Late yesterday America Unearthed host Scott Wolter reversed course after months of teasing a “major” fringe history discovery and published the results of his examination of the so-called Jesus Ossuary on his blog, where almost no one will see them. The Jesus Ossuary is a small first-century burial box found in the Talpiot Tomb in 2003 and claimed to be the burial box of Jesus Christ on the strength of an inscription said to read Yeshua bar Yehosef (Jesus, the son of Joseph) found on it, though critics have strongly disputed that the inscription is original. Indeed, some have been unable to find the name Yeshua at all. Wolter viewed the ossuary when it was on display in Los Angeles earlier this year. The vast conspiracy placed it on public display in one of the world’s most populous and media-saturated cities in order to hide it from the public, I’m sure. The box and the tomb have been championed by fringe filmmaker Simha Jacobovici, who worked with Israeli geologist Arye Shimron earlier this year to link dirt found on the so-called James Ossuary (another suspected forgery) to the Talpiot tomb (though technically only to the region of eastern Jerusalem) to strengthen the suggestion that the burial boxes found in the Talpiot tomb are those of Jesus and his family. The James Ossuary was known before the Talpiot tomb was opened, and therefore is not likely to have come from it. Wolter has looked at the Jesus Ossuary through Plexiglas and saw on it an eight-pointed asterisk that he claims is a “Hooked X®” superimposed over the Greek letter tau, symbolizing Jesus and the cross, Masonic symbolism, and a Greco-Hebrew hybrid alpha-omega symbol. (He sees the X as a stylized aleph and the tau as substituting for the last Hebrew letter, tav, since both vocalize as t.) One of the legs of the asterisk is carved slightly askew and can be read as a stave emerging from one of the other seven legs, thus producing the “Hooked X®.” He further claims that an acute angle found nearby is a “chevron,” aligned with Wolter’s mythology of symbols of the sacred feminine. “To find what appears to be the Hooked X carved on the lid of the Yeshua ossuary,” Wolter writes, “could be a major historical discovery that is consistent with much of the speculative research the author has already published.” Scholars have identified these marks as alignment markers meant to correctly align the lid, similar to those found on 40% or more of known ossuaries. Wolter dismisses this claim and suggest that the symbol is a Jesus family royal monogram. He concedes that he has no idea when it was carved, and further admits that the symbol was not carved by the same hand that inscribed the box with the disputed name of Yeshua bar Yehosef. His interpretation of the symbol rests entirely on his own pre-existing mythology of the Hooked X®, in turn resting on the assumption of a vast conspiracy stretching from ancient Egypt to modern Freemasonry.
On America Unearthed (episode S01E11), Wolter had previously identified the swooping X shape at the end of the Yeshua inscription as a Hooked X®, a claim that is apparently now inoperative since he discovered an inscription that better aligns with his conspiracy. Wolter has modified his Hooked X® beliefs somewhat and his now playing down claims that the symbol represents the penis of Jesus penetrating the vagina of Mary Magdalene to implant a royal embryo. Now he suggests that the symbol originates in the Egyptian crook and flail, symbols of royal authority sometimes seen crossed on the chests of Egyptian pharaohs or the god Osiris and only vaguely similar to the variant-A Scandinavian rune that started the Hooked X® mythology. (The flail’s most important part, the strips used for whipping, do not appear in the Hooked X® symbol in this interpretation.) The crook and flail, symbols of Osiris, were originally used separately in the Predynastic period and are known to have been paired only in the Second Dynasty; however, since the symbols appear with orthodox pharaohs from c. 2800 BCE onward, they cannot be taken as symbolic of “monotheistic dualism” or unique to the family of the heretical pharaoh Akhenaten as Wolter claims. In order for Wolter’s claims to make sense, one must accept that the Jesus Ossuary’s “Yeshua” inscription was present in the first century CE, that it referred to Jesus Christ and no other Yeshua, that this Jesus was educated in Egypt and privy to the secrets of a pharaoh 1500 years dead, that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene and had children with her, and that he and his followers encoded hidden truths kept hermetically sealed for millennia in symbols that they promiscuously scattered everywhere they could place their chisels, symbols that were so easily decoded that a Minnesota geologist could intuit all of the foregoing from them with absolutely no knowledge or understanding of the languages and texts in which they were supposedly grounded.
47 Comments
Scott Hamilton
8/26/2015 04:10:46 am
I wonder how Jesus could have a royal monogram. Was that even a thing back then? And unless Wolter is rewriting the history of Judea to an incredible degree, the most Jesus could have would be a *personal* monogram, because he wasn't acknowledged royalty by any government.
