bible true and justify faith of some kind or another. Other cultures, for what they are worth, exist only to provide support for the story of the Nephilim, and all of human history can be reduced to an effort to approach God through an understanding of the monsters that defied His will. We are all Nephilim hybrids, and all part evil and part divine. We have heard this all before.
41 Comments
Scott David Hamilton
3/10/2017 10:43:23 am
"Levenda... laments that 'technology has replaced religion as the opiate of the people.'"
Reply
3/10/2017 11:42:03 am
It's ambiguous in the text. He recognizes that the opiate of the people is a bad thing because it keeps them docile, but he doesn't like that technology has replaced religion because it pushes people farther away from truth. I guess it's a matter of which is worse, not that one is good.
Reply
Americanegro
3/10/2017 04:13:58 pm
"The foundation of irreligious criticism is: Man makes religion, religion does not make man. Religion is, indeed, the self-consciousness and self-esteem of man who has either not yet won through to himself, or has already lost himself again. But man is no abstract being squatting outside the world. Man is the world of man – state, society. This state and this society produce religion, which is an inverted consciousness of the world, because they are an inverted world. Religion is the general theory of this world, its encyclopaedic compendium, its logic in popular form, its spiritual point d’honneur, its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn complement, and its universal basis of consolation and justification. It is the fantastic realization of the human essence since the human essence has not acquired any true reality. The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
3/10/2017 11:54:33 am
"Levenda wrongly attributes the English words 'divine' and 'devil' to the Vedic devas..."
Reply
Naughtius
3/10/2017 01:20:33 pm
Does the word divine have the same root as Deus, Dia, Zeus, Jupiter, Dis Pater etc
Reply
Shane Sullivan
3/10/2017 01:47:40 pm
According to the Online Etymology Dictionary, yes.
Reply
E.P. Grondine
3/10/2017 01:35:44 pm
Hi Jason -
Reply
Bob Jase
3/10/2017 02:20:20 pm
Just offhand, since DeLonge and Peter Levenda believe in extreme hyperdiffusionism - can they explain who taught the alien-gods their civilization?
Reply
David Bradbury
3/10/2017 06:28:34 pm
- an earlier bunch of alien-gods?
Reply
Americanegro
3/10/2017 09:49:54 pm
Time traveling cargo cultists from the future. Seems pretty obvious to me. Et voila le cercle est complet!
A Buddhist
3/10/2017 07:06:28 pm
Jason,
Reply
3/10/2017 08:19:19 pm
I copied it out of the book on Chinese astronomy. I have no idea what preferred transliteration is used for any given word.
Reply
A Buddhist
3/10/2017 08:45:41 pm
Pinyin is becoming the standard transliteration system with Chinese. 3/10/2017 09:05:56 pm
Levenda talks a lot about Buddhism and endorses elements of Buddhist mythology, but without the underlying spiritual philosophy of Buddhism. His discussion is superficial, and the elements he takes from it are in service of a New Age belief system made from a mish-mash of philosophies.
Amerineg'ro
3/10/2017 09:33:02 pm
You're asking Jason to learn two separate romanization (not transliterating) systems for a language he doesn't work with. This is something that people do not do.
Buddhist
3/10/2017 10:37:50 pm
Jason: Thank you, I guess, for the clarification. What aspects of Buddhism does he endorse?
Weatherwax
3/11/2017 01:37:11 am
Since in all probability neither system gets to the correct Chinese pronunciation, there is no advantage to one over the other. Just do the best you can.
Americanegro
3/10/2017 09:14:49 pm
I knew it. Jason, you set off the Pali Canon alarm. Good thing you didn't mention sto- uh, nevermind.
Reply
A Buddhist
3/10/2017 10:41:02 pm
"Good thing you didn't mention sto- uh, nevermind."
BigNick
3/10/2017 10:55:51 pm
We've gone 96 hours now without anyone throwing a his system fit. I'm really proud of everyone. Thank you for all your hard work. Now can we just let it die?
Americanegro
3/10/2017 11:43:52 pm
What part of
A Buddhist
3/11/2017 09:02:08 am
Americanegro: I interpreted your statement "You're asking Jason to learn two separate romanization (not transliterating) systems for a language he doesn't work with" as suggesting that you thought that I was claiming to be familiar with both Wade-Giles and Pinyin systems.
