Yesterday, the all-rerun channel Memorable Entertainment Television (MeTV) ran a marathon of Rod Serling’s Night Gallery and has begun showing the series in the late night hours (1:30 AM) weeknights. I am far too young to have seen Night Gallery when it first aired, but I have fond memories of watching the program in syndication on what was then the Sci-Fi Channel when I was a kid. It used to come on in the afternoons when I was in high school, a couple of episodes back to back, and I think one summer I watched every episode one day after the next. Unfortunately, MeTV is showing the chopped-up, heavily edited syndicated version of the program, not the uncut episodes as they first aired. Night Gallery was originally an hour-long series composed of individual short films of varying length. The studio, Universal, re-cut the episodes to fit into half hour syndication slots, resulting in some segments pruned of up to half of their footage, and others expanded with unrelated shots from other segments, other shows, or old movies. (Truncated episodes from a completely different show, The Sixth Sense, were added to bring the episode count high enough for syndication.) The uncut episodes are available on Hulu Plus (it used to be on regular, free Hulu), and I strongly recommend that you watch the uncut episodes rather than the mangled versions airing on MeTV. It is a completely different experience.
It might be a bit heretical, but I enjoyed the Night Gallery more than Serling’s more famous series, The Twilight Zone. It’s probably that my aesthetic sensibility runs more Gothic than sci-fi, and I preferred monsters to aliens, castles and mansions to rockets and asteroids. That said, Night Gallery is a difficult show to love unconditionally. Like any anthology, its segments vary in quality, and few anthologies varied as wildly as Night Gallery, largely due to the tension between the putative star of the series, Rod Serling, and the producer, Jack Laird. At the time of Night Gallery’s inception, Serling had no interest in resuming the day-to-day running of a TV series, largely due to his bad experiences with CBS during the Twilight Zone years. He later realized it was a mistake to give control to Laird and the NBC network. Laird, to put it as gently as possible, was a populist in the worst sense of the term and pushed the show toward a campy, sensationalist tone that stood in tension with Serling’s more restrained take on the macabre. The result was a series that could reach dizzying heights (for 1970s TV, anyway) and fall to such painful lows as short one-joke comedy segments in which vampires visit blood banks, the Frankenstein’s monster needs a babysitter, or a cannibal tries to hire a maid. Needless to say, Lair was behind the misbegotten comedy bits, which severely undercut the stronger segments by their sheer campy awfulness. But even Laird was a bulwark of quality against interference from NBC and Universal Studios, who demanded lower quality, more action, more gore, and more shock. By the third season, Serling was little more than a paid host for a program that was churning out some of the worst genre television committed to film. (Just try watching the segments “Fright Night” or “Hatred unto Death.”) But at its best, Night Gallery offered dark, moving portraits of fear and the macabre, usually in the Gothic mode, many drawn from classic pulp magazine stories that Serling loved as a young man. Adaptations of Weird Tales authors Seabury Quinn, Clark Ashton Smith, August Derleth, and H. P. Lovecraft gave a pulp-literary cast to the show’s greatest efforts. To the best of my knowledge, in 1971 Night Gallery became the first TV show to produce straight adaptations of Lovecraft stories: “Pickman’s Model” and “Cool Air.” (The Dunwich Horror, a straightforward adaptation of Lovecraft’s tale, had bowed in movie theaters the previous year.) Such segments as “A Death in the Family,” “Class of ’99,” “Green Fingers,” and “Miracle at Camafeo” are both dramatically satisfying and as memorable as the best of The Twilight Zone. Even the critically-despised third season had a few hits, like the Smith adaptation, “The Return of the Sorcerer.” In my upcoming Cthulhu in World Mythology, I pay homage to Night Gallery. One of the segments on that show, a rather long comedy sketch by Laird entitled “Professor Peabody’s Last Lecture,” featured Carl Reiner as the titular professor explaining the Cthulhu Mythos to a room full of students with familiar names: Lovecraft, Bloch, Derleth, etc. In Cthulhu I refer to Prof. Peabody as “my distinguished predecessor” and offer his “last lecture” as a famous bit of scholarly discussion of Cthulhu! Although the Night Gallery segment itself is groan-worthy in its awfulness, this was a fun way of acknowledging my admiration for a series that tried hard and, more often than not, did good work. If you’re interested in Night Gallery, be sure to read Scott Skelton and Jim Benson’s Rod Serling’s Night Gallery: An After-Hours Tour (1999), pretty much the definitive guide to Night Gallery. Though I might quibble with their judgments on a few segments, overall they do an excellent job of rating both the wheat and the chaff.
0 Comments
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
September 2024
|