Reply
Scarecrow
8/26/2015 04:18:20 am
INRI is still believed in today
Reply
Scarecrow
8/26/2015 04:21:36 am
INRI of course was much more than a mere temporal designation 8/26/2015 04:41:45 am
I'm not sure that Wolter has specified what he means by "monogram" or what it was meant to cover. I imagine he views it as another variety of esoteric symbol.
Reply
Bob Jase
8/26/2015 05:12:55 am
So Jesus was a Viking? Well that explains the traditional European portraits of him as nordic.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
8/26/2015 05:42:28 am
He was Judea's only Viking Pharaoh King. That's what made him special.
Reply
Only Me
8/26/2015 05:37:56 am
So, let me get this straight. After stating in an interview on KFAI Radio he won't work with academics because they try to "baffle him with bullshit" and are closed to new facts, he demands they explain why he's full of shit. Later, in an appearance on the Jimmy Church radio program, he says about his ossuary discovery, “It will eliminate a lot of the skeptics’ arguments...I want to pack it up some people’s rear ends.”
Reply
Clint Knapp
8/26/2015 06:23:19 am
I must have missed that one. Scott Wolter would like to anally violate you with a small stone box. That's disturbing. More than his usual delusions.
Reply
Only Me
8/26/2015 11:28:50 am
To be fair, he hadn't revealed the details of what his discovery was at that time, but, yeah.
Joe Scales
8/26/2015 06:50:07 am
But his article is complete with citations... including some to his own prior speculation... so it must be legit.
Reply
Dave
8/26/2015 05:44:23 am
Wolter writes, “could be a major historical discovery that is consistent with much of the speculative research the author has already published.”
Reply
Clete
8/26/2015 05:45:20 am
He examined the Ossuary by looking at it through glass and from that can somehow infer from the marking that it was burial box of Jesus. What a scientific genius, why do any real research, why excavate ancient sites. Just have Scott Wolter show up, scratch his balls, look at the artifacts for six minutes and make his decision about what they are and how they fit into his theory that Viking or the Knights Templar produced them, probably as part of a land claim.
Reply
Scarecrow
8/26/2015 06:29:36 am
Clan Sinclair are looking forward to recent DNA findings suggesting that the Sinclairs were biologically related to the Vikings.
Reply
Scarecrow
8/26/2015 07:04:36 am
Message by Craig Sinclair from elsewhere:
vcs3
8/26/2015 08:23:04 am
Two things:
Reply
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
8/26/2015 09:52:33 am
1. I think English-speakers don't realize that other cultures use "Jesus" as a personal name simply because there's an unspoken taboo in the English-speaking world on giving somebody Jesus's name. Even to me it seems rather bizarre, though I'm not Christian and never have been. Plus, people are just ignorant and may not realize, even if they hear it, that the Spanish name that sounds like Hay-soos is actually Jesús. And yes, the name Jesus is really a Latinization of a variant of the name we know as Joshua, so it was a common name for Jews in Jesus's time.
Reply
Duke of URL
8/27/2015 04:20:24 am
Not Comte, thank you for your post. Somehow, I'd missed that fascinating review of Wolter's total insanity. It's clear that he has magickal powers - he can stuf(f) 365 pounds of bullshit into a 13-pound bucket...
Dora
8/28/2015 08:17:04 am
You are absolutely right, and also name Joshua (Yehoshua) was a very common name during Jesus time. And other names on the ossuary, Miriam name was extremely popular. c1/4 of women were named Miriam than, based on inscriptions and texts.
V
8/26/2015 06:32:41 pm
#1 reminds me of one day when I was driving home from a teaching job in a predominantly-Latino school. I passed a church with the name, "House of Jesus," and in my mind, I read it as "House of Hey-soos." It took me almost a mile to realize what I'd done.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
8/26/2015 10:16:43 am
"... that this Jesus was educated in Egypt and privy to the secrets of a pharaoh 1500 years dead, that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene and had children with her, and that he and his followers encoded hidden truths kept hermetically sealed for millennia ..."
Reply
8/26/2015 10:54:37 am
Wait till you see how Graham Hancock has incorporated Hermes, Enoch, and the Pillars of Wisdom. Hint: For him, they're literally Gobekli Tepe!
Reply
Shane Sullivan
8/27/2015 08:20:18 am
It's funny how suddenly and quickly Gobekli Tepe has come to be a regular lynchpin of his theories, when a few years ago he didn't seem to know it existed.
