This week, geologist Robert Schoch proposed a bizarre new idea about the temple complex at Karnak in Egypt after viewing nineteenth-century photographs of the ruins before they had been cleared of rubble and partially restored. He claimed that the blocks making up the rubble were too big for wind to have moved (true!) and that therefore the buildings, which he consequently redates to the Ice Age, had been deliberately buried by a lost civilization (false!). So where did he go wrong? It’s pretty obvious.
The observation of intentional burial at Karnak first struck Katie [Schoch’s wife] while viewing historical images on display along the walls of Karnak's Visitor's Center. […] Katie noticed that the blocks in some of the images appear to be too massive to have been blown into position by the wind, as often occurs around abandoned structures in arid regions over vast expanses of time. (The Sphinx Enclosure on the Giza Plateau is but one simple example; in just a matter of decades it will fill with sand if left unattended.) It appears that the loose blocks were positioned around the temple walls, as if to fortify them. Notice the mountain of dirt piled above the ram-headed sphinxes that line the entryway to the complex. What is apparent in the images is not simply sand blown in through time. The blocks in this rubble pile are enormous, and the mountain of rubble is many meters high.
The nineteenth-century photos do indeed show large mounds of carved and dressed blocks, as you can see here.
However, no one has ever claimed the massive stones, unlike sand, blew in on the wind. Rather than belabor the point, a glimpse at the same temple today, after decades of rubble-clearing and restoration, will make plain what happened: Those massive piles of blocks were the collapsed remains of walls and the upper reaches of the temple, which fell into mounds that the desert filled with sand. You can see he foundations in the photo. The Egyptians also used blocks and rubble from former buildings as fill for new pylons. For example, the temple to the Aten built by Akhenaten was demolished and is blocks used as fill for three later pylons.
A lot of the mudbrick Shoch observed abutting other temples and believes to be he proof of deliberate burial are the remains of mudbrick enclosure walls, which (unbeknownst to Schoch) surrounded most Egyptian stone temples. It’s literally in all the standard works on Egyptian architecture.
In short, Schoch published a lengthy discussion and an elaborate hypothesis with no evidence other than assumption.
10/8/2022 06:42:32 pm
"In short, Schoch published a lengthy discussion and an elaborate hypothesis with no evidence other than assumption."
10/8/2022 07:54:23 pm
Has anyone ever claimed the massive stones, unlike sand, blew in on the wind? It's not clear.
10/16/2022 01:48:54 pm
The "advanced technology" was probably the same as used at many other sites - ramps, pulleys, levers and plenty of man/beast power.
10/22/2022 09:42:59 pm
Right over your head, huh?
Article by Tim McMillan
10/9/2022 02:16:40 am
10/11/2022 04:10:53 am
We are a species with amnesia... because we have forgotten to check archaeological papers and books from the past 50 years.
10/14/2022 03:08:09 pm
His wife is a film school graduate whom he met at a conference devoted to fringe theories. He was impressed by her research on people turning into stars when they die. Just the person that you want interpreting ancient Egyptian ruins. Truly a match made in heaven.
Sir ned Flanders petrie
10/11/2022 01:28:02 pm
They buried the ruins after carefully removing all possible evidence that would support the hypothesis that said ruins are several times older than currently understood?
10/11/2022 04:34:32 pm
Maybe I'm being overly simplistic, but when I saw the first photo, my first thought was 'collapse caused by earthquake'. Is that so far outside of the realm of possibility that no one else thought of it?
Not Naming Names
10/13/2022 12:27:28 pm
This reminds me of another geologist who was right about one thing and wrong about everything else. This geologist started off with something real and then got Hooked On An X.
10/22/2022 02:51:03 pm
I guess studying geology doesn't make you an expert in everything.
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply.
I am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab.
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Terms & Conditions
Please read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.