Erich von Däniken has always been an opportunist. When authors across Europe and North America started writing about prehistoric UFO sightings in the 1950s and 1960s, he repackaged their work as Chariots of the Gods. When Christian conservatism came into flower in the years around 1980, he proposed to prove religion true with Miracles of the Gods. When “alternative archaeologists” like Robert Bauval and Graham Hancock revived Atlantis and pyramid mysteries in the 1990s, EVD latched on with The Eyes of the Sphinx. Last year, EVD caught the odor of Freemason conspiracy wafting up from the corpse of America Unearthed and the rantings of writers like Jim Marrs, and he produced The End of the Silence, a book I wasn’t aware of until this week but which (falsely) suggests in its book description and opening lines that it will reveal the unknown truths of the world’s secret societies, the organizations that run the world on behalf of space aliens. From the book description: Something about our past – the one that took place thousands of years ago – is not right. And members of lodges and the heads of great religions are aware of this. They are keeping their knowledge to themselves. “I’m providing the public with a few facts that have hitherto only been available to underground lodges. Or piecemeal in my books,” EVD humbly writes in the opening paragraph. He adds that Christians and Muslims alike have a psychological block that creates the need to keep wisdom and knowledge secret. He extends this to scientists, whom he accuses of perpetuating a dogma formulated more than a century ago. He complains that science and history are nothing more than “the same knowledge that was taught last century.” He should know. His books remain unchanged since the last century, and they were recycled from other people’s work even then. Meanwhile, back in reality, actual science has grown by leaps and bounds since 1968.
Speaking of recycling: EVD starts the book by offering a riff on the thought experiment he presented in Chariots, followed by a repeat of the old observations about cargo cults he made in the same book. He compares the cargo cults to the reception European conquerors received from the Native groups they interacted with—Columbus, Cortes, Pizarro, etc. He, of course, believes the old claim that the Natives worshiped these men as gods. To this he repeats old claims about how ancient people lacked the vocabulary to describe technology except in plant, animal, and mineral terms, and he provides examples that were shopworn even when Chariots recycled them from Morning of the Magicians, such as Elijah’s assumption into heaven and the supposed space alien nature of the Babylonian sage Oannes. He relies on the eccentric work of a German banker named Hermann Burgard to “prove” that the Sumerians had a space station. (Burgard makes his own unusual translations.) The Nephilim get a shout-out, too, because all fringe history books worth their salt must reference the Giants or their Watcher fathers in some capacity. It is seemingly an iron law of fringe history. The lengthy recap of Chariots—comprising more than a quarter of the book—leads up to his thesis that the problem with the world is organized religion, which he believes blinds people through “indoctrination” into a dogma that prevents them from embracing space aliens. He says that as a result of religion’s nefarious influence we face a “total catastrophe” when Yahweh, Allah, Buddha, Brahma and the rest of humanity’s gods are revealed to be mistaken visions of space aliens. Having said that, EVD returns to his favorite subject: rewriting Chariots of the Gods and its 1970s sequels. The Book of Enoch and Genesis 6:4 are discussed yet again—because: WATCHERS!—and a whole section is devoted to repeating claims about the Giants that he made in his 1990s and 2000s books like Odyssey of the Gods. EVD blithely pretends that the Gold of the Gods debacle never happened, so therefore he once again claims that the endless miles of tunnels filled with gold books under Ecuador really exist and that he personally visited them, even though he confessed decades ago to having lied about the whole thing. I’ll just stop here to mention that something funky is going on with the translation of the book. EVD seems to have freely adapted texts in German, and they have been rendered into English seemingly without reference to the originals. Here is how the book gives Genesis 6:4, the famous passage on the Sons of God and the Giants: “At the time, and afterwards, too, when the gods’ sons joined the daughters of the humans and had children with them, the giants were on earth. They are the giants of ancient times, the most famous ones.” Worse, the anonymous English translator used by the Singapore-based publisher doesn’t seem to have cared at all what EVD was actually trying to say. The word “Indians” is somehow given as “Indios,” an obsolete Spanish-derived word for Native Americans. The translator also didn’t bother to check what was being discussed and described to realize that Enoch and Henoch are the same fellow, translating them differently. At the halfway point in the book, we are still reviewing EVD’s earlier work, often with direct reference to his previous volumes. We get repeats of Lord Pacal’s coffin lid, ancient “airplanes” (vimanas), the December 2012 Maya apocalypse, Vedic nuclear war, Abraham’s trip into space, the Sirius Mystery, the Ark of the Covenant, and even the Coso artifact! Yes, the 1920s spark plug found in a concretion of rock in 1961 and wrongly believed to be a 500,000 years old. EVD buys the creationist claims for that hoary old chestnut hook, line, and sinker. There is a good reason for that: EVD is a creationist of sorts: “The story about the evolution of the monkey becoming an intelligent person is a farce.” What’s more of a farce is the fact that this book shamelessly repeats EVD’s earlier books (and those of rivals like Robert Temple) and pretends that it is saying something new. For a man who makes good coin appearing on Ancient Aliens—broadcast around the world on the History Channel—he speaks with no irony about how “International television also valiantly contributes to the dumbing down of the people.” This is because, he says, television refuses to present his ideas in their full complexity and scientific rigor. Instead, “the television professors and debunkers want to make Erich von Däniken look like an idiot.” Since he is the man who once wrote that Black Africans are a genetic mistake created by aliens’ failed attempts to make white people, and that he disapproves of easing traditional gender role restrictions, I’d say he does a pretty good job of making himself look bad. Speaking of looking bad: EVD happily cherry picks evidence to make his claims seem true. He thinks that Oannes lived under the sea in a submarine, so he adds that the Biblical prophet Jonah wasn’t swallowed by a fish but was instead taken aboard a submarine. He can’t base this on the Bible, so he takes it from Ginzberg’s modern Legends of the Jews (1909), from the body of medieval myth contained in the Haggadah: “The eyes of the fish served Jonah as windows, and, besides, there was a diamond, which shone as brilliantly as the sun at midday, so that Jonah could see all things in the sea down to its very bottom.” He even cites Gulliver’s Travels as proof of secret knowledge of Mars’s two moons, even though Jonathan Swift’s description was informed speculation based, in all likelihood, on passages from Kepler. Similarly, he accepts at face value the fraudulent Vaimanika Sastra, an allegedly ancient Sanskrit text actually written in the twentieth century. As the book approached its final part, I became rather dispirited that it failed to live up to the promise of the publicity blurb and the opening paragraphs. There is no discussion of secret societies, no effort to reveal their secrets—not even the well-known “secret” that the Freemasons claimed to have the tablets of angelic wisdom recorded by EVD’s beloved prophet Enoch. Instead, EVD gives space over to Nick Pope to repeat his allegations about modern UFO cover-ups, and to an unnamed Brazilian military informant who claims to have information about UFO encounters. We get a litany of UFO sightings and abduction claims, and EVD’s assertion that the Roswell Incident is as close as we will get to proof of continued alien involvement on the Earth. EVD threw in some speculation about panspermia and whether humans are “replicas” of alien species, and then the book simply ends in mid-thought while EVD is describing a CD a reader sent him showing video of what is allegedly an oval-shaped flying saucer. There is no conclusion. It’s as though EVD hit the publisher’s predetermined word count and dropped his pen. What a waste of time.