Dave
8/27/2015 08:30:05 am
Shane, it's probably because the mainstream archeologists and historians have been suppressing the existence of Gobekli Tepe and he only recently heard about it because of the fine investigations being conducted on Ancient Aliens.
bear
8/26/2015 10:28:39 am
Poor Scott, he sees this famous "hooked X" in nearly everything he comes across. Well, hey Scott, when I was a kid I looked at the sky and the clouds and saw a bunny rabbit. Even today, I can look at various clouds and see all sorts of critters, until the wind picks up and they change into something else.
Reply
Mike
8/26/2015 12:01:55 pm
Pareidolia strikes deep. Into the mind it will creep.
Reply
Kathleen Smith
8/26/2015 12:52:05 pm
Now that's funny!
Reply
Kal
8/26/2015 01:39:11 pm
That box story is fake and has been debunked over 6 years ago. The guy who carved it already got caught. Just because it became part of a History program some years ago doesn't mean it's real or legit. You know, there is a mental condition for finding symbols in things that aren't. Also some fringe people tend to be very paranoid and think that their poo doesn't smell.
Reply
The troll Krampus
8/28/2015 03:28:41 am
Huh. Imagine that.
Reply
tm
8/26/2015 07:29:55 pm
I wonder if any of this is related to the reason his new show hasn't been broadcast yet.
Reply
J. Adamson
8/27/2015 01:40:21 am
I'm not sure how Egyptologists are going to take the idea an "Egyptian Ankh which is actually a Tau Cross with an egg-shaped handle"
Reply
J.K. Potter
8/27/2015 03:57:28 am
"It took me a while to wrap my head around this too. It's still hard to believe even though I've seen it with my own eyes. In many ways it validates much of the work I've done while opening a bunch of new doors for inquiry. It really is an exciting discovery that some scholars in the biblical community have already embraced. My interpretations are going to take some time to sink in, but much of what the skeptics said was nonsense and impossible isn't so silly anymore.
Reply
lurkster
8/27/2015 05:23:14 am
I'm curious to see if Simcha lets this wild claim fly. He's far more defensive about his reputation and credentials than Wolter is, although he's less nasty and better at foisting intelligent-sounding rebuttals.
Reply
PNO TECH
8/27/2015 08:28:52 am
So, what percentage of ossuaries with alignment marks have them only on one of the pieces rather than both?
Reply
8/27/2015 08:57:55 am
Charles L. Quarles argues that the "X" on the side of the ossuary (the one Wolter first identified as a Hooked X before advocating the one on top) is an alignment marker, too, so the X-like star on top would indicate the same direction for aligning the lid.
Reply
Kal
8/27/2015 09:18:18 am
The box is real but the carvings are modern, and probably were added by whoever found the box. The bloodline of Jesus is just bull. If he is touting that, he is ridiculous.
Reply
The troll Krampus
8/28/2015 03:25:50 am
Oh, really?
Reply
FrankenNewYork
8/27/2015 07:31:19 pm
I think that this new hooked symbol is a precursor to and possible inspiration for the literary device employed by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. when he wrote in Breakfast of Champions "...here is my picture of an asshole." There are many examples of this drawing available on the internet a search for The Use of Illustration in Kurt Vonnegut's "Breakfast of Champions" will provide an image that will support my contention.(I understand the ossuary wasn't unsealed until well after the publication of the first appearance in print but, Magic)
Reply
Screaming Eagle
8/28/2015 03:11:11 am
Good job Franken, I learn something new every day!
Reply
jim
8/28/2015 10:06:20 am
...and his references to 'wide open beavers' in the same book is nothing more than a lowbrow allusion to the ossuary, or 'box', that the hooked X inscription would later be found.
Reply
FrankenNewYork
8/28/2015 11:15:55 am
Vonnegut must have channeled or remote viewed the contents of the ossuary, he was a genius 8/30/2015 08:16:54 am
I'm glad I'm not the only one who remembered that depiction of Vonnegut's emotional maturity ;)
Reply
John
8/31/2015 07:24:26 pm
That's a bit insulting to people who smoke weed. Even they have more brain cells than Scott Wolter has.
Reply
Tony
9/2/2015 10:23:52 am
It's also possible that Scott Wolter doesn't actually exist and this is just stealth advertising by Putnam for Sue Grafton's new novel, "X."
Reply
Jeff
9/2/2015 10:46:47 am
Everything I read from or about Wolter leaves me perplexed. I'm not a psychiatrist, but I did take an intro course before my archaeology and history education. This usually phantom "Hooked X" seems like an unhealthy obsession with Wolter. He sees it everywhere, he's legally registered the image, and at one point even claimed it represented Jesus' penis penetrating Mary Magdalene! I seriously think this man needs psychological help.
Reply
Americanegro
8/23/2016 03:53:45 pm
My view:
Reply
James Rubeck
2/19/2017 11:10:46 am
I liked this
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
October 2024
|