At Risk
3/11/2017 11:27:04 am
A BUDDHIST, a long-shot here, but do you have any idea how an Anglo-Saxon hooked-x rune found its way etched onto a 6th century Anglo-Saxon brooch found in England (as shown in a past Wolter Blog posting)? Is it merely a letter character or a symbol, or both, do you think, and what might it symbolize in this case?
A Buddhist
3/11/2017 12:55:16 pm
At Risk:
At Risk
3/12/2017 11:56:59 am
Thanks, A Buddhist. I'm trying to come to a better understanding of the transition of the Hooked X, apparently westward across Europe, finally ending up as two different rune-types...first Anglo-Saxon and then Scandinavian.
A Buddhist
3/12/2017 01:10:26 pm
At Risk
At Risk
3/13/2017 11:33:39 am
Thanks again, A BUDDHIST. I didn't mean to assume or imply that the hooked X has or has had only one secretive meaning. Perhaps the Anglo-Saxon hooked-X on the brooch was being used as a secretive symbol, too. It could be, as we seem to be finding out, that the hooked-X was used as both a symbol and a language rune...for these purposes, but at different times, sometimes independently and possibly sometimes together.
Only Me
3/10/2017 07:14:00 pm
And this is just the first book of Ancient Aliens: Abridged Edition? There's two more? To quote a popular Internet meme:
Reply
Pacal
3/10/2017 08:28:27 pm
The remarks by Levenda about the sexual aspects of Alien Abductions and his use of the term Black Mass reminds me of the following.
Reply
Michael
3/10/2017 10:47:57 pm
Hi Jason,
Reply
3/11/2017 04:43:42 pm
It tends to vary by book. I usually have a Word document open and type my thoughts as I move through the chapters. Yes, I look up facts as I have questions while reading, since the answer will shape my attitude about the author's research skills. At the end of each chapter, I revise my rough reactions into a more coherent reflection. After a while, though, the sameness of so many pseudo-history books makes it rather easy!
Reply
A C
3/11/2017 08:23:49 am
The origin of the divine offspring myth which the Nephilim are just one culture's demonisation of is pretty clear if you look at the propaganda of Kingship in the ancient world.
Reply
BigNick
3/11/2017 02:23:00 pm
ATRISK: I read that post on Wolters blog. He agrees that a combined ae symbol is a hooked x and then dismisses an actual artifact in the comments because it is too early to be a templar rune. Do you take him seriously?
Reply
Americanegro
3/11/2017 03:06:25 pm
"Americanegro: I interpreted your statement "You're asking Jason to learn two separate romanization (not transliterating) systems for a language he doesn't work with" as suggesting that you thought that I was claiming to be familiar with both Wade-Giles and Pinyin systems."
Reply
A Buddhist
3/11/2017 03:47:29 pm
Americanegro: So where did the English develop their Latin Alphabet? Rome? No, the English, in England, modified the Latin alphabet to write in English. They added in J, for example, and created various digraphs. J developed in other regions, but these other regions developed other letters that are not used in English, such as Ø.
Reply
Americanegro
3/11/2017 04:26:33 pm
"you thought that I was wanting Jason to be familiar with Wade-Giles and Pinyin systems of transcribing Chinese in the English Latin alphabet. Where are the words in which I said this? I asked him why he was using Pinyin"
A Buddhist
3/11/2017 05:06:55 pm
Americanegro:
Americanegro
3/11/2017 07:24:48 pm
"transliterating the Chinese script into the Latin Alphabet of Britain (for really, that is what Pinyin romanization is)"
Reply
A Buddhist
3/11/2017 09:01:18 pm
Americanegro:
Reply
A Buddhist
3/12/2017 09:20:44 am
Americanegro:
Eric
7/5/2017 06:43:17 pm
I sort of skimmed through a majority of the review once I noticed that it appears that Tom Delonge had little to do with the actual penning of this book. I'm sure it was a collaborative effort intellectually, however based on your review it seems we get Levenda's cynical tone, as opposed to Tom Delonge's genuine excitement over the material (based on his promotional interviews.) Even if it were still a rehash of ideas from earlier materials on the subject I get the feeling it would have been better to read in a Delonge tone instead. I almost feel his name is on the book just for brand recognition, regardless of level of input.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
October 2024
|