24 Comments
Tom
10/9/2016 10:55:01 am
It has puzzled me as to why so many fringe authors plunder ancient and incoherent myths legends and religious doctrines for their sources, yet go onto describe this as the very latest result of their search for The Truth.
Reply
B
10/9/2016 11:47:32 am
I just found this website, and I thank the ancient alien gods it exists. I, and couple of other friends, watch Ancient Aliens for laughs because we think it is ridiculous in words I cannot even describe. We were all surprised at how many people buy into their line of thinking, even when it blatantly contradicts itself. Their claims are so incredibly absurd that most people will not bother challenging them. Its good to know there are individuals who actually challenge their malignant BS.
Reply
B
10/9/2016 11:53:04 am
I forgot to mention I am writing this from a planet orbiting Alnilam, and that I was in fact the god Enlil.
Reply
Ken
10/9/2016 11:49:26 am
"the problem with the world is organized religion, which he believes blinds people through “indoctrination” into a dogma that prevents them from embracing space aliens"
Reply
Time Machine
10/9/2016 01:28:13 pm
Dogma exists on both sides
Reply
B
10/9/2016 01:32:37 pm
What's your point? Even rationalists have dogma.
Time Machine
10/9/2016 01:41:46 pm
Yes, rationalists dogma is to have no dogma
B
10/9/2016 01:49:55 pm
I am genuinely confused. That's a logical fallacy. You're using using your own premise as your conclusion. "Our dogma is to have no dogma, therefore we have no dogma". Not to mention a simple flat out contradiction. Are you sure you don't believe in ancient aliens?
Time Machine
10/9/2016 02:15:40 pm
I suppose you are using religious ammunition.
B
10/9/2016 03:06:25 pm
What? I am not sure what that means either, but I was just trying to get your goat. What I said is not "religious ammunition", it is actually used to counter religious based arguments a lot. It is a pragmatic argument where I am saying you are using your own premise as the conclusion itself. Thus offering really no evidence, just making a statement. E.g.: "The sky is blue, therefore the sky is blue" or "the bible is the word of God, because it says it is the word of God."
Shane Sullivan
10/9/2016 03:11:30 pm
Sorry about that, B. Time Machine is quick to accuse people of being religious practitioners when they disagree with him. That's one of the reasons a lot of regulars, many if not most of whom are not religious, ignore him most of the time.
B
10/9/2016 03:13:52 pm
No worries. After all this is the internet. Besides, I wasn't offended I am genuinely what he/she means.
B
10/9/2016 03:14:44 pm
*genuinely curious about...
Kathleen
10/9/2016 03:34:09 pm
My karma ran over my dogma
Time Machine
10/9/2016 04:15:48 pm
>>>many if not most of whom are not religious
Ken
10/9/2016 04:52:08 pm
South Park S10Ep13 - in 2546, a world war breaks out between the UAL (Unified Atheist League) and the UAA (United Atheist Alliance) about which name best represents the movement. 10/13/2016 12:14:55 am
@Ken
Time Machine
10/9/2016 01:29:51 pm
>>> Since he is the man who once wrote that Black Africans are a genetic mistake created by aliens’ failed attempts to make white people<<<
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
10/9/2016 03:51:59 pm
Because Himmler's, or for that matter Reagan's, occult beliefs in no way fed into policy or decision-making...
Reply
Weatherwax
10/10/2016 10:42:14 pm
Shane Sullivan: You forgot to mention he's a white supremacist, too.
Reply
A Buddhist
10/9/2016 04:44:29 pm
Buddhas are not gods. They are superior to gods, as teachers of gods and people. Furthermore, it should be the Buddha (or Shakyamuni Buddha), not just Buddha.
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
10/10/2016 09:05:28 am
So they're saints that intercede with a higher power on our behalf. Got it.
Reply
Kal
10/9/2016 06:01:45 pm
The fringe authors love to parade around and claim they have ''secret knowledge' that 'you all don't have' but you can for a price. It's probably been going on like that for a very long time.
Reply
Kal
10/9/2016 06:03:15 pm
Brother Jones is just a joke. He is not a real person.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
November 2024
|